Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Democracy Despite Itself: Why a System That Shouldn't Work at All Works So Well” as Want to Read:
Democracy Despite Itself: Why a System That Shouldn't Work at All Works So Well
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Democracy Despite Itself: Why a System That Shouldn't Work at All Works So Well

3.94 of 5 stars 3.94  ·  rating details  ·  36 ratings  ·  8 reviews
Voters often make irrational decisions based on inaccurate and irrelevant information. Politicians are often inept, corrupt, or out of touch with the will of the people. Elections can be determined by the design of the ballot and the gerrymandered borders of a district. And yet, despite voters who choose candidates according to the boxer--brief dichotomy and politicians wh ...more
Hardcover, 245 pages
Published January 27th 2012 by MIT Press (MA)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Democracy Despite Itself, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Democracy Despite Itself

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 201)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Churchill had two great quotes about democracy, that "the best argument against democracy is a five minute conversation with the average voter," and that "democracy is the worst form of government, except all of the others that have been tried."

In the alternately hilarious and depressing first half of the book, the authors explore the truth behind the first quote -- that voters are dismally ignorant about many issues and make terribly flawed decisions when choosing candidates. The authors combin
Peter Mcloughlin
The book explains why democracies do better despite ignorant voters, lying politicians and complex problems. the answer is in procedure. It doesn't matter that voters are ignorant. They will follow the laws if they beleive the people who made them are legitimate lawmakers. Therefore governments can carry out policy knowing the citizens won't resist as they would say in an autocracy. Hence there is less need for authoritarian measures and consequently more freedom. A free citizenry is happier an ...more
Disclosure: The lead author is a friend and colleague (I worked in his lab in college).

This insightful and thought-provoking book explores how democracy can do such a good job of ensuring the rights, freedoms, and prosperity of the people in it even though those people often make decisions--political and otherwise--for crazy reasons. The first half of the book mainly uses information from psychology to show how people's irrationality impacts the political process in ways most of us would like no
I won this book on Gooreads and I am so glad I had the chance to read it! Instead of tearing apart the democratic system Edwards and Oppenheimer examine the people who fuel the voting process. If our system is broken, they explain through clear examples, it is our fault not the fault of a democratic system. Uninformed, misguided voters select candidates based not on platforms but preconceived biases and "news" that they accept without questions. This book should be required reading for students ...more
Brian Sison
This book is basically split into two distinct parts:

Part 1 - Explains in scary detail how flawed and complicated the US democratic system is. It lists issues and contradictions in the candidates, the voting process, and even the voters themselves.

Part 2 - Explains why even despite all its warts, our US democracy is leaps and bounds more desirable than any of the alternatives. Seems like the system tends to be a self-righting ship usually headed straight ahead while being urged Left or Right by
Despite all their warts, democratic countries do better than the rest by a wide margin. There are many reasons why. When people think that the governing process is fair and that they have a voice, they are more likely to voluntarily follow laws, regulations and processes. When people do this, things work better. When opposition leaders see that there is life after being power, they will be more likely to accept criticism and defeat when they are in power again, thus enhancing the virtuous circle ...more
Bias alert: I'm married to the second author of this book.

It's an enjoyable read and surprisingly funny. You, the voter, get to be both the villain and the hero of the story.

Yep, you, me, the authors of the book -- we all make some pretty bad political decisions. But it's ok. In the end, things work out pretty great after all.
Jun 12, 2012 Kame marked it as to-read
Didn't realise this was an MIT Press book until I got it, makes me that much more excited to start it!

In compliance with FTC guidelines, I am required to disclose that I received the book for free through Goodreads First Reads.
Tara added it
Oct 07, 2015
Gilsey marked it as to-read
Sep 23, 2015
HA marked it as to-read
Sep 17, 2015
Andrea marked it as to-read
Sep 12, 2015
Tim McGrath
Tim McGrath marked it as to-read
Sep 06, 2015
hermitek marked it as to-read
Aug 30, 2015
Arun Singh
Arun Singh is currently reading it
Sep 03, 2015
Adam Morva
Adam Morva marked it as to-read
Aug 16, 2015
Deepanshu Aggarwal
Deepanshu Aggarwal is currently reading it
Jun 23, 2015
Eric Brooke
Eric Brooke is currently reading it
Apr 30, 2015
Mohammad marked it as to-read
Mar 19, 2015
Toka Western
Toka Western marked it as to-read
Mar 12, 2015
Tim marked it as to-read
Mar 12, 2015
Uru marked it as to-read
Dec 30, 2014
Jacquelyn Fusco
Jacquelyn Fusco marked it as to-read
Nov 12, 2014
زينب marked it as to-read
Sep 20, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book