<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	
<book id="130479">
  <title><![CDATA[Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science]]></title>
  <isbn><![CDATA[0312204078]]></isbn>
  <isbn13><![CDATA[9780312204075]]></isbn13>
  <work>
  <best-book-id type="integer">130479</best-book-id>
  <books-count type="integer">9</books-count>
  <default-description>In 1996, an article entitled &quot;Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity&quot; was published in the cultural studies journal &lt;I&gt;Social Text&lt;/I&gt;. Packed with recherch&#233; quotations from &quot;postmodern&quot; literary theorists and sociologists of science, and bristling with imposing theorems of mathematical physics, the article addressed the cultural and political implications of the theory of quantum gravity. Later, to the embarrassment of the editors, the author revealed that the essay was a hoax, interweaving absurd pronouncements from eminent intellectuals about mathematics and physics with laudatory--but fatuous--prose.&lt;p&gt;  In &lt;I&gt;Fashionable Nonsense&lt;/I&gt;, Alan Sokal, the author of the hoax, and Jean Bricmont contend that abuse of science is rampant in postmodernist circles, both in the form of inaccurate and pretentious invocation of scientific and mathematical terminology and in the more insidious form of epistemic relativism. When Sokal and Bricmont expose Jacques Lacan's ignorant misuse of topology, or Julia Kristeva's of set theory, or Luce Irigaray's of fluid mechanics, or Jean Baudrillard's of non-Euclidean geometry, they are on safe ground; it is all too clear that these virtuosi are babbling. &lt;p&gt;  Their discussion of epistemic relativism--roughly, the idea that scientific and mathematical theories are mere &quot;narrations&quot; or social constructions--is less convincing, however, in part because epistemic relativism is not as intrinsically silly as, say, Regis Debray's maunderings about G&#246;del, and in part because the authors' own grasp of the philosophy of science frequently verges on the naive. Nevertheless, Sokal and Bricmont are to be commended for their spirited resistance to postmodernity's failure to appreciate science for what it is. &lt;I&gt;--Glenn Branch&lt;/I&gt;</default-description>
  <id type="integer">125663</id>
  <media-type nil="true"></media-type>
  <original-language-id type="integer" nil="true"></original-language-id>
  <original-publication-day type="integer" nil="true"></original-publication-day>
  <original-publication-month type="integer" nil="true"></original-publication-month>
  <original-publication-year type="integer">1997</original-publication-year>
  <original-title>Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science</original-title>
  <rating-dist>total:110|5:21|4:44|3:32|2:6|1:7|</rating-dist>
  <ratings-count type="integer">110</ratings-count>
  <ratings-sum type="integer">396</ratings-sum>
  <reviews-count type="integer">216</reviews-count>
  <text-reviews-count type="integer">20</text-reviews-count>
</work>

  <average_rating><![CDATA[3.60]]></average_rating>
  <ratings_count><![CDATA[94]]></ratings_count>
  <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[20]]></text_reviews_count>
  <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/130479.Fashionable_Nonsense_Postmodern_Intellectuals_Abuse_of_Science]]></url>
  <authors>
        <author id="75002">
      <name><![CDATA[Jean Bricmont]]></name>
      <role><![CDATA[]]></role>
      <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/75002.Jean_Bricmont]]></url>
      <average_rating><![CDATA[3.62]]></average_rating>
      <ratings_count><![CDATA[125]]></ratings_count>
      <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[24]]></text_reviews_count>
    </author>
        <author id="75003">
      <name><![CDATA[Alan Sokal]]></name>
      <role><![CDATA[]]></role>
      <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/75003.Alan_Sokal]]></url>
      <average_rating><![CDATA[3.60]]></average_rating>
      <ratings_count><![CDATA[119]]></ratings_count>
      <text_reviews_count><![CDATA[23]]></text_reviews_count>
    </author>
      </authors>
  <reviews start="1" end="20" total="216">
    <review id="37737220">
  <user id="1711431">
    <name><![CDATA[Eric_W]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Forreston, IL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1711431-eric-w?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>4</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="philosophy" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2000</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Nov 14 13:09:58 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Tue Apr 07 15:47:13 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[In 1996, Alan Sokal submitted an article to Social<br/>Text entitled &quot;Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity.&quot; If that title means little to you, that's OK because the article was, in fact, nonsense. It was part of an elaborate hoax and parod...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37737220">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/37737220?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="5982938">
  <user id="366448">
    <name><![CDATA[Lane]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Chattanooga, TN]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/366448-lane-wilkinson?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>6</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="postmodernism" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[anyone sick of the post-modern hegemony]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Feb 01 00:00:00 -0800 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Sep 10 07:10:18 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Sep 10 08:12:40 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[<em>&quot;We can clearly see that there is no bi-univocal correspondence between linear signifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this multireferential, multi-dimensional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive character of their exp...</em><a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/5982938">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/5982938?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="13863731">
  <user id="818149">
    <name><![CDATA[Dave]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Austin, TX]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/818149-dave-brick?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Oct 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Jan 28 15:18:40 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Jan 28 15:46:00 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[If you've ever had to read the postmodernist writings of Focault, Derrida, Lacan, or any of their innumerable disciples and come away with only the vaguest idea as to their meaning, you might want to read this book.  But if like me, you regularly have to encounter postmodernism in the flesh and just...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/13863731">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/13863731?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="66516484">
  <user id="696973">
    <name><![CDATA[Leila]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/696973-leila?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>true</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Jul 06 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Aug 07 01:34:30 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Aug 22 01:27:42 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[as part of my online FUNDAEC course, i learnt about a hoax that was perpetrated against an American cultural studies journal in 1996. a physicist at the New York University, Alan Sokal, felt that the liberties the academic humanities and social sciences were taking with mathematics, science, scienti...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/66516484">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/66516484?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="62972669">
  <user id="2488462">
    <name><![CDATA[Danielle]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/2488462-danielle?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Jul 10 17:31:45 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Jul 10 17:38:05 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[PoMo peeps always get so uptight about the hoax and this book, but they are absolutely right that if you don't know shit about science, don't fuckin' talk about it. Maybe ultimately Sokal and his friends don't get postmodernism, but the point is that they know enough to challenge PoMo's retardedness...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/62972669">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/62972669?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="32715193">
  <user id="1508173">
    <name><![CDATA[David]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1508173-david?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Fri Sep 12 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Sep 12 13:25:56 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Sep 12 13:36:30 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This is a very interesting follow-up to the famous &quot;Sokal hoax&quot;, wherein physicist Alan Sokal wrote an spoof article, &quot;Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity&quot;, and then submitted it to Social Text, a leading postmodern journal that ...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/32715193">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/32715193?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="18828934">
  <user id="198459">
    <name><![CDATA[Sami]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United Kingdom]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/198459-sami-ghanem?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>2</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="philosophy" />
        <shelf name="science" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri Mar 28 05:16:54 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Mar 29 06:29:55 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A demolishing of the pretentions of philosophical frauds such as Lacan, Kristeva, Baudrillard and co. has been needed for some time now. Alan Sokal, perpetrator of the famous Sokal Hoax (in which a joke paper full of outrageous scientific nonsense cloaked under the guise of left-wing cant was accept...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18828934">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/18828934?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="17117875">
  <user id="832809">
    <name><![CDATA[J. Derrick]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[San Marcos, TX]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/832809-j-derrick-durham?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
        <shelf name="philosophy-theology" />
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[Anyone Exposed to PoMo Theoretical Nonsense]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Wed Mar 12 00:00:00 -0700 2008</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Mar 05 16:45:05 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Mar 12 13:46:17 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A fine example of the rift between proponents of scientific methodology and post-structuralist theorist/relativists. Sokal and Bricmont do a fine job breaking down the nonsensical and erroneous assertions posited in the writings of french literary/social/psychological theorists such as Lacan, Kriste...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/17117875">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/17117875?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="10902090">
  <user id="26188">
    <name><![CDATA[Jafar]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[London, The United Kingdom]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/26188-jafar?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Dec 22 23:37:41 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Sat Dec 22 23:42:45 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This book started off as a prank when Sokal sent an article to Social Text which was full of nonsense, but used pomo's vague and pompous style and confirmed some of their social/political beliefs. The editors, excited that a physicist has converted to their side, promptly published the article. Once...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10902090">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/10902090?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="3754175">
  <user id="121631">
    <name><![CDATA[Marty]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Baltimore, MD]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/121631-marty?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>4</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Sun Jul 29 15:03:53 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Dec 04 12:13:57 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[One of the authors of this book is Alan Sokal, who, to see just how far postmodernism had run amok, decided to submit a nonsensical article to the American cultural studies journal 'Social Text.'<br/><br/>The article was called &quot;Transgressing the Boundaries: Toward a Transformative Hermeneuti...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3754175">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/3754175?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="58071966">
  <user id="346333">
    <name><![CDATA[Evan]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/346333-evan?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Jun 01 10:59:26 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Jun 01 11:06:46 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[An effete attempt to rescue science from important criticisms. The authors' criticisms of particular works were interesting and often valid, as was their larger criticism of obscurantism, but their defense of science as a method in the sections titled 'intermezzo' were often incorrect and missing th...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/58071966">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/58071966?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="19622775">
  <user id="1055608">
    <name><![CDATA[Gerard]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Sheboygan, WI]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1055608-gerard?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>1</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Mon Apr 07 00:00:30 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Mon Apr 07 00:06:56 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[For the philosophically inclined.  A penetrating analysis of how modern deconstructionists (many French), have taken Wittgenstein's insight on the indeterminacy of language and run with it.  The insight that language is indeterminate (to an extent), emboldened many modern &quot;philosophers&quot; to...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/19622775">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/19622775?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="21962701">
  <user id="264991">
    <name><![CDATA[Andrés]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Hong Kong]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/264991-andr-s?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Fri May 09 20:07:31 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri May 09 20:09:02 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A wonderful little book. I did not always understand the concepts involved, but I guess neither did the authors' targets! In sometimes biting language, they show how some academics, rather than being brilliant, have been talking out of their asses. They expose some academics' obscure language as a f...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/21962701">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/21962701?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="25589452">
  <user id="912150">
    <name><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/912150-jeremy?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Jun 26 14:09:09 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Jun 26 14:23:14 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[How many epistemological relativists does it take to accept and publish (as a serious article!) a paper intentionally filled with nothing but vapid pseudo-intellectual horseshit and errors so obvious that any chemistry or math undergrad would realize it was a joke?  Read the aftermath of Sokal’s h...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/25589452">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/25589452?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="70158029">
  <user id="1285131">
    <name><![CDATA[Brian]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Kirkland, WA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/1285131-brian?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>1</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Thu Sep 24 09:23:31 -0700 2009</read_at>
  <date_added>Sat Sep 05 10:56:28 -0700 2009</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Sep 24 09:23:31 -0700 2009</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[This is a slog. I am not sure I even understand what they are making fun of since none of it makes much sense.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/70158029?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="15873772">
  <user id="784761">
    <name><![CDATA[Kvn]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[The United States]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/784761-kvn?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Tue May 01 00:00:00 -0700 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Feb 20 00:23:52 -0800 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Feb 20 10:15:40 -0800 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[Drawing from their foundations in science and mathematics, the authors of <em>Fashionable Nonsene</em> carefully parse through the inane psycho-babble of exalted lunatics like Jacque Lacan to expose them for the frauds that they are. This is a must-read for any student of the humanities who has had to suffer...<a href="http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/15873772">more...</a>]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/15873772?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="26141050">
  <user id="314508">
    <name><![CDATA[Justin]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Baltimore, MD]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/314508-justin?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>2</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Jul 02 13:09:04 -0700 2008</date_added>
  <date_updated>Fri Oct 24 10:06:54 -0700 2008</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A bit too technical for me, since I didn't know most of the thinkers the authors were criticizing, but there were some choice-bits.  The conclusion has a clear attack on the rampant &quot;relativism&quot; in academy, which is flowing over into the general public.  ]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/26141050?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="65253">
  <user id="6428">
    <name><![CDATA[Amir]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Brooklyn, NY]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/6428-amir?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>5</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Wed Feb 21 04:13:14 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Wed Feb 21 16:04:12 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[A sober (sometimes it's too sober and becomes as boring as real science!) expose of the French tradition of obscurantism.<br/><br/>The whole story began when Alan Sokal tricked a post-modern magazine into publishing a nonsensical article...]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/65253?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="1145716">
  <user id="76515">
    <name><![CDATA[Jeremy]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Northampton, MA]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/76515-jeremy?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>true</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at>Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 -0800 2007</read_at>
  <date_added>Thu May 10 11:45:45 -0700 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu May 10 11:46:58 -0700 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[The authors do the only thing you can do to fight post-modernism.  Point to it and beg everyone to realize that it's total B.S.  ]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/1145716?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    <review id="9431255">
  <user id="111081">
    <name><![CDATA[Doug]]></name>
    <location><![CDATA[Forest Park, IL]]></location>        
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/user/show/111081-doug?utm_medium=api]]></url>
  </user>
    <rating>3</rating>
  <votes>0</votes>
  <sell_flag>false</sell_flag>
  <spoiler_flag>false</spoiler_flag>
  <shelves>
      </shelves>
  <recommended_for><![CDATA[]]></recommended_for>
  <recommended_by><![CDATA[]]></recommended_by>
  <read_at></read_at>
  <date_added>Thu Nov 22 11:11:29 -0800 2007</date_added>
  <date_updated>Thu Nov 22 11:11:48 -0800 2007</date_updated>
  <read_count></read_count>
    <body><![CDATA[I agree with the points, but it wasn't exactly a page turner.]]></body>
    <url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/review/show/9431255?utm_medium=api]]></url>
</review>
    </reviews>
</book>
</GoodreadsResponse>