Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Le Morte D'Arthur” as Want to Read:
Le Morte D'Arthur
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Le Morte D'Arthur

3.91 of 5 stars 3.91  ·  rating details  ·  24,367 ratings  ·  534 reviews
The only complete, one-volume edition of Malory's Arthurian legends, now in paperback.
Paperback, 750 pages
Published November 1st 1986 by Collier Books (first published 1485)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Le Morte D'Arthur, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Alannah 'to dress' means 'to set in place' or 'to set one's self'. On page 25 of my version it says "[...] and dressed his shield and took a spear [...]" So…more'to dress' means 'to set in place' or 'to set one's self'. On page 25 of my version it says "[...] and dressed his shield and took a spear [...]" So in that case it is 'to set his shield in place'(less)
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
FINALLY finished this last night. No exaggeration: I have been reading this book for six months. Not six continuous months, mind you. I kept the book by my bed and would try to read a little bit every night, but I could never manage to read more than twenty pages in a single sitting, and I would usually be reading another book in the meantime and forget about Le Morte d'Arthur for weeks at a time.

This thing is a hell of a slog, in other words. Sure, there are knightly adventures and duels aplen
I just recently finished reading "Le Morte d'Arthur", and it was an interesting experience. It defies categorization. Not a novel, not an epic poem, not exactly a collection of myths, more than a collection of folk stories, certainly a product of a Christian imagination, but very earthy. Repetitive, but after I got into the rhythm of it, not boring. Once you submit your prejudices to the vision of the author, you become able to enter into this strange world of kings, knights, ladies, wars and to ...more
I'm so glad I finally read Le Morte Darthur. I've loved the King Arthur stories ever since I was little and read what I think was a retelling by Enid Blyton. I actually read this for my Late Medieval Literature class, but I'd have read it someday anyway. The copy I read was an abridgement, which is probably a good thing as parts of it got quite tedious as it was. The introduction to this version is pretty interesting -- and, by the way, my lectures on it were wonderful.

I subscribe to the view th
(I read this book as part of a reading project I have undertaken with some other nerdy friends in which we read The Novel: A Biography and some of the other texts referenced by Schmidt.)

This book reads like some jag-off had some time to kill in prison and was just putting words down on paper to keep himself from being super bored.

Oh, wait.

So no one really knows who Thomas Malory was, apparently, which is a story in and of itself much more interesting than this collection of loosely connected tho
cross-posted at booklikes and the mo-centric universe.

my copy of le morte d'arthur is the classic and complete vinaver edit and i highly recommend it. i haven't read it in years but picking it up now, i assure you this copy is well-thumbed and annotated from my first reading in university. in the first fifty pages, i have written in a very small hand above words to explain their meanings, as i did when reading other, older middle english works much more difficult to ken. still, i smile when i s
At long last hath I enchieved the goodliest quest of 937 pages of Ye Olde English!

937 pages of damosels and knights smiting everych other and breaking their spears all to-brast, and tourneys and "justing" and villainous kings who traitorly slew... oops, there I go again. I'm just! so! happy! I've been reading this book since February (it's now November) and inasmuch as I thought I was prepared because of that one Christmas that Mr. Murray wrote the family Christmas letter in Ye Olde English... r
Dec 20, 2007 Sky rated it 3 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Medieval Lit. Nerds
As a piece of engaging fiction Le Morte D'Arthur is bound to disappoint unless you are unabashedly entertained by similar cycles of knights questing again and again. Structurally Mallory's work is repetitive and contains a questionable moral structure.
But as an origin of British legends and the development of the English Language it is an essential work.
Its been interesting for me to look at one of the most definitive entries into the canon of England's national pride but it becomes strange whe
Of all the patriarchal, Christianity biased interpretations of Arthurian myth, this is the most misogynistic. Yes, I know one must judge a book by it's time period, but if ever a book infuriated me by illustrating the virgin-whore paradigm, this one has. Not only do most of the female characters completely fail to have names, but those that do are either shrewish sluts or purely chaste and looking to die for God. Also, Sir Gawain is ruined. Also, Merlin is the son of the devil. Also, the Lady of ...more
I decided to review Le Morte d'Arthur, even though it has been SO long since I read it. I don't remember everything, but I remember how how fascinating it was. It was a hard read; I remember that. I remember why I decided to read it, too. I had been browsing in the library, and I happened to see the book on some obscure shelf and I noticed it was misfiled. I thought to myself, "is that in French?"

Fast forward to the next day at my state Knowledge Bowl competition (please no nerd jokes here, I'm
I still have trouble believing I made it all the way through this. I really did have to struggle through it, and I feel bad saying that because this is a classic. It might not be the oldest written form of Arthurian Legend, but it what all others are based on. It's obviously a classic. However, it was written in the 1490s (yes, that's right, I said 1490s). A lot simply wasn't invented yet. For example, the quotation mark, or any punctuation except for a period. Also, there are a lot of archaic w ...more
Clarissa Olivarez
This is the ONLY version of Le Morte d'Arthur that you should EVER read. Complete with Early Modern English and absolutely NO dumbing down of the material. Great stuff.
Jan 23, 2014 AEriko rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Fans of Arthurian and/or Medival British Literature
This book is a cornerstone of Arthurian literature, and an engaging read. Once I got used to the language, it was something that really captured my imagination. It has its problems, but that's to be expected of something cobbled together out of multiple legends from multiple countries and written by an accused rapist in a prison.

Le Morte Darthur was the first manuscript to pull the widely disparate King Arthur stories into one comprehensive narrative. As a result, it has issues with previously
Alas! who can trust this world? - Sir Launcelot du Lake

Malory recounts epic episodes of tournaments, aimless adventures, noble quests, conquests and civil war. Magical prophets and incestuous adulteries plague the royal court but let the world remember Arthur as the once and future king! Despite the sometimes ridiculous episodes of knight-errantry, I did learn to respect the chivalry and the knight's code which governs the events and exposes admirable characteristics among soldiers and economic
It took me a long time to get through this unabridged, untranslated version of Le Morte Darthur, but it is -- for the most part, anyway -- worth it. The fact that Malory himself gave up on Tristan is a fair indication of that, and of course this is a hyper-masculine text and there are dozens of loving descriptions of battles and jousts, but the story of Arthur is, to my mind, one of the most powerful stories we tell (second only to that of Christ, in my mind). Nothing can bury that, not even a b ...more
May 01, 2015 Rozhin marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
من عااااااااااااااااااشق ارتور و مرلین و شوالیه های میز گردم*.*
بچه بودم یکی از ارزوهام اینبود که برم کملوت
به استون هنچ هم همیشه علاقه خاصی داشتم*.*
کلا عالیه این افسانه ها*.*
Sean DeLauder
I started reading this book almost 20 years ago, but made the mistake of reading T.H. White's The Once and Future King first. The difference in prose between a book written in the 1950s (White) and a book written in the 15th century (Malory) was so stark as to make this book nigh impenetrable. Needless to say, my memory of the book is having read up through a battle that seemed like a series of people losing their horses and going to get another in order to lose their horse again. The story read ...more
Stephanie Ricker
I read Morte D'Arthur, or most of it anyway, a very long time ago. I remember not being all that enthused and a bit bored at the endless jousting. Really, there are only so many ways to make getting poked by a stick and falling of a horse sound good, guys.

However, reading it now for Medieval Lit, I was surprised to find that I enjoyed it very much. The jousting was still boring (sorry, Malory), but the characterization was fascinating. Arthur is so painfully young at the beginning and really ha
As far as I'm concerned this is the edition of Malory's _Le Morte D'Arthur_ to read. The Middle English is really not so foreign that it requires 'translation' and even modernizing the spelling seems a bit superfluous to me as I felt the archaic spelling added to my immersion in the stories.

Malory is certainly not an easy read however, and his repetitions and digressions can become a bit tiring to the modern reader at times. That said, if you approach the text as a series of linked tales as oppo
Took FOREVER to finish. Normally that's a bad thing, but I totally needed all that time to get through it. I think I plowed through 100 pages or slightly more today just to have it done. I desperately want to get started on something else.

After reading this, I can't see where any of the legends we know of as King Arthur come from. Yeah, most of us are familiar with either Spamalot or Monty Python and the Holy Grail. There are most definitely traces of those in here. I can see where they pulled t

Eugene Vinaver was a Russian medieval scholar who was born in Saint Petersburg in 1899. Vinaver's family moved to Paris in 1919 due to the Russian Revolution, thus giving Vinaver the chance to study under the eminent French medievalist, Joseph Bedier. In the late 1920s Vinaver moved to England and became the professor of French Language and Literature at the University of Manchester. Vinaver also founded the Arthuriania journal, which would later be renamed Medium Aevum. By 1929 Vinaver had pub
For me, there exist two great editions of medieval textual scholarship, one is Frederick Klaeber's edition of Beowulf, the other is Eugene Vinaver's edition of Thomas Malory's Arthurian Romances. Over the years, I've had the good fortune to lay my hands on the first, second and third editions of Vinaver's three volume edition and also the Matthews and Spisak edition of Caxton's Malory. While I'm not the worlds biggest fan of Arthurian literature or Malory, I do enjoy a well edited medieval text. ...more
Mar 22, 2012 Bryan rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: anyone who loves a good (and lengthy, unabridged) story
March 6, 2012
I read through T.H. White's version of Arthur and then came back to this one by Malory. I think Malory's is dramatically better. The complex nature of Guinevere, Lancelot, and Arthur I found to feel more inspiring here as Lancelot eventually does swear off Guinevere (as shown when he refuses to kiss her at her request, towards the end of the book), whereas in White's version Lancelot never manages to swear her off on his own.

July 27, 2011
Note: When I wrote the commentary below, I
I really wanted to like this book, I did. It started out promising enough, with Arthur's campaigns against the British kings, the King of France, and the Roman Empire, and then the adventures of the various knights. Then Lancelot showed up, and immediately began to dominate the narrative. Knight is in danger? Lancelot happens by and saves him without even breaking a sweat. But I could cope with that.

Then Tristram showed up. He was basically a carbon-copy of Lancelot, down to the 'affair with my
First off, this review is for the OWC edition of the Winchester Manuscript edited by Helen Cooper. This is an edited version of Morte based on a manuscript copy of Malory's text, there are a few wee bits that Caxton changed for the printed edition he put out, including adding headings for chapters etc. This edition modernises the spelling of some words and edits out some of the repetition as well as streamlining the huge Book Of Tristram. Almost an abridgement...but as the manuscript is missing ...more
Lucy *Qhuay's shellan*

This is an enjoyable read to readers who are interested in Arthurian myths, but I have to say it was a bit boring.

The way it was written, it seemed that all these characters were wandering around like lunatics, running from place to place, fighting, killing people, whoring and just mentioning the name of the Lord for no apparent reason.

I was expecting something more intriguing, with lots of action and mystery and it was all very mild.

I guess other people might find it more interesting than I did
This is the original Arthurian legend. Some of the stories are interesting and others are rather mundane. I had to fast forward through some of the battle descriptions because they aren't very interesting. Basically, Sir So-and-So, son of Some Guy I Have Never Heard Of, sees his friend, Sir What's-His-Face de-horsed, so Sir So-and-So smites one of his enemies so Sir What's-His-Face can have a horse, etc.

Don't try to read the entire book straight. Take it in steps. After reading this you'll real
This is a fairly literal, but perfectly understandable transcription from original manuscripts, and academic versions of the book that has inspired scores of novels, movies, musicals, et cetera. Spelling has been regularized when necessary, and there is no criticus apparatus or footnotes to break the flow of narrative. Scholars looking for critical editions must search elsewhere. Lovers of medieval literature, Aurthurian legends, and courtly romances will find all they wish in this edition of a ...more
It's a great edition of the text with excellent secondary materials and essays.

However, I am very disappointed that an edition which advertises itself as being "unabridged" and in "original spelling" in fact silently emends all yoghs and thorns to gh and th. Use of u/v and i/j has also been ‘modernized’. It seems utterly bizarre to go to the lengths of reproducing such trivial features as Lombardic rubrication, when the Middle English alphabet this work was written in has been edited out.
I read this as part of my Middle English course when completing my English degree (which was a very long time ago now) but what I love about Le Morte D'Arthur is it's much more interesting and compelling than today's somewhat dumbed down and often cartoonish portrayals. You get a real understanding of the medieval outlook on consequences for actions (and a lot of guilt and maybe OCD).

Besides, this gives you a good background to better enjoying and appreciating the witty humour of Monty Python's
While I have read MANY versions of the Camelot mythos, the version I happened to listen to this time was a radio play by the BBC, the specifics of which I'll list below. I've copied them from a Goodread's friends account (here ... thanks, Bettie!)

There may be some spoilers below, but as most people are at least somewhat familiar with the story of Camelot it should be hard to "spoil" it for anyone. I happen to be a huge fan of Mark Gatiss, which is the mai
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
the power of merlin 2 20 Jun 10, 2014 11:30AM  
Which edition is unabridged? 5 26 Sep 30, 2013 08:05PM  
Is this the first book on the Arthurian legend? 3 29 Sep 24, 2013 08:26PM  
Ian Somerhalder F...: Camelot & the Arthurian legend 7 67 Oct 11, 2012 10:33AM  
Arthurian legend 5 41 Oct 02, 2012 08:24AM  
Translation 2 43 Aug 20, 2011 02:15AM  
Arthur's Aunts? 3 28 Jul 02, 2011 02:02PM  
  • Arthurian Romances
  • Idylls of the King
  • The Mabinogion
  • The History of the Kings of Britain
  • The Romance of Arthur, New, Expanded Edition: An Anthology of Medieval Texts in Translation
  • The Death of King Arthur
  • Tristan: With the Tristran of Thomas
  • The Lais of Marie de France
  • Parzival
  • The Acts of King Arthur and His Noble Knights
  • The Illustrated Encyclopaedia of Arthurian Legends
  • The Romance of the Rose
  • Early Irish Myths and Sagas
  • The Book of Merlyn (The Once and Future King, #5)
  • Troilus and Criseyde
  • Piers Plowman
Sir Thomas Malory was a knight in the fifteenth century, who, while imprisoned, compiled the collection of tales we know as Le Morte D'Arthur, translating the legend of King Arthur from original French tales such as the Vulgate Cycle.
More about Thomas Malory...
King Arthur and His Knights: Selected Tales Le Morte d'Arthur, Vol. 2 Le Morte d'Arthur, Vol. 1 The Romance of King Arthur and His Knights of the Round Table King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table Ultimate Collection

Share This Book

“This is the oath of a Knight of King Arther's Round Table and should be for all of us to take to heart. I will develop my life for the greater good. I will place character above riches, and concern for others above personal wealth, I will never boast, but cherish humility instead, I will speak the truth at all times, and forever keep my word, I will defend those who cannot defend themselves, I will honor and respect women, and refute sexism in all its guises, I will uphold justice by being fair to all, I will be faithful in love and loyal in friendship, I will abhor scandals and gossip-neither partake nor delight in them, I will be generous to the poor and to those who need help, I will forgive when asked, that my own mistakes will be forgiven, I will live my life with courtesy and honor from this day forward.” 37 likes
“Yet some men say in many parts of England that King Arthur is not dead, but had by the will of our Lord Jesu into another place; and men say that he shall come again, and he shall win the holy cross.” 16 likes
More quotes…