الرجال الذين اخترعوا الدستور صيف 1787
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

الرجال الذين اخترعوا الدستور صيف 1787

by
3.99 of 5 stars 3.99  ·  rating details  ·  777 ratings  ·  81 reviews
إن حكاية الدستور الأمريكي قصة مشوّقة. يحملنا هذا الكتاب إلى القاعة ذات الحرارة الخانقة حيث جاهد المندوبون طيلة أربعة أشهر لإنتاج الوثيقة التي ستحدّد هوية الأمة آنذاك والآن. كانت الغرفة مكتظة بشخصيات متنوّعة ومتحمّسة. بعضهم معروف: ألكسندر هاملتون، الحاكم موريس، إدموند راندولف، وآخرون طواهم النسيان إلى حدّ بعيد. إنه لأمر شيق في بلد يجادل باستمرار حول المقصد الأصلي من الوثيقة...more
Hardcover, 480 pages
Published 2010 by هيئة أبو ظبي للثقافة والتراث (first published January 1st 2007)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,773)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Jason
The Constitutional Convention is a subject I know something about, and have been drawn to for years.

It really started while I was an undergraduate student. We had something called "interim" which was a mini-semester between fall and spring. You took one intense month long course. My senior year, I took a course on the US Constitutional Convention. We went day-by-day through Madison's notes (and all the other notes that exist). It was one of the best and most memorable educational experiences of...more
Ron
i didn't realize slavery was so front and center in the constitutional discussions. politics (unity was more important than morality, it seems) won the day, and not only was slavery not abolished, but slave states were allowed to count their slaves for representation purposes, though only as 3/5ths of a person. yes, really.

david o. stewart seems to have a bit of a slant towards the virginians, whom he sees as the movers/shakers, and whose "virginia plan" he identifies as the blueprint for the c...more
Ron Davis
Well-reaseached, well-written and a pleasure to read. The constitutional convention was the response to the many failings of the articles of confederation, itself the earliest effort at a unified political system. Stewart walks us effortlessly through the dynamics of diverse interests and the efforts to strike a bargain that would allow the creation of a constitution and a federal government, or at least of a system of governance more systematized than the articles of confederaion.

Generally, the...more
Bev
This book was wonderfully detailed in how the Constitution was written, in detailed steps (I'm sure are tedious to many.) What I loved best was the clear characterizations of the people involved, learning that people I'd never heard of made the most effect. I sensed the author was trying to show that the Constitution is flawed and haphazardly put together while my view of the data he listed is different. I saw that these men were as polarized as the US Congress is today only more so but they cam...more
Jeff
Although I really liked this book, there was just a little something that prevented it from being a great book. I actually wasn't even planning on reading it right away, but casually picked it up off my shelf and just began the preface and chapter to get a feel for what I could expect when I did read it. Well, I got sucked in and had it done in under a week. It's organized chronologically and follows the summer in which the Constitution was written, as such more time is devoted to the matters th...more
Jeremy Perron
The Summer of 1787 is master piece. David Stewart takes us to arguably the most important event in U.S. History-- the writing of the U.S. Constitution-- and places it and a very smooth flowing narrative. Stewart explores the ups and downs of the very hot and often chaotic convention. The great majority of the delegates' time is focused on representation in the Congress between the `big' vs. `small' states and the slave holding vs. non-slave holding states. The Convention was called for during a...more
Brian
Informative and just plain good fun.

While Miracle at Philadelphia will probably always remain the so-called "definitive" book about the convention, this one is a much more entertaining read. Stewart proceeds chronologically through the convention, yet organizes each chapter around a key theme, issue, or debate. You'll spend one chapter watching the South try to work its will over the horrid 3/5s clause, another listening to grumbling about the election of the President, and another mediating the...more
Bob
The successful creation of the Constitution is a suspense story. The Summer of 1787 takes us into the sweltering room in which delegates struggled for four months to produce the flawed but enduring document that would define the nation -- then and now. George Washington presided, James Madison kept the notes, Benjamin Franklin offered wisdom and humor at crucial times.

The Summer of 1787 traces the struggles within the Philadelphia Convention as the delegates hammered out the charter for the wor...more
Erik
Anything I read about our nation’s founding fathers I automatically compare to David McCullough’s brilliant biography on John Adams. Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. In fact, as I found his bio so immensely rewarding – learning that Adams and Jefferson, although best of friends, were also bitter partisan rivals – I find a book like Stewart’s to be worthy of being uttered in the same breath as McCullough’s, that’s no faint praise. And in this case, Stewart’s well-researched and smoothly writt...more
David
The Summer of 1787, by and large, is a very good introduction to some of the difficulties faced by the delegates of the Convention, but it lacks the overall details that make history such a juicy subject.

Much effort is devoted to setting up the historical background as to give the reader a thorough understanding of the problems faced under the Articles of Confederation and what interests each State was trying to protect in drafting a new Constitution. The delicate crafting of the legislative br...more
Bob Price
The Constitution, with all of its wonders and of all its amazing insights, originated out of debate, compromise and prudence. When read in light of all of this, it is truly amazing how long enduring this document has become.

The Summer of 1787 tells the story of the making of this document. David Stewart is to be commended for telling this story in a straight forward way. From the establishment of the problem at the Mount Vernon Convention to the noble and (ignoble) ends of the men who attended t...more
Brian
This work is an in-depth analysis of the making of the United States Constitution during the Summer of 1787. From the initial meeting of the Convention in Philadelphia on May 25 to the final meeting and signing of the Constitution on September 17, Stewart traces all the proceedings of the Convention and relates biographical sketches of the 55 delegates from 12 colonies (Rhode Island refused to send delegates).

Each chapter details the discussions and debates among the Framers of the Constitution...more
Mrjames
History has in many ways smoothed over the bumps of the Founding Fathers. The men who invented the Constitution were certainly remarkable. They were starting creating a system of government almost from scratch. But they could be irascible, parochial and often-times short sighted. David O. Stewart has written a very readable account of the constitutional convention in 1787. It's not a scholarly work, laden with minutiae but a story well-told about a very bold endeavor. Stewart mostly has praise f...more
William Ramsay
One of the reviews I read of this book said that a well known story is made better by a good telling. The is partly true. We all have an image in our minds - probably from as far back as grade school of how the Constitution was written by a bunch of old guys in funny wigs two hundred years ago. Well, the truth is most people really don't know what a mish-mash of ideas produced maybe the greatest governmental outline ever written - and how it's been used to direct America's affairs longer than an...more
***Dave Hill
(Original review http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2010/05/...)

This retelling of the formation and course of the Philadelphia convention to reform the national government of the newly united States is gripping and well-told, a look at political battles that make our own current Congress look like a model of civility and straightforwardness.

The biggest questions that come up are an endless series of what-ifs — what if this person hadn’t been there to push for or against an issue, what if that particu...more
Robin Wright Gunn
Can you believe I am reading this book? It's neither a novel nor a memoir nor a spirituality book. Not like me at all. I was feeling the need to read something meatier, like.. hmmm...HISTORY. I rarely read history, beucase I find I don't retain much of what I read. But somehow this struck my fancy, I think for a few basic reasons: 1) it covers a VERY SHORT period in American history--3 months in 1787, 2) It covers ONE EVENT. The writing of the U.S. constitution. 3) I am generally interested in p...more
Darlis
Jul 02, 2008 Darlis rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: janell, robin, cynthia
This is a wonderful telling of the birth of the Constitution. I loved following the ideas back and forth. I enjoyed knowing about the Committee of Postponed Parts. It definitely shows that there were many compromises to made and that everyone needed to "give a little, get a little" to merge a system that might be workable. I was amazed at how many ideas there were on electing a president.

This is wonderfully researched, told with passion and intellectural curiosity, and describes so many of the v...more
jillian
This was an amazing recap of the men who shaped the Constitution, and the ideas which went into the document that still manages America. So much political theory went into that document, so many debates, so much re-working, so many issues, it's amazing it was ever written. It's amazing the country didn't dissipate under the original Articles of Confederation instead of producing a Constitution. For anyone with even a passing interest in constitutional law, or American history, who wants to under...more
Michaelpatrick Keena
Dec 27, 2008 Michaelpatrick Keena rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: those who love our constitution and know that is was made by extrodinary men not demigods
Shelves: early-republic
The Constitution did not just fall out of Heaven; nor was done cavalier manner. No, it was the result of a tug-of-war carried on by many of America's greatest minds and hearts. Sadly, men such Patrick Henry who boycotted the convention, could have even made it better; but what we have is still the greatest charter of freedom and government the world has yet to see. What resulted by the end of that summer has not only lasted longer than its designers expected; but became a light upon a hill for t...more
April Stanley
Stewart took Madison's notes, records of the weather, and a few letters written by the delegates and created a cohesive, interesting narrative of the famous Convention. After reading it, I feel worn out and sweaty, as if I'd been sitting in the back of the sweltering room in a wool coat and a wig with the rest of the delegates. The main characters of the convention and the actual writer were all mostly unknown to me before, but now I recognize their influence in The Document as easily as I recog...more
Brian
This was a fascinating book about the Constitutional Convention that took place in Independence Hall in Philadelphia in 1787. It was very interesting to read about the debates they had regarding how the number of legislators will be determined, slavery, and the powers of the president.

I was interested in the men that are usually omitted from the history books but played big roles in the writing of the Constitution like George Mason, John Rutledge, Gouvereur Morris, and Luther Martin. I was also...more
Don
An interesting book to read, as so much of the literature concerning the Constitution tends to deal more with the finished document and the effort to get ratified, while this book focuses on the narrow period of time the delegates were in Philadelphia, essentially sequestered, hammering out a proposed replacement for the Articles of Confederation. Interesting, as well, to read so close to an election, as we can see that the arguments they had in in 1787 about the role of government and the level...more
William Monaco
The Summer of 1787 is a fantastic book chronicling the important events surrounding the writing of the US Constitution. It truly puts into perspective just how miraculous the Constitution is. I never imagined the many factions present at the convention, how many compromises were made, or how close the convention come to breaking up over the summer. The book gives a balanced view of the viewpoints represented in Philadelphia and gives background about things that made it into the Constitution lik...more
JQ
I read this book during the same time period as I read "Miracle at Philadelphia: The Story of the Constitutional Convention, May to September 1787". They are both good books but "The Miracle of Philadelphia" isn't as lively as "Summer of 1787." Stewart does have the advantage of coming around second and fixing some of the problems in Brown's book. Such as explaining some historical events that are referenced a lot by the founding fathers.

It is obvious that Stewart has read "The Miracle of Phila...more
Jamie
A potentially dry subject to most people, the author brought our forefathers' struggle to life. I felt like I was in the east room, at the tavern, in Washington's parlor as the events unfolded. The writing our Constitution was fraught with angst, rivalry, jealousy and faith. It was incredibly interesting. I laughed out loud at some of the exchanges between the delegates. If everyone understood how fragile the situation was, of how it's existence almost didn't happen at all in a thousand differen...more
Laura
I am always so amazed that the men of the late 18th century could create the U.S. government. It is important to understand where they went wrong, and the power of slaveholders is frustrating -- I understand the economic forces that made men want to maintain slavery but I can never wrap my mind around the fact that these economic forces were so much stronger than basic human rights. The Constitution was not perfect, nor is it perfect today, but it is incredible that representatives from the stat...more
Russ
Reading this book, I felt like I was privy to many of the negotiations that went on in the "secret" proceedings from the Philadelphia convention in 1787. I was surprised by the success of the slave holding state representatives to secure for their states for many years, both a thriving slave trade and increased representation in the new government so as to protect their slaveholding rights. Over the first 50 or so years, the slave holding states produced such powerful leaders as Washington, Jeff...more
Win
A thoroughly enjoyable telling of the nitty-gritty of the Constitutional Convention. The heroes aren't who you expect. Luther Martin, Abraham Baldwin, James Wilson, Rufus King and others hold sway over one of the most singularly important moments in American history.

Quite an easy read as well -- and recommended for any cocksure political types who think "the Framers clearly ..." or "the text obviously ..." or "what they intended was ..." or even "they anticipated/did not anticipate this circumst...more
Adam
Yeah, it's an informative read-- but I had a few reservations with it.

First of all, it's a history written in that thoroughly-enjoyable narrative style. That is, lots of quotes, lots of "suddenly, he stood up and....," lots of "the rain pelted down blindingly in a way that made it difficult for them to navigate to the town." Which, great, but the skeptic in me feels like some of the details might be exaggerated a bit.

Some of the analysis felt a bit strained-- like the author was reaching a bit f...more
Michelle
This one was a slow read. I did learn a lot, but already most of the details have already left my head. The big picture stuff I do remember--the South had a lot more influence on the Constitution than I realized; at that point, slavery was already a big issue but one people mostly tap-danced around; and nothing was easy to agree upon--the men who invented the Constitution debated everything and could only compromise. It's amazing that with all of the individual states' demands that we managed to...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 59 60 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Great Upheaval: America and the Birth of the Modern World, 1788-1800
  • American Creation: Triumphs and Tragedies at the Founding of the Republic
  • Founding Myths: Stories That Hide Our Patriotic Past
  • Almost a Miracle: The American Victory in the War of Independence
  • John Marshall: Definer of a Nation
  • A Magnificent Catastrophe: The Tumultuous Election of 1800, America's First Presidential Campaign
  • Washington's Secret War: The Hidden History of Valley Forge
  • Revolutionary Characters: What Made the Founders Different
  • Samuel Adams: A Life
  • 1812: The War That Forged a Nation
  • Madison and Jefferson
  • Thomas Paine: Enlightenment, Revolution, and the Birth of Modern Nations
  • What Kind of Nation: Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall, and the Epic Struggle to Create a United States
  • 1775: A Good Year for Revolution
  • Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution
  • The Forgotten Founding Father: Noah Webster's Obsession and the Creation of an American Culture
  • Patriots
  • A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America
Impeached: The Trial of President Andrew Johnson and the Fight for Lincoln's Legacy The Lincoln Deception American Emperor: Aaron Burr's Challenge to Jefferson's America Madison's Gift: Five Partnerships That Built America Representing Small Businesses

Share This Book

“As Dr. Franklin progressed through Philadelphia’s republican streets, his regal trappings drove home the message that honor in America grew from talent, not birth.” 0 likes
“by better information or fuller consideration to change opinions…which I once thought right, but found to be otherwise. It is therefore that the older I grow, the more apt I am to doubt my own judgment, and to pay more respect to the judgment of others.” 0 likes
More quotes…