Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “الرجال الذين اخترعوا الدستور صيف 1787” as Want to Read:
الرجال الذين اخترعوا الدستور صيف 1787
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

الرجال الذين اخترعوا الدستور صيف 1787

by
4.01 of 5 stars 4.01  ·  rating details  ·  1,220 ratings  ·  93 reviews
إن حكاية الدستور الأمريكي قصة مشوّقة. يحملنا هذا الكتاب إلى القاعة ذات الحرارة الخانقة حيث جاهد المندوبون طيلة أربعة أشهر لإنتاج الوثيقة التي ستحدّد هوية الأمة آنذاك والآن. كانت الغرفة مكتظة بشخصيات متنوّعة ومتحمّسة. بعضهم معروف: ألكسندر هاملتون، الحاكم موريس، إدموند راندولف، وآخرون طواهم النسيان إلى حدّ بعيد. إنه لأمر شيق في بلد يجادل باستمرار حول المقصد الأصلي من الوثيقة ...more
Hardcover, 480 pages
Published 2010 by هيئة أبو ظبي للثقافة والتراث (first published January 1st 2007)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

Be the first to ask a question about الرجال الذين اخترعوا الدستور صيف 1787

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,752)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Jason
The Constitutional Convention is a subject I know something about, and have been drawn to for years.

It really started while I was an undergraduate student. We had something called "interim" which was a mini-semester between fall and spring. You took one intense month long course. My senior year, I took a course on the US Constitutional Convention. We went day-by-day through Madison's notes (and all the other notes that exist). It was one of the best and most memorable educational experiences of
...more
Mamdouh Abdullah
قراءة عن كتاب دافيد ستيورات
صيف 1787: الرجال الذين اخترعوا الدستور
http://wp.me/p28q6M-et
Ron
i didn't realize slavery was so front and center in the constitutional discussions. politics (unity was more important than morality, it seems) won the day, and not only was slavery not abolished, but slave states were allowed to count their slaves for representation purposes, though only as 3/5ths of a person. yes, really.

david o. stewart seems to have a bit of a slant towards the virginians, whom he sees as the movers/shakers, and whose "virginia plan" he identifies as the blueprint for the c
...more
Chris
I am so glad I listened to Stewart's Virginia Historical Society's talk which convinced me to start reading his books.

They are awesome books about US history. This one is about the writing of Constitution. Stewart details the major movers and shakers, and gives drafting the drama of an adventure story. It's a really good look at the major document.
Colleen Browne
I gave this book five stars. It is a concise, well researched, and extremely well written account of the days during the summer of 1787 when the convention at Philadelphia met to form a new government. Others have written this story and have done an exceptional job but no one, in my opinion, has done it in such a readable and clear way. I recommend this book to all Americans. It spells out the debates and compromises made in order to make a new government a reality. A certain section of our Cong ...more
Ron Davis
Well-reaseached, well-written and a pleasure to read. The constitutional convention was the response to the many failings of the articles of confederation, itself the earliest effort at a unified political system. Stewart walks us effortlessly through the dynamics of diverse interests and the efforts to strike a bargain that would allow the creation of a constitution and a federal government, or at least of a system of governance more systematized than the articles of confederaion.

Generally, the
...more
Drtaxsacto
For those of us that are fascinated by the process by which we adopted the Constitution, Stewart's book is a good addition to the wealth of material on that key activity in our history. The record is flawed from other sources although an earlier book Miracle at Philadelphia covers the history well. Madison became the official notetaker (and his notes are worth the read) but his journal was edited again and again over his lifetime. The official rules of the convention required secrecy - so the de ...more
Holly
A document like the Constitution had never before existed in history. It had to be invented. This is the story of the men who invented it and the document that would ultimately create a government unlike any other.

It details how our form of our form of government came to be though debates, discussions, deliberations and sometimes independent ideas. The book answers questions such as:

Why are there 2 houses of Congress with a different number of delegates per state?

How were the powers of Congress
...more
David Eppenstein
I have a great fondness for the history of our Revolution and the subsequent creation of our nation and its national government. I especially enjoy those histories which strip away the demigod veneers of our founders and reveal their true humanity with all its virtues and vices. Of several books about the writing of our Constitution that I have read this is the first that is truly a revelation. It identifies the prime movers at Philadelphia, what they contributed; what motivations they had; what ...more
Bev
This book was wonderfully detailed in how the Constitution was written, in detailed steps (I'm sure are tedious to many.) What I loved best was the clear characterizations of the people involved, learning that people I'd never heard of made the most effect. I sensed the author was trying to show that the Constitution is flawed and haphazardly put together while my view of the data he listed is different. I saw that these men were as polarized as the US Congress is today only more so but they cam ...more
Jeff
Although I really liked this book, there was just a little something that prevented it from being a great book. I actually wasn't even planning on reading it right away, but casually picked it up off my shelf and just began the preface and chapter to get a feel for what I could expect when I did read it. Well, I got sucked in and had it done in under a week. It's organized chronologically and follows the summer in which the Constitution was written, as such more time is devoted to the matters th ...more
Jeremy Perron
The Summer of 1787 is master piece. David Stewart takes us to arguably the most important event in U.S. History-- the writing of the U.S. Constitution-- and places it and a very smooth flowing narrative. Stewart explores the ups and downs of the very hot and often chaotic convention. The great majority of the delegates' time is focused on representation in the Congress between the `big' vs. `small' states and the slave holding vs. non-slave holding states. The Convention was called for during a ...more
Brian
Informative and just plain good fun.

While Miracle at Philadelphia will probably always remain the so-called "definitive" book about the convention, this one is a much more entertaining read. Stewart proceeds chronologically through the convention, yet organizes each chapter around a key theme, issue, or debate. You'll spend one chapter watching the South try to work its will over the horrid 3/5s clause, another listening to grumbling about the election of the President, and another mediating the
...more
Bob
The successful creation of the Constitution is a suspense story. The Summer of 1787 takes us into the sweltering room in which delegates struggled for four months to produce the flawed but enduring document that would define the nation -- then and now. George Washington presided, James Madison kept the notes, Benjamin Franklin offered wisdom and humor at crucial times.

The Summer of 1787 traces the struggles within the Philadelphia Convention as the delegates hammered out the charter for the wor
...more
Erik
Anything I read about our nation’s founding fathers I automatically compare to David McCullough’s brilliant biography on John Adams. Which isn’t necessarily a bad thing. In fact, as I found his bio so immensely rewarding – learning that Adams and Jefferson, although best of friends, were also bitter partisan rivals – I find a book like Stewart’s to be worthy of being uttered in the same breath as McCullough’s, that’s no faint praise. And in this case, Stewart’s well-researched and smoothly writt ...more
David
The Summer of 1787, by and large, is a very good introduction to some of the difficulties faced by the delegates of the Convention, but it lacks the overall details that make history such a juicy subject.

Much effort is devoted to setting up the historical background as to give the reader a thorough understanding of the problems faced under the Articles of Confederation and what interests each State was trying to protect in drafting a new Constitution. The delicate crafting of the legislative br
...more
Bob Price
The Constitution, with all of its wonders and of all its amazing insights, originated out of debate, compromise and prudence. When read in light of all of this, it is truly amazing how long enduring this document has become.

The Summer of 1787 tells the story of the making of this document. David Stewart is to be commended for telling this story in a straight forward way. From the establishment of the problem at the Mount Vernon Convention to the noble and (ignoble) ends of the men who attended t
...more
Brian
This work is an in-depth analysis of the making of the United States Constitution during the Summer of 1787. From the initial meeting of the Convention in Philadelphia on May 25 to the final meeting and signing of the Constitution on September 17, Stewart traces all the proceedings of the Convention and relates biographical sketches of the 55 delegates from 12 colonies (Rhode Island refused to send delegates).

Each chapter details the discussions and debates among the Framers of the Constitution
...more
Mrjames
History has in many ways smoothed over the bumps of the Founding Fathers. The men who invented the Constitution were certainly remarkable. They were starting creating a system of government almost from scratch. But they could be irascible, parochial and often-times short sighted. David O. Stewart has written a very readable account of the constitutional convention in 1787. It's not a scholarly work, laden with minutiae but a story well-told about a very bold endeavor. Stewart mostly has praise f ...more
William Ramsay
One of the reviews I read of this book said that a well known story is made better by a good telling. The is partly true. We all have an image in our minds - probably from as far back as grade school of how the Constitution was written by a bunch of old guys in funny wigs two hundred years ago. Well, the truth is most people really don't know what a mish-mash of ideas produced maybe the greatest governmental outline ever written - and how it's been used to direct America's affairs longer than an ...more
***Dave Hill
(Original review http://hill-kleerup.org/blog/2010/05/...)

This retelling of the formation and course of the Philadelphia convention to reform the national government of the newly united States is gripping and well-told, a look at political battles that make our own current Congress look like a model of civility and straightforwardness.

The biggest questions that come up are an endless series of what-ifs — what if this person hadn’t been there to push for or against an issue, what if that particu
...more
Dave Hoff
Getting men of 13 different States and walks of life to come up with our enduring Constitution is the greatest wonder of the ages. States Rights with slavery, and the north with industries, Big govt. or Small. but they did it. Then the selling for ratification. Most interesting chapter,Happiness,Perpetual & Otherwise. None of this, Nancy P.having to ratify the Constution before knowing what is in it. Hamilton,Madison & John Jay wrote essays, Ben Franklin pushed and many held parades & ...more
Robin Wright Gunn
Can you believe I am reading this book? It's neither a novel nor a memoir nor a spirituality book. Not like me at all. I was feeling the need to read something meatier, like.. hmmm...HISTORY. I rarely read history, beucase I find I don't retain much of what I read. But somehow this struck my fancy, I think for a few basic reasons: 1) it covers a VERY SHORT period in American history--3 months in 1787, 2) It covers ONE EVENT. The writing of the U.S. constitution. 3) I am generally interested in p ...more
Kathy
This is a well researched book about the 4 hot summer months of 1787 when a group of men with different ideas, beliefs, and personalities came together in Philadelphia to create the US Constitution. Sometimes I laughed, sometimes I slept, sometimes I was busy taking pictures of the North fire as we sat gridlocked on the freeway but I liked what I heard.
Darlis
Jul 02, 2008 Darlis rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: janell, robin, cynthia
This is a wonderful telling of the birth of the Constitution. I loved following the ideas back and forth. I enjoyed knowing about the Committee of Postponed Parts. It definitely shows that there were many compromises to made and that everyone needed to "give a little, get a little" to merge a system that might be workable. I was amazed at how many ideas there were on electing a president.

This is wonderfully researched, told with passion and intellectural curiosity, and describes so many of the v
...more
jillian
This was an amazing recap of the men who shaped the Constitution, and the ideas which went into the document that still manages America. So much political theory went into that document, so many debates, so much re-working, so many issues, it's amazing it was ever written. It's amazing the country didn't dissipate under the original Articles of Confederation instead of producing a Constitution. For anyone with even a passing interest in constitutional law, or American history, who wants to under ...more
Michaelpatrick Keena
Dec 27, 2008 Michaelpatrick Keena rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: those who love our constitution and know that is was made by extrodinary men not demigods
Shelves: early-republic
The Constitution did not just fall out of Heaven; nor was done cavalier manner. No, it was the result of a tug-of-war carried on by many of America's greatest minds and hearts. Sadly, men such Patrick Henry who boycotted the convention, could have even made it better; but what we have is still the greatest charter of freedom and government the world has yet to see. What resulted by the end of that summer has not only lasted longer than its designers expected; but became a light upon a hill for t ...more
Geoff
An entertaining and quick read. Stewart constructs a narrative that is organized well, allowing characters to enter and exit with punctuated relevance.
A great entrance into the study of the Constitution and the factors that formed it, both for and against.
April Stanley
Stewart took Madison's notes, records of the weather, and a few letters written by the delegates and created a cohesive, interesting narrative of the famous Convention. After reading it, I feel worn out and sweaty, as if I'd been sitting in the back of the sweltering room in a wool coat and a wig with the rest of the delegates. The main characters of the convention and the actual writer were all mostly unknown to me before, but now I recognize their influence in The Document as easily as I recog ...more
Brian
This was a fascinating book about the Constitutional Convention that took place in Independence Hall in Philadelphia in 1787. It was very interesting to read about the debates they had regarding how the number of legislators will be determined, slavery, and the powers of the president.

I was interested in the men that are usually omitted from the history books but played big roles in the writing of the Constitution like George Mason, John Rutledge, Gouvereur Morris, and Luther Martin. I was also
...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 91 92 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Great Upheaval: America and the Birth of the Modern World, 1788-1800
  • American Creation: Triumphs and Tragedies at the Founding of the Republic
  • What Kind of Nation: Thomas Jefferson, John Marshall, and the Epic Struggle to Create a United States
  • A Magnificent Catastrophe: The Tumultuous Election of 1800, America's First Presidential Campaign
  • The Idea of America: Reflections on the Birth of the United States
  • A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic
  • 1812: The War That Forged a Nation
  • Samuel Adams: A Life
  • John Marshall: Definer of a Nation
  • Samuel Adams: Father of the American Revolution
  • 1775: A Good Year for Revolution
  • Patriots: The Men Who Started The American Revolution
  • Founding Myths: Stories That Hide Our Patriotic Past
  • The Perils of Peace: America's Struggle for Survival After Yorktown
  • Revolutionaries: A New History of the Invention of America
  • Plain, Honest Men: The Making of the American Constitution
  • The Drillmaster of Valley Forge: The Baron de Steuben and the Making of the American Army
  • The Forgotten Founding Father: Noah Webster's Obsession and the Creation of an American Culture
Impeached: The Trial of President Andrew Johnson and the Fight for Lincoln's Legacy The Lincoln Deception American Emperor: Aaron Burr's Challenge to Jefferson's America Madison's Gift: Five Partnerships That Built America The Wilson Deception

Share This Book

“As Dr. Franklin progressed through Philadelphia’s republican streets, his regal trappings drove home the message that honor in America grew from talent, not birth.” 0 likes
“by better information or fuller consideration to change opinions…which I once thought right, but found to be otherwise. It is therefore that the older I grow, the more apt I am to doubt my own judgment, and to pay more respect to the judgment of others.” 0 likes
More quotes…