Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Fellowship of the Ring” as Want to Read:
The Fellowship of the Ring
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Fellowship of the Ring (The Lord of the Rings #1)

4.3 of 5 stars 4.30  ·  rating details  ·  1,217,204 ratings  ·  10,158 reviews
From Wikipedia:
J.R.R. Tolkien's 3 hardback books, 2nd edition boxed set of Lord of the Rings: includes The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers and The Return of the King

This is the 2nd Edition 3 volume box set, each volume contains a map foldout map in the back of the book. This box set contains: The Fellowship of the Ring, The Two Towers and The Return of the King.
Hardcover, Second Edition, 423 pages
Published December 31st 1986 by Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMH) (first published 1954)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Fellowship of the Ring, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

Anne-Marie If you want the whole poem, it has a few other verses:
Three Rings for the Elven-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of…more
If you want the whole poem, it has a few other verses:
Three Rings for the Elven-kings under the sky,
Seven for the Dwarf-lords in their halls of stone,
Nine for Mortal Men doomed to die,
One for the Dark Lord on his dark throne,
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
In the Land of Mordor where the Shadows lie.(less)
Millie Ha! I'm answering my own question! There are 398 pages to be exact.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
I refuse to write a review for one of the best books ever written. Asking a serious fantasy fan to write a review for Lord of the Rings is like asking a Christian to write a review for The Bible.
So instead I will supply you with this graph:
Authors who inspire a movement are usually misunderstood, especially by those they have inspired, and Tolkien is no exception, but one of the biggest misconceptions about Tolkien is the idea that he is somehow an 'innovator of fantasy'. He did add a number of techniques to the repertoire of epic fantasy writers, and these have been dutifully followed by his many imitators, but for the most part, these techniques are little more than bad habits.

Many have called Tolkien by such epithets as 'The Fa
I wasn't really "cool" back in high school. I never made out with girls under the bleachers, or smoked under the bleachers, or did any of the other things under the bleachers that - I am lead to believe - the popular kids did. Instead, I maintained a low profile and waited for the teenage years - that wilderness of strangled thinking - to end.

In high school, as today, I harbored geekish obsessions, had a wandering imagination, and nurtured an appreciation for minutiate. In other words, I should
Jonathan Cullen
A review of Lord of the Rings: Fellowship of the Ring, by Sauron

Hello. You may remember me as the title character of the Lord of Rings. I go by a lot of names: Dark Lord of Mordor, Sorcerer, Red Eye, Dark Power, Lord of Barad-dûr, Ring-maker and Base Master of Treachery (I use that one in my band). I actually object to Tolkien's chosen name of Sauron, which I understand originates from an adjective that means "foul, putrid" in his crappy invented language. What can I say, the showers in Mordor a
Jason Koivu
Give me a few friends,
a stretch of pleasant hills and an ominous wood.
Let us romp in the remnants of innocence,
free of the fear coursing through the veins of the greater world.
Give me the first half dozen chapters of The Fellowship of the Ring and I will gladly make a little heaven on earth out of it.

After finishing The Hobbit as a young boy, I needed something else, something a little more mature to meet my growing needs. Lucky for me, Tolkien had done just that in the form of his epic trilogy
Doc Opp
Tolkein's masterpiece is notable primarily for its historical significance. He basically invented the fantasy genre, and because of that all fantasy readers owe him a debt of gratitude. Many things in his books will seem somewhat cliche nowadays, but that's because they have been used so often since he wrote this book - almost all of them were original when this book was written.

That said, Tolkein is not a terribly good writer. He tends to go on in excruciating detail about trivial concepts. Par
(Update: Want to read the complete review? Visit the article in Counterpunch!)

I'll admit this: the only reason why I read the LOTR Trilogy was because I was jealous.

The year: 1972. It was a time of ridiculously insane fashion: hot pants, maxi-coats (and pads) and rough-woven cotton shirts, so scratchy they felt like the sartorial equivalent of surgical gauze with chunks of wood stuck between the weave. It was not for the faint-hearted.

And of course, who was the most faint-hearted? Me. I was ent
Read the review by Doc Opp; I think he covers it quite nicely. He explains how Tolkien was the forefather of fantasy writing, and why that makes his books important. He also shares his opinion that the historical importance sort of causes people to overlook that Tolkien couldn't write worth beans.

Opp posits that perhaps it has something to do with the concept of heroism being different in Tolkien's days than it is now. I'm not sure I agree with that. I mean I agree that his characters are a stud
Oct 12, 2007 Bryce rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone. This is an essential read.
I consider the Lord of the Rings trilogy the best fantasy, and perhaps the best fiction, ever written. Middle Earth is a beautiful, rich, complete land to which Narnia pales by comparison (don't get me wrong, I very much like Narnia, too).

The beginning of the quest, which starts innocently but dives into a much larger, darker world than its protagonist, Frodo Baggins, could have ever imagined, is absolutely spellbinding. A small portion of the near-infinite background is revealed and armed with
Do you have an old, worn piece of clothing? Perhaps that sweat shirt that you can’t wear anywhere except to bed or walking your dog? Perhaps it is an old blanket, a pair of shoes, maybe it’s a stuff animal. Regardless of what it is, every time you touch it or smell it, you feel peace, warmth, or perhaps, even home.

Know what I’m talking about? Good, that’s how The Lord of the Rings feels to me. I don’t how many times I’ve read the trilogy itself, let alone each book. I do know that I had to buy a
K.D. Absolutely
Jan 28, 2011 K.D. Absolutely rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to K.D. by: 501 Must Read Books; 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die (2006-2010)
No debate: This is monumental!

Tolkien created a whole new world called Middle-earth. When Peter Jackson's movie adaptation came out in 2001, I thought that Middle-earth was some kind of an ancient city that was submerged somewhere beneath the earth just like Atlantis was a fictional city in the bottom of the sea. Well, that was before I attempted to read this book. When that movie came out in 2001, I bought a copy of the book with Elijah Wood on the cover but I did not get past page 50. I found
Emily *Full-time Fangirl*
You know how they say


The Fellowship of the Ring is proof of that! It takes the rule of show-don't-tell and flushes it down the toilet, because who would rather experience all the kick-ass action scenes themselves when they could just hear someone discussing them over dinner tables like they were discussing rice vs. potatoes? Pffft, no one ofc....


I mean, who likes action anyway. Why don't we just drop all the action in general and add pages of pages of scenery descriptions instead?

Jul 15, 2007 Jessica rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anyone. Literally.
I first read this book after stumbling upon my father's copy. I hadn't enjoyed it (at the time, Tolkien seemed a little too long-winded for my taste); however, when five years later I requested the full set of Harry Potter novels (whatever had been out at the time), my Mother bypassed Rowling and bought my a full set of Tolkien instead... and I have been in love ever since.

I once read a quote about J.R.R. Tolkien, which asked increduously: "How did one man, in the course of a single lifetime, be
I suppose what I am about to type will be considered sacrilegious to some reading this review. However, I always believe in honesty in reviews, so here goes anyway :)

As much as I love the story, I have to say that I liked the movie better than the book. *gasp* There’s the blasphemy for you. Hehehehe. There was just so much singing in the book. I wish I could have skimmed the singing passages, but I was listening to the audiobook which made skipping the songs difficult. Maybe I was clouded in my
Jan 10, 2011 Amy marked it as abandoned  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: reviewed
Ok, I love this movie. It's a great, beautiful story. But no matter what, I *cannot* get through this book! It is so *boring*! I have tried numerous times, and every single time I fail miserably. I tried before the movie came out, and I've tried since the movie came out. Invariably this book winds up collecting dust on the night table. I just... can't... make... it... through!! Thank goodness for Peter Jackson, New Zealand, CGI, and great acting, otherwise I'd be missing out on a really great st ...more
Aaron Vincent
This is kind of surprising. The elements I dislike in some novels in the swords-and-sorcery genre are present in this book: very visible division between good and evil, clean-cut and self-sacrificial heroes, lengthy cross-country travelogues, etc., but in this case, those things actually worked in favour of the book. Perhaps it is the eminent sense of the foreboding tragedy that made me look past those stuff. Although I saw the entire movie trilogy and I know that the mortality rate wasn't that ...more
Sorry, J.R.R.: I am going to review the three volumes separately, but it’s really more of a running commentary of what’s on my mind. I don’t actually see The Lord of the Rings as three separate books; the volumes just provide a good place to pause and take stock. And there’s always a lot to take stock of, when you’re reading these books: Tolkien made sure of that. This isn’t the first time I’ve read them for pleasure since my Tolkien module during my MA, but that aspect of my reading is maybe a ...more
Crystal Starr Light
I'm not even going to bother with a formal review. If you've heard of the Lord of the Rings (and really, in recent years, how could you not?), you've probably already made your decision whether or not to read it before you even hit my review.

I first read this book in 2002, just before I rented and watched "The Fellowship of the Ring" on video tape (because yes, IT CAME OUT ON VIDEO TAPE!). Up to that point, I had mostly read science fiction, minus an attempt to read Tamora Pierce (but the book "
Fred D
Dec 20, 2007 Fred D rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Anybody
Shelves: fantasy
What can I say about The Lord of the Rings? I could go on and on forever. It is my #1 favorite book of fiction of all that I've ever read in my entire life. I am going to review each book separately, but much of what I have to say here applies to all 3 of the books. LOTR is so incredibly EPIC! The scope of the story expands as it progresses to enormous proportions. Tolkien uses a very sophisticated "old" style of writing which at first I found intimidating but eventually I got used to and which ...more
5.0 stars. I just re-read this book as it has been a LONG time since I first read it and was curious about how well it would hold up over time. The answer is... AMAZINGLY WELL. I was actually a bit surprised at just how good this book is as it is very easy to be disappointed when you read the "consensus" standard of any genre. Well this series not only IS the standard, but it DESERVES to be the standard of epic fantasy. I am looking forward to re-reading the next two books in the trilogy.
I want to read this book again because I feel like I'm missing out on the real message and how good this book is.
Fellowship of the Ring by J.R.R. Tolkien was so much more enchanting then I remember. It just goes to show how much our tastes can change along with how we view the world can alter as we get older. I really didn't like any of these books when I was a kid, but it was fantastic. I couldn't wait to finish it so I could watch the movie again, which I hadn't seen in years. I was impressed by how closely the movie followed this book, beside the leaving out of Tom Bombadil. The elves and Galadriel are ...more
'I wish it need not have happened in my time," said Frodo.
"So do I," said Gandalf, "and so do all who live to see such times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do with the time that is given us."

(view spoiler)
I’m going to let you in on a little secret: I’ve never seen the movies. I’m not willing to say anything bad about them. Sure, I tried watching the first one (twice), but fell asleep almost immediately. After I’ve finished reading the series, I’ll probably try the movies again. Because, let’s face it, you can never have enough walking.

Now, while I haven’t seen The Fellowship of the Ring, I have seen The Breakfast Club. And, so far as I can tell, it’s the same story.

We’ve got Frodo, he’s our Andre

JRR Tolkein is an artist. He takes his paints and spread them all over the canvas, expecting the viewer in the museum to understand it, as if this is the simplest thing in the world. Only the explanation at the sidebar beside the picture, let the viewer understand what the artist wanted to say by painting the picture. Watching such picture is a dangerous dive into the artist's soul.

Suddenly, while you dive into the picture, slowly but steadily, you notice something. It starts small, and turn

Well, that took me way too bloody long. It's an amazing world that Tolkien has created. The fantastical creatures, Middle Earth, all the places and languages and songs. That must have taken forever to come up with, or maybe he was just a genius. Either way, I'm gonna be a blasphemist here and say I prefer the movie. The book felt too long-winded and not as enticing as the movie. The characters stayed two-dimensional and most of them were not that different from one another. The story went on too ...more
When we're talking about novels that for some reason happen to be overshadowed by their big-screen movie adaptations (granted, not many exist), then The Lord Of The Rings belongs into that category. I know that the Tolkien-purists might crucify me for saying this, but I'm saying it nonetheless. For me, watching these movies usually equals an exercise of little to medium effort; reading the book, I often found myself on the verge of frustration. And I'm not one with an attention span of a grapefr ...more
Paulo "paper books always" Carvalho
What's needed to be said about the book that changed fantasy as we know it? If Robert Howard was the creator of Sword and Sorcery and others before him trended on Fantasy, Tolkien took it to the main publishers and began the Golden Age of Fantasy. Almost every writer in fantasy fiction read Tolkien. Almost every writer knows that he is the main Father and revered him.

Review Part II

The first review I made more than 10 years ago. There wasn't any LotR on the horizon so it was a long time ago. It
Emtiaj Hasan
ছয়/সাত বছর আগে এই বইয়ের সাথে আমার পরিচয়। তখন অনুবাদটা নিয়ে এসেছিলাম। এতো জঘন্য অনুবাদ আমি জীবনেও দেখিনি। আমার যতটুকু মনে পড়ে আমি ৩০ পৃষ্ঠার মতো পড়েছিলাম, মানে সহ্য করেছিলাম। কতটা বছর চলে গেল পড়বো পড়বো করে!

এ জীবনে পড়া সবচেয়ে প্রিয় বইগুলোর একটা হয়ে থাকবে হ্যারি পটার। পরিচিত কোন জগৎ নয়। লেখকের নিজের তৈরী করা একটা জগৎ যে জগৎ কিনা মারাত্মক ভালো লাগার। লর্ড অব দ্যা রিংস এর জগৎটাও ভালো লাগার। আমার ইচ্ছে করে হবিটদের সাথে থাকবো, গ্যানডালফের সহচর হব, অভিশপ্ত রিং ধ্বংস করে পৃথিবীকে রক্ষা করে ফেলবো :D নিজেক
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
  • Tehanu (Earthsea Cycle, #4)
  • To Green Angel Tower, Part 1 (Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn, #3; Part 1)
  • The Hand of Oberon
  • The Mystery Knight (The Tales of Dunk and Egg, #3)
  • The Shadow Rising (Wheel of Time, #4)
  • The Two Swords (Forgotten Realms: Hunter's Blades, #3; Legend of Drizzt, #16)
  • The Crystal Cave (Arthurian Saga, #1)
  • Elantris (Elantris, #1)
  • Dragons of Winter Night (Dragonlance: Chronicles, #2)
  • That Hideous Strength (Space Trilogy, #3)
  • Riddle-Master: The Complete Trilogy (Riddle-Master, #1-3)
  • The Darkest Road (The Fionavar Tapestry, #3)
  • The Power That Preserves (The Chronicles of Thomas Covenant the Unbeliever, #3)
  • The Hobbit: Graphic Novel
  • The Black Cauldron (The Chronicles of Prydain #2)
  • Ilse Witch (Voyage of the Jerle Shannara, #1)
  • The King's Buccaneer (Krondor's Sons, #2)
  • The Silver Hand (The Song of Albion, #2)
John Ronald Reuel Tolkien, CBE, was an English writer, poet, WWI veteran (a First Lieutenant in the Lancashire Fusiliers, British Army), philologist, and university professor, best known as the author of the high fantasy classic works The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings .

Tolkien was Rawlinson and Bosworth Professor of Anglo-Saxon at Oxford from 1925 to 1945, and Merton Professor of English langu
More about J.R.R. Tolkien...
The Hobbit (Middle-Earth Universe) The Return of the King (The Lord of the Rings, #3) The Two Towers (The Lord of the Rings, #2) The Lord of the Rings (The Lord of the Rings, #1-3) The Silmarillion (Middle-Earth Universe)

Share This Book

“All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.

From the ashes a fire shall be woken,
A light from the shadows shall spring;
Renewed shall be blade that was broken,
The crownless again shall be king.”
“Not all those who wander are lost.” 12448 likes
More quotes…