Darwin's Ghosts: The Secret History of Evolution

Darwin's Ghosts: The Secret History of Evolution

3.65 of 5 stars 3.65  ·  rating details  ·  234 ratings  ·  77 reviews
Christmas, 1859. Just one month after the publication of On the Origin of Species, Charles Darwin received an unsettling letter. He had expected criticism; in fact, letters were arriving daily, most expressing outrage and accusations of heresy. But this letter was different. It accused him of failing to acknowledge his predecessors, of taking credit for a theory that had a...more
Hardcover, 416 pages
Published June 12th 2012 by Spiegel & Grau (first published May 1st 2012)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Bring Up the Bodies by Hilary MantelThe Round House by Louise ErdrichBeautiful Ruins by Jess WalterBilly Lynn's Long Halftime Walk by Ben FountainThis is How You Lose Her by Junot Díaz
New York Times 100 Notable Books of 2012
49th out of 100 books — 205 voters
The Great Agnostic by Susan JacobyFreethinkers by Susan JacobyDarwin's Ghosts by Rebecca Stott400 Years Of Freethought by Samuel Porter PutnamNonbeliever Nation by David Niose
Freethought History
3rd out of 13 books — 4 voters


More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,631)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Stuart
Do you love Darwin? You should, really should. I know everyone loves Einstein because he looks so cute in his iconic pictures; his hair makes him seem a bit like a troll doll. Plus his theories seem so brainy and math heavy as to be almost imponderable. But Darwin? He looks so serious in his pictures, like one of the Smith Brothers of cough lozenge fame. And evolution? It isn't mathematical at all. At face value, it's a theory that anyone with observant eyes could have figured out.

But let me tel...more
David
As with some other recent Goodreads reviews and ratings, I am giving Darwin's Ghosts two stars because I felt it was "OK". I'd prefer three stars to indicate this, but I'm going by the documentation.

Anyway, one of the criticisms Charles Darwin faced after the publication of his Origin of Species were claims that the idea of transmutation of species was not new, and he was trying to claim the credit for an idea that others had written about. In later editions of Origin, Darwin attempted to add a...more
Darshan Elena
I loved how this book put Darwin's science into historical context over centuries. The portraits of the various scientists and their struggles to envision an origin of the species was fantastic. I also appreciated the author's investment in describing how science was policed by the combined forces of church and king. I wish the author had spent a bit more time discussing the social transformations that were happening alongside the rise of botany, geology, biology, and other fields. The author me...more
David
This book describes the lives and discoveries of a number of people who Darwin thought may have had some impact on the theory of evolution. Some of the earliest, such as Aristotle, actually had no concept of evolution. During the 1700's and early 1800's, several people developed ideas about evolution. However, only a couple--most notably Alfred Wallace--developed any concept of the mechanism of natural selection.

It surprised me that Charles Darwin's grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, was also a propon...more
Ray
I found "Darwin's Ghosts" something of an eye-opener in its description of the many scientists who preceded Darwin, and who laid the groundwork for his famous "discoveries" regarding evolution. As Rebecca Stott points out, evolution was not a brand new concept in Darwin's time. His fame, rather, is based on his explanations as to how / why species may evolve, not necessarily that he identified that species evolve.

Stott provides biographical descriptions of many natural scientists who preceded D...more
Bob H
Here are the intellects that preceded Darwin and his Origin of Species. Stung by a criticism that his Origin of Species was not, in effect, original, he would put a "Historical Sketch" in his third edition to show who proceeded him. What this author has done was to investigate all the theories and scholarship that addressed natural diversity, evolution ("transmutation" it was often called), and natural selection. The author found a wider college of thought than the "Historical Sketch" did, from...more
Chris Demer
When Charles Darwin published his "Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection", in 1859, he did not include a preface or acknowledgement of his intellectual predecessors in the field of Natural History. He was in a hurry to publish and his health was not good, but he was criticized for it at the time. He included such an acknowledgement in a later edition. This well-written book elaborates on the theories and investigations of many of the philosophers and students of "natural history" (biol...more
Beatnik Mary
http://www.cozylittlebookjournal.com/...

Rebecca Stott was raised in a Creationist household. The name "Charles Darwin" was not only synonymous with "instrument of the devil," it was in fact so verboten that her grandfather had excised the entry on Darwin from the D section of the family encyclopedia with a razor. This created in young Rebecca Stott an illicit fascination with science, scientists and of course, evolution. She would grow up to write a book about Charles Darwin, concluding that he...more
Tony
DARWIN’S GHOSTS: The Secret History of Evolution. (2012). Rebecca Stott. ****.
When Darwin was preparing his text for his fourth edition of “The Origin Of Species” for the American market (the first edition that was not pirated), he included a foreward entitled: “An Historical Sketch of the Recent Progress of Opinion on the Origin of Species.” His intent in this introduction was to give credit to the men who provided significant work in this field. When he had completed his citations he had a li...more
Philip
Charles Darwin felt indebted to the many antecedents of his work, "The Origin of Species". He set out to make a list. This book tells the story of those observers and several others who contributed to the development of what we now call "Evolution." Several names are familiar: Aristotle, Lamarck, and Alfred Wallace. But others like Jahiz, an Arab in 850 Basra, who wrote the first study of animals in the Islamic world and who may have first "suggested" natural selection was less well-known. Ortho...more
Ori
To sum up the really rather long blurb up there, Darwin's Ghosts is about the men and the ideas that paved the way for Darwin's theory of evolution. More interestingly, it details the struggles these men went through to explore and spread their ideas: how they had to break past the traditional hidebound theories of creationism, contend with contradicting contemporaries and popular opinions, and even suffer tropical diseases.

I don't often read non-fiction books because I spend far too much time q...more
Jake
A book about the precursors to Darwin. There were many who were influential to his ideas that existed before him. Scientists and naturalists who had similar theories before him. He felt guilty about having published his book so swiftly. There hadn't been time for him to include a section where he credited the people that came before him. In the past evolutionary theory was called certain other things like transformism. Many of these people were persecuted and challenged by the church when their...more
Jb
Various thinkers preceded Charles Darwin with hypotheses concerning natural selection, but Darwin was the first to give it scientific credibility. Author devotes a chapter to 11 predecessors, beginning with Aristotle. Some of these truth-seekers were denounced by bishops, even threatened with burning at the stake, because they dared question Biblical interpretation of biological and geological creation. Darwin himself, perhaps out of fear of similar incrimination, long hesitated to publish resul...more
Jamie Bradway
There's a very nice intro and using Darwin's acknowledgments from the second edition of 'Origin' was a nice outro, but most of the in-between bits were uneven, sometimes straying from what I understood to be the purpose of the book.

Each of these chapters were to reveal the contributions of the 'transmutationists' who preceded Darwin, often suffering the wrath of The Church in the process. Several of these chapters focus much more on biographical sketch than on scientific thought, however. And so...more
Catherine Woodman
The book is subtitled 'In Search of the First Evolutionists', and that is indeed what it is all about. Ms. Stott opens the book by explaining that she grew up with creationists, that she did not come to the study of the evolution of Darwin's thinking on natural selection with a long history of love of biology. She doesn't exactly explain how she did come to write the book, but she doesn't want us to think she was a life-long lover of all things Darwinian. She also doesn't go into Darwin's person...more
D.J. Butler
It's not clear how haunted Darwin was by these other men -- by Stott's account, he seems to have mostly been ignorant of their work.

Slightly off-the-mark title aside, this is a terrific story, written in highly readable narrative prose. It's about Darwin's predecessors (and, in the case of Alfred Wallace at least, the man who almost beat him to the punch). Starting with Aristotle (not an evolutionist, but a close observer of fact in the natural world) and working through Leonardo da Vinci and on...more
John
A Superb Examination into the Origins of Darwinian Thought

Rebecca Stott’s “Darwin’s Ghosts: The Secret History of Evolution” is a masterful overview of the history of science leading up to Darwin’s discovery of Natural Selection as a primary mechanism for biological evolution. Hers is an especially important account, since she places the work of Darwin and his intellectual forebears within the context of the societies and cultures they inhabited, stretching across a vast gulf of time that begins...more
Harry Hemstreet
Less to do about Darwin, more of a tracing of the ideas of evolution and origin of species from the time of Aristotle - the many shoulders that Darwin stood upon to complete his 'Origins'. Amazing how far we have progressed but are still fighting the same prejudices that were fought from the 13th century onward. All of the giants of natural history were in constant fear for their lives and reputations as the church steadfastly defended Genesis - to the point of branding these geniuses heretics....more
Lauren
Rebecca Stott's Darwin's Ghosts is an in-depth account of the figures who tirelessly studied animal anatomy and questioned the origin of life before Charles Darwin published his On the Origin's of Species. Stott devotes a chapter to each of the scholars who probed this existential question beginning with Aristotle. She captures the idea that history doesn't run in a straight line. It ebbs and flows and knowledge, at times, must be rediscovered and re-examined. Stott emphasizes how scientific kno...more
David
Aug 08, 2012 David rated it 3 of 5 stars
Shelves: book
Among the criticisms aimed at Darwin after he wrote "On the Origin of Species" was his failure to mention scientists before him who worked on evolution or, as it was called earlier, transmutation. Darwin, in subsequent editions of the book, attempted to cite earlier work but Darwin was not an historian so his attempt was incomplete and, in some cases, wrong. Stott does some of the job Darwin would have liked. Numerous people prior to Darwin, as far back as Aristotle, came close to our current un...more
Holly
It's history of science focusing on the personalities and historical contexts of Darwin's predecessors, but it's not science. Also not what I expected. The book isn't about Darwin's influences, necessarily - some of whom he hadn't even been aware of. That's not Stott's point or intention. She's telling stories about iconoclasts and ambitious thinkers whose work foreshadowed Darwin. I worried that some readers might assume that an Aristotelian method of examining phenomena, for example, has somet...more
Steven
Stott takes a look at the historical notes which Darwin included in later editions of On the Origin of Species (but which he left out of the first edition in order to rush it into print), to look at the work that Darwin's predecessors did in working toward a theory of evolution. She starts with Aristotle and works all the way up to Alfred Russell Wallace, and includes all kinds of interesting people in between, from the French scientists Lamarck and Cuvier, to the intriguin 18th century French e...more
Diana
This book elucidates the many people who came to some sort of evolution idea from their own studies prior to (or at the same time as) Darwin, showing that no idea exists in a vacuum quite well. I had no idea there were so many, or the insanity they dealt with at the hands of religious prejudice. A true book for geeking out and wondering why you never knew this stuff before, especially if you like scientific history. Really drove home the idea that these people worked, so hard, and came to conclu...more
Danny
Explores the history of scientific inquiry into the origin of species on our planet, pre-Darwin. It feels like we learn that Darwin came up with his theory of evolution by creating the whole idea for species change all on his own. But while he was the first to theorize on the the mechanism behind evolution (survival of the fittest) many scientists had noticed that animals seemed to have structures in common, which hinted that they might have common ancestors.

And this tells you all about it, sta...more
Lisa
This was an absolutely fascinating book! I was hooked immediately in the preface when the author described her childhood quest for knowledge outside the restrictions of a religious household. Each chapter thereafter is assigned a person of importance who contributed to the theory of evolution, be they naturalists or scientists, culminating with Charles Darwin (who later added an "Historical Sketch" to his famous book to acknowledge his predecessors of thought - proving that their contributions a...more
J.R.
The ghosts of the title refer to the predecessors of Darwin, the thinkers whose quest for an understanding of the essential questions about life culminated in his theory of evolution.

Darwin himself realized others before him had speculated on these matters which, as Stott points out, led him to attach an historical sketch to the fourth edition of Origins. Some of these earlier thinkers came very close to what he concluded, others were far from the mark. What they shared was that stubborn streak...more
Steve Goble
I gave this another go after a first attempt stopped me short. It is a collection of essays about the people who glimpsed pieces of the evolutionary puzzle before Darwin put it all together. The subject matters interesting, and the book is worth a read. However, I have a complaint. Stott apparently loves writing descriptions of ancient cities, marketplaces, caravan stops, etc. Scene setting in a book like this is necessary, but it can be overdone. Scott seems to enjoy setting the scene so much t...more
Michael Connolly
Darwin's theory of evolution was built on earlier ideas by his predecessors. Darwin's main fear was to be accused of blasphemy by the Christians. Immediately after the publication of The Origin of Species, Darwin's main problem was he was accused of failing to acknowledge his predecessors. Most of his predecessors were Europeans, but some were Arabs. A major obstacle to scientific progress in Europe was the Roman Catholic Church, which prosecuted as heresy any scientific ideas that contradicted...more
G Hodges
I can’t say I thought this was a worthwhile read. I was1/3 through before I learned something I didn’t already know. I didn’t really get the point of the book. Was it that people were involved in empirical thought before Darwin? Knew that already. Was it to tell us people thought of the evolution concept before Darwin? Knew that already. That Darwin expanded the ideas of others? We knew that. Was it an attempt to put together Darwins intellectual forebears? If so, it was not well realized. In fa...more
Anna
As a big fan of Thomas Kuhn, I really like the idea of the evolution in scientific thought as well as the idea of evolution itself. I think Rebecca Stott is a wonderful writer (I also liked her novel The Coral Thief). Darwin's Ghosts outlines the early thinkers and scientists regarding evolution - the forerunners of Darwin's On the Origin of the Species. Darwin learned that Alfred Wallace was about to publish his theory of evolution, a theory that was pretty much the same as Darwin's (which he h...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 54 55 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Darwin's Ghosts: The Secret History of Evolution (ebook)
Darwin's Ghosts: In Search of the First Evolutionists (Hardcover)
Darwin's Ghosts: The Secret History of Evolution (Audio)
Darwin's Ghosts: The Secret History of Evolution (Paperback)
Darwin's Ghosts: The Secret History of Evolution (Kindle Edition)

76199
Rebecca Stott was born in Cambridge in 1964 and raised in Brighton in a large Plymouth Brethren community. She studied English and Art History at York University and then completed an MA and PhD whilst raising her son, Jacob, born in 1984.

She is the author of several academic books on Victorian literature and culture, two books of non-fiction, including a partial biography of Charles Darwin, and a...more
More about Rebecca Stott...
Ghostwalk The Coral Thief Darwin and the Barnacle: The Story of One Tiny Creature and History's Most Spectacular Scientific Breakthrough Il codice di Newton Oyster

Share This Book

Your website