Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World” as Want to Read:
The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World

3.94 of 5 stars 3.94  ·  rating details  ·  466 ratings  ·  42 reviews
Here, from a brilliant young writer, is a paradigm-shifting history of both a utopian concept and global movement the idea of the Third World. The Darker Nations traces the intellectual origins and the political history of the twentieth century attempt to knit together the world's impoverished countries in opposition to the United States and Soviet spheres of influence in ...more
ebook, 384 pages
Published April 29th 2008 by New Press, The (first published 2007)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Darker Nations, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Darker Nations

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,352)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
A brilliant dialectical analysis of the political phenomenon of third world and the global political economy. This is an analysis and not a narrative and assumes some rudimentary knowledge of the world history of the 20th century on part of the reader.

The main thesis of Parishad is that the third world is a project among the formerly colonised states of Asia, Africa, and Latin America, for political, economic and cultural sovereignty and mainly for dignity. It thoroughly examines the major leade
Prashad’s book is important, though I wouldn’t call it a “people’s history” as it focuses largely on the actions of the leaders of the U.S., U.S.S.R., and “Third World.” He does a good job of accessibly covering the general themes that played out during decolonization, independence and neoliberalism, as well as conceptualizing the Third World as an intentional project. But no book can really get at the dynamics at play over the course of 80 years and three continents. And of course, as anyone in ...more
In The Darker Nations, Vijay Prashad’s objective seems deceptively simple: to recount the history of the post-World War II era through the perspective of those who have lived under imperialism, the so-called “Third World”. Yet by nuancing and specifying his definition of the “Third World”, the author is able to provide an account that is not a mere reflection of or reaction to the First and Second Worlds, but represents a culturally authentic and independent product of anticolonial thought and r ...more
Craig Werner
A classic case of where even smart Marxist history can go off the tracks. Prashad's one of he best writers about Asian American experience and he can be a fiery speaker whose anger about the state of the world, especially white supremacy and economic injustice, is usually on target. I was hoping that The Darker Nations would be the kind of overview that could serve as a foundation for readers wanting to orient themselves to the dizzying range of experiences subsumed under the "Third World" termi ...more
I will use this as a text again as my students find it the most illuminating book of unknown world history they have ever read. It is the book I have been waiting for as a professor who always hoped to find a political history of the "Third World" from the points of view of some thoughtful people who live there. Read the other reviews on goodreads. They all have the same praise. Fabulous.
Rick Goff
This fast-paced, erudite argument regarding the creation, rise and demise of the Third World was a very challenging read for me, as a result of my ignorance of geopolitical history and economic history. The Third World arose as a term to describe the remainder of the world (about 2/3 of its population) that was not covered under the labels First World (NATO) and Second World (Warsaw Pact) as they were defined in a speech by - who else - Winston Churchill.

Each chapter of Prashad's book is entitle
I'm not really sure what audience Prashad had in mind. As a novice to many of the histories, I was very confused. It doesn't really work as a textbook. The author offers so many case studies with little-to-no background I imagine even scholars would have trouble reading this without a reference guide.
Not quite as engaging as I hoped it would be but it provides tons of great info on the development of the "third world." It paints a very different picture of the non-first world than what we are probably used to seeing on television screens and newspaper articles.
J. Moufawad-Paul
I wanted to like this book, I really did, but it failed to live up to the subtitle. This is not to say that there weren't good parts in this book, only that Prashad failed to really give a People's History of the Third World. This is most probably because, as I later learned, Prashad isn't really on the side of the people when it comes to places like India where he does not support, unlike Arundhati Roy, the Naxal uprisings (which have a long history––yes a people's history) and instead endorses ...more
Enjoyed the book. The downsides were organization and clarity. On a couple of occasions I really had no idea what he was talking about, nor what he was getting at exactly. Mostly in the Tehran chapter and the chapter on Mecca. Seems like there was another but can't remember at the moment. Anyway this could have been my lack of knowledge concerning the Middle East as well. The way it was organized however, just seemed terrible to me. Each chapter is broken down into one particular city pertinent ...more
Leonel Caraciki
Um livro complicado de analisar. Por um lado nota-se a capacidade de pesquisa do autor, que consegue escrever um livro recheado de eventos e personagens com uso cuidadoso de fontes e de literatura de apoio. Por outro lado, Prashad que é um militante marxista ortodoxo faz tanta questão de jogar na cara do leitor suas preferências ideológicas que o livro se torna quase que um panfleto. Logo no início, o autor levanta a tese de que o Terceiro Mundo deu errado pois os projetos dos partidos comunista ...more
The title unsettled me a bit – but this had received good reviews and the series it is in (The New Press's People's History series edited by Howard Zinn) is really quite good. I am so pleased I read this: it is a cogent, politically charged and engaged analysis of the 'Third World' as a political project. Prashad sees the Third World as a potentially a powerful challenge to but also product of the two worlds of the Cold War, and a movement and concept with enormous promise. He argues that the co ...more
"The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World"

By Vijay Prashad

Review by James Generic

The Third World is a Cold War term, meaning mostly former nations that were ruled by Europeans and won their political independence in the decades after the second world war. That's how most people understand it anyway. It started off as a term of empowerment and hope by the leaders of the newly independent countries in the 1950s, after years of trying to bind the colonized into a single cause. Thes
I couldn't decide between 3 or 4 stars.

Before I read this book, I was expecting to hear a new perspective on third world battleground between the U.S and U.S.S.R, but even though the focus is different the author accomplished a lot more than I expected.

The subject of the book is what Prashad calls the Third World Movement, or Non-Aligned Movement, that really began to take shape after World War II through the efforts of Gamal Abdel Nasser, Kwame Nkrumah, Jawaharlal Nehru, Ahmed Sukarno, etc. Pra
Jon Morgan
An excellent overview of the Third World as a conscious project, one that started giddily in the newly liberated states but deflated in the face of neoliberalism. Although the book has a broad outlook, it avoids cliche and jargon. The use of chapters that focus on subthemes of how the Third World created itself (e.g. cultural projects, development strategies) allows the book to move quickly while packing in detail and comparative analysis of national and regional situations. A great introduction ...more
Not really a peoples history...more of a history of those in power/ those who had the ability to make any sort of difference (good or bad). People aren't mentioned (as in the masses) which seems to marginalize them more.
Interesting concept of the Third world as a project rather than a place, explains why these places are still behind today.
Explains how capitalism was able to grow (ie. how the US came to dominate everyone/everything). Of course it's impossible for these countries to become mini-A
This book was informative and thought-provoking, but fitting the histories of sixty countries on three different continents into a single 300-page book was kind of an impossible proposition. I felt like too many details were skated over, and while I appreciated the way the author tried to follow specific thematic threads across countries in each chapter, the timeline jumped around a LOT. At the very least, this book needed a glossary of the many acronyms and leaders involved, and some visual aid ...more
This was a fascinating read, and it gave a different perspective on a number of historical trends and events. Its structure is awkward, though, and Prashad seems married to the concept of arranging the chapters around cities in which events took place even if the city has little to do with what the chapter is actually about, thematically. This leaves the reader sometimes confused about the significance of what is being discussed in each chapter. There is also a level of inconsistency in that som ...more
such a wealth of information, much of which i've been literally craving to find in one concise spot for quite a while, but so awfully awfully written and awkwardly paced. then there's the fundamental concern for this (is it too early to call this a "style" unto itself? is it more than revisionism? hyper-revisionism?) "peoples history" business, ie if you plainly state your intentions and subjectivity as a historian and author, does that validate the blatant framing of historical incidents and ch ...more
This is an amazing book that tracks the history of the Third World Movement and its foundation of the Nonaligned Movement and how the efforts existed and the story of how it failed.

It's such a great read and it would be a great text book for International Relations degrees to get a much more Global South perspective than what you get in the mainstream academia.

Anyone in the field should read this book at some point!
I was skeptical when I first started the book -- Prashad seemed to idealize the nationalism of independence movements and to discount the impact of economic issues in the struggles for genuine independence. But as the "narrative" progresses, he confronts the problems of lack of economic development (when economic power is the only logic with currency) and movements that are based on nationalism.
The Tick
This book had a lot of good information in it, and I appreciated the perspective, which isn't one you usually get here. However, the way the information was organized made it difficult to follow, and the writing was extremely dense. I don't really mind dense writing most of the time, but this was really hard to get through.
Jackson Cyril
Prashad is Howard Zinn on steroids, and that's a great thing.
A history of the idea of the Third World, and how it played out in the 20th century, from a socialist perspective. Snapshots, examples and anecdotes, used to illustrate the trajectory of a dream - not a comprehensive history.
It was a good history of the elite of the Third World. The title is misleading as it does not focus on the people per se. I think it was badly written and it became a drag to read. Very informative though.
A good history of the symbolism of the international system from the perspective of the "global south." The official line but I wouldn't call it a people's history-- rather their governments.
Jul 26, 2007 Naeem marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
I read the first 100 pages of this and loved it. It is inspired by Stavrianos's Global Rift. Vijay is one of the smartest and sweetest people I know.
great history of the emergence of the third world as a political project and alternative to soviet and u.s. hegemony, its failures and successes.
Sep 30, 2007 Reena rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: those interested in history & politics
The history you don't learn in high school or that you forget. Not sure what I expected when I bought it but not what I expected...good read!
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 78 79 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body and Primitive Accumulation
  • How Capitalism Underdeveloped Black America: Problems in Race, Political Economy, and Society (Updated Edition)
  • The Revolution Will Not Be Funded: Beyond the Non-Profit Industrial Complex
  • The Invention of the White Race: Racial Oppression and Social Control (Volume 1) (Haymarket Series)
  • How Europe Underdeveloped Africa
  • Discourse on Colonialism
  • Capitalism & Slavery
  • Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour
  • The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All
  • A Dying Colonialism
  • Colonialism/Postcolonialism
  • Before European Hegemony: The World System A.D. 1250-1350
  • The Black Jacobins: Toussaint L'Ouverture and the San Domingo Revolution
  • The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class
  • Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism
  • A People's History of the World
  • Settlers: The Mythology of the White Proletariat
  • 500 Years of Indigenous Resistance

Share This Book