Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Come diventare se stessi. David Foster Wallace si racconta” as Want to Read:
Come diventare se stessi. David Foster Wallace si racconta
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Come diventare se stessi. David Foster Wallace si racconta

3.85 of 5 stars 3.85  ·  rating details  ·  4,823 ratings  ·  587 reviews
David Foster Wallace (I962-2008) è stato una delle figure più importanti della letteratura americana degli ultimi trent'anni. Con libri come Infinite Jest, La ragazza dai capelli strani, Una cosa divertente che non farò mai più ha saputo rivoluzionare la narrativa e la saggistica contemporanea, guadagnando si la stima della critica e l'amore dei lettori. A tre anni dalla s ...more
Paperback, Sotterranei #154, 443 pages
Published September 1st 2011 by Minimum Fax (first published April 13th 2010)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

Popular Answered Questions

Malcolm Ross I think if you are familiar with DFW as a writer, even if you haven't read IJ, you should be fine. I've never been able to finish IJ, but I have read…moreI think if you are familiar with DFW as a writer, even if you haven't read IJ, you should be fine. I've never been able to finish IJ, but I have read three of his short form books and know enough about IJ, and I'm loving the book thus far. But, if you feel like you have to read something by DFW before you read this, I'd suggest 'Brief Interviews with Hideous Men' or 'Consider the Lobster', depending on if you prefer fiction or not. (less)

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
A Brief Introduction

I recently saw the film version of this and was pleased with it as a rather tasteful adaptation. There were a lot of tender moments and while it was rather surreal to see DFW as a character portrayed in a film, Jason Segel gives a solid performance as Wallace. He captured the characteristic essence of Wallace, complete with anxiety and winces, without over-doing it as a bizarre caricature (a friend of mine complimented Segel for 'not aping DFW'). What struck me most still was
When it comes to David Foster Wallace, I’m not exactly a ‘howling fantod’—more of a casual admirer—but I still find it difficult to write about him without getting sappy. What made his death that much harder to take was the sense that we’d lost, not just a good writer, but a good man. And there isn’t such a plentiful supply of either quantity lying around that we can afford to be blasé about it.

On my emotional map of world literature, Wallace is right next door to George Orwell—which is odd bec
I'm really conflicted about this book. The bulk of it is just David Foster Wallace talking, and those parts are great. So many of DFW's essays are conversational, so a long transcribed conversation feels like a natural extension of his work. What really sucks, though, is that I think I hate David Lipsky. Like serious full-on loathing of his persona and the way he handled both the interview and the editing of the book.

This book has the feel of a first draft. It reads like Lipsky transcribed the i
If there had been three copies of this book given to Connor last week instead of two I would own my very own copy of this. Right now this book would be on my bookcase, figuratively (but not actually, because I have no order to my books) between my copies of Everything and More and Oblivion, aka the DFW books I'd been 'saving' for a rainy day to stave off the long periods between his work, that will now most likely never be read because that perfect day to read them will never come and because th ...more
Back in my misspent early twenties I labored for far longer than was prudent on a short story. The story involved a young writer who had stumbled into becoming the epicenter of the cultural zeitgeist of his day. People were so enamored with his thoughts and found his insights so refreshing that the books themselves soon became superfluous. When the corporate overlord types realized that the fans were getting an adequate fix from merely basking in his aura at readings and the occasional late nigh ...more
A number of things I learned from reading David Lipsky’s “Although of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself, A Road Trip With David Foster Wallace”:

- David Foster Wallace, in conversation, was an incredibly friendly, energetic talker. His interactions with Lipsky, as well as reading tour organizers, literati, press, the service industry, fans, escorts (the book tour kind, not the sex-worker kind), etc. exuded humor, patience, guarded sincerity, a natural empathy and attempt at understanding other
I'm constantly at a loss for words, or just generally inarticulate whenever I attempt to explain why I think David Foster Wallace is such an extremely important writer and thinker. These attempts often result in an adjective-laden stream of fawning praise; the sort of comments that I try to avoid when I can. In the end, I'm just too frustrated to speak or write, especially when I'm left with the task of defending him in a social environment. And I'm now especially frustrated because there are so ...more
Alas poor David, I knew him well, sort of, for a couple of days, once. This is a crime against literature and artistic integrity, a cruel and unethical grave-robbery of a book. David Lipsky spent a few days with DFW on the Infinite Jest tour in 1996, tape recording several hours of conversation with the understanding it would be edited down into a magazine article later. Here, riding on the back of DFW's suicide, the resulting cult who treat his every word as gospel, and the fact that he is no l ...more
This is the only book I've ever pre-ordered from Amazon. Its structure and content are no secret - it's right there in the title. The road trip in question took place as DFW was winding down the book tour for Infinite Jest ; David Lipsky had been assigned to interview him for Rolling Stone. That interview never came to fruition - instead, Lipsky brings us this account of their 5-day road trip from March 1996.

I thought I'd devour it in one sitting, but it actually took a while to warm up to it
If ever a book could hold my heart in its hand it would be this one.
I have read this book countless times and each time I do I can almost hear the words of the dialog in DFW's voice and for just a fleeting moment I forget he is no longer with us.

It is 1996 and Rolling Stone has sent reporter David Lipsky to interview David Foster Wallace (DFW). Wallace was riding high; his magnum opus, Infinite Jest, had just been published to more attention than had been bestowed upon any writer in recent mem
DFW is maybe in the process of achieving literary sainthood, so this transcript is like a textual shroud of Turin. The open rawness of watching DFW "wrestle with burly psychic self-consciousness figures" and talk in "crazy circles" lets you spend some serious time with the three-dimensional writer saint himself. Lots of riffs were familiar from essays/other interviews, but this seems like the real raw thing, a pretty comprehensive swipe at everything important to him at the time, all of it anima ...more
There are really two books here: the book Lipsky seems to think it is--reflected in his framing devices--and the one that emerges from Wallace's words. The latter is fascinating, troubling, complicated, messy, occasionally banal, occasionally beautiful--a kind of stream of raw data that I grappled with, even (or especially) as I dealt with my inevitable guilt at exploiting public mourning and cultish genius-worship.

Unfortunately, and embarrassingly, Lipsky believes this is a book about _his_ gro
This 300-page interview reads like a transcript of the best conversation you've ever had in your life, with the most interesting, erudite, and cleverest person you've ever known. It made me want to go back in time to my college years and seek out the people I knew then who used to set my brain on fire with our 2 a.m. debates about what it means to be alive, and how best to be an above-average human being. Above all, this book made me wish that I still had friends like that in my life and, perhap ...more
Sure, you were sometimes kind of a jerk, Lipsky, with your relentless, page-after-PAGE obsession with getting Dave to admit that he was revelling in his slender post-IJ fame...but I'm deeply grateful to you anyway, for hustling this into print and giving me a few more hours with the guy. I really needed them, today. So thanks again, for that—and for having grown up quite a bit in between interview and publication, so that you could wryly perceive and admit to us that a) he was mostly yanking you ...more
Oh how we enjoy glimpsing beautiful minds. Lipsky presents the mostly likable genius in a mostly interesting way. I have to admit, though, that I was probably looking too hard for signs of the tragic loss that was to come. DFW’s self-consciousness about how different he was seemed to clash with his Dale Carnegie cum cool exterior. I read the Afterword last, despite its placement at the beginning, and I think it was better to do it that way. It discussed the years after the interview, especially ...more
This books reads like one of the best conversations you've ever had. You know what I mean - the nightlong philosophical meandering lovely humorous discourses on life, the universe, and Meaning, and all of those Big Concepts.

I admit freely that I adore DFW and would have been a stuttering mess had I tried to talk to him, like that one guy in the book signing scene, and eavesdropping on this conversation was a distinct pleasure for me. I could sit and listen to him just talk, about his bandannas,
One of Stephen King's greatest characters ever, Roland Deschain of Gilead, was a Gunslinger. In King's universe, a Gunslinger was a kind of "walking justice" that roamed the worlds trying to keep order where disorder reigned. These men were by no means sages or smiling monks. They were filled with a sense of right and wrong in the world that made them lethal when they needed to be. But it was their knowledge, their ability to understand others around them, that made them best suited for their jo ...more
My primary issue with this book has to do with David Lipsky and the manner in which he frames his "road trip" with David Foster Wallace. DFW's comments can be refreshing at times, but they are overshadowed by Lipsky's relentless preoccupation with DFW's fame and past addictions. This keeps the narrative from progressing and limits it to a repetitive repertoire. Additionally, Lipsky's use of bracketed commentary comes across as an intrusive attempt at interpreting DFW's statements for the reader. ...more
What I like about DFW is that he just seems to be a great guy. Someone that, and I'm sure many will agree, it's just easy to relate with. But for most of us, expressing our feelings and morally-obvious things that should be easy to communicate and live by, represent a significant challenge. On top of that, the feeling of agreeing with someone of such intellect, gives one the assertion that probably you're okay. That this life, as he says in This is Water and actually most of his work, is full of ...more
Leo Robertson
Filled with quotability but my absolute favourite thing about this is that a guy at an Infinite Jest signing asked Wallace if he wrote poetry. HAH!

And so was born the inevitable pastiche of Wallace (there's no more fun author to do it with) writing a poem. Here is one attempt found amongst his notes- the quintessential encapsulation of American culture, "Darling Buds".

Would you mind, like get your Knickers In A good 'ol Twist if I did the increasingly crass and pretentious and somehow difficultl
At first, I thought Lipsky was kind of operating in that opportunist zone (and I'm sure there is a little of that, b/c journalism never can claim to be opportunist-free). Lipsky had, packed away, tapes and tapes of unused RS interviews with DFW. DFW has just killed himself, wow, a perfect time to rush it to press. The more I read, however, the more I realized in many ways I preferred the rough, transcription-like, quality of the book AND that it wasn't as simple as it first appeared.

The dialogu
Full Disclosure: I am a huge DFW fan, so, ya know, there was very little chance I wasn't going to like this "book".

I say "book" because it's not really a book in the traditional sense, more just a 310 page interview with David Foster Wallace during the last leg of his Infinite Jest book tour in 1996. A lot of what DFW talks about, as far as certain ideas about television, technology, entertainment, addiction, America, etc, I'd already read in other interviews (the best interview I've read with i
Zooey Glass
Questo libro fa male, fa soffrire ed è straziante per come riesce ad incarnare la teoria di DFW e Franzen (che modestamente penso abbiano copiato dalla sottoscritta!).
Innanzitutto, l'arte la possiamo definire un un dialogo tra anime e i libri, in particolare, servono a farci sentire meno soli. Attraverso i libri possiamo trovare sensibilità simili alla nostra e questo dovrebbe confortarci.
Qui ho trovato, non solo uno spirito affine al mio; DFW è per me l'altra metà della mela (platonicamente pa
Adam Floridia
I really, um, like enjoyed. Some of, uh.--ya know, David's [Foster Wallace] insights, commentary, and general analysis of uh things. As he saw them. I didn't [dudn't] care for David's [Lipsky] presentation of the uh interview. In which he like just seems to have really really transcribed the tapes. [Tape ends here]. This means he um uh um recorded all of the--hey lay down [talking to my dog]--anyway. All the hedgers and ya know are like in the book. Plus the--I said lay down--the context is almo ...more
I hate this author; this may be one of the worst books that I've ever come across. I really like listening to DFW, but somehow the author is able to make the book about himself. And while DFW and his philosophy / outlook are the subject, ultimately I have to judge the book by the author's handling of the subject. Hence, the one-star. This is one of those books that you are embarrassed to have on the shelf.
So this is less, like, a review, as such, than a set of personal remarks, and ramblings, and vaguely embarrassing confessions.

With a guy like DFW, I enjoy reading interviews, books like this one, and so on, because I'm a serious admirer. Like, if I were an attractive girl I would totally have flashed DFW at a reading or something, screaming in orgasmic ecstasy. But they're also a little empty to me, because I find that almost everything in them is stuff I've come across, in more interesting for
switterbug (Betsey)
David Lipsky has done a laudable service for both David Foster Wallace and his readership with this jaunty road-trip/interview/memoir. As Infinite Jest was being launched in 1996 and Wallace was nearing the end of his book tour, Lipsky, a rising name in journalism, followed Wallace through the last week of the tour, the Midwest portion, and recorded almost every word spoken. (The piece was supposed to run in Rolling Stone , but never did. Bad timing due to the untimely death of a rock star and o ...more
Jeff Jackson
This long interview transpires in fits and starts and doesn't really gain traction until the last third of the book, when DFW talks in unbroken detail about writing "Infinite Jest." That part is worth the entire price of admission. The rest is flawed by David Lipsky's compulsive need to annotate DFW's remarks with his own after-the-fact parenthetical asides, pseudo-psychological observations, and snarky comebacks. The early conversations are often frustratingly fragmented. DFW's opinions about, ...more
Mircalla64 (free Liu Xiaobo)
come diventare uno scrittore onesto

nonostante il titolo imbecille, pare quello di un manuale di auto aiuto, si tratta di una bella intervista a DFW durante il tour promozionale di Infinite Jest

David era agli inizi della fama, aveva già pubblicato ma questo era quello giusto per farsi notare, c'era una certa cautela nel percepire quel che accadeva, e la verità è che lui aveva una gran paura di abituarsi alle aspettative che la fama induce, e aveva paura di rimanere vuoto e la paura to
As I was reading "Infinite Jest," I was simultaneously reading "Although of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself: A Road Trip with David Foster Wallace," a straight up five-day dialogue between the author David Lipsky and DFW, taken from tapes made while D Lips was interviewing DF-Dubs for a piece in Rolling Stone that was eventually killed.

What a treat, this chance to eavesdrop on these two dudes as they kick it at DF-Dubs' pad, at airports, diners, long car rides, and a book signing at The Hung
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
The Movie 5 27 Aug 24, 2015 08:53AM  
  • Conversations with David Foster Wallace
  • Every Love Story Is a Ghost Story: A Life of David Foster Wallace
  • Both Flesh and Not: Essays
  • Understanding David Foster Wallace
  • Elegant Complexity: A Study of David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest
  • Changing My Mind: Occasional Essays
  • The Legacy of David Foster Wallace
  • Hiding Man: A Biography of Donald Barthelme
  • The Ecstasy of Influence: Nonfictions, Etc.
  • The Paris Review Interviews, II
David Lipsky is a contributing editor at Rolling Stone magazine. His fiction and nonfiction have appeared in The New Yorker, Harper's Magazine, The Best American Short Stories, The Best American Magazine Writing, The New York Times, The New York Times Book Review, and many other publications. He contributes as an essayist to NPR's All Things Considered, and is the recipient of a Lambert Fellowship ...more
More about David Lipsky...
Absolutely American: Four Years at West Point The Art Fair Three Thousand Dollars: Stories Late Bloomers: Coming of Age in Today's America, the Right Place at the Wrong Time Come diventare se stessi (Sotterranei)

Share This Book

“David Foster Wallace: I think the reason why people behave in an ugly manner is that it’s really scary to be alive and to be human, and people are really really afraid. And that the reasons…

That the fear is the basic condition, and there are all kinds of reasons for why we’re so afraid. But the fact of the matter is, is that, is that the job that we’re here to do is to learn how to live in a way that we’re not terrified all the time. And not in a position of using all kinds of different things, and using people to keep that kind of terror at bay. That is my personal opinion.

Well for me, as an American male, the face I’d put on the terror is the dawning realization that nothing’s enough, you know? That no pleasure is enough, that no achievement is enough. That there’s a kind of queer dissatisfaction or emptiness at the core of the self that is unassuageable by outside stuff. And my guess is that that’s been what’s going on, ever since people were hitting each other over the head with clubs. Though describable in a number of different words and cultural argots. And that our particular challenge is that there’s never been more and better stuff comin’ from the outside, that seems temporarily to sort of fill the hole or drown out the hole.

Personally, I believe that if it’s assuageable in any way it’s by internal means. And I don’t know what that means. I think it’s fine in some way. I think it’s probably assuageable by internal means. I think those internal means have to be earned and developed, and it has something to do with, um, um, the pop-psych phrase is lovin’ yourself.

It’s more like, if you can think of times in your life that you’ve treated people with extraordinary decency and love, and pure uninterested concern, just because they were valuable as human beings. The ability to do that with ourselves. To treat ourselves the way we would treat a really good, precious friend. Or a tiny child of ours that we absolutely loved more than life itself. And I think it’s probably possible to achieve that. I think part of the job we’re here for is to learn how to do this.”
“David Foster Wallace: I think one of the insidious lessons about TV is the meta-lesson that you’re dumb. This is all you can do. This is easy, and you’re the sort of person who really just wants to sit in a chair and have it easy. When in fact there are parts of us, in a way, that are a lot more ambitious than that. And what we need, I think—and I’m not saying I’m the person to do it. But I think what we need is seriously engaged art, that can teach again that we’re smart. And that there’s stuff that TV and movies—although they’re great at certain things—cannot give us.” 17 likes
More quotes…