Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “A Commentary to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason” as Want to Read:
A Commentary to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Preview

A Commentary to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

4.16 of 5 stars 4.16  ·  rating details  ·  25 ratings  ·  2 reviews
Of all major philosophical works, The Critique of Pure Reason is one of the most rewarding, yet one of the most difficult. Norman Kemp Smith's Commentary elucidates not only textural questions & minor issues, but also the central problems which arise, he contends, from the conflicting tendencies of Kant's own thinking. This Commentary by Kant's foremost translator into ...more
Paperback, 682 pages
Published May 24th 2011 by Nabu Press (first published 1918)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about A Commentary to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about A Commentary to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 89)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Erik Graff
Nov 22, 2013 Erik Graff rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: readers of Kant
Recommended to Erik by: The edition of the First Critique I read
Shelves: philosophy
Kant is the most pellucid philosopher I have ever read, the only one who not only attempted to construct a comprehensive explanation of everything (Hegel did that as well, certainly), but managed to do so without relying on undefined or fuzzy concepts. Every operant concept employed by Kant is well and clearly defined--partly a consequence of his intellectual rigor, partly of the fact that he virtually had to invent a philosophical German as he went along. Because of this and because of the impo ...more
ℝ
Dec 29, 2013 marked it as unfinished  ·  review of another edition
Abandoned about 150 pages in. I used it as an accompaniment to my first reading of the CPR, and I would personally recommend against using it for that purpose. While some parts were definitely helpful (such as the section providing historical/philosophical context), there is a lot of cross-referencing and extensive problematisation, which, legitimate or not, tends to leave one hanging on the details. Moreover, it is difficult to assess the plausibility of Smith's interpretations without having a ...more
Nic Poe
Nic Poe is currently reading it
Apr 10, 2015
Andrew Noselli
Andrew Noselli is currently reading it
Apr 16, 2015
Known Unknown
Known Unknown marked it as to-read
Feb 24, 2015
Alexa
Alexa marked it as to-read
Feb 19, 2015
Manuel McCree
Manuel McCree is currently reading it
Feb 13, 2015
Aeryk Pierson
Aeryk Pierson marked it as to-read
Feb 23, 2015
Maggie
Maggie added it
Mar 06, 2015
Tùng Lâm
Tùng Lâm marked it as to-read
Dec 15, 2014
Roninvd
Roninvd is currently reading it
Dec 03, 2014
Bm Prasad
Bm Prasad marked it as to-read
Sep 11, 2014
Randy
Randy marked it as to-read
Aug 12, 2014
J K
J K marked it as to-read
Jul 20, 2014
Josip Cmrečnjak
Josip Cmrečnjak is currently reading it
Jul 16, 2014
Giorgi
Giorgi marked it as to-read
Jul 02, 2014
Yanzhi Meng
Yanzhi Meng marked it as to-read
Jun 24, 2014
Iain
Iain marked it as to-read
May 14, 2014
Ali Muhammad
Ali Muhammad marked it as to-read
Mar 26, 2014
Nick
Nick marked it as to-read
Mar 20, 2014
« previous 1 3 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
The Philosophy of David Hume Immanuel Kant's Critique Of Pure Reason Studies in the Cartesian Philosophy New Studies in the Philosophy of Descartes: Descartes as Pioneer The Letters of Baron Friedrich Von Hugel and Professor Norman Kemp Smith

Share This Book