Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Zabluda o Bogu” as Want to Read:
Zabluda o Bogu
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Zabluda o Bogu

by
3.89  ·  Rating Details ·  165,747 Ratings  ·  6,522 Reviews
The God Delusion caused a sensation when it was published in 2006. Within weeks it became the most hotly debated topic, with Dawkins himself branded as either saint or sinner for presenting his hard-hitting, impassioned rebuttal of religion of all types. His argument could hardly be more topical. While Europe is becoming increasingly secularized, the rise of religious fund ...more
Paperback, 400 pages
Published 2007 by Heliks (first published 2006)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Zabluda o Bogu, please sign up.

Popular Answered Questions

J.D. Throughout the book, Dawkins speaks about religion and irreligion, so it seems more likely -- given that context -- that he was comparing how Atheists…moreThroughout the book, Dawkins speaks about religion and irreligion, so it seems more likely -- given that context -- that he was comparing how Atheists are tolerated to how religious groups are tolerated, as opposed to anything concerning criminal behavior.

I don't believe that it's dumb to wish to be true to yourself. I don't think anybody would expect a Christian to say a Muslim prayer or a Hindu to say a Jewish prayer, so why should an Atheist say a prayer that's not part of their belief system? It's really a matter of respect. Dawkins makes this point more than once in the text -- that while other religions are often given respect, the absence of religion is not given nearly as much respect by comparison.

I think everybody is an individual. There are some people who take what they think is valuable from the Bible, the Quran, the Torah, etc., and then let go of the rest. There are others who were taught things as children, upheld the beliefs as adults, but never really questioned or examined those beliefs. There are others who did examine the beliefs and came to find that religion didn't suit them. There are still others who have converted from one religion to another. -- So, it's hard to say that religious people are just one thing or another.

I think the greatest concern that I have personally is when people use God as a justification for various behaviors, and then put God beyond reproach. This keeps the decision process from ever being evaluated on a rational level, and as a result, many atrocities have occurred. There is a great quote from a Hindu Swami named Aksharananda, which I always come back to when thinking of this issue:

Rationality is all I am advocating. Religious people often decide which things are right and wrong based on what they believe and imagine to be true, which in turn is based on what is stated in their religious texts. How does one know whether a religious scripture is right? The answer is that it is the inviolable, unalterable word of God. And, how does one know that it is the word of God? The only answer is because God says so. Quite an eternal conundrum!

Rationality, therefore, must be the only sound base for our relationship and for understanding one another. No religious scripture, no matter how sacred we hold it to be, which elevates itself beyond the scrutiny of reason, can be accepted as a standard by which to judge human conduct. It can never be a safe ground on which to decide important issues that may have implications in matters of life and death.


This quote was on the topic of the religious approach to homosexuality in Guyana, a country in South America: http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/2010...(less)
Dave McAlester The God Delusion is essential reading for atheists. The author debunks all of the reasons people believe in gods. Dawkins shows that a person does not…moreThe God Delusion is essential reading for atheists. The author debunks all of the reasons people believe in gods. Dawkins shows that a person does not need religion to be moral. In fact, atheists are more likely to be moral than most religious people. If you are looking for reading material to learn about atheism, The God Delusion is a good place to start.(less)
This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Anica
Dec 20, 2007 Anica rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone, but particularly Christians and Muslims
Shelves: changedmylife
Well, this settles it once and for all. There is no God. Which turns out to be a good thing, considering the God most Americans believe in is a crazy, vengeful, ego-maniacal monster. Dawkins’ insights are so cunning and profound you can’t help feeling embarrassed for the believer.

Some of the main arguments:
Believer #1: The diversity of life is too complex to be random, so it must have been designed by someone even more complex.
Dawkins: If the designer is so complex, then it must’ve been created
...more
Aeisele
Nov 03, 2007 Aeisele rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Rabid squirrels
This is perhaps the worst polemic against religion I have ever read. Really, if Dawkins actually knew anything about religion, he wouldn't have written the book. Instead, he knows nothing about the subject, and so if you know nothing about something, you don't even KNOW when you say stupid things.
For instance, Dawkins brings up John Hartung's article about "love thy neighbor"(Hartung is not, in case you were wondering, a biblical scholar. He's a Professor of Anesthesiology). The argument is tha
...more
Xysea
Dec 28, 2007 Xysea rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people interested propping up their own arguments in support of atheism
I am not an atheist, but neither am I a 'true believer'. I border more on 'agnostic', that is to say I believe there is some force beyond this Earth and that I don't know what it is, but I don't subscribe to any particular set of beliefs, per se.

Until I come across books like this one. Then, I get an irrational urge to defend spiritual beliefs (but not religion, and that's another discussion).

What I mean is, I am generally docile and private about my spirituality and my beliefs until someone goe
...more
Riku Sayuj
Aug 18, 2014 Riku Sayuj rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Vikram Johari, Manjunath Muddaraju, Rohini Nair
Recommended to Riku by: Tarun Tripathi
The God Delusion - Why there almost certainly is no God?

I have been a big fan of Dawkins from the time I read The Selfish Gene. This book does nothing to damage that, even though it is not as logically cohesive as The Selfish Gene. The God Delusion is easier to argue with and maybe even win, if only in my mind. Dawkins argues mostly against the Christian God that created earth and knows nothing of the vast universe beyond. He remains silent about the God hypothesis that can arise from new physic
...more
J.G. Keely
The senior Bush once said, during his presidency, that atheists should not be considered citizens of the United States. He expressed that he thought it was not only allowable but desirable to exclude people from the rights and protections of their country, not because they posed a danger or had committed any crime, but because of how they saw the world.

Athiests have been ranked as one of the least trusted groups, and the oft-repeated notion that atheism is the same as amorality is always saddeni
...more
Manny
I must admit that I was somewhat taken aback when Donald Trump suggested the US should deny entry to Muslims and require them all to carry ID cards. But having had time to get over the initial shock and consider it on its merits, the idea has definitely started to look more attractive. The only problem is that Trump doesn't go far enough.

Come on, we need to be realistic here: half-measures won't help. We simply have to face up to the fact that monotheists are extremely dangerous. From the thousa
...more
Huda Yahya
لا يقل الملحد المتعصب سذاجة عن المؤمن المتعصب
كلاهما تكاد تراه محتقن الوجه من فرط الانفعال والتأثر
وهو يقفز لأعلى و أسفل مرددا : أنا صح .. أنا صح

سأتعامل مع دوكينز هنا كمفكر
وأفصله عن العالم الذي يمتعنا بكتبه العلمية المتخصصة

العلماء بعيدا عن العلم يدعون أحيانا للرثاء
فنادرا ما تجد من هو مثقف تثقيفا حقيقيا
وله عذره فعلمه وإسهاماته تكفيه وتكفينا
ولكن بعضهم يأبى إلا أن يخوض في ما لا يعرف
يظن أنه بعلمه- مهما كان غزيرا
يكفي لدراسة البشرية ومنظومتها الفكرية العقائدية

ولذا كثير من العلماء
الذين يحاولون إثبات ع
...more
Alex Telander
THE GOD DELUSION BY RICHARD DAWKINS: Dawkins latest book is as brutal and honest as its title. For those who aren’t looking to have their faith and beliefs gravely challenged, you may want to skip this book. Though Dawkins is looking for everyone to read this book with an open mind, whether you’re devoutly religious, agnostic or atheist. Having an open mind is actually one of the New Ten Commandments Dawkins cites.

The book begins in a calm and orderly manner, with an opening chapter on the “god
...more
Nick
Mar 24, 2007 Nick rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: People with a critical mind
Ok, we get it. Religion is bad. Christianity is evil, Islam is maniacal, and all other religious zealots are out of their mind. I guess Dawkins is right...public hospitals, orphanages (both Christian inventions in the West), as well as communal values all have destroyed Occidental culture. I wish we still practiced 'exposing' infants (i.e. literally throwing out unwanted babies, as made popular by the ancients). Although there seems to be correlation between violence, homocide, and arrogance wit ...more
Manny
I thought the very best point this book made came right at the beginning. Dawkins reports on surveys carried out in the US, where subjects received a description of an otherwise sympathetic political candidate, and were asked whether they would still vote for them if one extra feature were added. Would it still be OK if they were a woman? 90% or so say yes. Black? Yes. (Well, we have hard evidence on that now!) Gay? Most people still say yes. Atheist? Half the population says no! Considering tha ...more
Richard
May 14, 2007 Richard rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Everyone, but especially anyone religious.
I'm going to get the criticism out of the way before I move on to why I *love* this book.

Richard Dawkins is not an easy read. He never pulls a punch, and if any of the beliefs he is attacking in his book are yours then this is going to get your back up. Not for nothing was he passed over as a witness in the intelligent design trials in America. His appearance on the witness stand would probably have worked for the ID advocates as he pointed at every 'believer' in the room and berated them for th
...more
James
This book was a dramatic disappointment that did not live up to the "finally someone has proven religion is poppycock" hype it received. Dawkins fails utterly to tear down any meaningful experience of religion, instead he merely reinforces the petty grudges that some atheists have against religion, grudges that betray one's own lack of spiritual maturity and suggest a deeper ailment at work.

It's a shame. I saved up my energy to read the radical atheism espoused in Richard Dawkins' The GOD Delus
...more
Jasper
Jan 14, 2008 Jasper rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Nobody
Shelves: non-fiction
As an agnostic I can wholeheartedly promise you that this book is so tedious it will reduce you to tears. He debunks God as a concept and in the process completely misses the point of God. He then just carries on repeating himself through chapter after chapter after boring chapter. If there really was a god, he wouldn't allow people like this idiot to write mind numbing drivel and then market it with tacky gimmicks like the "Come all ye faithless" Christmas Card I got with mine....I should have ...more
Carlo
Regardless of your religious beliefs, I urge you to read this book.
Trevor
I've had a love / hate relationship with Dawkins over the years. I didn't really like his The Selfish Gene, mostly because I think it tries to explain things on the wrong scale. I quite like his meme metaphor, but think people like Dennett take it too far by forgetting it is a metaphor. The Blind Watchmaker has that long (and dull) bit at the end about computer program insects that is just too painful to read. And then there is the ongoing fight between him and Stephen J Gould. I always loved Go ...more
Salma
Nov 28, 2012 Salma rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
سألني أحدهم عن رأيي في كتاب وهم الإله لدوكنز، و لكن لم يسبق لي أن كنت قرأته... فبحثت في النت و عثرت عليه... قرأت مقدمته و مقاطع متفرقة منه... الكتاب كتاب إلحادي تقليدي، يتحدث عن وهمية فكرة الإله و الأديان بشكل عام و يقدم تصوره عن الأمر بطريقة لا تخلو من عاطفية مفرطة في كثير من المواضع أقرب لتصير تطرفا، _و أذكر وصفا طريفا لمن نصحني به بكون مؤلفه أشبه بجهادي إلحادي_ و يكاد المؤلف يجزم أنك بعد قراءته ستصير ملحدا... أو بعبارة أخرى أدق أنك ستعتنق دينه الإلحادي...0
في الحقيقة الكتاب لم يجذبني لأقرأه كا
...more
Cecily
Feb 23, 2016 Cecily rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book is so well known, it seems almost pointless to review it. If you are a believer, you will not like it, though you're probably aware of that.

Dawkins' explicit aim is that “religious readers who open it will be atheists when they put it down” and that unbelievers shouldn't be ashamed to say so, to which end he presents a detailed and cross-referenced set of arguments, examples, discussions and thought experiments, touching on science, philosophy, psychology etc. Many of his points are f
...more
Paul Bryant
Dec 27, 2011 Paul Bryant marked it as assorted-rants-about-stuff  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: godreads
TWO RANTS FOR THE PRICE OF ONE


Now, here's the thing about this author :

With friends like Richard Dawkins, who needs enemies?

Okay, i said it. Whew, I feel better. He's just so annoying, even when you agree with him. Grr.

Okay, well, so, some time ago I watched Richard's two documentaries "The Enemies of Reason" and "The Root of all Evil" so I should get round to this book at some point, but really, it's so hard to make any kind of sense of this debate.

Right now, I kind of know what the Bible me
...more
Lia
Mar 31, 2008 Lia rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people who need more hate in their lives.
I feel the need to insert a negative review from a believer of evolution and a harsh critic of organized religion. His basic assertion that faith and science are inextricably entangled is sound. However, he leaps off this logical diving board and into a mess of false simplifications about the nature of faith, the logic of science, and the lives of atheists vs. believers. If you want to figure out if evolution is real, read some biology books and take a walk outside. This trash is only for people ...more
Erik Graff
Feb 01, 2011 Erik Graff rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: biblical inerrancists
Recommended to Erik by: A.M.
Shelves: religion
When others throw such words as "god" or "spiritual" or "soul" into their conversation I must ask them what they're talking about unless the context is clear. Unchurched, when I was a kid I thought they all meant something, something obscure to me, but still significant. Feeling ignorant and ashamed of this, I generally would let such remarks pass, but they haunted me.

The study of Latin in high school was a start in unpacking such nebulous words via etymology. I was lousy at Latin, good at effor
...more
Ahmed Hassan
خليني أعترف إني في البداية كنت متخوف من التجربة..القراءة عن الإلحاد..
من ملحد!
عجيبة الكوميديا في بلدنا..اللي عايز يقرأ عن الإشتراكيه يقرا لمصطفي محمود..
واللي عايز يقرأ عن العلمانيه يقرأ لمصطفي محمود..
واللي عايز يقرأ عن تجربة تركيا العلمانية يقرأ لراغب السرجاني..

المهم.

كنت متخوف في البداية لكن لما قرأت الكتاب أستمعت أيما إستمتاع..
الحقيقة قراءة كتب زي "وهم الإله" أو أي كتاب لملحد متزن ونقده عقلاني بيخرجك أما ملحد واما يطور فهمك لمسألة الإيمان أكتر..
وفعلاً أستفدت جداً من الكتاب وطور فهمي للأمور.

ريتشا
...more
Natalie
I'm a part of the atheist choir to which Dawkins is preaching; but I honestly believe that this book might change a religious person's mind, if they bothered to pick it up (I've been hearing a lot about how many religious congregations are condemning Dawkins's work as a tool of Satan). It's full of scientific goodness, and refutations of common defenses of religion and attacks upon atheism. Suddenly, I don't feel so alone.

It's well known how many horrors are perpetrated in the name of religion,
...more
Ian "Marvin" Graye
PRE-CONCEPTIONS:

Singular White Male Dominant

I thought I might write down some of my thoughts in anticipation of reading this book, so that I can see what changes (if any) I go through.

I believed in God, until I was about 13 years old.

He was singular, white, male, Anglo-Saxon and Protestant. Anglican, actually, although back then, it was the Church of England.

I can't remember exactly why I started to doubt the existence of God. However, suddenly, I believed that there was no God with the same lev
...more
Julian
Mar 22, 2015 Julian rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Reading The God Delusion took a while, but not because it’s long or somehow difficult. It is a jaunty text, in fact, and I found myself often stopping to ponder and/or revel in Richard Dawkins’ happy heathen insights. Also, I do much of my reading on the bus, and you never know when some surly Christian’s going to appear in the seat next to you.

Dawkins’ arguments for not believing in God or the “perfection” of the Bible (or the Koran or whatever basic religious text you please) are strong, coge
...more
Kat Kennedy

such wow

Rather like the meme, which Dawkins so helpfully coined the term for, this book has permeated through many parts of our culture. And Dawkins himself has become synonymous with the Atheist movement. How else does a book garner more than 10 books published simply to refute it.

The first half of The God Delusion is a thoughtful, fact based response to religion, one that I thoroughly enjoyed. The second half tended to veer away from science based theory to more personal opinions of Dawkin's and this
...more
Sura  ✿
لم التقيم "سيء" نجمه واحده ؟
لم لا انصح بقراءته ؟

ليس لانه يخالف افكاري .. بتاتا

لكن بسبب :

اولا:التعصب: يبدأ في مقدمه كتابه بالحكم على من لن "يلحد" بعد قراءة الكتاب بانه يملك مناعه ضد النقاش العقلاني , وان من سيلحد فهو صاحب عقل نير
بدايه متعصبه ان ابتدأ بها كتاب ديني ماكنت لاكمله
ان كانت النصوص الدينيه هي سبب التعصب , فماهو سبب تعصب الملحد ؟


ثانيا: .. تخبط كثيرا محاولا اثبات ان الايمان بالله وهم ثم يستشهد باقوال اينشتاين وغيره من العباقره الذين تخبطوا طيلة حياتهم بين الالحاد ووجود الاله وهذا شي
...more
Natali
Jun 28, 2008 Natali rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I am so thankful for this book. When reading Dawkins' deconstruction of religion, I felt as though he was articulating thoughts I had thought in some form or fashion throughout my entire oppressively religious upbringing. I had notions of these things but never was able to present them to myself quite as logically.

The God Delusion addresses just about every religious argument I've ever heard in a convincing and organized manner. Each chapter builds on the same argument fluidly and cogently, alt
...more
Julia
Jan 19, 2008 Julia rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: apologetics
Witty and well-written, Dawkins is obviously well-read and an intelligent force in the atheist movement.

Even so, his book did not sway me towards the atheist worldview, at all. Which surprised me. I expected at least a bit of a philosophical struggle to work through. Instead I found cherry-picked examples of the horrors produced by "religion", plenty of witty insults lacking real substance, a few astonishing and unsupported claims ("[Religion] teaches us that it is a virtue to be satisfied with
...more
ندى الأبحر
" وهم الإله "

عنوان إجتذبني علي إحدي مواقع التواصل الإجتماعي مذ اكثر من 3 اشهر ، وبعد فترة تعثرت برابط تحميل مُترجم للعربية مما أجبرني علي قرائته عنوة
..

يقول أحدهم :
" الجنون صفة لشخص واحد يعاني من وهم ما ، أما عندما يعاني العديدون من هذا الوهم .. يُسمي ديناً "
و ها هنا تكمن الفكرة العامة للكتاب
الحديث عن الإلحاد كمذهب بدأ في الانتشار مؤخراً ، ولولا إعتناق العديدين له لما أثار ضجة فكرية زعزعت الاستقرار الديني في الغرب قبل الشرق

دفعني لقرائته كتاب " لصوص الله " لعبد الرزاق الجبران الذي مهد فكرة اللاأدر
...more
Nandakishore Varma
Original review posted on 28/09/2011

Even though I am not a believer, and agree with most of Dawkin's points, I found the book only "so-so". Why? Well, it's a case of "the lady doth protest too much".

Dawkins is so angry with religion and God that he overstates his case to the point of nausea. He dismisses all concepts of God as nonsense: and Buddhism, a religion without a God, he says "cannot be called a religion but an ethical system of philosophy". He reduces all religions to reflections of t
...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
agnostic: the way to go. 811 658 11 hours, 31 min ago  
The God Paradox 29 473 Oct 31, 2016 12:47AM  
Non Fiction Book ...: October - The God Dilusion 17 19 Oct 23, 2016 08:27AM  
Goodreads Authors...: The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins 10 35 Feb 24, 2016 02:31PM  
How can Science explain the existence of God? 112 284 Jan 10, 2015 11:59AM  
All About Books: The God Delusion Readalong (Charbel, Jenny) 99 71 Feb 12, 2014 04:54AM  
Who has money on Pascal's Wager? 107 492 Aug 20, 2013 11:19AM  
  • Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon
  • The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason
  • God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything
  • Atheism: The Case Against God
  • God: The Failed Hypothesis: How Science Shows That God Does Not Exist
  • Letting Go of God
  • Freethinkers: A History of American Secularism
  • The Varieties of Scientific Experience: A Personal View of the Search for God
  • The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails
  • Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up
  • Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism
  • 50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God
  • Good Without God: What a Billion Nonreligious People Do Believe
  • The God Virus: How Religion Infects Our Lives and Culture
  • Sense and Goodness Without God: A Defense of Metaphysical Naturalism
  • Why Are You Atheists So Angry? 99 Things That Piss Off the Godless
  • Society Without God: What the Least Religious Nations Can Tell Us about Contentment
  • Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists

Share This Book



“We are all atheists about most of the gods that humanity has ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further.” 3698 likes
“The God of the Old Testament is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.” 1553 likes
More quotes…