Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Decision In Normandy” as Want to Read:
Decision In Normandy
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

Decision In Normandy

3.92 of 5 stars 3.92  ·  rating details  ·  238 ratings  ·  16 reviews
Field Marshal Montgomery's battle plan for Normandy, following the D-Day landings on 6 June 1944, resulted in one of the most controversial campaigns of the Second World War. This book gives an account of the conception and execution of Montgomery's plan, with its problems and complexities.
Paperback, 558 pages
Published April 29th 2004 by Penguin Books (first published 1983)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Decision In Normandy, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Decision In Normandy

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 479)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Graham
Good story solidly told: This book definitely looks at Normandy at the strategic level. From the initial planning through to operation Cobra. And he definitely points out Monty's faults, both what he did/did not do as well as Monty's attempts to rewrite history which makes it much better.

Because it concentrates mostly on the strategic level, it can't be as compelling as one that gets down on the ground. We know what pappened strategicly.

He also concentrates almost wholy on the British sphere o
...more
Buck Ward
Decision in Normandy is an in-depth look at the planning of the D-Day invasion and the battle for Normandy. It concerns itself with the battle planning and execution much more than the battles themselves, and focuses primarily on the role of British General Montgomery, who devised the plan for the ground war. It is a tale of blunders, ego, and infighting.

I heard the audiobook version of Decision in Normandy. It suffered from not having appropriate visuals, maps especially, which presumably are
...more
Ben Vos
In-depth strategic record keeping. Not huge amounts on the process of decision making or tactics at division level even. Few maps:a real let down. However, the immense plethora of first hand sources who have contributed and been mined for information on the changes in Monty's plans for breakout, make this a perennial classic. Out can't be done again.
Bob Haferl
Mr. D'Este is a very good writer. This topic has been covered by a myriad of other authors, none the less this is worth your time
Andy Bennett
Excellent book that gives a big picture perspective of the Normandy campaign, particularly the relationships between Montgomery and all the other allied commanders. It particularly reviews how the battle developed, as compared to the plan Montgomery had in place, and Montgomery's unfortunate habit of trying to indicate he planned it that way all along rather than acknowledge he did an excellent job adapting to the situation as it developed, particularly given the constraints the British Army in ...more
Jan
So why was this book written? To demonstrate that the original plan for the Battle of Normandy did hold up in all details? That Montgomery was vain? That the Allied generals spent nearly as much time fighting each other as the Germans? That the battle was an enormous blood bath?

-- maybe all of the above. Nonetheless it seems that the author could have benefitted from more clearly stating the objectives from the outset and then used his solid grasp of the sources available to make his point.
Kyle
This is a good account of the planning for Normandy and much of the action afterwards, particularly in the British secotrs. d'Este does spend quite a lot of time hammering Montgomery for not taking Caen and changing his goals after the fact to excuse himself. This thesis (the raison d'etre of the book) can be a bit distracting at times. Still worth a read, though, by all means.
Charlie Newfell
Detailed and objective view of the aftermath of D-Day. The battle for Normandy was significantly tougher and bloodier than the Longest Day. Detailed troop movements and numerous battles that would have been easier to follow with some good maps or detailed drawings. Most interesting was the lost opportunities and inter-command battles of egos.
Trent
The low rating has mostly to do with my lesser interest in the military history genre. If you're into military history, you'll probably like this a lot more. And if you're interested in this book, please look for it at your local independent bookseller.
Scott
Thouroughly researched book focused on the interpersonal disagreements between the leadership elements of the Supreme Alled Command during the Normandy invasion of WWII. An excellent description of the complexities of war in this battle.
Lee
Originally read in 1991 or 1992, liked it very much then.

Re-reading it in March 2014, in preparation for a wargame. I had forgotten that it was tightly focused on Montgomery and the British First Army.
David
Great book on the Battle of Normandy. Great details and covered all the main facts. Was very neutral on subjects such as the Falaise pocket. Gave all point of views and let the reader decide.
Linda Jacobs
Very well researched and even-handed work on the Allied Plan and Action (and how they differed, despite Montgomery's assertions) during the battle of Normandy, from the pre landing to the aftermath.
Bob Alexander
Pretty good. Don't know I would have bought it if I'd known that its predominately about the Brits' involvement on D-Day and beyond.
Peter
A dry, somewhat academic but generally balanced analysis of political and military personalities and the decisions they made in Normandy.
Leah
Leah marked it as to-read
Dec 27, 2014
Lacy
Lacy marked it as to-read
Dec 26, 2014
Mark Wilson
Mark Wilson marked it as to-read
Dec 26, 2014
BobHawks
BobHawks marked it as to-read
Dec 23, 2014
Chiek Er
Chiek Er marked it as to-read
Dec 19, 2014
Patrick
Patrick marked it as to-read
Dec 18, 2014
Sarah
Sarah marked it as to-read
Dec 16, 2014
Joseph Ferrara
Joseph Ferrara marked it as to-read
Dec 15, 2014
Ashley
Ashley marked it as to-read
Dec 07, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 16 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • To Lose a Battle: France 1940
  • A Time for Trumpets: The Untold Story of the Battle of the Bulge
  • Panzer Battles: A Study of the Employment of Armor in the Second World War
  • Eagle Against the Sun: The American War With Japan
  • Six Armies in Normandy: From D-Day to the Liberation of Paris; June 6 - Aug. 5, 1944
  • Why the Allies Won
  • A War to be Won: Fighting the Second World War
  • Dam Busters: The True Story of the Legendary Raid on the Ruhr
  • Blitzkrieg: From the Rise of Hitler to the Fall of Dunkirk
  • The Battle of Kursk
  • Das Reich: The March of the 2nd SS Panzer Division Through France, June 1944
  • Masters of the Air: America's Bomber Boys Who Fought the Air War Against Nazi Germany
  • Guadalcanal: The Definitive Account of the Landmark Battle
  • The Two-Ocean War
  • The Ultimate Battle: Okinawa, 1945: The Last Epic Struggle of World War II
  • The Last 100 Days
  • Patton: Ordeal and Triumph
  • A Soldier's Story
23906
Carlo D'Este retired from the U.S. Army as a lieutenant colonel in 1978, having served overseas in Germany, Vietnam, and England. Born in Oakland, California, he received his B.A. from Norwich University and his M.A. from the University of Richmond and an honorary doctorate of Humane Letters from Norwich in 1992.
More about Carlo D'Este...
Patton: A Genius for War Eisenhower: A Soldier's Life Warlord Bitter Victory: The Battle For Sicily, July August 1943 Fatal Decision: Anzio and the Battle for Rome

Share This Book