My rating:

add to my books

Man and his Symbols

by C.G. Jung, Joseph L. Henderson, Aniela Jaffé, Jolande Jacobi, John Freeman (Introduction), Marie-Louise von Franz

4.11 · rating details · 3,129 ratings · 155 reviews

Illustrated throughout with revealing images, this is the first and only work in which the world-famous Swiss psychologist explains to the layperson his enormously influential theory of symbolism as revealed in dreams.

Mass Market Paperback, 432 pages

Published August 15th 1968 by Laurel (first published 1964)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson

A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking

Science books you loved

70th out of 382 books — 586 voters

Greatest Psychology Books

14th out of 179 books — 138 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 6,326)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Oct 28, 2008

Lyla rated it

I am still reading this one. I'm a slow reader when it comes to non-fiction but this book is absolutely RIVETING. I had no idea that psychology could feel so... supernatural.

** ** ***

My copy is a very old, tiny and densely printed copy I got for free from a psychology library in San Francisco that was moving to a new location and clearing out the stacks. I taped together the spine where it was started to fall apart. I'm still only about 100 pages ...more

like 1 like

· see review

Oct 06, 2011

Bob Nichols rated it

This is a collection of essays on Jungian thought. The initial essay was written by Jung, who also approved the other essays (as true to his thinking) shortly before his death in 1961.

The Jungian approach integrates the unconscious and the conscious so that individuals can be whole, which generally involves tapping into our psychic center that is distinct from our conscious ego. Civilization's focus on the ego and denial or ignorance of the unconscious results in all sorts of psycho...moreThis is a collection of essays on Jungian thought. The initial essay was written by Jung, who also approved the other essays (as true to his thinking) shortly before his death in 1961.

The Jungian approach integrates the unconscious and the conscious so that individuals can be whole, which generally involves tapping into our psychic center that is distinct from our conscious ego. Civilization's focus on the ego and denial or ignorance of the unconscious results in all sorts of psychological health and social problems. Regarding the latter, Jung makes a connection, but it is more assertive than clear. The best part of Jung is the emphasis on the instinctual energy within that needs to be recognized and accommodated in some way, and the recognition of our individuality that suggests there is a biological basis for character and temperament that influences how we experience the world. Jung or one of the contributors references the psychic center as the unseen force within that pushes us in certain directions regardless of what our ego says or wants us to do. This is a striking point.

With Jung and his colleagues, dreams and symbols unlock the unconscious, but there seems to be an over interpretation of what's involved in these various expressions. Dreams can express simple, individualized fears without tapping into universal or cosmic level archetypes. Stone grave markers, per se, can be used not as symbols of universal yearnings for eternity but because they best endure over time to mark the memory of a lost one. The last chapter was particularly problematic. In one place, the writer suggests that most modern day concepts of physics "were originally intuitive, semi-mythological, archetypal ideas of the old Greek philosophers." Off hand, this seems to take too much credit for Jungian thought. Later, the writer says the relationship between the conscious and unconscious is also a form of "compelmentarity" seen in modern physics, and that the unconscious is similar to the "field" concept. To say that there are similarities does not mean that consciousness is a particle and that the unconscious is a wave, and that the unconscious is, itself, a field as understood by physics. It's fair to speculate about the connection between human psychology and physics since we are at least matter and energy, but the type of speculation seen in this last chapter strikes me as overly ambitious on behalf of Jungian thought. (less)

· see review

Sep 26, 2011

Kevin Fuller rated it

A symbol, Jung explains, is a word, picture, photograph, statue, etc. that always signifies something much larger than what we immediately know, and therefore points to the unconscious.

In this book, Jung first introduces us (the lay public) to the unconscious and it's machinations that can be found in personal ticks, social characteristics, dreams and fantasies. The unconscious can manifest personally in the complex, those group of personal characteristics we acquire through private ex...more

· see review

Apr 02, 2011

Rommel rated it

This was the first time I read a book on Carl Jung. In fact, I didn't read it, I listened to it on you tube. Not sure if the entire book is recorded but I think i got the core in the 15 10 minute videos that are posted on you tube. I'm a slow reader so it was great to find this online.

My overall feeling about this book is that it is a good introduction to Jung's theories on dreams, the conscious and unconciousness, and man's symbols. I do agree with a lot of Jung's theories as I ...moreThis was the first time I read a book on Carl Jung. In fact, I didn't read it, I listened to it on you tube. Not sure if the entire book is recorded but I think i got the core in the 15 10 minute videos that are posted on you tube. I'm a slow reader so it was great to find this online.

My overall feeling about this book is that it is a good introduction to Jung's theories on dreams, the conscious and unconciousness, and man's symbols. I do agree with a lot of Jung's theories as I have been studying my own dreams for the last 2 years and his theories seem to reinforce a lot of the structure behind my dreams.

I found several things interesting and understand them to be truth as far as my dreams are concerned,,,for example, Jung believed that the unconscious is organic and instinctive. Organic in the same way a plant produces it's flower, there are no prejudices, no playing field, it just produces. However,and I quote, "if the unconcious contains many things that ought to be concious than it's function becomes twisted and prejudice, motives appear that are not based upon true instincts but that owe their existence and psyche importance to the fact that they have been consigned to the unconcious by repression or neglect."

There are also several points that seem contradicting and confusing. He says that dreams can not produce a definite thought, if they begin to do so, they cease to be a dream because they cross the threshold of consciousness. This seems to be saying that dreams are not reliable to interpret things about our outer world, yet he interprets certain dreams with such accuracy and assures that many of his clients were diagnosed and cured due to their interpretation of the dream. Maybe I missed the point. He goes on to say that, "meaningfulness and purposefulness are not the perogative of the mind, they operate in the whole of living nature." Again, this statement seems to contradict the notion that dreams have a place in the interpretation of our events in life.

Overall, I liked the listening experience of this book and would recommend it to anyone looking to get an introduction into some of Jung's theories.

(less)

· see review

May 25, 2010

Trevor rated it

Shelves: psychology

I have a strange love / hate relationship with Jung. There are so many things about him that I find utterly fascinating and then others that I think are just crazy. I would rather think one thing or the other, but since he was obsessed with dualities, perhaps he would be happy with my conflicting and opposite feelings towards him.

There are things about his ideas that I find incredibly appealing. A personal story might help make that clear. I started reading this book a while ago n...moreI have a strange love / hate relationship with Jung. There are so many things about him that I find utterly fascinating and then others that I think are just crazy. I would rather think one thing or the other, but since he was obsessed with dualities, perhaps he would be happy with my conflicting and opposite feelings towards him.

There are things about his ideas that I find incredibly appealing. A personal story might help make that clear. I started reading this book a while ago now – before I started Uni this year – and one of the things that made me continue with it was the idea of what I would call ‘metaphorical illnesses’. I’ve forgotten what Jung called them, but since my name is better than his could possibly be (no matter what it was) we will go with that. The idea is that sometimes in life you have an ‘illness’ which has symptoms which mirror the psychological conditions you are suffering from. You may not be able to walk, for example, but this has little to do with your legs, but much to do with how you feel trapped in a particular relationship in which you feel you can’t escape from, even though on a deep level you know escaping would be the right thing to do. So, it is as if your mind has said, ‘if you can’t walk away from this then don’t walk at all’.

Now, I’m the first to tell you that I would find such metaphorical illnesses a bit over the top and hard to believe being possible in any but the most troubled and deeply psychotic – I mean, can you really ‘make yourself’ blind because your ‘unconscious mind’ is ‘trying to tell you something’? Does this really sound likely? Well, possibly not. But then again, last year I left an intolerable job, but while I was there I found I had developed terrible headaches, or at least, not headaches as such, but more a scorching pain across the top of my head. This, I found out, was caused by the clenching of my teeth in my sleep. This year has been incredibly busy and often quite stressful, in many ways as stressful as anything I put up with last year. I’ve had more reading than I can keep up with and more work to do than can be done – both of which I guess are good predictors of stress – and yet the thing that has surprised me is that I haven’t been grinding my teeth at all this year (trust me, I would know if I had been).

This had been one of those little facts about life that had fallen into the ‘isn’t that odd’ category until I read this book and learned of Jung’s metaphorical illnesses. The whole time I was working at the union – at least for the last four or so years – I felt unable to say anything about the direction in which the union was heading. I think Jung would have had no trouble in diagnosing my night time teeth grinding. As someone ‘unable’ to talk during the day, the fact I kept my jaw clenched tight shut at night was clearly a sign from my sub-consciousness of my own self-imposed voicelessness.

Of course, the things that are nice about that story are also the things that make we feel uncomfortable about Jung in general. It is all too neat. There are lots of stories in this book and these stories are joined with lots of explanations of what certain symbols mean – but one of the things that I’ve learnt in life is that people love to hear good explanations of what something vague and obscure MEANS. If someone tells you their dream and in it there is a naked black man walking about the streets of Paris (as there is, for example, in one of the dreams described in the book) it might well be that the people in the country of the man having this dream do associate Paris with a certain kind of sexual liberation and relaxed mores and perhaps associate nudity with the ‘naked truth’ and even intend the black man in the dream to represent the inverse of the white man who is dreaming the dream – or it could all just be an example of homo-erotica – or it could be an example of lawlessness – or it could be that dreams in themselves aren’t actually all that meaningful.

How could we ever really know?

I think we find it quite appealing to believe that people are more or less like books, in that they have plots and themes and characters and that we can somehow become the perfect book reviewer with people’s dreams and lives and thereby judge and explain people in much the same way we might judge and explain The Da Vinci Code. The problem is that really no one is summed up by the face they present to the world – no, not even the dumb people – and no one is so shallow as to have dreams that have only one meaning and that the meaning a therapist helps you find. Repeatedly during this book we are told that symbols mean different things depending on the meaning they acquire within the context of the dream and the life in which they appear. And this is to the good, but also time and again we see the therapist tell the patient how to interpret a particular symbol (like the number four) in a single way from the therapist's ‘deep’ knowledge and understnding of how symbols ‘mean’. For Jung the number four is the number of completeness – I believe in Chinese it is the number for death, although this is not the kind of completeness Jung is talking of, I feel. I worry when people are reduced to texts that can be studied and interpreted and understood on the basis of a subtext that is not apparent to the character, but is clear and unambiguous to the reader.

I guess it is inevitable that Jungian psychology might come about given the rise of literary criticism over the last couple of hundred years – for isn’t that as good a definition of Jungian psychology as any other? The search for the sub-textual meaning in the lives of people when read as texts. My problem is that it is very difficult to know if the ‘reading’ by the psychologist is a valid or accurate reading, if this reading does in fact really illuminate something essential in the life of the person being read and finally just how efficacious such a reading is in ‘treating’ someone’s neurosis. All of these are problems that are not helped by the fact that it is highly questionable if there is any such thing as a ‘sub-conscious’ in the first place.

To me, the idea of there being a hidden driver of our actions, one who can’t speak to us directly but who knows the truth of our situations and leaves before us Sybil like clues and riddles as answers to our deepest troubles seems remarkably unlikely. That this veiled women who lurks in the depths of our psyches can only speak to us in dreams and is invariably right about how we should live out lives seems a hypothesis that would be impossible to prove. Even if our sub-conscious did exist, how could we ever be certain that it only ever meant to offer us clues to help us live our lives? Why couldn't our sub-conscious be occasionally as destructive as our consciousness clearly often is. Like that wonderful story of Apollo who after being repeatedly asked by someone if they should invade a city finally says yes because it will mean they will be killed and hence finally shut up and not ask him stupid questions any more.

The problem that needs answered first is whether or not the images thrown up in dreams are any more meaningful than those elicited from ink blots. And if not, how can we know if our interpretation of these symbols is any more than ‘an’ interpretation. Unfortunately, as much as I enjoyed some of the interpretations described in this book, I was left feeling very uncomfortable by the idea that people were being reduced to characters in books. And while I understand (possibly all too well) the power our narratives have in framing our lives, I also understand that like all truly great books there simply are more than one reading that is both satisfying and meaningful to any cluster of symbols. I would recommend hesitating when coming to conclusions based on the images thrown up at us from the sub-conscious – much more hesitation than we might expend in coming to conclusions on the sub-textual elements in a novel.
(less)

like 8 likes

· see review

Oct 26, 2011

Naxa rated it

Shelves: psychology

Not as bad as I thought it would be, but considering I thought it would totally fail that isn't saying much. I didn't really like what I had heard of Jung's psychology before this and this introductory book written by him and others didn't really change my mind in that regard.

Everyone can point out that psychoanalytic approaches aren't grounded in science or in some other form of legitimization. So in that sense while I criticize Jung for this as I would those of Freud and Adler, I ...moreNot as bad as I thought it would be, but considering I thought it would totally fail that isn't saying much. I didn't really like what I had heard of Jung's psychology before this and this introductory book written by him and others didn't really change my mind in that regard.

Everyone can point out that psychoanalytic approaches aren't grounded in science or in some other form of legitimization. So in that sense while I criticize Jung for this as I would those of Freud and Adler, I also recognize that not everything can have an absolute basis. In fact absolutely no information in our lives is grounded on anything stable. I'd be willing to lower my skeptical threshold if they could merely answer one aspect of their approaches with detail. In regards to Freud and Jung I would like to know why dreams must necessarily "mean" something. The reasons Jung gives in the book simply aren't good enough. He says dreams are important, because they display the unconscious, but the unconscious at least to the extent Jung and others wish to tout it as a necessity hasn't been proven either. His other reason and the reason given in the other essays in this book, amount to some myths seem to correlate with dreams people have today. Yet common images in our daily life and in our dreams could have a more easily put forward naturalistic answer.

We don't have exactly the same culture as some of the myths they use to elaborate on dreams in this book, but we do come from an extended temporal and spatial context containing the same information. Given the theory of evolution as it has been shown with linguistics, all of humanity must of shared a common cultural context at one point. This has been shown and is being shown with linguistics. The more we spread our scope of inquiry the more it seems that are languages back in some point in time had a common source. I believe the same can be said for all things relying on these vocal traditions including myths. The myths we have today from disparate cultures may be the result of accumulations and differentiations of previous myths that changed as the human species migrated outward from its original position or positions. This would also explain the vast similarities culminating into the mono-myths of the well known Jungian Joseph Campbell.

This seems like a much simpler answer than positing a need for subconscious to give us a vague symbol mechanism that transfers messages. However I would be open to hearing answers as to why dreams "must" be giving us subconscious messages that we need to decipher to have psychologically healthy lives.

I'm convinced to some extent after reading this, that psychoanalytic theory is in love with misogyny. Every major psychoanalytic thinker I have read books of, including Freud, Jung, Sartre and to a lesser extent Adler all propose sexist ideas as being key points of their particular school of psychology. The eternal feminine as Jung uses it, sometimes is used as a way of showing men the value of things traditionally seen as non-masculine. However, this is part of the main problem with it as well, past a certain point in history it just becomes crude essentialism and more then that they use it in explicitly sexist and deplorable ways in this very work. Jung blames a women for being sexually assaulted in a park after he said "she was doing dangerous things" or at least that is what her dreams indicated to Jung. We aren't told anything general about her life or why she necessarily in Jung's view "put herself" in harms way. The next essay written by a student of Jung's claims that a female patient came to him that wanted to have an equal standing with men, this man suggested she "tap into her eternal feminine" which culminated into her being more submissive in his own words. The problem with myths and religion in general is they typecast and stereotype people, sexism is the tip of the iceberg of the problems that occur if we insist on seeing people through the lens of traditional myths and roles.

Jung differs greatly with Freud and Adler in that he doesn't really have a methodology. He mainly "examines" patients through associative techniques such as Rorschach tests, incomplete pictures and staged conversations. Other then this his method relies heavily on comparing dreams to existent mythological symbols. In some ways this is better then the other psychoanalytic approaches because it is more individualized, less about method and pet ideas and more about the individual person. In other regards it seems overly vague and general in it's own right and as I showed with sexism, it has it's own ways of generalizing and typecasting people.

I do agree with Jung that quantitative psychology has not focused on emotions enough. Hopefully with the advent of evolutionary psychology study of emotions will become more important. Since emotions are key drives in an organisms ability to survive and reproduce. Joseph Ledoux has taken up this charge to an extent in showing the mechanisms for fear and stronger emotional states in great detail in several of his works. The problem and greatness of western society has been its over obsession of seeing "man" as essentially rational and even in scientific regards we do not wish to examine those things that have historically been seen as the lower and more folly laden aspects of our existence, such as emotions.

I didn't really enjoy it, cant recommend it.
(less)

· see review

Jul 22, 2010

Owen Spencer rated it

My university professors never introduced me to Carl Jung. I understand why, I guess, but it's a shame that I didn't read Jung's work until now. Jungian psychology is amazing. It addresses the unconscious and the "self"/"psyche" in a unique and enlightening way. And, unlike most other psychologists, Jung did not shy away from unexplained phenomena and the so-called "paranormal". His theory provides insights into "unexplained" phenomena and is the only...more

like 1 like

· see review

Nov 30, 2009

Margaret rated it

This was the first mainly psychological book I had read and I had no ideas or hopes going into reading it. That being said, I felt as if -once I had finished the book- I truly understood the symbolism the authors tried to convey. I did not, however, completely agree with everything, such as the theory about male psyches, but other things I found extremely interesting; for example, the bit about schizophrenia in artists was really very intriguing. I'm not sure if I will continue to read C.G. Jung...more

· see review

Dec 01, 2011

Amber rated it

Jung's theories of psychology have always fascinated me. The idea of archetypes and the collective unconscious make perfect sense to me, though I imagine that anyone who has been devouring stories longer than she's been devouring solid food will find it natural to have them applied to the human mind. Living stories is part of what makes the urge to write and read and tell stories so powerful.

It doesn't hurt that there was a psychoanalytical section in my literary criticism class and t...more

· see review

Nov 15, 2011

David added it

I have come to see over many years that the conscious mind with its little logical concerns is a mere scratch on the surface, and that what rules us, benignly, is the unconscious with its wonderful symbols, the truths of which we all know and which are closer to us than anything else. Let them in. All the rest is a shadow play. Even my own cherished wishes are nothing but an illusion. I’m a confirmed Neo-Platonist in that respect at least. I’d like to be a Buddhist but could never join a club th...more

· see review

Jan 02, 2011

Robin rated it

Shelves: 2011, therapy

While I grasped the basic hypothesis of Jung I did find a lot of the references to symbols flying past my comprehension. I do agree that there is the possibility of people having conscious and unconscious selves (how often do we get gut instincts about people or situations that only reveal themselves later) I am unsure if they show up in dreams as symbols as he believes. Oddly enough the chapters not written by Jung himself (he only wrote one) do a better job of explaining his point than he does...more

· see review

Jan 15, 2012

Messengerlikeyou rated it

I didn't get it, I really tried, way over my head, but I get Jung in so many other ways. Things like symbolism go right over my analytical head, I only give the mans book 5 stars because he is a Black Swan in mind doctoring (Psychology). The Field of Psyology is ruled by so many Tight Ass pussys, that I give the man 5 stars to piss them off! Hear that Psychologists Doctoring Fools. Hats off to you Jung, You went into the world no Eleites Wimps would Go, You Sir Have Honorand my respect! Fr...more

· see review

Aug 22, 2010

John rated it

I love this book, although the used "Dell" edition I bought is falling apart. I'll have to buy another copy. The book has much to say about dreams and art. I'm adding some quotes from the book to the review I posted a few days ago.

If you think about the following quote while viewing paintings, you might find insights about artists who often, unconsciously, express their conscious attitude to the right of the canvas and their unconscious attitude on the left: “Among other ...more

like 2 likes

· see review

Nov 30, 2008

Aaron rated it

Shelves: social-science, psychology, philosophy-religion, anthology, art

The book was written for the general public and, as Jung's last published work, along meant as a kind of after-the-fact introduction to his work. Unfortunately, it doesn't really work as either. Those looking for an introduction to Jung would do better with Anthony Storr's The Essential Jung, which gives a balanced introduction to his work over the whole course of his life. His writing here is interesting, but not a good introduction to the rest of his ideas; little effort is made to explain thi...more

· see review

Jan 13, 2009

Mitch rated it

Shelves: manning, 2009

I am conflicted about this book. I picked it up because I saw it on a couple different reading lists recommended for screenwriters. If I could have read this book simply as a writer, I may have gotten more out of it, but I am doubtful. Instead, it was hard for me to repress my scientific mind for some of the more outlandish "theories" presented.

With respect to improving my writing, I did get a lot out of this book. It presents society, the history of human culture and the p...moreI am conflicted about this book. I picked it up because I saw it on a couple different reading lists recommended for screenwriters. If I could have read this book simply as a writer, I may have gotten more out of it, but I am doubtful. Instead, it was hard for me to repress my scientific mind for some of the more outlandish "theories" presented.

With respect to improving my writing, I did get a lot out of this book. It presents society, the history of human culture and the psyche in terms of symbols. I think much of what is written for the screen today lacks the cohesive visual storytelling that supports complex thematic or deep character study. In this respect, I think I will be able to craft richer visual tableaus and explore the medium of film with deeper and more cinematic stories. In this respect, I think the book could have been a high three star book.

However, this book also reinforced many of my criticism of social "science". I will go too deeply into this subject for two reasons: first, it has no place here, and second, because this book is pushing 50 years old (Jung wrote and edited the book before he died in the early sixties, but it was not published until a couple of years later.) At the time it may have been very cutting edge and the discipline itself my have been solidified or become passe since. That being said, a conflict is occasionally hinted at between psychoanalysis and the physical sciences. Like most other opponents of the strict discipline of science, the authors tend to paint scientists as having some personal failing that prevents them from fully exploring the untestable declarations of the metaphysical or psychic realm. The conclusion of the book attempts to close this rift by drawing random and sporadic parallels between Jung's speculations and recent breakthroughs of "micro"physics. One example of the presentation of the duality of the self (conscious and unconscious) and the dual nature of light (sometimes acts as a wave, sometimes as a particle). This evidence is a collection of correlations and suggestions of causality or at least an underlying relationship. Any good this conclusion my have done for me was completely undone by the comparison of Jung's theory of synchronicity (psychic connections, devoid of critical thought) with Bohr's complementarity principle or Heisenberg's uncertainty principle (both based on observation and scrutinized by scientific testing.) The shame here is the continuation of this conflict of the unknown and creativity against scientific reasoning. One needs only to look at Sagan's marriage of wonder and scepticism to see that creativity and reason are integral partners in the pursuit of understanding. I think that the parts that offended my inner Sagan were not very useful in future fiction writing, and thus did not damage what the writer within took from this. That being said, scientifically, I give this book a 1 star.

In the end the duality of my personality probably did not hurt my reading of this book. If I had no scientific side, I likely would have just gleaned over the offensive parts because that had little impact on my reading as a writer. In this respect, I am glad I read the book. Perhaps someday in the future I will take a look at modern psychological theory to see if the field has changed.(less)

· see review

Sep 20, 2008

Tessa rated it

Recommends it for: Sabrina - she asked to borrow it

Shelves: philosophy

this was my first book from jung, though it was only partially written by him. the majority of the book was written by students of jung, though they greatly adhere to his concepts. this was meant to be a layman's course in jungian symbolism and the difference between conscious and unconscious thought.

the first sections of the book introduced archetypes or "tendencies" of the symbols in conscious or reality versus unconscious or dream symbolism. the latter half of the book ...more

· see review

Oct 09, 2007

Fretty rated it

Recommends it for: everyone

Shelves: psychologysessay

I read this because I was doing a thesis about the relation between Dreams and Architecture. In my thesis I talked more on the psychology being of an architect and the reason of an architect design such a shape and space. It is needed for me to know the space within the soul of an architect. And this book helped me to see that.

For me, Jung taught me to see another different view of a person from this book. Why man acts the way a man act, and how a man could symbolizes their hidden s...more

· see review

Aug 18, 2007

علی rated it

اگر تعبیر خواب و رویای فروید را خوانده اید، از "انسان و سمبول هایش" لذت مشابهی خواهید برد. با این همه کتاب سوم در این زمینه "زبان از یاد رفته" از اریش فروم است که به اندازه ی هر دوی اینها جالب و خواندنی ست. این هر سه کتاب روند نگاه به رویا را در طی سه دهه نشان می دهند، از فروید که عناصر رویا را در ارثیه ی روحی و روانی و جنسی شخص از روزگار رشدش می داند، تا یونگ که ریشه های رویا را در گذشته ی اساطیری و آیینی انسان می بیند و بالاخره اریش فروم که به مخلوطی از این دو اشاره می کند،...more

like 1 like

· see review

Mar 11, 2011

Ben rated it

Recommended to Ben by: Every blood-sucking Jungian enthusiast on the face of the Earth

Shelves: unremarkable-things-that-fade

Pedantic. Over-explanatory. Circular. What innovative insights were afforded in this book were nullified by sheer literary inexactitude. I couldn't make it past Jung's own portion, and by sampling portions of the others, don't think I'm missing much. Even the majority of the psychological theories were too spontaneous and inexact, which I can accept, as Jung argued, but no matter how many subconscious anecdotes he tries too cram in, they remain venerable to any skeptical reader. I fear psychoana...more

· see review

Jun 07, 2011

Steven Fogel rated it

Shelves: consciousness, self-transformation, philosophy, wisdom

Jung wrote it near the end of his life to describe his work to laypeople. One of Jung's major contributions to our understanding of our consciousness is the importance of dreams. In Man and His Symbols, he writes about what he learned about his own dreams and what he learned about dreams in other cultures. As part of his research, he studied societies that were still untouched by Western civilization, and he discovered that certain dreams and stories are common to all of the societies.

· see review

Jul 09, 2009

Johnjbrantley rated it

Who isn't fascinated by the subconscious? I sort of imagine that even before the modern pop psychology phenomenon, people were doing more or less the same thing.

It's pretty fun stuff. The subconscious seems to have endless capacity to produce dramatic scenarios and freaky associations. And all to good purpose, Jung assures us.

The book's tendency to overgeneralize about essential human desires and motivations kept me from giving it the full five stars.

...more

· see review

Nov 21, 2009

CD rated it

· review of another edition

Shelves: psychology, art, art-painting

The best coffee table book you will ever own. Of course this is not a coffee table book, even in the large original format but it is one that if it is out in view people will continue to pick it up and look through it.

Jung's unpublished additional work in his own calligraphic style has recently become available, but Man and His Symbols will continue to be classic reference.

This may not be a work that everyone will get something from as it is an almost esoteric topic. Yet ...more

· see review

Apr 03, 2011

Courtney rated it

· review of another edition

Very interesting read. Some of his ideas seemed a tad too supernatural for me to take him 100% seriously, but overall pretty good. Favorite quote: "It is plain foolishness to believe in ready-made systematic guides to dream interpretation, as if one could simply buy a reference book and look up a particular symbol. No dream symbol can be separated from the individual who dreams it, and there is no definite or straightforward interpretation of any dream". Bahahaha, love it!!

· see review

Jan 03, 2011

Faith rated it

I sat down and read this book all in one day, which was probably not the greatest idea in the world as it's really, really intense. But, that's what I do to myself sometimes. Through my work I've become increasingly interested in symbology. I checked the big version out from the library, and the illustrations are pretty amazing. Probably not for those not interested in Jung's philosophies, but a real classic.

· see review

Jul 19, 2011

Julianne Davidow rated it

This is an excellent overview of Jungian thought, with contributions by several of Jung’s closest colleagues. It was the last of his writings to be published before his death and was written in response to a request for a book for the general reader. It almost never came into existence, as Jung initially didn’t want to do it. After an interview with Jung for the BBC, a man named Wolfgang Foges, managing director of Aldus Books, along with the man who had done the interview, John Freeman, trie...more

· see review

Nov 08, 2011

Stephen Standridge rated it

Eh, most of the book wasn't Jung. There was quite a bit of examination of symbolic thought/dreams and quite a bit of information concerning how to handle/accurately(lol)interpret said dream; however, one point that was made over and over was that these symbols are relative to the individual. By extension, does that make the interpretation as relative? My conclusion: yes.

· see review

Dec 31, 2009

فروغ rated it

ارتباط زیربایی میان پدیده های گوناگون زندگی رو یونگ
اسطوره ها و روابط آنها در ما جریان دارند ،البته برداشت کلی من اینه که کهن الگوها به خاطر سازگاری با حیات باقی مانده اند و ما خواه نا خواه استمرار آنها هستیم

· see review

Oct 14, 2011

Ellen Harrington-kane rated it

If you have a desire to understand Carl Jung's theories on the personality and the self, this book is an excellent, relatively easy read that will really get you started. Most of the books written by Jung himself are dense and very clinical and difficult for many to read, but this one puts it in language for all of us to understand. I highly recommend it.

· see review

Nov 21, 2008

Kim added it

I learned so much from this book that there's no room to write it all. I changed my view of life, of myself and of other people thanks to this book, and it will be well worth your time to check it out. It deals with psychology in a very human way, taking into account the most important thing about any of us, the soul. A must read.

· see review

Mar 23, 2010

Charlotte Murray rated it

Shelves: psychology

I read this book one night after I graduated from college and have reread it many times over. If I remember correctly, the first chapter was Jung's last published work before his death. It's a great book for those who are not familiar with Jung and serves as a good stepping stone into reading Joseph Campbell and Jung's earlier works.

· see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 210 211 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend it | Stats | Recent status updates

combine
Other Editions (24)

More editions...

Genres

Psychology

241 users

Non Fiction

82 users

Philosophy

42 users

Fantasy > Mythology

24 users

Science

13 users

Reference

11 users

Religion

10 users

Classics

7 users

Art

7 users

Philosophy > Theory

6 users

See top shelves...

Readers Also Enjoyed

About C.G. Jung

Carl Gustav Jung was a Swiss psychologist, influential thinker, and founder of analytical psychology.

Jung's unique approach to psychology was influential in countercultural movements in Europe and the United States in the 1960s. He has emphasized understanding the psyche through exploring the worlds of dreams, art, mythology, world religion and philosophy. Although he was a theoretical...more

More about C.G. Jung...

Books by C.G. Jung

The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious (Collected Works 9i)

Psychology and Alchemy (Collected Works 12)

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Pin It

last activity Jan 21, 2012 04:55am

shelf: read

title link	preview: Man and his Symbols
avg rating	preview: Man and his Symbols Goodreads rating: 4.11 (3129 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/123632.Man_and_his_Symbols?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1327336291m/123632.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/123632.Man_and_his_Symbols?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]Man and his Symbols by C.G. Jung[/url]

Man and his Symbols

Friend Reviews

Lists with This Book

Community Reviews

new topic
Discuss This Book

combine
Other Editions (24)

Genres

Readers Also Enjoyed

About C.G. Jung

Books by C.G. Jung

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website

Trivia About Man and his Symbols

Quotes from Man and his Symbols

Groups That Shelved Man and his Symbols