Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Aristotle: Rhetoric” as Want to Read:
Aristotle: Rhetoric
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Aristotle: Rhetoric

3.86  ·  Rating Details ·  2,946 Ratings  ·  119 Reviews
Aristotle emphasizes upon the three kinds of proof that can be offered in behalf of an argument. This is not light reading, but it is amazing the insight you get into human nature from this book. This is another must in the long line of Aristotle. This book is easy to read in true text, not scanned images that can sometimes be difficult to decipher. This eBook has bookmark ...more
ebook, 202 pages
Published November 3rd 2003 by NuVision Publications (first published -322)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Aristotle, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Aristotle

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Matt
Jul 19, 2010 Matt rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Aristotle defines. Unmercifully. And The Art of Rhetoric is no exception. Aristotle disdained the sophist tradition of ancient Greece as much as Plato, but he also understood that rhetoric was a popular study of the day and it became another discipline he sought to master. With a scientific eye and a mind toward philosophical value, Aristotle studied rhetoric as “the power to observe the persuasiveness of which any particular matter admits” (pg. 74; Ch. 1.2). Rhetoric, when used appropriately, b ...more
Paul
Not Aristotle's clearest or best organized work, but still part of the core curriculum of a liberal education.

Why read Aristotle today? Because he is one of the greatest minds in Western history, and such a person's well-considered thoughts are inherently worth reading, if anything is.

In addition, this book was deliberately aimed at those seeking to play an active role in a democratic society, to help them fulfill their function as citizens of a free society. We in the West imagine ourselves (mo
...more
Paul Haspel
You may never have read anything by Aristotle; but if you've ever taken a college writing course, you've had him as your teacher. The Art of Rhetoric did so much to define how subsequent generations, and civilizations, regarded the task of crafting persuasive language that it can truly be regarded as a founding text. Methodically, Aristotle sets forth his sense of how the writer's handling of character and emotion contributes to success in rhetorical terms. His insights regarding style and compo ...more
Alp Turgut
Aristoteles'in Platon'un "Gorgias"da bahsettiği Retorik kavramını bir üst seviyeye taşıdığı eseri "The Art of Rhetoric / Retorik", insani tutumlara dair mükemmele yakın tanımlamarıyla adeta bir hayat sözlüğü niteliğinde. Kıskançlık, kibir, gurur, hırs, yaşlılık, gençlik gibi bir sürü kavramın açıklamalarını okuma şansı bulduğumuz eserde özellikle ilk iki kitabı okurken ünlü filozofun zekasına ve gözlemlerine hayran kalıyorsunuz. Öte yandan, eğretileme ve konuşma tekniklerinden bahsettiği daha ço ...more
Eric
Feb 03, 2012 Eric rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
The first book of Aristotle’s highly taxonomical Rhetoric opens with a parsing of dialectic and rhetoric. He sets up the latter as an art of persuasion related to but nevertheless distinguishable from the former. After exploring the usefulness of syllogisms and enthymemes for both arts, Aristotle sets out his three basic categories of rhetorical discourse: deliberative, judicial (or forensic), and epideictic. He spends the rest of the first book exploring topics (related to the Greek topos, for ...more
Scott
Feb 26, 2010 Scott rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book is obviously a classic to the field of rhetoric. It also contains what is essentially the first treatise on human psychology, in addition to systematically analyzing the art of persuasion.

I have never read any other editions of this book, but I would recommend this edition to everyone who wants to read it. George Kennedy's translation and his commentary are incredibly helpful, even amusing at times. His sheer knowledge of Aristotle and this work (he must have spent decades on it) is st
...more
Gwen Burrow
Read this when I barely knew what "rhetoric" meant. So I should sift through it again.
Daniel Gonçalves
Apr 22, 2015 Daniel Gonçalves rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Lido para a disciplina de retórica, obviamente. Um marco na história da civilização.
Jesse Broussard
Apr 19, 2008 Jesse Broussard rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: mediocre
I'm sure it's excellent, necessary, brilliantly designed, etc. But so is a sewer system, and you don't want to spend too much time there either.
Carmen
Sep 09, 2008 Carmen rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: education
I need an Idiot's Guide type book to help me with this one because this is just not sinking in. Perhaps I need to reread it. ehh. I'm not really a fan of rhetoric to begin with but this is certainly the book for orators, politicians, and lawyers to be. Proof, proof, proof, make sure you can back up what you say, but when you don't have proof, at least say it with style and panache, that's half the battle. An interesting read during election season.

One of the most interesting moments in this boo
...more
Daniel Gargallo
Mar 27, 2017 Daniel Gargallo rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: classics
A translation is mainly an analogue to another text. This edition presents a direct analogue that, to the layman, doesn’t arouse any suspicions of misrepresentation in the text, and sustaining that particular suspension of disbelief is the measure of any translator's work.

I was totally content with this specific publication, but my interests were to read it once and be done with it. This is an unglamorous edition and I wouldn’t give it to your daughter’s boyfriend for Christmas.

As a speechwrit
...more
James
Feb 09, 2013 James rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
While this is a book about rhetoric the broad definition that is used by Aristotle allows for excursions into philosophy, government, history, ethics, and literature. Thus when discussing the proper organization of a speech Aristotle draws on literary examples from Homer and Herodotus to Sophocles. No one can deny the strength of Antigone's argument when she says, "But when mother and father have gone to Hades there is no brother who can be born again".(p 271)
The work is difficult for Aristotle
...more
Eric McLean
There is a lot of good stuff here (obviously-it's Aristotle, man!) and it almost feels wrong not giving this 5 stars, but alas...I just didn't find all of it very interesting. I struggled to finish this, mostly because there were some great points on rhetoric surrounded by mountains of definitions that don't really seem to define rhetoric as it is today. I'm sure there are some more modern texts that get at the same ideas in a more modern context-but we all owe a lot of that to Aristotle.

Anyway,
...more
Brittany Petruzzi
I cleared my one-star rating for being a purely subjective impression as a college freshman. Never have I read a more unpersuasive and engaging treatment of the art of persuasion. Perhaps I would have found it more so with a better translation? Someday I may pick up a Sachs translation and give it another go.
Rhonda
Apr 21, 2011 Rhonda rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I am glad to be reminded of this wonderful book, although I read it some time ago. It is effectively practical advice in nature which perhaps I did not completely appreciate at the time. Perhaps it is time to read it again.
Yann
Jul 21, 2011 Yann rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Je me suis régalé avec Aristote.
J. Alfred
Aristotle is one of those guys that you know is a seminal influence on the whole of civilization, and yet seems to have gotten there by saying all the obvious things. (Somebody had to do it!) The man is clearly brilliant, but not quite congenial to modern taste, if I'm any judge. Case in point: a treatise on rhetoric-- that is, the art of speaking well-- should not, I submit, be impossibly labored, irritatingly imprecise in terminology, and totally unmemorable, and yet this seems to be.
Ahem: "e
...more
Zachary Rudolph
“Sweet-natured through their not having yet observed much wickedness, and credulous through their not yet having been many times deceived, and optimistic ... because they have not frequently met with failure. And for the most part they live in hope; for hope is of the future and remembrance of the past, and for the young the future is long and the past short; for on one’s first day one can remember nothing but hope for everything. And they are easily deceived for the reason given (that they easi ...more
Emily
May 08, 2017 Emily rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Emily by: Herder
Shelves: classics, informative
Aristotle's work is very difficult to understand but this work is very important in explaining how people should represent themselves through their words. I found this book to be beneficial during my class but I feel reading this book without any external guidance is difficult and it is hard to grasp the entire meaning of the text.
Samuel Chen
Mar 19, 2017 Samuel Chen rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
talk that talk man
Kien Pham
Mar 04, 2017 Kien Pham rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Despite, eh, questionable views regarding certain issues (women, slavery, torture), Aristotle gives a comprehensive guide on how to compose the perfect speech in this book, with many of his advice still remaining relevant to this day.
Michael Jose
Mar 03, 2017 Michael Jose rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Excellent formatting book with excellently editing. Genuine must read this book.
Aaron
Feb 16, 2014 Aaron rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Throughout the book Kennedy places On Rhetoric into its important historical context. Starting with the Prooemion and through the introduction, Kennedy shows how clearly Aristotle's theories deviated from Isocrates, Plato and Socrates. For example, Aristotle’s “instinctive feeling for philosophy came to be far more pragmatic than Platonic idealism” (2). But, Kennedy also shows how Aristotle combined the important overlapping aspects of philosophy and rhetoric, mainly from Plato and Isocrates.

Be
...more
The Thousander Club
Adam C. Zern offers a few thoughts . . .

"Reading Aristotle's Rhetoric was a good idea that ended up being far more painful that I would have liked. It is common for me to read the recommended or referenced books of intellectuals that I admire. Although I don't quite remember where I heard or read Rhetoric referenced, it did find it's way on my Amazon Wish List. I can now say I've read it, but I wouldn't say much more than that about it. (Word of warning: Rhetoric is extremely referential to Ari
...more
Elliott Bignell
To read Aristotle on rhetoric is to be present at the birth of a new science, as this was the footing upon which the Philosopher sought to place the idiom. While this concept of "science" is a far cry from Popper's conjecture and refutation and the modern synthesis of scientific thinking, it is closer than one might think. Aristotle seeks to provide a theoretical framework based in the minds of listeners, to classify and taxonomise species of argument and to back it all up with concrete, quasi-e ...more
Elias Vasilis Kontaxakis
“Persuasion occurs through the arguments when we show the truth or the apparent truth from whatever is persuasive in each case.”

Whereas the Poetics concerned itself with the nature and composition of art, On Rhetoric is Aristotle’s examination of its effect on the audience. And not just art, but any compelling medium such as debate, storytelling, or speech. He again picks the subject apart and labels its organs, gives each a purpose and analyzes their effective use.

The Philosopher first distin
...more
María
Escrito probablemente entre los años 329-323 aC. este tratado conserva aún significativa vigencia. En su época El arte de la Retórica logró superar el conflicto existente entre Filosofía y Retórica, desdeñada por los filósofos que la consideraban una práctica sin rigor, solo interesada en el despliegue de la elocuencia. Aristóteles en esta obra instituyó definitivamente las leyes de la Retórica, fijó con exactitud el objetivo específico del arte oratorio y declaró la naturaleza de sus elementos ...more
Silvius
Apr 27, 2016 Silvius rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition

Un bun indicator pentru stilul vestic de cunoastere, care merge dinspre detaliu spre imaginea completa.
Autorul incepe cu definirea retoricii ca ramura a dialecticii, in contrast cu discursul rational. Retorica este folosita cand te adresezi unui public care nu poate sau nu are destul timp la dispozitie pentru a urmari un sir lung de argumente ori care nu are la dispozitie destul timp pentru a face asta.
Urmarea logica este prezentarea diferitelor moduri prin care un orator isi poate convinge publ
...more
Leopold Benedict
Oldie but goodie.
Aristotle divides rhetoric into three spheres with distinct purposes. The political speech, the judicial and the eulogy. A skillful speaker is characterised by his ability in three features, logic, pathos and ethos. Ethos, the character and credibility of the speaker, is the one that is widely underestimated in contemporary rhetoric. Other than that, you will get your good old Aristotle with lots of definitions.
David
Dec 21, 2013 David rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Though ancient, and though filled assumptions about the usefulness of slavery and the uselessness of women, much of this is very relevant to today, because while science has advanced, what convinces and moves the average human is pretty much the same after 2,000 plus years (there's a depressing thought). The funny thing is that even when he talks about rhetoric he disdains it, saying that rhetoric/language by nature is inferior to math because "you don't need rhetoric when teaching Pythagoras". ...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Book Groups 2 8 Dec 02, 2012 01:53PM  
Reading Rocks!: Why is it important to analyze the "moves" writers make? 115 204 Oct 25, 2012 07:07AM  
Brain Pain: Aristotle - The Art of Rhetoric - Discussion 1 50 Nov 26, 2011 10:45AM  
  • Rhetorica ad Herennium
  • Phaedrus
  • Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student
  • Lives of Eminent Philosophers, Vol 1, Books 1-5
  • A Rhetoric of Motives
  • Plato I: Euthyphro. Apology. Crito. Phaedo. Phaedrus. (Loeb Classical Library, #36)
  • History of the Peloponnesian War: Bk. 1-2
  • The Rhetorical Tradition: Readings from Classical Times to the Present
  • A Handlist of Rhetorical Terms
  • Outlines of Scepticism
  • Menander: The Plays and Fragments
  • Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students
  • Discourses, Books 1-2
  • The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation
2192
(Greece: Αριστοτέλης)
(Arabic: أرسطوطاليس)
(Bulgarian: Аристотел)
(Russian: Аристотель)


Aristotle (384–322 B.C.E.) numbers among the greatest philosophers of all time. Judged solely in terms of his philosophical influence, only Plato is his peer: Aristotle's works shaped centuries of philosophy from Late Antiquity through the Renaissance, and even today continue to be studied with keen, non-antiquaria
...more
More about Aristotle...

Share This Book



No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

“What makes a man a 'sophist' is not his faculty, but his moral purpose. (1355b 17)” 8 likes
“If there are two definitive features of ancient Greek civilization, they are loquacity and competition.” 2 likes
More quotes…