Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Androcles and the Lion” as Want to Read:
Androcles and the Lion
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Androcles and the Lion

3.59 of 5 stars 3.59  ·  rating details  ·  437 ratings  ·  28 reviews
Tells the tale of Androcles, a slave who is saved by the requited mercy of a lion.
Paperback, 160 pages
Published March 29th 1988 by Penguin Books (first published 1912)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Androcles and the Lion, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Androcles and the Lion

I, Claudius by Robert GravesJulius Caesar by William ShakespeareThe First Man in Rome by Colleen McCulloughClaudius the God and His Wife Messalina by Robert GravesLove, Eternally by Morgan O'Neill
Books Set in Rome
45th out of 162 books — 53 voters
Daddy-Long-Legs by Jean WebsterChronicles of Avonlea by L.M. MontgomeryDeath in Venice by Thomas MannA Princess of Mars by Edgar Rice BurroughsThe Lost World by Arthur Conan Doyle
Best Books of 1912
9th out of 14 books — 10 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 810)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
J.G. Keely
Shaw was a man of conflicts, and though some came from without, the majority were simply Shaw running roughshod over himself. He was quick to adopt new ideas, then vehement in defending them for as long as he kept them--which was rarely very long.

He first fought to abolish censorship, then supported the right of a fascist regime to silence undesirables. He was a lifelong supporter of the people's revolution against economic tyranny, but praised totalitarian rule by both Stalin and Hitler. He con
Erik Graff
Jun 01, 2015 Erik Graff rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
Recommended to Erik by: Ken Bennett
Shelves: drama
I hadn't realized until just a few weeks ago that the tale of Androcles and the lion was current in the Roman Empire, but as a fact, not a fable. A lion actually did spare its intended victim in the Coloseum, apparently showing affection towards him. I found the reference in an academic study of the history of Roman gladitorial contests.
Jason Williams
The bulk of this is not the play, but a dizzying (and I think more enjoyable) literary and historical criticism of the Bible (New Testament mostly). Perhaps half of what he says was with a smirk, but all of it serious to varying degrees.

In some very prominent ways, Shaw can be read alongside Tolstoy's essays on religion and, along with some Romantics, Transcendentalists and Liberationists, they can be very useful perspectives on grassroots and anarcho-Christianity.
I don't know if I should begin with the 109 page "preface" or the fact that the entire book felt a bit preachy... There were times when the play itself was actually funny.
Ali Reda
The Emperor is the Defender of the Faith. In throwing you to the lions he will be upholding the interests of religion in Rome. If you were to throw him to the lions, that would no doubt be persecution.

THE CAPTAIN: What is God?
LAVINIA: When we know that, Captain, we shall be gods ourselves.

And from the preface:

The modern practical form of the communism of Jesus is therefore, for the present, equal distribution of the surplus of the national income that is not absorbed by simple communism.

Paul suc
David Sarkies
Shaw on the Origins of Christianity
21 September 2009

This play, set in Imperial Rome, is the story of a Christian being thrown to the lions. However, the play is a lot more than just a poor defenceless soul being ripped apart by a ravenous beast, nor is it an attack upon Christianity, but rather a critical look at the church in modern times. The intention of the play seems to be to remind Christians of where they have come from and what they have become.
The play was released in 1913, during a t
Tyler Jones
I read this as an ebook - so I seem to have a slightly different edition than my fellow goodreaders, many of whom seem have enjoyed a rather lengthy introduction by GBS in which he dissects the gospels. My cheap little ebook did not include this, but instead tacked on a epilogue in which Shaw chides as all for being just as stupid and cruel as the crowds that filled the Roman forum. I could have done without this tongue lashing - I prefer a play to speak for itself and if the author feels the ne ...more
محمد عبادة
One of Shaw's plays that are wholly devoted to discussing religion, and Christianity in particular. A lengthy introduction to the short 2-act play is actually in unison with the Shavian tradition! Nonetheless, it's an enjoyable introduction indeed, although nothing compares to the magic of drama.
Shaw renovates the old fable of Androcles and the Lion, in order to serve his view of the essence of Christianity; a true socialistic essence according to his own judgement, twisted and manipulated by t
I keep trying to think of something to say about this play, but I have found that there is not much for me to say except for this: I think that Shaw made a point of looking critically at the Church by using an ancient example. Androcles is a rather weak man who is saved from death because of his friendship with the lion that is supposed to kill him. His kind nature is what saves him, because instead of scorning the lion when he first sees him at the start of the play, he treats it with kindness. ...more
The version I read was the Shaw Alphabet version of this play. I found the idea of a Shavian alphabet interesting and I might actually try my hand at learning it. That by itself would have earned this a 5 star rating but unfortunately, I was not all that fond of the actual play itsellf, or this representation of the fable and so I balanced the one star rating I would have given the story against the 5 star rating and came out with 3 stars. I guess spending my very young years having Aesops fable ...more
Enjoyed the entirety of the preface (an exegesis and critical dissection of the bible) more than the play. Both, however, were worth the read.
The version I read did include the long introduction, but since I didn't realize that the introduction was by Shaw, himself, I didn't read it. It was also a collection of three plays: Androcles, Overruled, and Pygmalion. I'll review the other two plays separately.

Androcles was delightful. Sharp and sardonic. A lot of social commentary that was probably very “of the moment,” but Shaw’s view is broader enough that his themes and critiques still carry both sting and humor.

It's pretty light, subtle
Somehow I missed this brilliant extended essay. Take this gem: " will learn how the same primitive logic which makes the Englishman believe today that by eating a beefsteak he can acquire the strength and courage of the bull, and to hold that belief in the face of the most ignominious defeats by vegetarian wrestlers and racers and bicyclists, led the first men who conceived God as capable of incarnation to believe that they could acquire a spark of his divinity by eating his flesh and drin ...more
Nov 04, 2010 Anittah rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: anyone not terribly familiar with the Bible
The short:

The preface to Bernard Shaw’s Androcles and the Lion is a recommended read for anyone not terribly familiar with the Bible. Shaw’s exegesis is funny, dry, and sociohistorically illuminating — and still relevant. Plus, the play’s pretty funny, too; mewonders if Shaw cast Androcles as a prancing fairy.

The long:

Go to
This and Major Barbara are my favorite Shavian works, fresh and funny. He was such a brave thinker, trying to get God and the devil in front of us, trying to call on the higher instincts of humans and show us our denial and hypocrisy, and spirit.
Mike Jensen
This is a smart satire on religious commitment, love in mixed cultures, and early Christianity. As usual, Shaw writes as if he has the final word, when his is only one perspective, but it is a powerful perspective that must be considered.
Dusty The2ofHarts-com
Classic Play Note: Although I read these plays in high school, I now have a copy of the 3 plays noted as "read," in the collection titled "3 Plays by George Bernard Shaw"
There's not much to say. Androcles and the Lion was my first ever read play as kid and coming back to it was super idea. I still love this.
This was my introduction to Shaw; rest assured I have every intention of reading many, many more of his works!
I like to breeze through his plays , to be entertained and not take him too seriously.
It's been years since I read it; I remember liking it well at the time.
Martha Treder
I love George Bernard Shaw and his commentary on human nature.
Laura Wetsel
Don't neglect the preface. I enjoyed it more than the play.
read this in high school ... it was fun
Denis Farley
I'm in awe of Shaw!
Justin marked it as to-read
Nov 25, 2015
Stephen Robertson
Stephen Robertson marked it as to-read
Nov 16, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 26 27 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Original Illustrated Mark Twain
  • Shamans Through Time
  • Collected Plays: Volume 1: A Dance of the Forests; The Swamp Dwellers; The Strong Breed; The Road; The Bacchae of Euripides: 001 (Includes a Dance of ... Breed/the Road/the Bacchae of Euripides)
  • The Young Man from Atlanta
  • The Cocktail Party
  • The Emperor's Three Questions
  • Plutus
  • Complete Plays, 1932-1943
  • A Magic Broken
  • The Doctor and the Devils
  • The Complete Pelican Shakespeare
  • Four Major Plays, Vol. 1: A Doll House / The Wild Duck / Hedda Gabler / The Master Builder
  • J.B.
  • One Christmas
  • Daring Spectacle: Adventures in Deviant Journalism
  • The Meaning of Meaning
George Bernard Shaw was an Irish playwright, socialist, and a co-founder of the London School of Economics. Although his first profitable writing was music and literary criticism, in which capacity he wrote many highly articulate pieces of journalism, his main talent was for drama. Over the course of his life he wrote more than 60 plays. Nearly all his plays address prevailing social problems, but ...more
More about George Bernard Shaw...

Share This Book

“The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. The happiness of credulity is a cheap and dangerous quality of happiness, and by no means a necessity of life.” 251 likes
“The primitive idea of justice is partly legalized revenge and partly expiation by sacrifice. It works out from both sides in the notion that two blacks make a white, and that when a wrong has been done, it should be paid for by an equivalent suffering. It seems to the Philistine majority a matter of course that this compensating suffering should be inflicted on the wrongdoer for the sake of its deterrent effect on other would-be wrongdoers; but a moment's reflection will shew that this utilitarian application corrupts the whole transaction. For example, the shedding of blood cannot be balanced by the shedding of guilty blood. Sacrificing a criminal to propitiate God for the murder of one of his righteous servants is like sacrificing a mangy sheep or an ox with the rinderpest: it calls down divine wrath instead of appeasing it. In doing it we offer God as a sacrifice the gratification of our own revenge and the protection of our own lives without cost to ourselves; and cost to ourselves is the essence of sacrifice and expiation.” 7 likes
More quotes…