Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Battle of Kursk” as Want to Read:
The Battle of Kursk
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Battle of Kursk (Soviet (Russian) Study of War)

4.01 of 5 stars 4.01  ·  rating details  ·  377 ratings  ·  20 reviews
Immense in scope, ferocious in nature, and epic in consequence, the Battle of Kursk witnessed (at Prokhorovka) one of the largest tank engagements in world history and led to staggering losses-including nearly 200,000 Soviet and 50,000 German casualties-within the first ten days of fighting. Going well beyond all previous accounts, David Glantz and Jonathan House now offer ...more
Hardcover, 472 pages
Published November 27th 1999 by University Press of Kansas (first published 1999)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Battle of Kursk, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Battle of Kursk

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 925)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
The Battle of Kursk was a decisive Nazi-Soviet tank battle at Prokhorovka, which went on for days, wreaked massive destruction on both sides, and turned the tides of the war — from then on the Nazi army was in retreat, with the Soviets hot on their heels. This was one of those books that fascinate you and make you want to tear out all your hair at the same time. This is because the maneuvers are described in excruciating detail. Like this:

Although the 170th Tank Brigade lost its commander and a
This is a typical Glantz book - very heavy on details, to the point where it becomes difficult to follow, which is why he loses a star. I think Glantz is one, along with Jonathan House, of the leading historians of the Soviet Army during World War II. The Battle of Kursk is not his best effort, however, it is still very good.

The book goes into the massive deception effort the Soviets conducted in order to lure the Germans into a massive and extremely well defended salient. The Soviets had used
Steven Peterson
The battle at Kursk was a horrific and bloody battle on the eastern front in the Second World War. Huge armies engaged here--almost 1 and a half million Soviet troops against many hundreds of thousands of German soldiers. The German leadership hoped to snuff out the Soviet salient at Kursk and buy time against the Soviet hordes. It was also a colossal armored battle. Much bloodletting. The end result was that the Germans were badly bloodied and the Soviet forces began to take greater initiative. ...more
It is always good to remember that the German war aims on the Eastern front going back into WWI, let alone WWII, were to control Eastern Europe and the Ukraine and push the Russians back into Asia. As the tide of war on the Eastern front turned after the failures at Moscow and Stalingrad, the German war aims retooled into their core essentials: control of the Ukraine as a breadbasket and stabilizing the Russian front in preparation of a two front war with both Russia and the Western alliance. It ...more
David Vanness
Knowing little about Kursk, I found this a fabulous read. The German attack plan was titled 'Citadel'. The volumn is based entirely on German records and the Soviet records only released since the demise of USSR. They have 20 nice pictures of the equipment used. One of the events that I found of German thought out-side-of-the-box was when they captured a Soviet T-34 tank. They turned it around and it led the Germany tanks miles thru of Soviet armor. Of course it was dark that July 12, 1943 night ...more
There used to be a title called The Tigers are Burning by a raffish old author named Martin Caiden, more famous for his co-authoring Samurai with Saburo Sakai,the Japanese Zero ace. This more modern study has detailed all the mistakes attributable to Hitler alone in the delays in Unternamen Zitadelle that allowed the Red Army the time to prepare elaborate defensive rings around the Kursk Salient.

Barbarossa,the Battle for Moscow, Stalingrad, Sevastopol, the Battle for the Baku oilfields and this,
'Aussie Rick'

There is no denying that this account of Kursk by David Glantz and Jonathan House is extremely well researched. The amount of detail is awe inspiring with 165 pages in the appendixes dedicated to OB's, strengths & losses, comparative armour strengths and key German & Soviet documents.

The maps, some 32 in all, are very detailed however I must admit that at time they were still hard to read due to the amount of detail. The book itself was well presented and the photos were excellent. The
John Williams
Gland does OK, but it is not one of his better works. I guess I am looking more for a blow by blow down to the regiment and below. I wish Jason Mark would take this up and drill down to the unit actions similar to his books on the Leaping Horseman.
Harry Miktarian
IMO this book is not a general interest book, but a book for those that have read a book or two on the Eastern front during WWII. If you are looking into a more narrative war book or a general history of Kursk, this might not be the first book I would grab. That said, if you are interested in Kursk and are looking for more detail, this is the book for you. This book contains an impressive amount of detail and research. If you are interested in the Russian and/or Axis OOB's, detailed numbers and ...more
Chris Salisbury
Now this on the other hand is more like your typical classroom textbook; full of endless point-by-point information. However, as dull a read as it can be at times, it does convey the sheer volume of men and machines that went into this most decisive of battles for the Nazis on their Eastern Front and the most epic of armored battles in the history of the world. When you realise that in places the Russians had defenses which literally extended over seven miles you begin to graps the enormity of t ...more
Glantz proves himself (again and still) the master of operational history of the Great Patriotic War (aka the Eastern Front of World War II). Not just an outstanding battle history, but a careful analysis of this key point where the Red Army learned how to stop a blitzkrieg attack, albiet at tremendous cost, and began the series of counterattacks, again at terrible cost, that would only end in Berlin.
Nick Leali
Incredible amount of detail in this book on the described conflict. Accomplishes what it sets out to do, namely, be the authoritative volume on the Battle of Kursk. However, the amount of detail and material makes it difficult to read and take in. But if you're looking for a detailed account of the lead up to and fighting in the largest tank battle in human history, this is the book for you.
John Bianchi
The definitive work on the pivotal battle of the eastern front in WWII, Glantz and House use Soviet records made available for the first time in the west. The result is a microscopically detail oriented account that is readable yet scholarly. Must read for anyone studying the War in the East or interested in the Second World War.
Glantz is always interesting to read. I've read a few book on Kursk over the years and think this may be the best. Lead-up, the battle itself, and the aftermath.
Nicolas Adame
It's a rather interesting book on something that's often overlooked in most Textbooks. It was a bit too long for my liking, but I overall still enjoyed it.
A touching tale of the Red Army overcoming the Wehrmacht through the power of friendship
John Vanore
Full of info, but extremely dense. Only for the hard-core military history buff.
Todd Powell
This is the best book on the Battle of Kursk, July 1943.
a relatively boring litany of unit numbers
Chuck Dietz
Chuck Dietz marked it as to-read
Oct 11, 2015
Amanda marked it as to-read
Oct 08, 2015
Tim marked it as to-read
Oct 06, 2015
Brad Harris
Brad Harris marked it as to-read
Oct 03, 2015
Allan Brawer
Allan Brawer marked it as to-read
Oct 03, 2015
Dave Van Es
Dave Van Es marked it as to-read
Oct 03, 2015
Joseph marked it as to-read
Oct 02, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 30 31 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Battle of the Tanks: Kursk, 1943
  • In Deadly Combat: A German Soldier's Memoir of the Eastern Front (Modern War Studies (Paper)
  • Decision in Normandy
  • A Frozen Hell: The Russo-Finnish Winter War of 1939-1940
  • Panzer Battles: A Study of the Employment of Armor in the Second World War
  • Utmost Savagery: The Three Days of Tarawa
  • Hitler Moves East 1941-1943
  • Lost Victories: The War Memoirs of Hilter's Most Brilliant General
  • It Never Snows in September: The German View of Market-Garden and the Battle of Arnhem, September 1944
  • Achtung-Panzer!: The Development of Armoured Forces, Their Tactics and Operational Potential
  • Das Reich: The March of the 2nd SS Panzer Division Through France, June 1944
  • The Road to Stalingrad: Stalin`s War with Germany
  • Guadalcanal: The Definitive Account of the Landmark Battle
  • Hitler's U-Boat War: The Hunters, 1939-1942
  • Russia's War: A History of the Soviet Effort: 1941-1945
  • A Time for Trumpets: The Untold Story of the Battle of the Bulge
  • A World at Arms: A Global History of World War II
  • To Lose a Battle: France 1940
David M. Glantz (born 11 January 1942 in Port Chester, New York) is an American military historian and the editor of The Journal of Slavic Military Studies.

Glantz received degrees in history from the Virginia Military Institute and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and is a graduate of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College, Defense Language Institute, Institute for Russian
More about David M. Glantz...
When Titans Clashed: How the Red Army Stopped Hitler To the Gates of Stalingrad: Soviet-German Combat Operations, April-August 1942 Armageddon in Stalingrad: The Stalingrad Trilogy v. 2: September - November 1942 (Modern War Studies) Zhukov's Greatest Defeat: The Red Army's Epic Disaster in Operation Mars, 1942 Barbarossa 1941

Share This Book