Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Town: A Novel of the Snopes Family” as Want to Read:
The Town: A Novel of the Snopes Family
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Town: A Novel of the Snopes Family (The Snopes Trilogy #2)

4.07 of 5 stars 4.07  ·  rating details  ·  936 ratings  ·  48 reviews
This is the second volume of Faulkner’s trilogy about the Snopes family, his symbol for the grasping, destructive element in the post-bellum South. Like its predecessor The Hamlet, and its successor The Mansion, The Town is completely self-contained, but it gains resonance from being read with the other two. The story of Flem Snopes’ ruthless struggle to take over the town ...more
ebook, 384 pages
Published May 18th 2011 by Vintage (first published 1957)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Town, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Town

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,870)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
I like this second novel of The Snopes trilogy (it can certainly be read as a stand-alone) much more than the first one, The Hamlet, though it's partly a retelling of the first (the first 1/3 is mostly flashbacks though by different voices, a Faulknerian trait, for sure) but of course more of it is a continuation, told from three viewpoints, to be taken as a sampling of the community. Within the narrating of these three, there is much humor to be found, at least in the first 3/4 of the book, and ...more
Jul 12, 2014 Still rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Everyone. This should be required reading
Recommended to Still by: My wife.

Faulkner wrote many novels and many short stories. Almost all are acclaimed. I haven’t read but one of those novels- The Reivers.
That was up until my wife persuaded me to read “The Snopes Family Trilogy” comprised of the novels, The Hamlet,The Town, and The Mansion.

Of those three titles, I’ve so far read only the first two entries.

This morning I finished The Town. I am still reeling.

This novel has three distinct narrators: young Charles (“Chick”) Mallison, his uncle Gavin (“Lawyer”) Stevens, and
A masterpiece.

Everyone puts The Hamlet on a pedestal and although i enjoyed it, personally speaking The Town is Faulkner at his utter and inimitable best.

First, all the Snopes characters in the trilogy are so singular and unforgettable that you can tell Faulkner was writing for eternity when he composed this trilogy. First we have the devious, intelligent, empire-building Flem Snopes who proceeds to slowly take over the town of Jefferson here bit by bit. Think about that title - The Town - so s
Mar 28, 2011 Brandon rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people from small towns
Recommended to Brandon by: Jim Hinkle
The communal crisis of The Town's plot is reflected in the nature of its three narrator's: the attorney Gavin Stevens, his pre-adolescent nephew Charles Mallison and entrepreneur V.K. Ratliff.

If anyone ever had any doubts about how much Faulkner intended the town to serve as a character in his work, they might find an answer in the Charles Mallison’s opening to The Town,: “when I say ‘we’ and ‘we thought’ what I mean is Jefferson and what Jefferson thought (3).” Just as Faulkner finds the town
Some ghosts, or real people, are going to kill me...but Faulkner is BETTER than one gets more in one page (which is what makes him so difficult)...and no one writers purer human one puts it on paper with more unbridled energy...some of his sentences, about one every three pages, just make you want to give up and crawl back into the womb...

This one is the second in a trilogy, call it The Snopes Empire Strikes Back, about the dark and soulless and anarchic lengths to w
Bernard Norcott-mahany
Though this book lacks the scope of "The Hamlet" which has an almost mythic quality about it, I like that this book features the story told by three characters, two who are intimately connected with the action (V.K. Ratliff and Stevens) and one (Chick Mallison, Gavin Stevens' nephew, who is removed from the action -- in fact the first chapter which is narrated by Chick takes place before he is born, so his "version" of the events is entirely dependent on what Ratliff and his uncle Gavin told him ...more
Kristiina Widenius
Lukupiiripakkopulla, osa 2. Alussa kertaus edellisen osan tapahtumista parhaaseen sarjatyyliin. Silti olin jo pudonnut kärrryiltä sivulla 25 enkä päässyt takaisin kyytiin. Lauseet tässä kirjassa lyhyempiä, mutta pronominien käytössä (ja ehkä muutamassa muussakin asiassa) yhä ongelmia. Beat-runous ja Nostradamus ovat selkokieltä tämän rinnalla. Harvinaisen vapaasti irti reaalimaailmasta leijaileva naiskuva.

"Oletko koskaan luonut silmäystä tyttöön? Sinä olet inhimillinen vaikka oletkin nainen." N
I wasn’t expecting to like this better than “The Hamlet” but I thoroughly enjoyed it and found it quite moving at the end. I thought the use of narrators to be skillful, and I did not mind V.K. Ratliff or Gavin Stevens the way I normally do. I thought Chick Mallison was a great narrator, speaking as both himself as a child and as an adult looking back on his childhood perceptions. I loved the stories about Montgomery Ward Snopes and Wall Street Panic Snopes and the different ways they do busines ...more
Michael David
I hate William Faulkner.

I hate the fact that I can't even give this book a five because I would have to give The Sound and the Fury and Absalom, Absalom! six or sevens. I hate the fact that he could both write with the utmost complexity and utmost simplicity. I hate the fact that to me, he's so good that I can place five of his books on my personal top 10 without flinching.

I hate how even years removed from reading his other novels that I can remember who Bayard Sartoris was, who Lucas Beaucham
K.M. Weiland
This is a much more complex story than we find in its prequel The Hamlet. Told in three first-person POVs, it offers a rounded presentation of perspectives on the slow degeneration of the small Southern town. The child narrator, Charles Mallison, is an especial joy. The humor isn't as wild as in The Hamlet, but the subtlety and its organic growth from the characters only strengthens the story.
John Harder
Faulkner is unique. His language is always simple; anyone with a sixth grade education could read anything in the text but the situation and alternating perspectives provide a difficult but worthwhile approach. In this case three individuals narrate the story, so be prepared the new and differing juxtapositions.

Jefferson has an invasion of Snopes – the surname of an insidious brood. Eventually "Snopes" becomes synonymous with fluid morals. As the Snopes grab for any loose dollar that is about, G
Well, I love Faulkner's writing, and I don't know what more can be said about any of his books. If you can get into his writing style, he's an amazing story-teller. There is lots of humour, often with poignancy that doesn't really hit you in the face until you're away from it. A synopsis of the story will tell you that it is about the rise of Flem Snopes as he takes over the town of Jefferson. However, you spend much of the book not really hearing about Snopes' actions. Like Snopes' character, t ...more
The Town, the second book in the Snopes Trilogy, was, for me, a much better book than The Hamlet. The writing style was the same, Faulkner never changes his style, the story itself is just a bit more interesting, with a but more of a mystery to hold.

Flem Snopes has left the Bend and moved to the town of Jefferson. In Jefferson he starts at the bottom again, but it takes little time before Flem is the Superintendent of the water company. This is just the beginning. As often in the author's works
Dan Pecchenino
Probably Faulkner's most under appreciated novel. Highly experimental, yet not acknowledged as such.
'the town" is the second book in a trilogy written by faulkner on the snopes family. the 1st and second books were written almost 25 years apart. it is strongly suggested that you read the 1st in the series, "the hamlet", first.

in this book faulkner brings the infamous flem snopes from frenchmen's bend to the city of jefferson and traces his steps up the social ladder from superintendent to president of the local bank. The story is told thru the eyes of three characters ranging in age from a chi
Christopher Sutch
The second novel of Faulkner's "Snopes Trilogy" starts out well enough, but suffers a marked identity crisis about halfway through. The first half resembles the brilliance of the first Snopes novel, _The Hamlet_: Faulkner concentrates on telling the stories of the "Snopes invasion" of Jefferson and the events that ensue, particularly the rivalry (or triangle, perhaps) between Flem Snopes, Manfred de Spain, and Gavin Stevens, narrated from three different viewpoints. The writing is straightforwar ...more
The rise of Flem from living in a tent to living in a house; restaurant owner to bank VP; the background plots just simmer in the background, like Eula (now married to Flem) and her 18 year old affair with Manfred de Spain, until Flem "cashes in his 20 dollar goldpiece." The narrative voices of Ratliff, Gavin Stevens (known as Lawyer) and Charles or Chick, the kid all help parts of the plot overlap a bit and clarify as they retell. The extended metaphor of the nail in the oak tree through the ye ...more
The Town is the second book in Faulkner's Snopes trilogy. The Hamlet, 1940, was the first and according to my notes when I read it eight years ago, was very dark and gave me nightmares. The Town is much lighter in comparison, even humorous in parts. I have now read enough Faulkner to feel less of a stranger in his imaginary town of Jefferson and in Yoknapatawpha County.

The Snopes are a family of white trash degenerates who came into the county trading horses. One of them by the name of Flem wa
Mark Sacha
The middle novel in Faulkner's Snopes trilogy, coming almost 20 years after the first entry. I think The Town is stronger than The Hamlet, with a tighter structure and a back-and-forth between its various POVs. Narration is shared between V.K. Ratliff, Gavin Stevens and his nephew, Charles, winding and merging fluidly as they tell the story of what occurred after the Snopes clan rose to primacy in Jefferson. There's an active process for the reader of assembling threads that makes more canonical ...more
Mike Gilbert
You could certainly read this novel without reading the fist book in the trilogy, The Hamlet, but much of depth of the narrative would not be so deep. The Town was funnier, moved more quickly, and seemed to be an easier read its predecessor - though I don't know if that's because its the second Faulkner book I've picked up after a long hiatus and my mind is re-familiarizing itself with his prose or if its because the story is told alternatively from three different points of view, including VK R ...more
Dec 16, 2010 John rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: those with time to read and digest. Start with The Hamlet
Check out my quizz of The Town.

But if Uncle Gavin was hid somewhere in that ditch too, Gowan never caught him. Better still, Uncle Gavin never caught Gowan in it. Because if Mother ever found out Gowan was hiding in that ditch behind Mr Snopes's house because he thought Uncle Gavin was hidden in it too, Gowan didn't know what she might have done about Uncle Gavin but he sure knew what would have happened to him. And worse: if Mr Snopes had ever found out Gowan thought Uncle Gavin might be hiding
Taylor Napolsky
Not as good as The Hamlet but still very enjoyable. I'll definitely read the third book in the trilogy.
The second novel in the Snopes trilogy continues the development of the various characters.

Hugh Atkins
What's not to love about the Snopes clan? This is the second in Faulkner's Snopes trilogy and I enjoyed it more than the first one ("The Hamlet"). I think Faulkner's writing style improved in the years between the writing of these two novels. Now, it's on to "The Mansion."
Clif Hostetler
This is the second book of Faulkner’s “Snopes” trilogy. Over the past two books we have followed the rise of Flem Snopes from son of poor tenant farmer to bank president living in The Mansion. I have a lot more to say about the Snopes trilogy in my review of The Mansion .
Scott Murphy
Full of memorable scenes.
The second book in the Snopes trilogy. Flem Snopes has moved on to a bigger town and it seems as if he has taken most of his relatives along with him again. I didn't like it as much as The Hamlet, being told by three different narrators was interesting, but I still found it boring at times. I was not expecting what happened at the end though. Poor Eula. Poor anyone related to a Snopes.
Faulkner has that amazing ability to go into everybody's shoes and take multiple perspectives regarding the story. Whoever exposed himself under a magnifying glass in one chapter, is being pushed to the wings in the next one. Still there are those stunning poetic descriptions of colour and smell as in those other books of his. Looking forward to "The Mansion".
Repetitive only because Faulkner recaps some of the incidents that took place in The Hamlet (and also because I already read a couple of sections as short stories), The Town is still exemplary Faulkner -- a story about storytelling about a community's secrets, prejudices, cowardice, greed, and unfulfilled desires.
Maybe I've read too much Faulkner, too soon, but I felt a little Faulknered-out on this one. Some intriguing scenes of the intricate conflicts between the Snopes and the town, but half a page of parenthetical in the middle of a sentence just became a little too much to bear right now.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 62 63 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • One Matchless Time: A Life of William Faulkner
  • Eudora Welty: A Biography
  • The Ponder Heart
  • Pale Horse, Pale Rider
  • Lilith
  • The Long Dream
  • Collected Stories
  • The Collected Short Stories
  • Negro with a Hat: The Rise and Fall of Marcus Garvey and His Dream of Mother Africa
  • The Rabbit Factory
  • Toys in the Attic
  • A Visitation of Spirits
  • The Clearing
  • Of Love and Dust
  • Lie Down in Darkness
  • Bats Out of Hell
  • The Cambridge Companion to Gothic Fiction
  • Her First American
William Cuthbert Faulkner was a Nobel Prize-winning American novelist and short story writer. One of the most influential writers of the twentieth century, his reputation is based mostly on his novels, novellas, and short stories. He was also a published poet and an occasional screenwriter.
The majority of his works are based in his native state of Mississippi. Though his work was published as earl
More about William Faulkner...

Other Books in the Series

The Snopes Trilogy (3 books)
  • The Hamlet
  • The Mansion
The Sound and the Fury As I Lay Dying Light in August Absalom, Absalom! A Rose for Emily

Share This Book

“She was bored. She loved, had capacity to love, for love, to give and accept love. Only she tried twice and failed twice to find somebody not just strong enough to deserve it, earn it, match it, but even brave enough to accept it.” 306 likes
More quotes…