Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Three Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante And Goethe” as Want to Read:
Three Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante And Goethe
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Three Philosophical Poets: Lucretius, Dante And Goethe

4.07  ·  Rating Details  ·  60 Ratings  ·  6 Reviews
This scarce antiquarian book is included in our special Legacy Reprint Series. In the interest of creating a more extensive selection of rare historical book reprints, we have chosen to reproduce this title even though it may possibly have occasional imperfections such as missing and blurred pages, missing text, poor pictures, markings, dark backgrounds and other reproduct ...more
Published January 1st 2007 by Kessinger Publishing (first published 1953)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Three Philosophical Poets, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Three Philosophical Poets

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 241)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Mar 25, 2008 Lanny rated it it was amazing
Recommends it for: Epicureans, Decadents, Scholars

This book is foul. Not the text especially but its self. It literally makes me sneeze it's so grotty and old. I read some article in the Berkeley Philosophy Journal Qui Parle a while back which sort of pegged George Santanyana as a politically indifferent Bourgeois Classicist, and maybe he is. I really don't think any sort of direct critique of thought or people or anything is very interesting anyway, as if Nature's true meaning can be just 'had out' by some yapping grad-student.. Just look at l
Chris Schaeffer
Jan 06, 2011 Chris Schaeffer rated it really liked it
I guess one could fairly call Santayana a kind of bougie hedge-artist, and I guess that would be sort of correct. He's concerned with aesthetics, definitely, and the metaphysics of creating, and if he preferred to tie his tie on and contemplate Dante on a yacht instead of politicizing his arguments, well, it certainly doesn't endear him to me personally, but nor does it make his work any less important or engaging.

Santayana's apolitical aesthetic sense is unfashionable nowadays but has its defe
Sep 01, 2011 Jon rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I have only read the introduction and the third of the book that is about Dante; but it is excellent. I knew very little about Santayana, other than the famous quote about being doomed to relive history; but he was apparently very well known for his artful prose and his witty quotes. He does not fail to deliver in this book. He makes fun of Plato's insistence on emphasizing final causes for objects found in the real world, saying that it leads to ideas like: the reason we have very long intestin ...more
Sep 02, 2014 Pavel rated it really liked it
Refreshingly good read. The chapter on Lucretius is masterful. The invocation of the future master poet, who will synthesize the sentiments and visions of the three discussed philosopical po, is gripping.
Apr 05, 2015 Alberto rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
The book adds absolutely nothing to my understanding of the three poets, beyond what I could gather by just reading the original texts on my own. Adds no value to the canon.
Sep 24, 2010 David rated it liked it
Fairly heavy reading.
Christopher Bajgier
Christopher Bajgier marked it as to-read
Jul 20, 2016
West Cuthbert
West Cuthbert marked it as to-read
Jul 19, 2016
Joel Brumfield
Joel Brumfield rated it liked it
Jul 15, 2016
Christopher Hurtado
Christopher Hurtado marked it as to-read
Jul 01, 2016
Alex Galton
Alex Galton marked it as to-read
Jun 29, 2016
Justin Barney
Justin Barney marked it as to-read
Jun 19, 2016
Benji Vesterby
Benji Vesterby marked it as to-read
Jun 15, 2016
Elisa marked it as to-read
Jun 12, 2016
Vi Lai
Vi Lai marked it as to-read
Jun 10, 2016
Christopher (Donut
Christopher (Donut rated it it was amazing
May 27, 2016
Rahil Patel
Rahil Patel marked it as to-read
May 27, 2016
Lanell marked it as to-read
May 22, 2016
Tyler marked it as to-read
May 19, 2016
Anastasia marked it as to-read
May 19, 2016
Rob marked it as to-read
May 09, 2016
Cibelle Proulx
Cibelle Proulx marked it as to-read
Apr 23, 2016
Stuart Huggins
Stuart Huggins marked it as to-read
Apr 23, 2016
M S rated it really liked it
Apr 12, 2016
Frederick Mcadam
Frederick Mcadam marked it as to-read
Apr 09, 2016
Jacq marked it as to-read
Mar 25, 2016
راحيل أزرق
راحيل أزرق marked it as to-read
Mar 22, 2016
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Abba Abba
  • Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust
  • Conversations Of Goethe
  • The Broken Tower: The Life of Hart Crane
  • Principles of Literary Criticism (Routledge Classics)
  • The Demon and the Angel: Searching for the Source of Artistic Inspiration
  • The Norton Introduction to Poetry
  • What Is Philosophy?
  • Concerning the Angels
  • Poems for the Millennium, Vol. 2: Modern and Postmodern Poetry from Postwar to Millennium
  • The Banquet Years: The Origins of the Avant-Garde in France, 1885 to World War I
  • How to Read a Poem
  • Poets in a Landscape
  • The New Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics
  • Dante: Poet of the Secular World
  • Laocoon: An Essay on the Limits of Painting and Poetry
  • The Seduction of Unreason: The Intellectual Romance with Fascism from Nietzsche to Postmodernism
  • Mysticism and Logic (Western Philosophy)
Philosopher, poet, literary and cultural critic, George Santayana is a principal figure in Classical American Philosophy. His naturalism and emphasis on creative imagination were harbingers of important intellectual turns on both sides of the Atlantic. He was a naturalist before naturalism grew popular; he appreciated multiple perfections before multiculturalism became an issue; he thought of phil ...more
More about George Santayana...

Share This Book