Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Animal Liberation. Die Befreiung Der Tiere” as Want to Read:
Animal Liberation. Die Befreiung Der Tiere
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Animal Liberation. Die Befreiung Der Tiere

4.15 of 5 stars 4.15  ·  rating details  ·  3,648 ratings  ·  259 reviews

The Book That Started A Revolution

Since its original publication in 1975, this groundbreaking work has awakened millions of concerned men and women to the shocking abuse of animals everywhere -- inspiring a worldwide movement to eliminate much of the cruel and unnecessary laboratory animal experimentation of years past.

In this newly revised and expanded edition, author

Paperback, 415 pages
Published 1996 by Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag (first published 1975)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Animal Liberation. Die Befreiung Der Tiere, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Animal Liberation. Die Befreiung Der Tiere

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
I read the "bible" of the animal rights movement because I wanted to get some clue as to what is being thought. I should consider all views in order to change, consolidate or move on my own position.

On a very simple analysis, if you are guilty about existing and using the planets resources then this book will confirm your views and help you to rationalise your thoughts.

If you feel that you are part of nature and have every right to exist and survive (just like every other creature) then you can
Animal Liberation is the book that started the modern animal rights movement. Peter Singer, the author, is an Australian philosopher. He is the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University, and laureate professor at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (CAPPE), University of Melbourne. He specializes in applied ethics, approaching ethical issues from a secular preference utilitarian perspective.

In 1975, the first edition of Animal Liberation was published. It has b
Jul 02, 2007 beggs rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Everyone
Animal Liberation is credited with launching the animal rights movement in the industrialized world when it was first published in 1975 by the then relatively unknown, Peter Singer ([]). You can blame all of the illogical stupidity of [] PETA on this book. But PETA's antics tend to blind people to any logical discussion of the real points in Animal Liberation. Singer does not support the animal rights movement epitomized by PETA but hold ...more
Ross Blocher
Peter Singer builds a step-by-step, iron-clad ethical case for considering the welfare of animals as part of our ever-expanding circle of moral consideration. While non-human animals may not be our equals in many respects, the only thing that really matters is their shared ability to experience pain and suffering. Any attempt to draw a line between what makes humans worthy of consideration and non-human animals not worthy of consideration fails in establishing any kind of logical distinction. If ...more
Michael Bennett
Normally I won’t review nonfiction, since most of the time I don’t even give them a star rating. However, there a few exceptions. First of all I may end up reviewing some memoirs since I consider a good memoir to be a blend of fiction and nonfiction (think James Frey here, but also less sinister examples). So my major exception will be this book. I feel okay with reviewing this book because I do have a philosophy degree, and also because this book had a major impact on me at a fairly young age. ...more
Even after so many years, most people remains either unaware or indifferent to the horrible way we are treating animals. Most people are unaware because it is difficult to see connections when you live in a city you never leave and just see a piece of red, inanimate matter wrapped in plastic that just tastes delicious.

Animal liberation must have been a shocking book, a revelation to many people about the unfair use and abuse animals suffer because of our insatiable search for pleasure, our ignor
Peter Singer’s main argument in Animal Liberation is that humans’ current perception and treatment of animals is morally indefensible. He defends this view from multiple angles, and concludes that animals deserve “equal consideration” (which differs considerably from equal treatment) based solely on the fact that they can feel pain, and causing unnecessary pain is immoral. The current abuse of a being based solely on their species (which Singer refers to as “speciesism”) stems from similar moral ...more
Jack Ferreira
So glad to have finaly read what many consider as the "Bible of Animal Rights". It certaintly met my expectations and grounded, developed and solidified my views on the subject.

I assumed that it would be just philosophicaly centered all the way through, with a few references here and there to shed light on what animals actualy go through behind the scenes. I was pleasently surprised that he dedicated two whole chapters to describing the realities behind animal testing and factory farming.

An intriguing and informative book. I'll give it 4 stars because it's well written and makes you think, though I can't say I'd bother reading it again.

Modern philosopher Peter Singer argues--both abstractly and with detailed, concrete examples--that we are currently "speciesist" who must acknowledge that animals may not be our intellectual equals, but the relevant question is whether they, like we, suffer. He documents how they can and do, both psychologically and physically, in animal experimen
Lisa Vegan
May 19, 2007 Lisa Vegan rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: those who want to read a primer on animal rights
This is an animal rights classic, and although there are so many animal rights books now, this is still worth a read. It's been a very infuential book to many and hasn't lost much of its impact over time.
Victoria Foote-blackman
Though much of what Singer covers in the way of data and animal rights theory has now been hashed over by many writers who have come after him, Animal Liberation is that seminal book that really got the movement on its tracks, whatever others want to say.

Some of his positions seem mainstream now but one must not forget how very radical he was back in 1973. In this manifesto Singer addressed two of the most egregious forms of animal abuse in some detail (the farming of animals and animal experime
Alexandra Kulik
"The book that started a revolution" from the philosopher who started my intellectual exploration into species equality and my conversion into vegetarianism. I did not need to read this book to know that Singer's argument is impermeable, or that prejudice toward other species is unassailably on par with such unjustifiable discrimination as racism and sexism. That is, I did not need to read this because when I first heard Peter Singer talk about this in the documentary "Examined Life," and then s ...more
Andrew Georgiadis

Human beings are not the only creatures capable of suffering or having interests. Singer published this classic work to convince the lay reader of this self-evident argument back in the 1970s, and has commanded various updated editions, this most recent in 2002.

There are moral arguments to be made against the wholesale slaughter of cows, chickens, pigs, and other animals. The conditions in which they are now bred, especially in the United States, seems to maximize stress and suffering
Primarily a work of philosophy, Animal Liberation discusses human attitudes toward nonhumans (that is, animals) through examining our institutional and habitual treatment of them and uses to which we put them. This project obviously entails a discussion of animals as food and, more specifically, of our industrialized farming culture, though Peter Singer also chronicles the history of human attitudes toward nonhumans and the ways in which animals are used in medical, military and product testing. ...more
This book is very well written, and very well argued, but unfortunately it's let down a little by the fact that it's now rather dated. The three stars are based on a judgement of how relevant and effective the book was as of the date I read it, not on how influential it has been in the past. The philosophy is sophisticated, considered and accessible, although some of the points are slightly laboured. The second chapter on the use of animals in science is the biggest casualty of progress, and in ...more
This book made me grateful for having cut my vegan teeth on abolitionist theory without first getting tangled up in this sort of watery utilitarian thinking. Apart from introducing the philosophically convenient (and I think accurate) concept of speciesism, this book presents little of real ethical value.

In fact, my complaint with this book is the same as my complaint with welfarism and utilitarian theories of animal ethics as a whole: it acknowledges the problem of animal abuse without strikin
Jan 03, 2008 Claire rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: everyone
Although Singer wrote Animal Liberation over twenty years ago, its message against speciesism is still relevant. He uses reason and logic to argue against our deeply-entrenched relationship to animals. He pulls down the veil and shows that our (ab)use of animals is not natural, not necessary, and not beneficial to either humans or the other animals. In the two painful chapters describing animal experimentation and factory farming, Singer uses only the researchers' and farmers' own descriptions o ...more
This is not a book about animal rights but an utilitarian philosophy that barely touches the issue of animal welfare. Peter Singer doesn't claim that animals have an inherent value, therefore if you believe that your cat or pig has an interest in life (fx their will and capability to feel pain and joy won't not turn off when there comes time to consume them), I would recommend to read something by Gary Francione.
Maybe "Animal Liberation" had some points compared to the times it was written but
I, like most people, prefer to mentally block out graphic images of cows and chickens, dangling upside-down, assembly-line style, while eating meat. I do consider myself a hypocrite, however, for not knowing the origins of that nicely organized package of meat I just bought at the grocery store. While this book is more of a philosophical contemplation on the morality of eating "flesh", I was pleasantly surprised to see an entire chapter devoted to factory farming. Singer describes, in frightenin ...more
Peter Singer creates powerful images by showing the real nature of animal experimentation and extensive farming. His principle of equal consideration of interests is incredibly convincing and impenetrable. The more I thought about it, the more sense it made to me. Despite his obvious utilitarian perspective on the matter, ALL counter-arguments are incredibly weak.

I've found out from my own personal experience, that many people get defensive when talking about these issues. It's as if we know we
I read this for an Animal Rights paper I wrote against animal testing in 2008. Singer goes through all aspects of what goes on for the desires/needs of humans. The majority of the book was hard to grasp and read but if, even as you are reading this book, animals are going through just that then we can at least hear of their story. I have heard people say that they just don't understand vegans. Just because an animal is being "killed" for their meat doesn't mean they are living, beautiful healthy ...more
Jan 26, 2015 Gina rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: anyone who eats food
After almost 1.5 years as a vegan (and 7 years before that as a vegetarian) I still found that this book had a lot to offer someone who requires no further convincing of the arguments this book sets forth. Singer is a profoundly intelligent ethicist who raises as many important questions as he eloquently answers. I honestly cannot imagine a more reader-friendly or sensible argument for the deconstruction of the human-animal hierarchy than is provided by chapter one (alone) of Animal Liberation. ...more
Edward Sullivan
I read this book for some background research. A philosopher with a specialty in ethics, Singer discusses "specieism" (prejudice toward non-human animals) and offers vivid accounts of its most gruesome by-products--chilling, horrific documentation of animals victimized in military, scientific, and consumer product research, and the gut-wrenching realities of factory farming. Singer makes a well-reasoned, compelling argument for vegetarianism and veganism, but I'm not yet ready to make that leap. ...more
Matt Hutchinson
As a prologue, this book is a bit difficult to give a rating to because it can't (or shouldn't) be reviewed in the same manner as a novel or entertainment book. Whether or not I enjoyed it, or agreed with Singer, isn't as important as whether or not I found the book valuable. In fact, I don't agree with Singer on a lot of issues and the book wasn't particularly enjoyable to read a lot of the time. But it was valuable and thought-provoking.

This book above all others will really make you examine
Bella Grewal
Djurens frigörelse handlar om huruvida vi människor har rätt att använda andra djur för våra egna intressen. Och dessutom plåga halvt eller helt ihjäl dem under tiden. Han diskuterar begreppet speciesism, dvs diskriminering av andra p g a deras arttillhörighet. Han anser att alla arter som kan känns smärta ska behandlas med omsorg.

Han tar upp ett antal argument, starka argument, för varför vi ska sluta exploatera andra djur.
Ett ständigt dilemma för mig själv. Var går gränsen, för mig?
Jo, jag är
All of the books I have read by Peter Singer have been great. I love that he talks about animal testing. I've read a lot of books arguing for vegetarianism, but nothing this good or well informed about animal testing. A lot of things he says in this book were things I was thinking but was never able to word them as well as he does! I was honestly not sure about this book, because reading the title, I immediately assumed it was about breaking into labs and freeing animals, and that it would be to ...more
This was a good book. While I can't agree with everything the author says since he is biased and passionate about his perspective (not a bad thing by any means), he does make a good argument. I was horrified to read the history of animal experimentation and started looking into the meat industry more after reading this. I am trying to be a more informed consumer, and I am looking for products labeled "cage free" and "humanely raised", etc, instead of just picking the cheapest one. It's also star ...more
There was a time when this would have been necessary reading for anyone interested in animal rights, but now due to the influence of television and the internet Peter Singer's Animal Liberation is more of an amusing artifact than a compelling book.

Animal Liberation is in theory a book on a specific subject within the philosophy of ethics written by a major player in the field, but the book features only about a chapter or so of arguments that could be considered philosophical and Singer's actua
Jacob Stubbs
The Good:
I think Singer is onto something by arguing that a committed egalitarian should allow their circle of ethical consideration to extend to animals. In general, the arguments of the first chapter - especially those that pertain to "speciesism" - seem very convincing (although, there are certainly disagreements).

The Bad:
Singer is a utilitarian, and his use of sentience as THE ONLY calculus for determining moral action seems to really leave no room for the respect of nature, especially as
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
CBC Books: Animals As Citizens? 3 19 Jan 05, 2015 09:45AM  
  • The Case for Animal Rights
  • Dominion: The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy
  • Making A Killing: The Political Economy of Animal Rights
  • Thanking the Monkey: Rethinking the Way We Treat Animals
  • Meat Market: Animals, Ethics, & Money
  • Farm Sanctuary: Changing Hearts and Minds About Animals and Food
  • Terrorists or Freedom Fighters?: Reflections on the Liberation of Animals
  • Introduction to Animal Rights: Your Child or the Dog?
  • Slaughterhouse: The Shocking Story of Greed, Neglect, And Inhumane Treatment Inside the U.S. Meat Industry
  • The Animal Activist's Handbook: Maximizing Our Positive Impact in Today's World
  • The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory
  • Striking at the Roots: A Practical Guide to Animal Activism
  • The Pig Who Sang to the Moon: The Emotional World of Farm Animals
  • Eternal Treblinka
  • The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery
  • Rattling The Cage: Toward Legal Rights For Animals
  • Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs, and Wear Cows: An Introduction to Carnism: The Belief System That Enables Us to Eat Some Animals and Not Others
  • The Inner World of Farm Animals: Their Amazing Intellectual, Emotional and Social Capacities
Peter Albert David Singer is an Australian philosopher. He is the Ira W. DeCamp Professor of Bioethics at Princeton University, and laureate professor at the Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics (CAPPE), University of Melbourne. He specializes in applied ethics, approaching ethical issues from a secular preference utilitarian perspective.

He has served, on two occasions, as chair of phil
More about Peter Singer...
The Way We Eat: Why Our Food Choices Matter The Life You Can Save: Acting Now to End World Poverty Practical Ethics Marx: A Very Short Introduction One World: The Ethics of Globalization

Share This Book

“To protest about bullfighting in Spain, the eating of dogs in South Korea, or the slaughter of baby seals in Canada while continuing to eat eggs from hens who have spent their lives crammed into cages, or veal from calves who have been deprived of their mothers, their proper diet, and the freedom to lie down with their legs extended, is like denouncing apartheid in South Africa while asking your neighbors not to sell their houses to blacks.” 112 likes
“If possessing a higher degree of intelligence does not entitle one human to use another for his or her own ends, how can it entitle humans to exploit non-humans?” 83 likes
More quotes…