by
3.42 of 5 stars
The amazing story of how the electric chair developed not out of the desire for a method of execution more humane than hanging but of an effort by ... read full description

reviews

Apr 05, 2010
Converse rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Main focus is on the legal manuevering around the first execution by electrocution. Much of the legal action result of the conflict between Westinghouse & Edison. Basically, Edison, stuck with a direct current system that was proving unpopular once people realized that it required a generation plant every few miles, tried to make the use of alternating current, championed by Westinghouse, in an execution into a marketing ploy that would show that alternating current was too dangerous to have ar More...
Jul 22, 2010
Allie rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Horrifying, yet informative. I already kind of disliked Edison, now I rather hate him for his role in the electric chair. I wish that the book went a little more into the electric chair's role in the 20th century, but when a book goes into this much detail you can't make the focus too broad. The illustrations of the electric chairs may make people sitting next to you on the subway nervous.
Jan 23, 2012
Kelly rated it: 5 of 5 stars
Dec 18, 2011
The Resa marked it as to-read
Oct 18, 2011
Tom marked it as to-read
Sep 25, 2011
Keith added it
Sep 12, 2011
Ty rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Sep 01, 2011
Melissa marked it as to-read
Aug 05, 2011
Tritoch marked it as to-read
Jul 14, 2011
Cynbad rated it: 4 of 5 stars
May 09, 2011
Cleopatra1074 rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Feb 26, 2011
Greg added it
Nov 14, 2010
Jannine rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Jul 13, 2010
Miranda rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Jun 01, 2010
Kathy Jo marked it as to-read
May 31, 2010
Doug added it
Mar 17, 2010
Chris added it
Mar 11, 2010
Nathan marked it as to-read
May 23, 2010
Melissa added it
Mar 04, 2010
Dan rated it: 4 of 5 stars
Oct 07, 2009
Brad rated it: 5 of 5 stars
May 20, 2009
Dana marked it as to-read
May 07, 2009
Julie added it
Jun 07, 2009
Heidi rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Sep 27, 2011
Quinn marked it as to-read
Jan 12, 2009
Lauren marked it as to-read
Jan 11, 2009
James rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Dec 17, 2008
Paul rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Sep 30, 2008
O'shannon rated it: 3 of 5 stars
Oct 17, 2008
M— rated it: 2 of 5 stars