Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Introducing Radical Orthodoxy: Mapping a Post-Secular Theology” as Want to Read:
Introducing Radical Orthodoxy: Mapping a Post-Secular Theology
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Introducing Radical Orthodoxy: Mapping a Post-Secular Theology

by
3.71  ·  Rating Details  ·  163 Ratings  ·  18 Reviews
Provides a helpful overview of Radical Orthodoxy, highlights its areas of agreement with Reformed theology, and assesses its value as a truly postmodern theology.
ebook, 0 pages
Published December 1st 2004 by Baker Academic
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Introducing Radical Orthodoxy, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Introducing Radical Orthodoxy

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 411)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
David Mosley
Aug 13, 2012 David Mosley rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Peter Stevens, Zachariah Reynolds, JJ Simpson, Colin Nicolle
This book, both because of its critiques and in spite of them, has made me very interested in the project of Radical Orthodoxy. I'm now specifically interested in how it relates to reality as I have up to now understood it, and how it relates to my own background in the Restoration Movement. I recommend this book to anyone who is no longer satisfied with the sacred-secular divide and is searching for ways to express their belief in the sacredness of all things created by God (which is to say eve ...more
Jacob Aitken
EDIT: I am now quite critical of RO. This is an older review.

Introduction
RO is a group of theologians who saw the bankruptcy of modernity, and the inability of post modernity to answer the tough questions, thus positing a critique that seeks to avoid both secularism and pre-modernity. It is similar to a Parisian Augustine. RO is sensitive to post-modernity's critiques of secularism. The book offers a multi-angled critique of secularalism: epistemological, ontological, and ecclesiological.

Once Up
...more
Will
Apr 03, 2015 Will rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
As I become increasingly interested in the project of RO, I have found this book to be a great explanation and complement to RONT. Smith is admittedly one of my favorite authors despite our confessional differences.

Pros for this book:
- Smith does a great job at making the RO material accessible. I think RO has yet to make it on the popular level (although, should it?) largely because the RO writings are so dense (looking at you, Milbank). Smith provides a truly great "Introduction" to the sensi
...more
Jake
Jul 23, 2013 Jake rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
This was a fine overview, but I guess I'm just not convinced that RO is the way to go. There's a false dichotomy, it seems, between neo-Platonism and nihilism. I don't want to fully embrace either one, but RO says I have to.
Daniel
May 04, 2009 Daniel rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
I really got psyched about it when I read it, but then I came down off it a little. It's a good book, but Radical Orthodoxy likes sounding real extreme, except it isn't.
Frankie Della Torre
Radical Orthodoxy is a movement that seeks to use postmodernism as a catalyst for returning to an unapologetically Christian view of reality. In short, RO proponents criticize modernity's epistemology, ontology, and metaphysic - using many of the postmodern arguments put forth by thinkers like Lyotard, Derrida, and Baudrillard - and present a specifically Christian epistemology, ontology, and metaphysic.

RO orthodoxy seeks to break ties with all things "secular," since the very idea of a "secular
...more
James
Aug 16, 2007 James rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: people who think church is boring but also that atheists are arrogant
This is a great introduction to Radical Orthodoxy, a school of thought in desperate need of such an overview for the unfortunate reason that its principal practitioners make no sense. Seriously, Milbank is an absolute nightmare to read, but Smith clears it up somewhat. The most basic claim is a very interesting one, perhaps drawing on Prof. Adam Bronson's belief that all Derrida/Spivak/et al. really want is a philosophical grounding for moderate left pluralism. RO people agree with this criticis ...more
Ryan
Aug 08, 2012 Ryan rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
n typical Smith fashion, this introduction is very much a critical introduction. In the first part of the book he maps out RO, its historical approach, and its relationship to other current theological movements. In the second half he puts RO in dialogue with the Dutch Reformed movement, causing each to critique the other. The second part is by far the better, with chapters 5 (epistemology) and 6 (ontology) being the shinning pinnacle of the book. However, the shinning pinnacle is neither much b ...more
Luke
Apr 29, 2016 Luke rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Great introduction to, and synthesis of, complex material. Connection to Neo-Calvinism seemed awkward.
Luke Dubbelman
Complex "introduction"... but great stuff. Would love to read again.
Chris Comis
Not as good as I thought it was going to be. I generally like Smith, and appreciate all that he's done to try and wed Kuyperian Reformed theology with Radical Orthodoxy, but he just failed to deliver any significant "ah-ha" moments for me here. It seemed like he was more interested in writing a scholarly report, full of academic respect and scholarly pats on the back, rather than really challenging any of the several theological traditions he mentions with any substantive critiques.

It was alrigh
...more
Steve
Superb overview, highly recommended.
Jeff
Sep 04, 2012 Jeff rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition


Smith offers a critical engagement with Radical Orthodoxy, a theological movement that offers a theological position described as, "postmodern critical Augustinianism." Smith interacts with RO as an ally and brings his own reformed theological heritage into the conversation. The result is an engaging interaction between two theological schools with numerous points of parallel as well as several areas of marked distinction.
Mike
May 08, 2013 Mike rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Good introduction and overview of Radical Orthodoxy. Even if you do not necessarily agree with the tenants of this movement, which I do not, it is a good primer to this increasingly popular post-secular theology.
Charles
Nov 29, 2008 Charles rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Really helpful entree into the world of Milbank, Pickstock, and company. Added bonus: relates Radical Orthodoxy to the equally encompassing thought world of Dooyeweerd and his Dutch Reformed school.
Greg
Mar 16, 2009 Greg rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Pretty good overview of the movement, and helpful topical bibliography for each chapter. Not intended as an RO original source. RO has really captured my imagination lately.
Nate
Oct 15, 2010 Nate rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: theology
Good overview of this interesting theological approach. I like how Smith interacts from a Reformed perspective.
Aaron Cummings
Jun 05, 2012 Aaron Cummings rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Good food for thought.To measure this book by its title, Smith is a capable cartographer.
Farris Johnson
Farris Johnson marked it as to-read
Jul 21, 2016
Connor Yerxa
Connor Yerxa marked it as to-read
Jul 14, 2016
Stephanie
Stephanie rated it it was ok
Jul 04, 2016
Micah
Micah marked it as to-read
Jul 03, 2016
Zmo
Zmo marked it as to-read
Jul 02, 2016
Joy
Joy marked it as to-read
Jun 27, 2016
Ben Daniels
Ben Daniels marked it as to-read
Jun 27, 2016
Tyler Burns
Tyler Burns marked it as to-read
Jun 25, 2016
Seth Miller
Seth Miller marked it as to-read
Jun 24, 2016
Philip Tadros
Philip Tadros marked it as to-read
Jun 22, 2016
Abraham
Abraham marked it as to-read
Jun 12, 2016
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 13 14 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Theology and Social Theory: Beyond Secular Reason
  • The Kingdom and the Glory: For a Theological Genealogy of Economy and Government
  • Proper Confidence: Faith, Doubt, and Certainty in Christian Discipleship
  • The Beauty of the Infinite: The Aesthetics of Christian Truth
  • Reason within the Bounds of Religion
  • Traces of the Trinity: Signs of God in Creation and Human Experience
  • For the Life of the World: Sacraments and Orthodoxy
  • Is There a Meaning in This Text?
  • Natural Supernaturalism: Tradition and Revolution in Romantic Literature
  • The Scandal of the Evangelical Conscience: Why Are Christians Living Just Like the Rest of the World?
  • Heavenly Participation: The Weaving of a Sacramental Tapestry
  • The Unintended Reformation: How a Religious Revolution Secularized Society
  • Paul: In Fresh Perspective
  • The Christian Tradition 1: The Emergence of the Catholic Tradition 100-600
  • Knowledge and the Sacred
  • Christianity and Culture: The Idea of a Christian Society and Notes Towards the Definition of Culture
  • On the Holy Spirit
  • The Spirit of Early Christian Thought: Seeking the Face of God

Share This Book



“The state does not take a merely temporal regulatory role and leave salvation in the hands of the church; rather, the modern state seeks to replace the church by itself becoming a soteriological institution.16 It is in this sense, then, that the modern state is a parody of the church: “The body of the state is a simulacrum, a false copy, of the Body of Christ” (RONT, 182). As a result, while political rhetoric may suggest that the state is confined to a “public” sphere or that the reign of the secular is circumscribed, in fact the modern state demands complete allegiance, and the reign of the secular does not tolerate territories of resistance.17 The state is happy to absorb all kinds of private pursuits under the umbrella of civil society, but it cannot tolerate a religious community that claims to be the only authentic polis and proclaims a king who is a rival to both Caesar and Leviathan. In such a case, this community’s allegiance to its king ultimately trumps its allegiance to the state or empire, and its understanding of the nature of human persons does not fit the normative picture of liberalism. This the state cannot tolerate. It is in this sense that “every worship service is a challenge to Caesar.” 1 likes
More quotes…