The Seven Basic Plots: Why We Tell Stories
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Seven Basic Plots: Why We Tell Stories

3.86 of 5 stars 3.86  ·  rating details  ·  428 ratings  ·  92 reviews
This remarkable and monumental book at last provides a comprehensive answer to the age-old riddle of whether there are only a small number of 'basic stories' in the world. Using a wealth of examples, from ancient myths and folk tales via the plays and novels of great literature to the popular movies and TV soap operas of today, it shows that there are seven archetypal them...more
Paperback, 736 pages
Published January 9th 2006 by Bloomsbury Academic (first published October 28th 2004)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,709)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
James
An absolutely infuriating book. The basic premise, that there are a limited number of basic structures to be found in narrative storytelling, is fair enough but hardly anything new. Booker makes some good connections and some of them are undeniably on-the-money. But the whole book is infected by Booker's right wing, traditionalist ideology that it becomes, as it goes along, a deeply unpleasant, reactionary read. For Booker, the ideal man is a martial warrior & the ideal woman a housewife (sa...more
Katie
700 pages! A great deal of which is repetition of ideas and extensive plot summaries of exemplar stories throughout time, and can be skimmed. The ideas put forth in this book are appealing intuitively if ultimately unfalsifiable, and familiar if you've ever gotten into Jungian psychology or Joseph Campbell. Basically we're talking about archetypes, the psyche, and evolutionary drives; the human desire to "re"connect with "something greater," which might be god or more likely perpetuation of the...more
Richard
Notes:

Recommendation:
* Read all of Section 1, containing descriptions of the seven basic plots in erudite detail.
* Skip to Chapters 21 through 24 of Section 3. These explore the "dark" and "sentimental" variations of the foregoing.
* Skim Chapters 26 and 27, wherein the author is revealed to be a sexist reactionary. Keep in mind that if one can enjoy the music of Frank Sinatra while ignoring the fact that he as a sexist jerk, one can read the balance of Bookings with the same forbearance.
* Either...more
Michael Herrman
This book is 5x thicker than it needed to be. If it didn't make a very few fine observations I would have thrown it against the wall, which would have left a considerable hole.

Repetition aside, its greatest weakness is Booker's inability to disentangle his personal prejudices from what makes a story work in the general sense. For example, according to Booker, if the hero doesn't vanquish the villain and run off with the (victimized) female who, he maintains, is nothing more than a projection of...more
Milena March
Though I'm a little uncomfortable dismissing a book that has taken someone half a lifetime to write, I can't help but think that when it comes to The Seven Basic Plots the author's time could really have been better spent. There were points where this book outright insulted me; as a literature student, as a feminist, as a psychology major, and as a lover of stories in general.

The idea of applying Jungian theory to literature is not new, but reading this book often had me wondering whether such a...more
Rita Crayon Huang
May 02, 2009 Rita Crayon Huang added it
Recommended to Rita Crayon by: Heidi
I didn't mean to read this book. I just wanted to know see what the seven basic plots were! But I devoured the first 300+ pages in a way that made me realize I just might read all 700. (It's just so lucid! With all this yummy discussion of well-known stories from throughout the ages, FOR all ages . . . )

The next 150 pages or so have made me increasingly uneasy, as we discuss all the ways in which stories can go "wrong"--AND what this says about their authors. Not to mention us as a society. AND...more
Jessica Healy
So I was uncomfortable, early on, with the extreme heteronormative attitude, and the appropriation of Freudian/Jungian discourse as if these theories are just self evident, but I gave it a bit of leeway, because, if problematic, that kind of analysis is at least widespread... But my discomfort and suspicion grew, and at last, I could read no more. I gave up after he attempted to discuss Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley. Here are the sentences that almost broke my brain:

"The question which then ari...more
Carl
Perhaps you have heard that there are no new stories, there are only the retelling of old stories. Or maybe you have heard it said that there are only a small number of basic stories. Well, Christopher Booker took these statements seriously, and spent a lifetime writing his book about them and published it in 2004. He asserts in the beginning that there are only seven basic plots: Overcoming the Monster as exemplified by Beowulf and Star Wars, Rags to Riches with Joseph in the Bible and David Co...more
Rachel
Finished at last. What an utter waste of time - but in a sick sort of way I just had to keep going, to see just how bad it could get. He started off with a good idea - that a lot of stories have similar basic plot outlines. Unfortunately he then gets a bit carried away, comes up with a formula, then applies it not just to literature, but the whole of human history. Which is all a decline from some prelapsarian state of blessedness. It's like the theory of the four humours in medicine - it seems...more
Rebecca
The thing I recall most about this book was the author's feeling that something has grown askew within the 21st Century story structure...as if we can't resolve things 'the way we used to' - Post modernism? Something about storytelling inside that giant evolving universal perspective appealed. Stories are incredibly powerful. I didn't finish this book, but I cherry-picked some gold. However, I read these structural writing books and then instantly try to forget them. I don't want to feel to head...more
Erin Lale
This book helped me do something I find excruciatingly difficult: describe my own novel. I read this book when I was trying to write back cover copy for Punch book 1: The Loribond. It was only in reading The Seven Basic Plots that I realized I had unwittingly written a comedy.

The Seven Basic Plots is a humongous tome. For a book that purports to survey all of human literature to reveal the basic driving psychology of human storytelling, it's focused on the DWMs a bit too much for me. There were...more
Jessica
A fascinating but infuriating book which requires one to accept the premise that Jungian archetypes form the only satisfying basis for a narrative. This premise is explored through the means of numerous if partial examples from both literary and popular culture. The author's bias and erudition make this an enjoyable read and it is worth persevering to the end, however there are several annoying factual errors in the plot summaries. And Booker's despair with regard to novels and other works from...more
Chris
Booker's identification of the principal narrative structures underlying the best examples of stories, novels, plays and films is attractive and, seen retrospectively, intuitively right. Those seven plots (which he entitles Overcoming the Monster, The Quest, Voyage and Return, Rags to Riches, Comedy, Tragedy and Rebirth) singly or in combination naturally appear to underpin a very large proportion of the narratives Booker approves of. The first part of this mammoth study seems to triumphantly pr...more
Sharri
Full disclosure: I didn't finish this book. But that's partly why I give it only 2 stars.
1. It was much longer than it needed to be.
2. It made me angry, or at least uncomfortable, with where the author was taking his arguments.

The first section of the book was interesting and worthwhile. The author demonstrated how stories -- from all over the world and from ancient times to modern -- can be categorized by seven basic plots. I enjoyed reading the examples (summaries of books, movies, operas, f...more
Heather
An exellent book that I highly recommend to any writer, or "wannabe" writer. It helps if you have some concept of Jungian psychology, but the author does a good job of making his discussion of the concept of the "self" and "ego" very approachable. He does synopses of many famous stories, ranging from ancient folk tales to modern Hollywood blockbusters. If you've ever wondered why you found a particular story unappealing, reading this book might help you understand why. I foresee this book being...more
Emma Sea
I'm quitting this. I'm really perlexed that Brooker is acting as if the idea of the commonalities in stories is merely a "teasing notion" to everyone else, and that he's the only person to actually research it. Plus this review.
Daniel
May 21, 2009 Daniel rated it 4 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: writers, readers
Shelves: writing
Anyone who likes reading or writing, or even some other form of storytelling (like movies for example) really owes it to themselves to read this book. This book will give you so many great new insights and you will gain a much deeper understanding and appreciation on how stories are built up. I found myself looking at stories differently than I did before.

Booker explains how all stories basically fit into one of the seven basic plots. What's more, those stories will go through the same five main...more
Garry Powell
This is first-rate criticism--and I am usually averse to criticism, as in my view few critics understand literature. (Perhaps that sounds absurd, but I think most writers agree with me.) It's also a particularly useful book for writers. Its basic premise is that Jung is correct on his theory of the archetypes, and if stories are to mean anything to us, they need to conform, basically, to archetypal patterns. Obviously that doesn't mean that they need to be formulaic. Booker thinks that western l...more
Janice George(JG)
I purposefully did not research this author before finishing the book because I wanted to absorb the book on its own merit.

I loved the book, and I thoroughly enjoyed Booker's conjectures and conclusions about why humans seek meaning in their stories, and what meaning they seek. The only real flaw in the book (for me) was toward the end when he was discussing contemporary fiction... I think Booker's British experience and passionate nationalism clouded and somewhat distorted his otherwise mostly...more
Joff
Jan 14, 2013 Joff added it
As Harry Hill is fond of saying, "You gotta have a system!"

In this case, it's Christopher Booker, a europhobe journalist who helped found the venerable satirical magazine Private Eye in the 60s. This is Booker's life's work: a breakdown of the fundamental structure of stories to show how alike they all are. Leading us through myths, novels, poems and movies, Booker claims that all stories are basically based around seven plots, which are:

Overcoming the Monster

The Quest

Voyage and Return

Rags to Ri...more
Cynthia Haggard
THE SEVEN BASIC PLOTS by Christopher Booker is a provocative book. The basic idea is that any story can be boiled down to one of seven plots:

Overcoming the Monster
Rags to Riches
The Quest
Voyage and Return
Comedy
Tragedy
Rebirth

What is excellent about this book is the amount of learning involved and the interesting connections made between authors as disparate as Jane Austen and Luigi Pirandello. However, this is a big book at over 700 pages, and I think that part of it could have been condensed.

Like...more
Wayland Smith
It's an ambitous book, I have to give it that. The first two thirds of it or so are really interesting, talking about the basic structures that underlie most stories in the thousands of years that stories have been told.

The author breaks them down by plot type, with detailed sections on each one, and offers some great insights.

Unfortunately, after that, he takes a sharp right turn in his writing, and I can't get the image of him standing on his front step shaking his fist at kids on his lawn ou...more
Adam Stevenson
I read the book in one sitting, powered through the sheer weight of verbiage by the force of my hatred for it.

To say there are 7 plots and they represent ways of talking about overcoming the ego is fair enough - but when he can't find a single novel that properly exemplifies these ideas, it may have been time to ditch the theory.

Instead he concludes that all authors since the romantic movement have not been emotionally mature enough to fit his theory, so it must be the author's fault. Not a faul...more
Mattie
I've now typed and lost two versions of this review. Gah. Here's the bottom line: It starts out well enough, describing the seven basic story patterns (and the comic and tragic variations thereon) and the psychological archetypal characters that populated them. Interesting. However, Booker's inability or refusal to acknowledge that a book in which the patterns or characters are subverted could actually have artistic merit and his inability/refusal to entertain the notion that the psychological a...more
Old-Barbarossa
Frustrating.
I wanted to like this.
Like many models this can at times feel as though the facts are hammered to fit the theory.
Seems to note that each of the 7 plots is the most recognisable...they can't all be.
Also, misquotes some sources. No bibliography, which considering the point of the book seems to be a flaw.
I'll stick with Joseph Campbell and Marina Warner.
Surin
A very good introduction to the concept of plot and character archetypes. As a person who has a great interest in Jungian Psychology it was interesting to see how the author was able to intepret the plot structure and characters to Jungian archetypes.

The book is easy to read and the concept easy to grasp. In fact right after I had finished ready Section 1 and the intro to Section 2, I was able to analyse the recent Transformers movie. Despite it being a horrible movie, I could tell what plot str...more
عبدالله AlSaidy
A recurring theme throughout the literary cannon is the quest. The quest manifests itself in renowned tales such as Homer’s Odyssey, Dante’s Divine Comedy, and popular contemporary works like J.R.R. Tolkien’s The Lord of The Rings. In this chapter, Booker presents the plot of the quest by making alliterations to predecessors of the same genre: an obstacle-filled journey towards a priceless goal that really never seems to end when the physical journey is complete. Booker states five essential poi...more
Linda Robinson
Too much of a muchness, as my grandmother was fond of saying. Nothing revelatory or fascinating, and every other word could be eliminated. I appreciate the research and the hours behind the book, but the outcome is a daunting and misnamed book. Covers "how" in great detail and leaves hanging the "why."
James
A masterwork of more than thirty year’s research into why people tell stories. Booker breaks down stories into seven archetypal themes which occur in all types of stories. Not everyone will agree with Booker, but everyone can learn from him, about reading, writing and understanding.

Rebekah
It took Booker 34 years to write this 700 page tome, which means that he draws on a LOT of ancient stories instead if more contemporary ones, and a lot of his ideas about feminine/masculine feel incredibly forced. I really enjoyed his breakdown of plots But I never really felt like he talked about mysteries, and I disagreed with some of his value judgements of books that don't clearly fit in his rubric, and he started relying on outdated stereotypes as the book progressed. Anyway, here are my no...more
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 56 57 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • 45 Master Characters
  • 13 Ways of Looking at the Novel
  • The Art of War for Writers
  • 20 Master Plots: And How to Build Them
  • The Penguin Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory
  • Artful Sentences: Syntax as Style
  • How Novels Work
  • Booklife: Strategies and Survival Tips for the 21st-Century Writer
  • The Anatomy of Story: 22 Steps to Becoming a Master Storyteller
  • Writing the Breakout Novel Workbook: Hands-On Help for Making Your Novel Stand Out and Succeed
  • Spunk & Bite: A Writer's Guide to Punchier, More Engaging Language & Style
  • The Pocket Muse: Ideas and Inspirations for Writing
  • Between the Lines: Master the Subtle Elements of Fiction Writing
  • Writing Fiction: A Guide to Narrative Craft
  • How to Grow a Novel: The Most Common Mistakes Writers Make and How to Overcome Them
  • The Key: How to Write Damn Good Fiction Using the Power of Myth
  • The Scene Book: A Primer for the Fiction Writer
  • The Artful Edit: On the Practice of Editing Yourself
Christopher John Penrice Booker is an English journalist and author.
More about Christopher Booker...
The Real Global Warming Disaster: Is the obsession with 'climate change' turning out to be the most costly scientific blunder in history? Scared to Death: The Anatomy of a Very Dangerous Phenomenon The Great Deception: Can the European Union Survive? The neophiliacs: a study of the revolution in English life in the Fifties and Sixties The Seventies: Portrait of a Decade

Share This Book

“At the beginning of a full five-stage Tragedy, the central figure is always part of a community, a network of relationships, linked to other people by ties of loyalty, friendship, family or marriage. And one of the most important things which happens to such heroes and heroines as they embark on their tragic course is that they begin to break those bonds of loyalty, friendship and love (even if, initially, they may form other alliances). It is the very essence of Tragedy that the hero or heroine should become, step by step, separated from other people. Often they separate themselves in the most obvious, violent and final way possible, by causing other people's deaths.” 0 likes
More quotes…