Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays” as Want to Read:
Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays

by
4.03 of 5 stars 4.03  ·  rating details  ·  110 ratings  ·  11 reviews
Rationalism in Politics, first published in 1962, has established the late Michael Oakeshott as the leading conservative political theorist in modern Britain. This expanded collection of essays astutely points out the limits of "reason" in rationalist politics.

Oakeshott criticizes ideological schemes to reform society according to supposedly "scientific" or rationalistic
...more
Paperback, 582 pages
Published March 31st 2010 by Liberty Fund Inc. (first published 1968)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays

The Constitution of the United States of America by James MadisonThe Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the U... by Thomas JeffersonAtlas Shrugged by Ayn RandThe 5000 Year Leap by W. Cleon SkousenLiberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg
Best Conservative Books
198th out of 199 books — 167 voters
Atlas Shrugged by Ayn RandAfterTastes and Tales from Russia by Jake DanishevskyThe Tempting of America by Robert H. BorkRight from the Beginning by Patrick J. BuchananThe Road to Serfdom by Friedrich Hayek
A Conservative Reading List
39th out of 44 books — 17 voters


More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 475)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
John Doe
I have a problem with authority, and I don't have a lot or respect for tradition. I think we should question everything, and have good reasons for what we do.

But, I don't live like that. Many things I do, like driving a car, are the result of teaching my body how to do things. This comes from practice and trial and error, and it is not a conclusion of a rational argument or something you can learn in a book. It's life.

Oakeshott's thinks that tradition is the life of the community that you can't
...more
Paul
Oakeshott is as careful and painstaking a writer as you will find; and he makes considerable demands of the reader; but the effort will be rewarded. His examinations of what he calls Rationalism, "the conservative disposition" and "abridgments" of traditions, and other matters are innovative and thought-provoking. Some essays will require multiple readings, but I have yet to wrestle with one that did not yield considerable insights.
Ashley Cale
This is based purely on the essays "Rationalism in Politics" and "On Being Conservative." I would really give him a 4 1/2 stars; I find his essay striking. Beautiful metaphors and analogies woven throughout. Even if you aren't conservative, I think he can convince you of the subtle instances where you are. It's an interesting question whether or not people really do like change as much as they say they do.
Tony Gualtieri
Oakeshott is an honest writer and presents his ideas in direct if somewhat turgid prose. He advocates for tradition and experience in making political decisions rather than what he sees as dangerously proscriptive rationalism. It's an attractive position, but I think Oakeshott underestimates the duplicitousness of most politicians. They are nothing like a collection of disinterested Oxford dons! Even so, I think Oakeshott's ideas are important and these essays give a unique and appealing philoso ...more
Jonathan
I find this collection puzzling. It presents the beginnings of a remarkably solid case for epistemological and political conservatism (understood in the English sense, in which "conservatism" is a form of cranky Whiggism). Yet I think the essays in this book contradict each other in spirit if not in letter. The view of knowledge articulated in the title essay is at odds with the view developed in "The Activity of Being an Historian" and "The Study of 'Politics' in a University." Oakeshott argues ...more
Brittany
The meandering prose makes the book longer than it needs to be and sacrifices some clarity. Rationalism in Politics is the best essay, presenting a solid conservative case against the rationalist turn in modern politics that oddly coincides with similar critiques on the far left. The Voice of Poetry in the Conversation of Mankind, a tedious meditation on art in which Oakeshott's prose is at its most florid and overwrought, is the worst of the collection.
Mike
The title essay in this collection does a better job of demolishing the very notion of benefical, systematic political ideologies better than anything else I've ever read.
Heba Abdel hamid elsaman
للللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللللىى لابلابلبلبلابابابffff;g;hhg;;g;;g;ghlllhlhl ggllf ]dd; ,;pygl,d;
Anittah
Dec 08, 2008 Anittah marked it as to-read
I read selections in college but I don't remember a thing (who was this person who made these underlines and margin commentary?!) so am re-reading.
Jeff
Both the title essay and "On being conservative" from part four are not to be missed.
Craig J.
Rationalism in Politics and other essays by Michael Oakeshott (1991)
Madelaine
Madelaine marked it as to-read
Jul 24, 2015
eden
eden added it
Jul 18, 2015
Evan
Evan marked it as to-read
Jul 08, 2015
Prodes
Prodes marked it as to-read
Jun 22, 2015
Josh Chapa
Josh Chapa marked it as to-read
Jun 17, 2015
Booksearcher
Booksearcher marked it as to-read
Jun 13, 2015
Gaurav Srivastava
Gaurav Srivastava marked it as to-read
Jun 08, 2015
Scott Jenkins
Scott Jenkins marked it as to-read
Jun 07, 2015
Robert Singh
Robert Singh marked it as to-read
Jun 06, 2015
Pedro Pupo
Pedro Pupo marked it as to-read
May 27, 2015
Mari
Mari marked it as to-read
May 23, 2015
Ennui_Allure
Ennui_Allure marked it as to-read
May 23, 2015
Kenneth Hammond
Kenneth Hammond marked it as to-read
May 22, 2015
Zach
Zach marked it as to-read
May 20, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 15 16 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Natural Right and History
  • Meaning Of Conservatism
  • The Conservative Mind
  • The New Science of Politics: An Introduction
  • Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality
  • The Quest For Community: A Study In The Ethics Of Order And Freedom (Ics Series In Self Governance)
  • Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy
  • The Tempting of America
  • Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality
  • Essays: Moral, Political and Literary
  • Whose Justice? Which Rationality?
  • Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy: 0
  • Liberty: Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty
  • Natural Law and Natural Rights (Clarendon Law Series)
  • The Political Writings of St. Augustine
  • On Law, Morality, and Politics
  • The Man Versus the State
  • The Discourses & Other Early Political Writings (Texts in the History of Political Thought)
65231
English philosopher and political theorist who wrote about philosophy of history, philosophy of religion, aesthetics, and philosophy of law. He is widely regarded as one of the most important conservative thinkers of the 20th century, although he has sometimes been characterized as a liberal thinker.
Oakeshott was dismayed by the descent into political extremism that took place in Europe in the 193
...more
More about Michael Oakeshott...
On Human Conduct The Voice of Liberal Learning Experience and Its Modes The Politics of Faith and the Politics of Scepticism On History and Other Essays

Share This Book

“To be conservative, then, is to prefer the familiar to the unknown, to prefer the tried to the untried, fact to mystery, the actual to the possible, the limited to the unbounded, the near to the distant, the sufficient to the superabundant, the convenient to the perfect, present laughter to utopian bliss.” 28 likes
“Like Midas, the Rationalist is always in the unfortunate position of not being able to touch anything, without transforming it into an abstraction; he can never get a square meal of experience.” 10 likes
More quotes…