Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science

Rate this book

Clear rating

1 of 5 stars 2 of 5 stars 3 of 5 stars 4 of 5 stars 5 of 5 stars

Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science

3.97 of 5 stars 3.97 · rating details · 413 ratings · 30 reviews

Nobel Prize winner Werner Heisenberg's classic account explains the central ideas of the quantum revolution, and his celebrated Uncertainty Principle. The theme of Heisenberg's exposition is that words and concepts familiar in daily life can lose their meaning in the world of relativity and quantum physics. This in turn has profound philosophical implications for the natur...more

Paperback, 176 pages

Published August 3rd 2000 by Penguin Classics (first published 1958)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

Shakespeare - A Invenção do Humano by Harold Bloom

Concentric Circles

7th out of 122 books — 19 voters

The Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. Kuhn

Scientists and Philosophers

11th out of 76 books — 64 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,310)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Aug 05, 2011 Page Quinton added it · review of another edition

Heisenberg's historical account of the progression of thought in both physics and philosophy operates, at least in my eyes, as a means to illustrate his understanding of what exactly science is. The information presented in reference to the historical developments in both science (of course most notably physics, given the topic of the text) and philosophy tended towards that of an introductory text. Though for me this added a repetitive nature to some of the essays, it allows the text to be more...more

like · see review

Jan 11, 2011 Mangoo rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Here is Heisenberg's main account of the development of the quantum revolution and its, in some sense, standard interpretation (which he built in the Copenhagen infatuation). He presents the implications and the connections of the advent of quantum mechanics, and to a lesser extent of relativity theory, to modern thought and society. He is almost obsessed with the observation, which dates to Bohr in fact, that common language as we are endowed by daily experience is no suitable to describe unamb...more

like · see review

Apr 06, 2013 Mengsen Zhang rated it 3 of 5 stars

ok. it's a great book. I'm giving three stars based on my personal experience with this book-- I do not fully understand his composition of this book. I have to ignore many passages to have a holistic impression of what he's arguing about.
Based on what I understand, I would give this book another name: "Language and Dispute: the evolution of human knowledge". I would say it's more about language and reality rather than physics and philosophy. The most charming part of this book to me, is his ana...more

like 1 like · see review

Aug 22, 2012 Austin Wright rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Physics and Philosophy by Werner Heisenberg Review

Physics and Philosophy is a book published in 1962 by Werner Heisenberg, a “giant of modern physics”, about the theory of Quantum Mechanics and its philosophical implications. This book is certainly best read with prior knowledge of some classical and some quantum physics. I actually read it knowing little or nothing about quantum physics, and the parts that described in detail the physics seemed technical and hard to understand, yet still i coul...more
Physics and Philosophy by Werner Heisenberg Review

Physics and Philosophy is a book published in 1962 by Werner Heisenberg, a “giant of modern physics”, about the theory of Quantum Mechanics and its philosophical implications. This book is certainly best read with prior knowledge of some classical and some quantum physics. I actually read it knowing little or nothing about quantum physics, and the parts that described in detail the physics seemed technical and hard to understand, yet still i could make sense partly of most of it. But then I took a course in quantum cryptography and looking back at it it all makes well enough sense. So knowledge of physics is very highly recommended. As far as the philosophy goes i found it much easier to understand as he talks about high level concepts in ancient greek and renaissance thinking.

If fully understood this book can really help to inform our perception of reality and how quantum mechanics has changed that. Forever we have imagined the world as objectively “real” that whether or not we observe something it is the same, that one thing must be in one single place at any given time, that time and space are infinitely divisible and constant. This book uses the proven theories of quantum mechanics and relativity to help break those notions on what reality truly is and it is this aspect of the book that i find most enthralling. It uses logic, experimental evidence, and facts to undermine objective reality and replace it with a weird, alien view of everything. This book is incredibly important more so for philosophers thank physicists because it breaks many core assumptions down and replaces them with new and strange, yet experimentally proven results that, taken to logical fruition, produce the likes of Schrodinger's Cat which is in a superposition of dead and alive, that is to say, both dead and alive simultaneously. It are these ideas that radically change the basis of much thought ever since the beginning of human history.

I recommend this book only if you have at least a rudimentary understanding of some physics and algebra, and if you are open minded enough to question the very core beliefs of reality, because that can certainly be alot to fully grasp. Otherwise this book can seem very technical when it talks about physics, and strange about philosophy. But if you can understand and accept the statements made here then it is an absolute must read provoking some deep insight into some of the largest and most fundamental questions of reality. (less)

like · see review

Jun 13, 2010 Amy rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Some Knots Have Knotted Limbs

Toward the end of Physics and Philosophy Werner Heisenberg presciently mentions the incompatibility of quantum mechanics with relativity and the need for coherent concepts that allow for both theories without mathematical inconsistencies. Today unified field theories of quantum gravity that attempt to reconcile quantum mechanics with relativity are being explored by physicists in proposals like string theory. Heisenberg also mentions that the physicists of his time w...more Some Knots Have Knotted Limbs

Toward the end of Physics and Philosophy Werner Heisenberg presciently mentions the incompatibility of quantum mechanics with relativity and the need for coherent concepts that allow for both theories without mathematical inconsistencies. Today unified field theories of quantum gravity that attempt to reconcile quantum mechanics with relativity are being explored by physicists in proposals like string theory. Heisenberg also mentions that the physicists of his time were discovering elementary particles by experimenting with high-speed particle accelerators (which he calls “big accelerating machines”), referencing a machine in Geneva, what we now know as the operational Large Hadron Collider at CERN that is testing aspects of string theory by attempting to recreate conditions of the universe during the Big Bang.

Heisenberg’s discerning comments about the future are not surprising given the intricate attention he pays to contemporary and historical conditions through contextualizing quantum mechanics in relation to everything from Einstein’s relativity—Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle rebuts Einstein’s notion that probability cannot be expressed in physical reality—to atomic weaponry to Western philosophical thought (Descartes, Berkeley, and Kant).

Heisenberg relates quantum theory to the first conceptions of atomic science, starting with Thales, who says that water is the fundamental substance of reality. After Thales, Anaximander says the fundamental substance is ageless and eternal but nothing that can be known; his student Anaximenes says the fundamental substance is air. Heisenberg notes that Hereclitus’ argument for fire being the fundamental substance comes closest to his contemporary understanding of atomic science if only the word, “fire,” was replaced with the word, “energy.” It was Empedocles who shifted the debate from monism to pluralism by proposing the fundamental substance could not be one substance but instead the four basic elements. When Anaxagoras proposed that matter is composed of small seeds and that all change is caused by mixture and separation, he was just one step to the concept of the atom, which occurred with Leucippus and Democritus proposing that the smallest unit of matter is finite, eternal, and indestructible and that motion is made possible by the empty space between these units. Plato then articulated a theory of matter that combined Democritus’ atomism with the teachings of Empedocles and Pythagoras (who inspired schools of ritualistic Dionysian number theorists who took religious oaths to the tetraktys, the fourth triangular number of 10) to propose that the smallest units of matter are mathematical forms, about which Heisenberg comments, “here it is quite evident that the form is more important than the substance of which it is the form.” Like a poem?

Describing his understanding of the structure of language, Heisenberg quotes from Goethe’s Faust, where Mephistopheles tells the student that while formal education instructs that logic braces the mind “in Spanish boots so tightly laced” and that even spontaneous acts require a sequential process (“one, two, three!”), in truth, “the subtle web of thought/Is like the weaver’s fabric wrought,/One treadle moves a thousand lines,/Swift dart the shuttles to and fro,/Unseen the threads unnumber’d flow,/A thousand knots one stroke combines.” In addition to the swift darts and unseen threads of the imagination science must also be based on logic, open to pattern and swerve. Yet Heisenberg acknowledges there is no adequate language for quantum theory, which suggests that any novel science must concurrently create a novel language—poems?—where a “thousand knots one stroke combines.”

(less)

like · see review

Apr 06, 2013 Laura rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: physics, history-of-science

This work is an interesting historical window into the philosophical crisis caused by quatum thoery. Having come to academic maturity well after quantum mechanics was thoroughly formulated I've never had the crisis of philosophy presented here: as a student the duality of nature was presented as mathematically elegant description of how nature works and it didn't occur to me then any more than it occurs to my students today that this somehow subverts the tenants of natural science. Given the sta...more

like · see review

Feb 15, 2009 Anna rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: physics, philosophy

This is really a book about physics that only lightly touches on philosophy. A good reason to read it would be to understand why it is that 20th century physics totally changed the world, something that I think is generally forgotten these days in spite of our (ab)use of technology, the prodigal wunderkind of the advances in science over the last 200 years or so. The thing to remember about Heisenberg's book is that it was written at the height of the Cold War, and therefore beneath the shadow o...more

like 1 like · see review

May 08, 2012 Liam rated it 4 of 5 stars

"The observation itself changes the probability function discontinuously; it selects of all possible events the actual one hat has taken place." (54)

"We may remark at this point that modern physics is in some way extremely near to the doctrines of Heraclitus. If we replace the word 'fire' by the word 'energy' we can almost repeat his statements word for word from our modern point of view." (63)

"Natural science does not simply describe and explain nature; it is a part of the interplay between nat...more "The observation itself changes the probability function discontinuously; it selects of all possible events the actual one hat has taken place." (54)

"We may remark at this point that modern physics is in some way extremely near to the doctrines of Heraclitus. If we replace the word 'fire' by the word 'energy' we can almost repeat his statements word for word from our modern point of view." (63)

"Natural science does not simply describe and explain nature; it is a part of the interplay between nature and ourselves; it describes nature as exposed to our method of questioning. This was a possibility of which Descartes could not have thought, but it makes the sharp separation between the world and the I impossible." (81)

"In the experiments about atomic events we have to do with things and facts, with phenomena that are just as real as any phenomena in daily life. But the atoms or the elementary particles themselves are not as real; they form a world of potentialities or possibilities rather than one of things or facts." (186)

"The connection between natural science and technical science has from the beginning been that of mutual assistance: The progress in technical science, the improvement of the tools, the invention of new technical devices have provided the basis for more, and more accurate, empirical knowledge of nature; and the progress in the understanding of nature and finally the mathematical formulation of natural laws have opened the way to new applications of this knowledge in technical science." (188)

"[O]ne may say that the human ability to understand may be in a certain sense unlimited. But the existing scientific concepts cover always only a very limited part of reality, and the other part that has not yet been understood is infinite. Whenever we proceed from the known into the unknown we may hope to understand, but we may have to learn at the same time a new meaning of the word 'understanding.' We know that any understanding must be based finally upon the natural language because it is only there that we can be certain to touch reality, and hence we must be skeptical about any skepticism with regard to this natural language and its essential concepts. Therefore, we may use these concepts as they have been used at all times. IN this way modern physics has perhaps opened the door to a wider outlook on the relation between the human mind and reality." (201-2)
(less)

like · see review

Jul 05, 2012 Cassandra Silva rated it 5 of 5 stars

Shelves: science

Heisenberg the famous Nobel Prize winner takes us through the building up of our current understanding of Quantum Reality and the physics that lead up to this. He gives a good discussion of the Uncertainty principle of which he is so famous for and how this will impact the future of physics and how we see the world. The title is misleading however, don't expect much philosophy out of this book, and of course it was written when many ideas of modern physics were not even hardly fleshed out yet. I...more

like 1 like · see review

Sep 02, 2012 Martina rated it 5 of 5 stars Recommends it for: everyone

Shelves: physics, philosophy

This has got to be one of the most singular reading experiences ever. Ever. Heisenberg's book is so unusual, refreshing and unique - I'm not even sure on which shelf to put it. The funny thing is, this book is not so much about physics, or about philosophy, for that matter. Perhaps a more apt title would be The life and times of Werner H. It reads like a novel, and, in a way, it is a novel. I would call it a "novelized autobiography", for Werner talks about his life, his work, his thoughts in a...more This has got to be one of the most singular reading experiences ever. Ever. Heisenberg's book is so unusual, refreshing and unique - I'm not even sure on which shelf to put it. The funny thing is, this book is not so much about physics, or about philosophy, for that matter. Perhaps a more apt title would be The life and times of Werner H. It reads like a novel, and, in a way, it is a novel. I would call it a "novelized autobiography", for Werner talks about his life, his work, his thoughts in a series of episodes, referencing many political and historical events and famous persons he had a chance to meet. It's all written in a lively style, which is quite unexpected for someone who is deemed to be a great physicist of the 20th century (and physicists are supposed to have dull writing styles :P).

As most people, I'm curious about the lives of people who had done something worthwhile. It's a benevolent kind of curiosity that drives one to ask questions about the person behind that big name; a person with likes, dislikes and quirks, a person who wasn't born with an innate knowledge of his or her discipline, but who had to work to get where he or she is at. And in that regard, Physics and philosophy is a great accomplishment, because we have a chance to get to know the real Werner Heisenberg. Not just the guy who founded matrix mechanics and gave the world the uncertainty principle, but a nature lover with a penchant for music, who had engaged in the works of a youth organization and who had no qualms whatsoever to work as a lumberjack just to alleviate the financial strain from his father.
But all this information is more like a subtext of the book; Heisenberg, for the most part, concentrates on his studies and professional career, and doesn't talk about physics in a textbook manner. Rather, he talks about the problems that preoccupied him at the time, with just enough hints so that readers versed in physics know what he's saying, and that the laymen readers don't get bored.

But for me, the biggest thing Werner accomplished with this book, is the portrayal of the zeitgeist in his country (in his youth) and later on in the world. No, I'm not going to romanticize the time he lived in. We all know about the gruesome things that had happened (time frame: Heisenberg was twelve at the beginning of WWI)... I'm referring to the general climate after the 1st World War. It was a time when people read more, played music together (by and by, Heisenberg was an excellent piano player), and were not afraid to dabble in things that weren't their specialty. Almost everyone had interests on the side, and pretty substantial ones - like reading philosophy books - and even young people were not shy to discuss their personal thoughts on this or that matter. I was amazed at how perceptive many of those young people were at the time (according to the conversations Heisenberg had relayed in the book).
To make things even more exciting, it was a dawn of a new time, the birth of atomic and molecular physics, quantum mechanics, and relativistic physics. So it's not all together surprising that many of the scientists Heisenberg had encountered, even during his university years, ended up as Nobel prize winners. We meet a whole host of them throughout the book, and somehow, we get to know them as people, or at least Heisenberg's impression of them. His teacher Sommerfeld, and his university colleague Pauli; then Bohr himself, Einstein, Schrödinger, Dirac... Just reading about Werner meeting all these people (especially from today's perspective) is totally mind-blowing. It's true that Heisenberg had edited out a large quantity of "physics talk" with them, but he included other conversations which were not so much on philosophy, but more about life and beyond. Those conversation revealed much about the participants. They even managed to endear Niels Bohr to me, and by that alone, you can tell how persuasive Heisenberg's writing is! (view spoiler)

I also loved that we got deeper insight into Heisenberg's own thinking processes. His account on how he got to the groundbreaking idea of the uncertainty principle should be mandatory reading. (view spoiler) The book is also incredibly witty, especially when Heisenberg paints humorous scenes. (view spoiler) And it's chock full of memorable quotes; if I started to quote now, I would probably use up all my characters. If you have a chance to read this book, do it. You won't be sorry.(less)

like 1 like · see review

Apr 29, 2013 Mscout rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: philosophy, science

This was a history of physics and the philosophy of natural science, while at the same time being a defense of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum theory. It is grounded in the argument between classical physics and quantum physics that was then ongoing at the time of publication. Heisenberg gives equal time to the detractors of the Copenhagen Interpretation, even as he refutes each one. It is an interesting read today, as much of the old argument has been proven obsolete. A rather difficul...more

like · see review

Dec 05, 2012 Mahendra rated it 5 of 5 stars

I thought I would wait until today December 5th, 2012 on Heisenberg's 111th birthday to write this review. Heisenberg was without a doubt a "wunderkind", a "giant" in physics and an vital contributor to the discovery and the progress of Quantum Mechanics. In 1900, Max Planck discovered something strange and scary, that energy did not flow in a steady continuum, but was delivered in discrete packets Planck later called "quanta." What I think was the greatest discovery of all time, Quantum Mechani...more

like · see review

Jan 19, 2012 Aurochz rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: science, philosophy

Heisenberg Nobel laureate of physics, decided to taint himself by using the merits of his classical education, to show the history of atomic and further quantum ideas and their place in western philosophy since the Greek's. I was joking about that tainted thing, it seems a few people here see it as a terrible thing that a scientist knew philosophy and philosophical history. Which is amazing considering that only a century before physics was a subject in philosophy and science generally was known...more Heisenberg Nobel laureate of physics, decided to taint himself by using the merits of his classical education, to show the history of atomic and further quantum ideas and their place in western philosophy since the Greek's. I was joking about that tainted thing, it seems a few people here see it as a terrible thing that a scientist knew philosophy and philosophical history. Which is amazing considering that only a century before physics was a subject in philosophy and science generally was known as natural philosophy. Also amazing considering the people complaining about that and their petty obsession with categories, aren't even a tenth as smart as the philosophers they're complaining about and certainly not as smart as Heisenberg himself.

In my Harper Perennial version of this book, it comes with three essays, his nobel laureate speech and a few interviews and smaller adjunct essays as a bonus. The main essay where he outlines his Copenhagen Interpretation and general ideas in Quantum mechanics, while also relating them ans citing similarities with previous idea in philosophy and comparing them to earlier views on science. I didn't always agree with his interpretations of particular philosophers and his interpretation of quantum mechanics is somewhat dated. That being said is was still a nice exposition of the basic ideas and into the way he thought of things and saw connections in ideas and subjects other people did not.

In one of the other essays he does a similar comparison between science and politics and the way they both work. At one point in this essay, he says "science has objective ways of stating something is the truth." I cant agree with that statement at all, science might be better at weeding out bad ideas, but I find it hard to believe a man so singularly responsible for having put much of classical physics into question can really think science ever comes to an objective truth. While I cant agree with that statement, nor can I really pinpoint what really makes science different from other subjects, I can say I liked his comparisons and his insights on the supposed differences between these subjects.

I generally liked the essays and his histories, though I often disagreed with his own stated view points and interpretations on things. It is still interesting to see an actual scientist engage in philosophy of science. I would recommend.
(less)

like · see review

May 11, 2011 Temperamente rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: saggistica

Tanti anni fa, quando ancora frequentavo il liceo, presi l’abitudine di conferire alle mie letture una continuità concettuale che potesse legarle tra loro, così da svolgere uno studio per quanto possibile sistematico e non troppo “dislocato”. E le abitudini, si sa, sono dure a morire. Riprendiamo dunque da dove abbiamo interrotto con l’ultima recensione: principio di indeterminazione, meccanica quantistica, filosofia della fisica. Sono questi, infatti, i temi del saggio di Werner Heisenberg, che...more

like · see review

May 27, 2010 Gendou rated it 2 of 5 stars

Shelves: non-fiction, quantum-physics, physics

A strange and out-dated book by a brilliant physicist.
The physics in the book is solid, but drown by the primitive foolishness of Greek philosophy.
Read some Feynman before you read this book, and you'll appreciate the clarity of his philosophy of science all the more.

like · see review

Aug 01, 2009 Chris Feldman rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

This along with his "Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics" and Schrodinger's "What Is Life?" are what you want to read instead of "The Tao Of Physics" and "Dancing Wu Li Masters."

like · see review

Jan 20, 2009 lucas rated it 2 of 5 stars

Shelves: philosophy, physics

not really that useful. it's interesting to see how he looked at QM philosophically during that period, though.

like · see review

Jan 06, 2013 Manuel Alejandro rated it 5 of 5 stars

It's a book about how changes found in modern physics gives a paradigm change to the understanding of philosophy.

like · see review

May 24, 2012 Zrinka rated it 3 of 5 stars

Shelves: science, physics, philosophy

Gives a review of the progress of physics in the 20th century, and explains the consequences of the new ideas. Also, he writes about the relationship between physics, chemistry, biology and religion.

like · see review

May 08, 2012 Daniel Prasetyo rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

The essence of quantum physics from one of it's founder. Mind blowing..

like · see review

Feb 16, 2010 Clency rated it 3 of 5 stars

The content does not match the great title of the book.

like · see review

Oct 01, 2012 Graham rated it 1 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: science, non-fiction

Sorry Werner, fell asleep...

like · see review

May 22, 2012 Frank rated it 4 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Shelves: math-science, philosophy, non-fiction

If the mark of intelligence is to take the complex and explain it cogently, then the mark of genius may be to take the incomprehensible and express it persuasively.

___________________________________

It was Richard Dawkins, I think, who said that forcing children to attend Sunday school was child abuse. Exposing an innocent child to religion would permanently injury their confidence in their native power to comprehend the world.

It that doesn't work, we could always tell them about two slit experi...more

like · see review

Oct 31, 2012 Ross rated it 5 of 5 stars

Brilliant

like · see review

Apr 28, 2009 Lynn rated it 3 of 5 stars · review of another edition

The edition I plan on reading is from the UofM library, and is actually the 1958 edition, so I'll be missing out on any of the forewords, prefaces, etc., from this 2007 edition. It would be interesting to see if there are any differences in translation or any revisions, too.
Review pending...

like · see review

Aug 16, 2008 Robert rated it 5 of 5 stars · review of another edition

Recommended to Robert by: Humanities class at UA

"What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning."

Heisenberg has great language subtlety in this book. It really pushes what you would considered exacting descriptions. He is obviously brilliant, and the nice thing is that he conveys it equally through science and written language.

like · see review

Nov 07, 2011 Erickson rated it 5 of 5 stars

Shelves: philosophy, physics

Very well written book, though the only issue is the incompleteness due to new updates within science that occur after the book has been published.

like · see review

Nov 26, 2007 Alex marked it as to-read · review of another edition

I bought this and having been looking forward to reading it since I read Charles Seife's Decoding the Universe.

like · see review

Oct 05, 2009 Gerry rated it 2 of 5 stars

Shelves: science-philosophy-of-science

Long on the Physics, but very short on the philosophical impacts and thus disapointing.

like · see review

Aug 11, 2008 Leavvedolgi rated it 2 of 5 stars

bit boring book..

like · see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 43 44 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

topics	posts	views	last activity
Wrong Cover	6	5	Apr 18, 2013 06:39pm

combine
Other Editions (13)

More editions...

Genres

Philosophy

79 users

Science

70 users

Science > Physics

40 users

Non Fiction

19 users

Classics

3 users

Science > History Of Science

3 users

Social

2 users

Science > Popular Science

2 users

See top shelves...

Readers also enjoyed similar books

About Werner Heisenberg

Werner Heisenberg was a German theoretical physicist who made foundational contributions to quantum mechanics and is best known for asserting the uncertainty principle of quantum theory. In addition, he made important contributions to nuclear physics, quantum field theory, and particle physics.

More about Werner Heisenberg...

Books by Werner Heisenberg

Physics and Beyond: Encounters and Conversations

The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory

Encounters with Einstein and Other Essays on People, Places and Particles

Philosophical Problems of Quantum Physics

Quantentheorie Und Philosophie: Vorlesungen U. Aufsatze (Universal Bibliothek ; Nr. 9948) (German Edition)

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Trivia About Physik Und Philos...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Quotes from Physics and Philosophy...

“What we observe is not nature itself, but nature exposed to our method of questioning.” — 30 people liked it

More quotes…

title link	preview: Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science
avg rating	preview: Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science Goodreads rating: 3.97 (413 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/111185.Physics_and_Philosophy?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]https://d202m5krfqbpi5.cloudfront.net/books/1359928264l/111185.jpg[/img][/url] [url=https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/111185.Physics_and_Philosophy?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science by Werner Heisenberg[/url]

Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website