Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Only Good Thing Anyone Has Ever Done: A Novel” as Want to Read:
The Only Good Thing Anyone Has Ever Done: A Novel
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Only Good Thing Anyone Has Ever Done: A Novel

3.54 of 5 stars 3.54  ·  rating details  ·  170 ratings  ·  31 reviews
When Chrysalis Moffat and her brother, Eddie, inherit a mansion on the coast of California, Eddie hatches a plan to fleece credulous Californians of their cash by starting the fraudulent Tibetan School of Miracles.

But something else is happening. Through Chrysalis's reunion with her brother, she begins to discover her adoptive father's secret past, causing her own identity
Paperback, 400 pages
Published June 15th 2004 by Harper Perennial (first published 2002)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Only Good Thing Anyone Has Ever Done, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Only Good Thing Anyone Has Ever Done

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 364)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
i really liked this book, but i found that the middle was a little weak and the ending was too abrupt. that being said - its definitely worth reading, especially because its such a quick book. im just pleased because i didnt figure out all the secrets before the ending - big pet peeve of mine. im always happy to find an original voice.
A fun quick read. Stylistically quirky, and I'm a sucker for gimmicks and usually I'm disappointed in them, but the unorthodox manner in which the book was written turned out to be a really effective device. As opposed to what some people have written here it doesn't seem like the writer was being 'lazy' in making lists and outlines instead of just writing a straight forward narrative. The lists work well to fill in gaps of the story and give background in a way that fits the unreliability of th ...more
I really loved this, but I'm okay with things that are of questionable substance but have boundless amounts of style. I am even of the opinion that sometimes enough style and beautiful language can generate substance like spontaneous combustion, without the author even fully meaning to.

it's real cool and jonathan safran foer liked it: "[she] has an amazingly original way of thinking. often hysterically funny, profoundly strange, and unbearably beautiful. Often all at once."
sandra newman is incredible at intersecting several unordinary characters' gigantic and complicated life histories in a nonlinear way. lots of lists and other experimental organizational tactics. the story is so idiosyncratic it verges on surreal. really interesting read.
It seemed like sometimes her style of outlining instead of writing paragraphs was more lazy than creative. It felt like I could skip big chunks of it and it would have no effect on the story-I didn't like that.
It seemed like sometimes her style of outlining instead of writing paragraphs was more lazy than creative. It felt like I could skip big chunks of it and it would have no effect on the story-I didn't like that
I would've liked this book a lot better if it had been shorter. I was pulled into the story briefly (and actually eager to continue reading), but I just lost interest after the first two hundred pages. I got tired of being told major plot points in an almost spoiler-like fashion well before the events were described. It would have benefited from a little more order in all the "chaos." I put quotations around the word because it seems more of an intentional style, which has its charm to begin wit ...more
A year or so ago, I picked this book up at a dollar sale solely because a review on the cover referred to the author as the "Vonnegut of our generation". The novel sat on my bookshelf until two nights ago when I hastily grabbed it on my way out the door because I needed something to while away the hours while working a night shift.

Stylistically, I'm not reminded of Vonnegut when I read this book, but no matter: this book is really good.

The book starts with our main character Chrysalis in the m
I didn't actually keep reading this book - I probably read 1/4 of it at best.

It was really nicely written. I was tempted to keep going because it was a treat to read something so beautifully crafted. However, it was really really depressing and most of the characters were really really really unlikeable and I had to quit. And it was depressing and the characters were unlikeable in a realistic way, and isn't that just enough to make you secretly cut? I returned it to the library so I could read
This book took me forever to get to because I could not bring myself to read it right after Dear Everybody. It just did not feel good or right.

In fact given time as a stand alone this book is outstanding. The story is something very different but very much the same as something like Invisible Monsters. Separation, family, starting, coming together... This book for me seemed very special. The psychosis of the characters made a very specific kind of sense. If someone were truly to go crazy this i
Jul 22, 2008 Kevin rated it 4 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: Readers of unconventional writing styles
Shelves: fiction
Sandra Newman employs numbered and bulleted lists throughout her first novel, but The Only Good Thing Anyone Has Ever Done doesn't suffer because of it. Since the nature of the lists require each point to be succinct, the technique works as long as each brief detail covers a very important matter we'd rather not glean through exposition or inner monologue.

If any fault can be laid at Newman's feet, it would be there for the too-quick wrap up in the concluding pages, but she is hardly the first a
i could not tolerate this book. the dialogue irritated me - especially the brother's. the lists irritated me. none of the characters were developed in any way to make you care about them. and i dont think any of it was funny.

i had to stop reading it and return it to the library. i could not understand what i would be taking away from this book after forcing myself to read it so i just gave up!

usually when i have nothing nice to say i do not but i could not help this.
This book is absolutely unlike anything I have ever read before. That's why I liked it, for its originality. Not a sane or sober character in the bunch. Not a light read b/c it takes some focus to keep the characters and their relationship to each other straight. Lots of loose ends flying around until the end. It's "out there," though, you've been warned. Very, very unique, ecclectic. Almost bizarre. But I liked it.
It's impossible for me to say whether this is a2, 3,or 4 star book. Is it genius or merely an outline of detailed character sketches that goes nowhere? I truly don't know, but even though I didn't like the book, I had a nagging feeling that I didn't understand it. Like it or not, art creates feelings like that. Then again so does a fraud. For that reason, this book is easily loved or hated.
Unfortunately there's no option for 'couldn't finish'. I was sort of enjoying it, the writing is really unique, funny, clever....but I got bogged down just after half way. Perhaps I'll finish it later. Perhaps the main character was just a bit too neurotic/psychotic for me to persevere with. And the brother was such a wanker. Still, the plot was interesting.
I didn't read far enough to find out what Newman thinks is the only good thing anyone has ever done. It's for sure not writing this book though. The gimmicky writing gets old fast and the characters are not people you want to spend time with.
I like its form. Deconstruction stuff without the annoying babble. Turns religion, philosophy, and mental conditions into an economy. As my dear friend Deborah Carver would say, "Everything is always about sex or fate." This is both.
Parts of this book made me laugh out loud on the bus. The narrator uses outlines to tell the story, which I thought was very clever.
Apr 29, 2013 Andrea rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: fans of the experimental
I liked this strange novel and if you like to read about California weirdness, gambling, and mysterious parents, this is the book for you.
You've never heard of this book because no one has, but it's AWESOME and you'll never know till you read it, damn it, so read it.
благородных благодати
It is a strange book, a mesh of unexpected events ocurr and well, there's pokar, CIA stuff and faith in the game.
This was a very odd book, even for me. I just can't tell if it was a good book...
I'm not sure about this book yet. It's really hard to get into.
Jan 05, 2011 Alison added it
Apparently I read this but I remember nothing about it!
Funny, unexpected, sad, and vastly entertaining.
Jane Slavin
A wonderful surprise. Just read it.
Abbi Dion
sandra frickin rules.
Gets better with every read.
This was one weird book.
Lobster Moriarty
Loved the language!
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Gun Dealers' Daughter
  • The Zoo Where You're Fed to God
  • Talk Dirty to Me
  • The Evening Hour: A Novel
  • Through the Valley of the Nest of Spiders
  • Deadly Housewives
  • The Lightning Keeper
  • Four Comedies: The Taming of the Shrew, a Midsummer Night's Dream, the Merchant of Venice, Twelfth Night
  • Like Being Killed
  • Oh Pure and Radiant Heart
  • Mr. Dixon Disappears (Mobile Library Mystery #2)
  • The World of Mathematics Set
  • Making Friends with Hitler: Lord Londonderry, the Nazis & the Road to War
  • Create Dangerously: The Immigrant Artist at Work
  • Thunder God
  • The Unbinding
  • Cyber Way
  • An Evening of Long Goodbyes
The Country of Ice Cream Star The Western Lit Survival Kit: An Irreverent Guide to the Classics, from Homer to Faulkner Cake Changeling: A Memoir Of Parents Lost And Found Read This Next: 500 of the Best Books You'll Ever Read

Share This Book

“Examining the actual contents of my crying, I found a quailing sludge emotion, with a foul insecticide taste. If it was a peanut, you would spit it out. Yet I was indulging this toxic goo, giving it its head and letting it dictate my actions. People had every good reason to despise me. ” 5 likes
“He says nothing, vehemently. I falter away and we sit, mutually staring into the fouled water. ...

With time to kill, I ponder dismally the possible derivation of the zombie myth from people like my boyfriend. I picture Ralph blackened, semi-fingered, with bright bone peeking through his flesh. The odd small worm clings, festively wiggling. In my image, Ralph's really upset about decaying, and I feel for him sorrowfully. I want to tell him I would still love him, if he were decomposed. Of course in practice there is no predicting what I'd feel, and besides which, it's a wild associative leap.

I ponder dismally how I've alienated people, all my life, with my bizarre associative leaps. ”
More quotes…