The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates

by
4.03 of 5 stars 4.03  ·  rating details  ·  1,806 ratings  ·  28 reviews
The dissenting opinions of Patrick Henry and others who saw the Constitution as a threat to our hard-won rights and liberties.

Edited and introduced by Ralph Ketcham.
Paperback, 480 pages
Published May 6th 2003 by Signet Classics (first published October 7th 1986)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
The Constitution of the United States of America by Founding FathersThe Declaration of Independence and The Constitution of the U... by Thomas JeffersonThe Federalist Papers by Alexander HamiltonGreen Illusions by Ozzie ZehnerThe Revolution by Ron Paul
Best Books to Become an Informed Voter
20th out of 662 books — 826 voters
The Stranger by Albert CamusRabbit, Run by John UpdikeThe Little Prince by Antoine de Saint-ExupéryAlice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking-Glass by Lewis CarrollThe City And The Stars by Arthur C. Clarke
Stars and Stripes
56th out of 162 books — 24 voters


More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Kevin
I picked up the Federalist Papers with a thirst for the wisdom of men who understood freedom. Even though I accidently ordered two editions of the book the vast volume of the wisdom I was going to partake made this seem almost trifle.

As I began to read, I began to realize that there was no wisdom in what I was reading, that it was old propaganda written by an evil man. The descriptions of the Federalist Papers contained in the beginning and their history is all you will need for once you start r...more
Rebecca
After you read the federalist papers it is so mind blowing to read the counter arguments. Both are such a study in government and propaganda. Again, I would recommend reading these essays over any american history text book to anyone that wants to really understand our government. They are facinating.
Tony
Feb 27, 2007 Tony rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Everyone
I enjoy this even more than the federalist papers, really interesting to anyone who cares about politics or the nature of political thought in this country. This is where it all started.
trivialchemy
I would argue that the anti-Federalists' papers are more important than those of the Federalists. I predicate this on the belief that greater comprehension of the status quo comes through studying that which dissents from it.

Believe that or not, either way if you had a teacher who forced you to read the Federalist papers and not the anti-Federalist papers, he was most assuredly a fascist.
Murray
Kind of tough to read, but if you want to know what went wrong with the country, it's that these guys were right.
Briana
I have nothing interesting to say. I know very little about the Anti-Federalists, other than the pro-"small government" idea, since according to the blurb, "Although the Anti-Federalists lost, they came close to winning..."

They say the winners write the history books...

*EDIT*

Another 1776 moment...Edward Rutledge saying that slavery has to do with interest, not religion, and that South Carolinans and Georgians are not such fools as to abolish slavery...

Eerily close to the musical...guess the prod...more
Catherine
The Anti-Federalist Papers were written less in response to the Federalist arguments than I had anticipated. The true discussion was between the Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitution itself. The Anti-Federalist Papers were not less enjoyable a read for all that; in fact, they were impassioned, with moments of stunningly powerful rhetoric. Their downfall lay more in the repetition of or contradiction between the different arguments, the natural result of their not having been designed to be...more
Shawn
This volume is an excellent companion to the Federalist Papers. Although far from being a comprehensive collection of Anti-Federalist writings, it provides an excellent summary of key points of debate in the shaping of the U.S. Constitution.

The book's introduction provides a brief summary of Federalist and Anti-Federalist principles, as well as some historical context, a brief chronology, and a summary of Anti-Federalist arguments. The book then moved on to James Madison's notes on the Federal...more
Zinger
Oct 27, 2010 Zinger rated it 5 of 5 stars
Shelves: 2010
I really enjoyed reading the Anti-Federalist Papers. Before reading the book, I had thought of those who didn’t sign the Constitution at the Convention as …not bright enough to get it. Great men, but just a little short compared to those that signed. Now having read the arguments against, I realized that these men were patriots and statesmen who contributed much by their voice of caution and their criticisms. This resistance I feel helped improve the dialogue, discussions, and ultimately the con...more
Brad
Okay, being a collection of primary source documents it seems a bit silly to rate them. But I found them to be precious, informative and stimulating. This edition especially gave some keen insights into the process by which our country was created, the players, their thoughts. The things I have always taken for granted about our government and the way it runs. So many statements I agreed with, so many persons that seemed interesting. I don't know that this would be fun reading for all, but if yo...more
Trey Shiver
The most fascinating part of this book is the Constitutional Convention debates, via Madison's daily journal. The day-to-day accounts of the major events in the construction of the U.S. government remind you that the people who organized the American government were really just a bunch of guys in a room who'd been allowed the unusual privilege to organize their ideal political system. The only question was what did that look like and how would it actually work? Really strips away the facade of h...more
Benjamin Spurlock
A must-read for anyone curious about America, or the origins of the system of government in which we find ourselves. In particular, it's good to note the predictions made of some of the Anti-Federalists, and how, sadly, they were exactly right about the nature of this government.
Kristin
It was good to read this to get the perspective of those who believed in something that didn't come to be the reality of what America is. However, when read with the Federalist Papers, the Anti-Federalist Papers really couldn't hold a candle to them.
Angie
I loved seeing the opposing views of the makers of our Constitution, especially the views expressed by the unknown Federal Farmer. He drew out some really good points about the House of Representatives not being adequately represented, among other things.
Michael Taylor
Nice collection of Anti-Federalist papers. Extremely useful to have the other side of the story. Not definitive, but the book to start with for the side of the story of our founding that has received much less attention.
Aaron Crofut
This would make a decent book for a class, but otherwise you are better off just finding the complete anti-federalist works and Madison's notes on the Constitutional Convention online. Both are definitely worth reading.
Alex Schwerdt
Nov 08, 2013 Alex Schwerdt is currently reading it
Sort of. I bought it a LONG time ago, read a few pages and haven't finished yet. It's on my list. Someday I will finish, and I want to read The Federalist Papers at the same time, or afterwards. Either way.
John Yelverton
A wonderful, classic rebuttal to the argument that the United States needed a Constitution. It was through the works of these arguments that the Bill of Rights was passed.
Gracie
well written on the whole, but the best part is being able to see what the anti federalists predicted so long ago. we became exactly what they didn't want, an empire.
Elaine
Interesting read...shows that the so-called "Libertarian" viewpoint was actually a prominent minority one at the time of the founding.
Craig
essential to understanding how the american experiment works. these arguments are still playing out today. should be mandatory.
Craig J.
The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates (Signet Classics) by Ralph Ketcham (2003)
Colin
I may disagree with the points made, but essential documents to my understanding of America.
Joe Vaughn
Dec 27, 2007 Joe Vaughn rated it 5 of 5 stars
Recommends it for: Citizens
Excellent opposing viewpoints to centralisied gov't.
Melvin
I had to read this book for a class in college.
robert
Yikes!! The Revolution was hijacked!
Faith Bradham
Same as The Federalist Papers.
Jason
Is it bad to enjoy these more than the Federalist Papers? These arguments came to pass as the government DID overstretch and usurp power from the rest. these guys were right.
Iaccobvs
Iaccobvs marked it as to-read
Jul 28, 2014
Linda
Linda marked it as to-read
Jul 28, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Federalist Papers
  • Paine: Collected Writings: Common Sense/The Crisis/Rights of Man/The Age of Reason/Pamphlets/Articles & Letters (Library of America #76)
  • The Constitution of Liberty
  • Of Plymouth Plantation 1620-1647
  • Reflections on the Revolution in France
  • The Debate on the Constitution : Federalist and Antifederalist Speeches, Articles, and Letters During the Struggle over Ratification : Part One, September 1787-February 1788 (Library of America #62)
  • America's Constitution: A Biography
  • Jefferson: Writings (Library of America #17)
  • Selected Speeches and Writings
  • Writings (Library of America #109)
  • Democracy in America
  • Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century
  • I Have a Dream / Letter from Birmingham Jail
  • The Basic Political Writings
  • New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR's Economic Legacy Has Damaged America
  • The Spirit of the Laws (Cambridge Texts in the History of Political Thought)
  • Original Meanings: Politics and Ideas in the Making of the Constitution
James Madison Presidents Above Party: The First American Presidency, 1789-1829 The Madisons at Montpelier: Reflections on the Founding Couple Framed for Posterity: The Enduring Philosophy of the Constitution (American Political Thought) Benjamin Franklin

Share This Book