Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “What? Are These the 20 Most Important Questions in Human History or Is This a Game of 20 Questions?” as Want to Read:
What? Are These the 20 Most Important Questions in Human History or Is This a Game of 20 Questions?
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

What? Are These the 20 Most Important Questions in Human History or Is This a Game of 20 Questions?

3.01 of 5 stars 3.01  ·  rating details  ·  90 ratings  ·  32 reviews
What is What? Could it be that noted author Mark Kurlansky has written a very short, terrifically witty, deeply thought-provoking book entirely in the form of questions? A book that draws on philosophy, religion, literature, policy-indeed, all of civilization-to ask what may well be the twenty most important questions in human history? Or has he given us a really smart, im ...more
ebook, 96 pages
Published April 26th 2011 by Walker Books (first published January 1st 2011)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

Be the first to ask a question about What? Are These the 20 Most Important Questions in Human History or Is This a Game of 20 Questions?

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 204)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Jeanette  "Astute Crabbist"
Is this a book review or just a list of questions? Is a list of questions a book review if the book being reviewed is composed entirely of questions?

Can this book be read in one sitting? Is that one of its best attributes? Is there something increasingly annoying about reading one question after another? Are there any answers in this book?

Does this book deserve three stars? Did I get anything from it besides a compulsion to make my own endless list of questions?
Tracy Rowan
Would it matter to you if it wasn't? Would you buy this book in any event because it piqued your interest? But doesn't it seem to you that a book entirely comprised of questions is just a little pretentious? And honestly, isn't a small-format book of fewer than 100 pages a bit over-priced at more than $10? Even with illustrations? Even very nice little woodcuts? But the bottom line is, how long do you really think you can stand reading an entire book that is nothing but questions?

Yeah, I thought
At the first question, I thought "Huh. This is a little strange." By the third question, I thought "Wow, this is annoying." By about question 5, I thought "I just gotta push through this book. It's only 82 pages, and I can add it to my books read pile."

Around question 6, though, I got sucked in. A book that's entirely questions is an interesting conceit. Reading a book that's full of questions requires a subtle shift in the way I read a book: like reading Shakespeare or speech written in a diale
this is a book about the historic and modern importance of questions and asks which questions are important those with answers or those without?
Al Bità
Was I was initially amused by the conceit of this book? Did I smile when the author asked whether he was the author? When he questioned who to thank? Asked about the Index? Queried the title of the book? Was uncertain about whom to dedicate his book to? Is it significant that the information on the verso of the title page is not questioned?

Am I not an advocate of the Socratic admonition to question everything? How is it then that I eventually found this perpetual questioning irritating? Was it u
What is What? Has Mark Kurlansky drawn on philosophy, religion, literature, politics - indeed, all of civilization - to ask the twenty most important questions in human history, or has he given us a really smart, impossibly amusing game of twenty questions? In What?, Kurlansky considers the work of Confucius, Plato, Stein, Shakespeare, Descartes, Nietzsche, Freud, Hemingway, de Gaulle, Woolf, Dickinson, and others, distilling the deep questions of life to their sparkling essence. What? supplies ...more
Jane S
This slim volume is composed entirely of questions about what is the nature and purpose of life, reality etc., interspersed with musings on what sages and philosophers such as Nietzsche and Confucius have said on the same. To all intents and purposes, the premise seems fine ; in execution however, the project seems to strain and try too hard to fit questions within chapters nominally framed by those questions journalists ask i.e. Who, What, When, Why, Why, How and a few more besides. This imposi ...more
There were three or four moments in reading this book where I found myself happily re-reading a sentence, or thinking that a particular insight was well presented. The rest of the time I was more or less annoyed by the all the questions. Clearly there is no denying the value of questions, particularly to philosophy. On or near the 20th page of this little book, I began to wonder if there was some correlation between the viceral annoyance I was experiencing reading a book which asks far to many q ...more
Kris McCracken
I like Mark Kurlansky’s work, I really do. This one failed to resonate though. In What? Are These the 20 Most Important Questions in Human History or is This a Game of 20 Questions? every single sentence is a question.

Yes, every single one.

As much as I like Kurlansky and as much as I like questions, it just didn’t work for me. Let me put it this way, do you like being asked random questions for hours on end? Do you like no narrative thread in the books you read? Do you like endless and disjoin
Robert Heckner
Was this a good book? Did I like it? Is Kurlansky brilliant or mad? Does this book answer any questions? What? Where? Why? Who? How?
Linda K
Can a book only pose questions and be a viable book? Can an author be so astute that he can write so many interesting questions? Does reading such a book get quite annoying after awhile?

Answer to all these is "Yes!"

This premise is so clever that it is hard not to appreciate it. The idea that questions are so integral to our continued reading and understanding is purposed. And, the idea that if we had bothered to truly find the answers to a lot of questions we would be in a much better place.

A f
Jeffrey Bumiller
Consider this: "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"

I found this book fascinating. I was glued to it, carrying it around the apartment cleaning up the kitchen while reading it, considering getting in the shower and reading it, just so I didn't have to put it down. It's very poetic in a way and it reaffirms the value of questions in our world.
Loved this clever, thought-provoking little book - written entirely in the form of questions. There is something so open, humble, and liberating about questions, as opposed to dogmatic or pat answers. Makes you wonder: are questions the answer? Despite its brevity not to be read to hastily - after all, shouldn't questions provoke thinking and analysis?
Craig Davey
Interesting , sometimes thought provoking , but ultimately unfulfilling. Quite a small book for the big questions contained within which limits the depth with with one can dive for answers. Although the aim of the author seems to pose questions and why we ask them, rather than try to find his own answers and share them with the reader.
Enka-Candler Library
What is this? A book written entirely with questions? How fascinating is this?
Really, the author writes in the entire book with questions. Granted, it's a little gimmicky, but it's an interesting take on the subject--which is a look at the some of the most intriguing questions put forth by humankind.

Does it appear that I rate every book I finish with five stars? How can we assign a rating to a book? Did it make us think? Did it provoke more questions than it answered? Did it leave me wanting more? If the answers to these questions is yes, then does this book deserve the highest rating?
This book did not resonate with me. Conceptually it does provide an interesting approach to the elements of philosophy, and life’s great question. The cynic in me makes me think the book is a filler in a commitment to publish a certain number of books to fill a contractual obligation.
It seems I liked this book more than most people. It's short and, at first glance, looks like a shallow novelty. But I think its fundamental point--that questioning is important in its own right--cannot be overstated, and recognizing that is the beginning of any great philosophy.
A total impulse read. Just for the heck of it. Finished it in less than half an hour. Have forgotten almost everything in it. But I do remember it was strange and interesting to read a book composed almost entirely of questions.
A bit gimmicky. Didn't find it made me think about these questions in a new or deeper way. Author implies in the acknowledgements that his agent wasn't really enthusiastic about this book. Could have been on to something.
I liked it. I found the ongoing amount of questions grating. At the same time found that I was looking at ideas from a different perspective simply by having something posed as a question vs a statement.
Edward Sullivan
An occasionally amusing little book that has an intriguing underlying concept but relies too much upon gimmickry which qickly wears thin.
Short and sweet? Worth your 30 minutes? Why all the questions? Must all the answers be given to you all the time?
A nice short book. Annoying at times, but with enough patience and curiosity you'll get some nice bits of inspiration.
A short little book, lots of questions, no answers. It's up to the reader to figure out the answers!
Incredibly annoying book. Somehow manages to be less than the sum of its parts.
Cute idea-pulled off with enough wit and intelligence to make a fun read.
A book full of a philosophy minor, I was quite intrigued.
I can be silly, but it was a good laugh, among other things.
ChJ Loveall
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Anything for a Vote: Dirty Tricks, Cheap Shots, and October Surprises in U.S. Presidential Campaigns
  • Never Done: A History of American Housework
  • Floating Gold: A Natural (and Unnatural) History of Ambergris
  • Medieval Underpants and Other Blunders: A Writer's (and Editor's) Guide to Keeping Historical Fiction Free of Common Anachronisms, Errors, and Myths [Second Edition]
  • Bento's Sketchbook
  • I Hardly Ever Wash My Hands: The Other Side of OCD
  • Death by Petticoat: American History Myths Debunked
  • Einstein's Refrigerator and Other Stories from the Flip Side of History
  • Throw the Damn Ball: Classic Poetry by Dogs
  • Many Genres, One Craft: Lessons in Writing Popular Fiction
  • Greatest Clicks: A Dog Photographer's Best Shots
  • African Friends and Money Matters: Observations from Africa
  • My Teenage Werewolf: A Mother, a Daughter, a Journey Through the Thicket of Adolescence
  • Free Speech: A Very Short Introduction
  • The Creation of Inequality. How Our Prehistoric Ancestors Set the Stage for Monarchy Slavery and Empire
  • Easy Labor: Every Woman's Guide to Choosing Less Pain and More Joy During Childbirth
  • Ether
  • Without Sin: The Life and Death of the Oneida Community
Mark Kurlansky (born 7 December 1948 in Hartford, Connecticut) is a highly-acclaimed American journalist and writer of general interest non-fiction. He is especially known for titles on eclectic topics, such as cod or salt.

Kurlansky attended Butler University, where he harbored an early interest in theatre and earned a BA in 1970. However, his interest faded and he began to work as a journalist in
More about Mark Kurlansky...
Salt: A World History Cod: A Biography of the Fish that Changed the World The Big Oyster: History on the Half Shell The Basque History of the World: The Story of a Nation The Food of a Younger Land: The WPA's Portrait of Food in Pre-World War II America

Share This Book