Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom?” as Want to Read:
The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom?
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The Transparent Society: Will Technology Force Us to Choose Between Privacy and Freedom?

3.91 of 5 stars 3.91  ·  rating details  ·  367 ratings  ·  33 reviews
A respected futurist advances an argument sure to cause debate?in a wired world, the best way to preserve our freedom will be to give up our privacy.
ebook, 384 pages
Published May 1st 1999 by Basic Books (AZ) (first published 1998)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Transparent Society, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Transparent Society

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,025)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Richard Reviles Censorship Always in All Ways
Rating: 4.5* of five

David Brin LIKES my review! *complete fanboy SQUEEEEEEEE*

The Publisher Says: �In New York and Baltimore, police cameras scan public areas twenty-four hours a day.
�Huge commercial databases track you finances and sell that information to anyone willing to pay.
�Host sites on the World Wide Web record every page you view, and "smart” toll roads know where you drive.

Every day, new technology nibbles at our privacy.Does that make you nervous? David Brin is worried, but not jus
This may be a 4-star book, but I was tempted to give it 5 stars just for David Brin himself. It's not quite as rare as one might think to have pretty good ideas and opinions about things, as David Brin does. What's especially rare, that David Brin has, is to not just be smart about things, but to *not be a dick about it*. Even if you don't care about privacy, even if you don't think it's worth your time to read a book about the internet from the time before the internet was really the internet, ...more
A very interesting premise, and from a point of view I hadn't considered before, but ultimately it didn't need to be as long as it was. The structure of the book was basically a central idea which then got poked by a stick from a dozen different angles.

Three stars for changing the way I think... and for proving how very far technology has come even since 1998!! Brin's summary of the functions and capabilities of the Internet are no end of amusing: 'you can even play [text-based:] RPGs involving
Mark Ballinger
A not bad book, but sadly outdated by history since 1998. The idea is that a society where openness rules, but from the government to the people and people to government, is a society trending toward justice. This book could use an update!

"but the real impulse to force them open may only come after some band of terrorists manages to kill thousands with a gas attack, or blow up a skyscraper, or poison a reservoir, or 'dust' a city with radionuclides (sic). When this happens, many will call for dr
Joshua Mooney
Read this as a required text for a graduate course on Information Policy, and liked it so much I ended up reading the whole thing, not just the required chapters. It is very refreshing to see a book approach the concerns of an increasingly interconnected society with something other than brackish paranoia or blithering optimism. In fact, to put it succinctly, the book is really about eliminating false binaries commonly held in regards to surveillance technology and increasingly sophisticated met ...more
David Brin would make any shortlist of my favorite public intellectuals. He is a man of many quirks, a loquacious contrarian fond of bizarrely placed punctuation and enthusiastic but sometimes strained prose. Those qualities, which so often show up in personalities that grate the ear and bore the mind, somehow come together in Brin with a kind of obnoxious harmony, one that taunts readers almost as much as it seduces them.

The Transparent Society is Brin's only nonfiction book, and while it is t
Jun 23, 2013 Jenny rated it 5 of 5 stars  ·  review of another edition
Recommends it for: free thinkers
Shelves: favorites
A great thought experiment on the antithesis of the idea that privacy is sacred. Even if the book doesn't change your mind about the right to privacy (What is privacy? Is it the ideal?) it will at least make you think about it. This book is one that consistently informs my outlook on the world and society.

I would give this 5 stars except that the last few chapters lose their focus a bit. I got most information from the first 50-60% of the book, and the rest didn't really add much. Update: I gave
In The Transparent Society (1998), David Brin overviews various threats to our privacy in an age with increasing information technologies and proposes a policy of open reciprocity transparency. Arguing against "strong privacy" advocates who oppose a transparent society (20), Brin argues that "'reciprocal transparency' may be our best hope to enhance and preserve a little privacy in the next century" (55). He explores the various threats to privacy, most of which are surveillance (cameras, sensor ...more
Joey H.
This is mildly interesting as a study of privacy issues of the modern era. The problem with it is that it is written like a bad Wikipedia article - sometimes claims have proper references, sometimes they are completely unfounded and unprovable, and sometimes they are outright delirious fantasies. Brin, a science fiction author (if you read this book, he will remind you constantly of his many successes in the SF world lest you should forget how amazing he is,) simply did not have the desire/disci ...more
Aaron Slack
n this non-fiction book, talented science fiction author David Brin (the Uplift series) makes a long and rambling case for a transparent society being the only way to prevent government and private entities from abusing new and existing surveillance technologies. I disagree. When government and/or public opinion outlaw a legitimate practice, all the transparency in the world, two-way or not, will not help. For example, what about China's one child per family policy, enforced with forced abortion ...more
Dave Peticolas

What I love about David Brin is his optimism. He reminds us that, although things are far from perfect, they are much better now than in the past, thanks in large part to democracy and pragmatic empiricism.

In this book, Brin takes on the 'cypherpunk' credo that privacy and anonymity, as provided by the modern tools of encryption, are the keys to our freedom. Brin question not only the feasibility of obtaining true anonymity, but also whether we should want it at all. His main argument is that de

Although a few years old, the issues described in this book have only become more pressing. Brin's premise is an interesting one: preserving privacy is going to become almost impossible, so our only recourse is to make sure that we know who's watching us and hold them accountable. In other words, we must be able to watch the watchers. I'm not sure he's entirely correct that we can't protect our privacy, but I think his argument that we should have reciprocal transparency is a good one (although ...more
Reading this book convinced me that this debate about privacy and accountability is among the most critical questions we need to be answering now in order to preserve what maintains our remaining freedom. Brin's discourse is clear and thoughtful. What I most appreciate is his consistently balanced approach, capped only at the very end with a strong stance of his own. The only thing this book needs is an update. Written in 1999, it anticipated the evolution of the web, but I'm sure the technology ...more
Brian Holder
I will admit that this book took me a very long time to finish but that is because of how dense I found this book and how much I have found myself invested in its arguments and positions. Even with sixteen years between its publication and now the concerns discussed are highly prescient in this post-9/11, post-Enron, post-Snowden world.
The book points out that we rail at government and corporate secrecy but we do so from opposite societal ends without realizing that these ends actually share a
David Hill
Transparency has been the great engine of science, markets, and democracy. Brin discusses how technology may affect society with regards to privacy, secrecy, and anonymity, the possible ways powerful oligarchies may shift power using surveillance, and how transparency might (should? will?) be the great equalizer.

The book was written before Google and Facebook and Twitter, before 9/11, before every cell phone had a camera and GPS. I was concerned that the book would be dated but the concepts are
Brin has an interesting thesis: that the technology for privacy invasion has become pervasive, and that the important thing now is not to try to reclaim personal secrecy, but to embrace the technology enough to make it possible to watch the watchers. This book came out in 1998, and I read it in either 1999 or 2000; it would be interesting to read it again now after the experiences of the intervening years. I think I might find the thesis more compelling now than when I first read the book.
There is no turning back ... but where are we really going? Being old, I have seen most prognostications of the future wrong. We are, however, moving to more efficiency in natural resource use with stuttering progress in moving towards replenishable balance with the resources of earth. Global warming is the wakeup call, but world financial stability is the deciding one - money always speaks loudest. (There, I have prognosticated).

Godd read. Brin is brilliant.
Jay Sprenkle
I enjoyed some of David's science fiction so I thought I would give his non fiction a try. Honestly I could not finish the book. If there's a point he's trying to make he approaches it pretty circuitously. I got through several chapters and felt they could have been written in two paragraphs. If you're impatient this is not the book for you.
"Brin brings a smart and well-composed treatise on transparency, privacy and freedom in an increasingly technological/pervasive age. Written in the 90s, not all his predictions have come to pass - yet - but others were remarkably precise. Whether you value privacy or freedom more, this book (while relatively long) is worth it.
Written as a corrective to all the anarcho-libertarian crypto stuff that was so terribly fashionable at the close of the 20th Century. Worthwhile and provocative if you're into this kind of stuff, but somewhat condescending. Also: way too many exclamation points.
Hard to accept this was written in 1998. Very prescient; only complaint is that Brin tends to repeat himself.
A good history and an interesting thesis, but eclipsed by the revelations of Edward Snowden. The argument for hard encryption in the hands of individuals is now irrefutable.
They will have the information, so we might as well too. Besides, the only people who have a lot to hide are the people who do something wrong.
Science For The People
Recommended on Skeptically Speaking show #90 on December 17, 2010.
Nick Arnett
Gotta give stars to any book that quotes me! As usual, David digs deep into the impact of technology. Very thought-provoking.
This is WAY better than any of his science fiction ( I couldn't read Startide Rising )
A good gordian knot solution to the problems of privacy in a hyper-techno era.
An excellent premise, but seems pretty labored by the end of its 300+ pages.
Dave Burns
remarkably current considering when it was written and about what.
computer science,nonfiction,privacy,ubiquitous computing
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 34 35 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Love and Sex with Robots: The Evolution of Human-Robot Relationships
  • Beyond Fear: Thinking Sensibly about Security in an Uncertain World
  • The Populist Moment: A Short History of the Agrarian Revolt in America
  • Your Hate Mail Will Be Graded
  • Breaking the News: How the Media Undermine American Democracy
  • Brave New War: The Next Stage of Terrorism and the End of Globalization
  • Summa technologiae
  • When the Rivers Run Dry: Water--The Defining Crisis of the Twenty-first Century
  • Against the Machine: Being Human in the Age of the Electronic Mob
  • Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science
  • Discordia
  • Wired for War: The Robotics Revolution and Conflict in the 21st Century
  • The Right to Privacy
  • Synthetic Worlds: The Business and Culture of Online Games
  • Coup d'État: A Practical Handbook
  • Freehold
  • The Googlization of Everything: (And Why We Should Worry)
  • Earth 2788 - The Earth Girl Short Stories (Earth Girl, #0.5)
David Brin is a scientist, speaker, and world-known author. His novels have been New York Times Bestsellers, winning multiple Hugo, Nebula and other awards. At least a dozen have been translated into more than twenty languages.

Existence, his latest novel, offers an unusual scenario for first contact. His ecological thriller, Earth, foreshadowed global warming, cyberwarfare and near-future trends
More about David Brin...
Startide Rising (The Uplift Saga, #2) The Postman The Uplift War (The Uplift Saga, #3) Sundiver (The Uplift Saga, #1) Foundation's Triumph (Second Foundation Trilogy, #3)

Share This Book

“Teach your children to be politely but firmly skeptical about any- thing they see or hear [on the Net]. Teach them to have no fear of rejecting images or communications that repel or frighten them. Teach them to have a strong sense of their own personal boundaries, of their right to defend those boundaries physically and socially. Teach them that people aren’t always who they present themselves to be [in e-mail], and that predators exist. Teach them to keep per- sonal information private. Teach them to trust you enough to con- fide in you if something does not seem right. HOWARD RHEINGOLD” 0 likes
“Though his book vigorously promotes strong privacy, Miller notes that people routinely trade personal information for convenience or a few dollars of savings, even offering names of “friends and families” to commercial users, if it benefits them.” 0 likes
More quotes…