Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Great Big Book of Horrible Things: The Definitive Chronicle of History's 100 Worst Atrocities” as Want to Read:
The Great Big Book of Horrible Things: The Definitive Chronicle of History's 100 Worst Atrocities
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Great Big Book of Horrible Things: The Definitive Chronicle of History's 100 Worst Atrocities

4.07  ·  Rating Details ·  563 Ratings  ·  87 Reviews
This book examines history's one hundred most violent events, from 480 BCE's second Persian War through this century's war in the Congo.
Hardcover, 688 pages
Published November 7th 2011 by W. W. Norton & Company (first published 2011)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Great Big Book of Horrible Things, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Great Big Book of Horrible Things

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Paul Bryant
This book isn't in the best possible taste. Like one of those countdown programmes on cheesy tv - 2011's 100 Most Shocking Celebrity Moments it ranks massacres, wars and man-made catastrophes of limitless human suffering and discusses them all in a slightly unnerving jokey chatty unhistorianlike manner :

The Germans had come so close to winning the First World War they couldn't believe they didn't.

Communism lasted longer than fascism, jazz, John Wayne, Bonanza and the American Motor Corporation.
Oct 25, 2011 Dana rated it it was amazing
You know that scene in Maus Part II when Art Spiegelman, seated at his drawing board, is perched high up on a Holocaust bodypile? Okay. Matthew White is made of something *steely* because this man's work has him sitting on top of not just *a* tragic body pile, but *the* tragic body pile, the ENTIRE HUMAN BODYPILE. And I just spent the last couple of evenings mountaineering with him to the human bodypile's damnable peak. From up here, let me tell you what it was like: I was impressed because I am ...more
I expected to be utterly depressed throughout my reading of this fascinating trip down Atrocity Lane, but instead I found myself enthralled by the history being presented to me and the different way it was being presented. Though the sordid history of humanity is quite the cautionary tale in how we fail to treat each other in the ways in which we wish them to treat us, from slavery to warfare to acts of genocide to politically and racially induced famines, "The Great Big Book of Horrible Things" ...more
Razvan Zamfirescu
Jan 31, 2016 Razvan Zamfirescu rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: istorie, crap, razboi
Pierdere de timp. Nu inteleg de ce ai citi o astfel de carte. E ca si cum ti-ai propune sa citesti DOOM-ul sau DEX-ul de la cap la coada.
Genul de enciclopedii scrise de un singur om nu ma atrag nicicum. Nu stiu de ce am ales, totusi, sa-mi pierd timpul cu volumul lui White. Poate ca de vina-s sarbatorile de iarna...

Spicuiri din recenzia finala care se gaseste pe blogul meu

Nu contează ce crede Pinker despre Marea carte a umanității și nici nu mă interes
Jan 19, 2012 Alden rated it really liked it
Shelves: history
The first thing you need to know about The Great Big Book of Horrible things is, you're going to not only learn things, but you'll at times be embarrassed about the things you know almost nothing about. The worst genocide since the Holocaust occurred in Bangladesh in 1971? The bloodiest war since WWII, the Second Congo War, ended less than ten years ago, and nobody in the United States noticed? 20 million Indians died in the 1800s due to famines that the British didn't want to respond to?

Makes y
I know a lot of people can be heavily offended by the tone of this book. I wasn't. I couldn't be. Researching evil people and understanding war, torture, man-induced famine from a psychological point of wiew is what I do every day. This is not an offensive work - gasping and bowing your head in pain and shame everytime you hear the word "gang rape" or "Holocaust" is not a sign of caring more for the subject than someone who is very clinically exposing the truth behind (and of) them. For the ammo ...more
Mary Overton
From the introduction:
"Aside from morbid fascination, is there any reason to know the one hundred highest body counts of history? Four reasons come to mind:
"First, things that happen to a lot of people are usually more important than things that happen to only a few people....
"Second, killing a person is the most you can do to him....
"Therefore, just by default, my one hundred multicides had a maximum impact on an enormous number of people. Without too much debate, I can easily label these to be
Reading with hopes of an article on the value of statistics in understanding human atrocity--especially for those (like me) who tend to favour personal stories and even fictionalized accounts over this kind of data. We'll see what develops...

(Also: this is a whopper of a book, and while I don't often read eBooks, this one is helpful to have in this format; scrolling and searching is much easier).

Update: ended up writing a post on this topic here:
Shana Dennis
Jan 25, 2012 Shana Dennis rated it it was amazing
Shelves: nonfiction, morbid
This book had a good chance of being dry and rambling, given the subject matter, but the author's tone and way of explaining each event kept me reading. White does not pin down a single cause for all of the horrible things in his great big book, which I liked. It is a bad historian that does that; a good historian recognizes that the world doesn't function in terms of black and white.
Aug 17, 2014 Þorrbjórn rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
Essentially what you have hear is a concise yet surprisingly richly detailed, informative and intriguing encyclopaedia of the last three thousand years as told through a chronological rundown of events ranked by body count.

When I first picked this book up I was under the misunderstanding that it would be a collection of the most depraved examples of man's inhumanity towards their fellow man (or woman). Rather than basing his countdown of the most inhumane acts based on perceived depravity, cruel
Jun 21, 2012 Kurt rated it it was amazing
For people who appreciate military history and the great battles waged here on Planet Earth, this is probably going to entertain you, as it did me. The personalities, settings, and sheer number of those involved with these 100 atrocities make for some fantastic non-fiction reading. However, be warned that the author does not hold back in describing some intensely gruesome scenarios -- millions of wasted souls fly out of these pages. It got me down a bit, close to the end of the book, reading abo ...more
Apr 16, 2012 Cwiegard rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: anyone who finds history fascinating
This is a surprisingly fascinating examination of the dark side of human history- the ways in which large numbers of humans die at the hands of other humans. We learn among other things that 3 million or more people died in the Roman gladiatorial games over some 700 years. Who knew? White may not be a Harvard professor, but he is clearly a bright man who has done a lot of research and thought deeply. It is well worth reading. This turns out to NOT be a freak show or a list of horrors- it is an h ...more
Apr 02, 2012 Nelson is currently reading it
So far so good...some best lines I read so far:

"While fighting over land is quite common, the land in dispute usually provides some practical resource - minerals, crops, harbors, farms, strategic location, exploitable labor, or sheer size. Palestine has none of these. The sole resource of the Holy Land is heritage. There's no gold, no oil, very little fertile land, and few natives, nothing but sacred sites, so in essence, the Crusades killed 3 million people in a fight to control the tourist tra
Feb 19, 2012 Cacophony rated it it was amazing
This was an amazing book. I learned so many things about history that I never learned in school. Basically anything having to do with African or Asian history was news to me. The writing was also quite witty for being about horrible atrocities.
Mar 09, 2012 Blake rated it it was amazing
This guy writes with so little emotion about world events, it's hilarious. For example, he describes the Crusades as a fight to control the tourist trade. Also, it's comical how easily humanity resorts cannibalism. Loved it.
I like lists, I like
History. This book combines
Them exhaustively.
Lewis Smith
May 15, 2015 Lewis Smith rated it it was amazing
When I saw the title of this book on the shelf at our local Hastings store, I knew I had to have it. How could any historian pass up such a whimsically fascinating, yet awful, title as this?
White sets out to chronicle the 100 worst atrocities in human history, comparing and analyzing the different types of multicides (a new word here) throughout human history and discussing their similarities and differences. He also theorized that, 200 years from now, historians may rank the first half of the
Dec 16, 2014 David rated it it was amazing
This is quite possibly the most important history book I've ever read.

White has a particular perspective: that the human cost of human actions should be quantified and studied thoroughly. This book uses a systematic approach to provide an overview of human events which does not ignore any of the ugliness in history. His use of a simple definition and exquisite sourcing give the reader quite a bit to digest - from the Punic wars to the Congolese civil war to the Three Kingdoms to the Atlantic sla
Susan Morris
Apr 18, 2012 Susan Morris rated it it was amazing
In this book, the author attempts to list every atrocity that occurred in the history of mankind. It's an ambitious project, especially considering that many of the atrocities occurred so long ago that it's nearly impossible to validate the ancient accounts. When possible, he does verify the facts with archeological evidence, but at other times, it seemed he researched and made an educated guess based on conflicting stories. He's been criticized for that but I think he is to be commended for tak ...more
Aug 18, 2012 Adrian added it
The book I read was titled 'Atrocitology Humanity's 100 Deadliest Achievements'. White ranks man-made causes of death devoting between a page and ten pages to each and covers them chronologically. Most of the 100 are wars but not all. I appreciated his irreverance and lack of political correctness. He stands controversially with Marvin Harris in explaining Aztec human sacrifice as a need for protein. A valuable point is made about doubt historians have for the scale of murder caused by Chinggis ...more
Stephen Cranney
Like a lot of pop-history books, this one is a little lacking in details; but this is forgivable because of the sheer amount of material he covers. People often have these "who was the worst" person discussions, and body counts inevitably get brought up, so it was nice to have a source that compiles all the different arguments.

Also, we've all heard of the Holocaust, Stalin, etc., but there were a lot of these genocides and massacres that I had never heard about before (Bengali Genocide, etc.),
Dale Muckerman
Mar 16, 2012 Dale Muckerman rated it it was amazing
I picked this book up thinking I would read a little here and there, but I ended up reading it straight through from beginning to end. It really puts a perspective on history and on the extremes of human nature. Before you think times are bad now, read this book and get a perspective on what's happened in the past. It's amazing how cruel people have been. It's amazing how complicit religion has been in wholesale death and war. But what's most amazing is how no matter what some of these villains ...more
Feb 05, 2012 Carolyn rated it really liked it
Laid out chronologically the author covers the 'top 100' with classifications (religion, civil war, political, etc.) that highlights the terrible things that we have done to one another throughout history. We are very efficient at killing and we also have short memories He also brings a little levity where appropriate (yes, it can be appropriate)

I really enjoyed this book. And it makes a great reference!
Jan 04, 2012 Kyleen rated it it was ok
Shelves: put-aside
More of a "read through the chapters that interested me" than a "put-aside." This is more of a reference book to me and not something I could ever read all the way through (unless I was into genocide and war in a big way).

I quickly realized human suffering on a grand scale doesn't interest me. I'll stick to Cormac McCarthy for my fictionalized and personalized human suffering and violence, thank you.
I'm starting this book again. I had to take it back to to the library. So I am going to start with Joseph Stalin on pg. 382.
Paul Valente
Feb 27, 2012 Paul Valente rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Fascinating account of the deadliest multicides in history, written in a refreshingly non-academic but engaging style, scrupulously impartial and thoroughly absorbing.
I totally would have paid more attention in social studies if this was my text book.
Amar Pai
Mar 30, 2013 Amar Pai rated it really liked it
Lorenzio Phillibuster Fireworks
I hope you noticed that two of the heroes from earlier chapters are the villains in this chapter. History is complicated.

When I came across Atrocitology at work, I thought it was a really intriguing concept. I was actually quite surprised by the results of this book too – while some of the results were as I expected (WW2 is Number 1) there were plenty of events that I did not expect to have such a high death toll, nor some events to have occurred so long ago.

Matthew White’s compendium spans fr
Zeke Chase
Dec 23, 2013 Zeke Chase rated it it was amazing
Shelves: history
This has to be one of my favourite books. I’m referencing and citing it all the time. I use the numbers in this book in debates or tangential ramblings. This book was designed exclusively for someone like myself. The witticism, the hard numbers, the blame game, the basic synopsis.

I once had a debate with a very staunch Christian who claimed that, collectively, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and the Kim Dynasty killed 4 billion people. You’ve probably had similar debates with blithering idiots that claim G
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
topics  posts  views  last activity   
Atheists and Skep...: Necrometrics - The History of War and Mass Murder 10 22 Feb 13, 2013 05:13PM  
  • Outbreak! Plagues That Changed History
  • Moment of Battle: The Twenty Clashes That Changed the World
  • How the End Begins: The Road to a Nuclear World War III
  • The Curiosity of School: Education and the Dark Side of Enlightenment
  • The Gettysburg Address: A Graphic Adaptation
  • Ministers at War: Winston Churchill and His War Cabinet
  • Twelve Caesars
  • Mission to Berlin: The American Airmen Who Struck the Heart of Hitler's Reich
  • The Wit and Wisdom of Abraham Lincoln: A Book of Quotations (Dover Thrift Editions)
  • The Greatest Presidential Stories Never Tol: 100 Tales from History to Astonish, Bewilder and Stupefy (The Greatest Stories Never Told)
  • Who Will Write Our History?: Rediscovering a Hidden Archive from the Warsaw Ghetto
  • Lost Liners: From the Titanic to the Andrea Doria the Ocean Floor Reveals Its Greatest Lost Ships
  • Who Hates Whom: Well-Armed Fanatics, Intractable Conflicts, and Various Things Blowing Up A Woefully Incomplete Guide
  • Lovers' Lane: the Hall-Mills Mystery (A Treasury of XXth Century Murder)
  • The Lost Photographs of Captain Scott: Unseen Images from the Legendary Antarctic Expedition
  • Atomic Accidents: A History of Nuclear Meltdowns and Disasters: From the Ozark Mountains to Fukushima
  • Almost President: The Men Who Lost the Race but Changed the Nation
  • Courage & Defiance: Stories of Spies, Saboteurs, and Survivors in World War II Denmark

Share This Book

“Legend has it that while drinking wine in a boat on the river, [8th century Chinese poet Li Po] tried to grab the moon's reflection on the surface and tumbled in, which is probably the poet's equivalent of dying bravely in battle.” 2 likes
“When corporate security squads were sent on punitive raids, they were told not to waste ammunition—one bullet, one kill. They were not supposed to use company ammunition hunting big game for sport. As proof of their frugality, they were expected to bring back one severed human hand for every bullet expended.4 One eyewitness described soldiers returning from a raid: On the bow of the canoe is a pole, and a bundle of something on it. These are the hands (right hands) of sixteen warriors they have slain. “Warriors?” Don’t you see among them the hands of little children and girls? I have seen them. I have seen where the trophy has been cut off, while the poor heart beat strongly enough to shoot the blood from the cut arteries at a distance of fully four feet.5 Severed hands became a kind of currency—proof that orders were being obeyed. A basket of smoked hands covered any shortfall in production, and if there was no rubber to be had, the Free State’s security forces, the Force Publique, would go out to collect a quota of hands instead. Natives quickly learned that willingly sacrificing a hand might save their life. And not just hands. After one commander grumbled that his men were shooting only women and children, his soldiers returned from the next raid with a basket of penises.” 0 likes
More quotes…