Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Science without Laws” as Want to Read:
Science without Laws
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Science without Laws

by
3.91  ·  Rating Details ·  11 Ratings  ·  2 Reviews
Debate over the nature of science has recently moved from the halls of academia into the public sphere, where it has taken shape as the "science wars." At issue is the question of whether scientific knowledge is objective and universal or socially mediated, whether scientific truths are independent of human values and beliefs. Ronald Giere is a philosopher of science who ...more
Hardcover, 296 pages
Published June 1st 1999 by University Of Chicago Press
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Science without Laws, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Science without Laws

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-26)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Matt
Mar 29, 2013 Matt rated it really liked it
Shelves: philosophy
An interesting set of essays on a fascinating set of ideas in contemporary philosophy of science. The book reads as Giere laying down the precursors of his preferred form of methodological naturalism, a view that reaches a more mature form in his more recent Scientific Perspectivism.

As the essays are spread out by topic matter, there is a little here for even the layman interested in an "insider's" look at both the practice of science and the philosopher's reflections on them. Not everyone will
...more
Will
Sep 04, 2008 Will rated it liked it
Recommends it for: anyone tired of logical positivists.
Some books have an overarching theme that flows across chapters. Giere's text has one theme that's repeated 12 times. The book is at it's most interesting when the author recounts the history of 20th century philosophy of science. His interpretation of logical empiricism's rise is so interesting that I didn't mind reading it three times over. I can't say the same for the rest of the text which beats around the "model-based reasoning" bush delivering a vague course of action for the field.

I sugge
...more
K
K rated it really liked it
Aug 24, 2016
Chad Brock
Chad Brock rated it really liked it
May 10, 2013
David
David rated it it was amazing
Jul 30, 2011
Chris Pariso
Chris Pariso rated it really liked it
Mar 20, 2014
Alexandre Guay
Alexandre Guay rated it really liked it
Aug 06, 2011
Inci
Inci rated it it was ok
Sep 22, 2015
Peter Spiegler
Peter Spiegler rated it really liked it
Dec 29, 2013
Evan
Evan rated it it was amazing
Jan 13, 2016
J Alec
J Alec rated it really liked it
Aug 11, 2015
Patrin
Patrin marked it as to-read
Jan 03, 2009
Judson
Judson marked it as to-read
May 22, 2011
Aivoturso
Aivoturso marked it as to-read
Dec 02, 2011
Steven Lawrie
Steven Lawrie marked it as to-read
May 06, 2012
Nick
Nick marked it as to-read
Nov 29, 2016
Martisch
Martisch marked it as to-read
Feb 03, 2013
Justin Swenson
Justin Swenson marked it as to-read
Mar 19, 2013
Manuel Fernando
Manuel Fernando marked it as to-read
Nov 20, 2013
Steve' and Karen's Library
Steve' and Karen's Library is currently reading it
Nov 12, 2016
Michael Mcdonough
Michael Mcdonough marked it as to-read
Jul 29, 2014
David
David marked it as to-read
Oct 28, 2014
Mark
Mark marked it as to-read
Dec 24, 2015
Telorian
Telorian marked it as to-read
Feb 10, 2015
Susan
Susan added it
Jan 16, 2016
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book



“Reichenbach, I believe, made it a precondition for doing scientific epistemology that the very notion of 'Jewish science' be philosophically inadmissible. The Nazi racial laws were not only a crime against humanity, they were a crime against philosophical principle.” 0 likes
More quotes…