Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The First Clash: The Miraculous Greek Victory at Marathon and Its Impact on Western Civilization” as Want to Read:
The First Clash: The Miraculous Greek Victory at Marathon and Its Impact on Western Civilization
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

The First Clash: The Miraculous Greek Victory at Marathon and Its Impact on Western Civilization

4.01 of 5 stars 4.01  ·  rating details  ·  92 ratings  ·  21 reviews

“A compelling and provocative read . . . With a soldier’s eye, Jim Lacey re-creates the battle of Marathon in all its brutal simplicity.”—Barry Strauss, author of Masters of Command

Marathon—one of history’s most pivotal battles. Its name evokes images of almost superhuman courage, endurance, and fighting spirit. In this eye-opening book, military...more
ebook, 288 pages
Published March 29th 2011 by Bantam (first published January 1st 2011)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The First Clash, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The First Clash

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 200)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
Clark Hays
A familiar story well-told; pair with a glass of retsina

The story is now familiar: a vastly outnumbered group of Athenian hoplites turning back the great Persian horde and saving the western world, but I never grow weary of the retelling. Lacey does a great job of distilling the historical events and figures and intrigues down to a very manageable and engaging work. Despite its slender size, it's rich with keen military insights while still providing a roadmap through the social and political co...more
“At Marathon, Athens saved itself, Greece, and by extension all of Western civilization. Some have proposed that Marathon made little difference in the creation and development of a unique Western civilization. After all, this argument goes, Pericles, Aristotle, Plato, and Socrates still would have been born. They still would have been brilliant, and their achievements would have been as great. One is hard-pressed, however, to think how these great minds and independent spirits would have soared...more
Robin Friedman
In 490 B.C., a force of 9,000 Athenian and 1,000 Platean hoplites (heavily armed infantrymen) defeated a Persian army at least three times its size on the plains of Marathon about 24 miles from Athens. It was a heroic and inspiring victory against what seemed to be long odds and saved the budding Greek city states from conquest by the Persian Empire. Ten years later, in 480 B.C., the Greeks would repel another, larger Persian invasion.

Marathon is the stuff of myth and poetry, but it also a criti...more
Lauren Albert
Since I don't know the controversies surrounding the battle of Marathon, to some extent I had to accept Lacey's point of view. His arguments seem reasonable enough. His first goal seems to destroy two myths--one, that the Athenian army was a collection of amateurs and their victory was a miracle; and two, that the Persians were effete. In his version, both armies were experienced warriors. But the Persians had no experience with the Hoplite battle style which made normal Persian battle strategy...more
Lacey is not an ancient historian by training, rather he is an analyst at the Institute for Defense Analyse at John Hopkins University, and an embedded journalist for the American invasion of Iraq- therefore, his analysis is from a non specialist perspective, and should be read with caution.

Whilst there are many theoretical and logical problems with Lacey's article (so many that perhaps one could write a book or article simply reviewing his, work,as I have done for an ancient history thesis) the...more
Steven Peterson
There is not a great deal known about the battle of Marathon, in which the Athenians and some others held back the horde of Persians, who were invading Greece. It is high testimony to the author's skills that he, nonetheless, has authored a fine book on the subject. Much of the book is background. Why did the Persians invade Greece? Why did Athens take on this vast military machine? Lacey does a good job on this background work, freely acknowledging what is his speculation and what is the best w...more
Jim Lacey's "The First Clash" is a wonderful look at the historic Battle at Marathon, in which the Athenian army held their own against the Persians. Lacey goes in-depth into both the history of Persia and the Greek city states just prior to they met in battle, and his tale is fascinating and easy-to-read. It's been quite a while since I've read Greek history, but Lacey's telling is smooth and engaging.

An important part of Lacey's historical review is the revisionist portion of the book, which o...more
Derek Weese
This is an excellent,short overview of the Battle of Marathon where a small Athenian and Plataen (I may have misspeled them...) army crushed a much larger Persian army in the first of many fights to occur between the Greek's and the Persians.
I gave this book five stars as, honestly, the majority of academic history is so poorly written that it is no wonder that most Americans couldn't care less about history. This book, while not able to blow minds with its amazing wordsmithing, is still a very...more
Chris Lemery
This is a pretty good overview of the Battle of Marathon, about which I previously knew little. It's a quick read. It's not superbly written, but it's not terrible, either. It has a lot of backstory about how Persia and Athens came to war, but much of it was dense and really hard to follow. I think it takes a more skilled writer than Lacey to really explain this part. The latter part of the book about the actual Battle was quite good, though, and Lacey offers pretty good evidence for his thesis...more
Daniel Kukwa
A book that manages to cover a pivotal moment in Ancient Greece, thrash through several different interpretations of that event, and provide suitable background knowledge of all the key players...all in a concise, easy-to-read package. What more could you want from a work of history?
I really enjoyed this short book. The author raises a number of good points about Herodotus' veracity on certain points of the battle and reasonings, while at the same time being even handed enough (and thats the best compliment I can give to an author that addresses such a worked over topic)to admit that we cannot throw out Herodotus without completely giving up on our only source to have spoken with veterans of the battle. Plutach and others address Marathon, but they are further from the batt...more
Great History

Great History

I don't know if the author's view and opinions are correct, but he presented a strong argument for them and a very interesting history of the times.
Avis Black
The main problem with this book is that you don't actually get to the Battle of Marathon until you're almost at the end of the book. There does need to a lead-in to the battle, but not as much material as the author has stuffed in here.
Jean-Paul Adriaansen
Without Marathon, the first deciding battle between East and West, we might never have known the benefits of Democracy.
The author states that the Greek were not as untrained and undermanned as we think they were, but rather a force to be reckoned with. Their phalanx, the backbone of their Army, was the ancient version of the modern tank. Their generals, skilled in battle, were heroic tacticians and strategists.
Jim Lacey explains the organization and growth of the Persian and Greek Armies, their...more
'Aussie Rick'
Although the title of this book sounds like it is about the Battle at Marathon in 490BC it covers much more. The majority of the narrative is taken up with the history of the people and empires (Greece and Persia) leading up to the climatic battle. Overall it's a good study of this period of ancient history and the author puts his own spin on his reading of ancient sources based on his military experience, it’s up to the reader to accept that or not. Overall a decent history but be aware that th...more
I stayed up all of last night reading this. It's damn good.
I couldn't resist this book based on its promise to explain the impact of the Battle of Marathon's impact on Western civilization. It didn't do the job.
The writing was mediocre. The analysis was not compelling. The author included a lot of extraneous material.
I do love the subject though.
I didn't know that Aeschylus, the playwright, had fought in that battle and wanted to be remembered as a "Marathon Man."
Kilian Jones
This is a great read with lots of details about both sides leading up to the battle of marathon. The only issue is that there seems to be more info about the factors leading up to the battle then the battle itself. But as I already knew a lot about the battle I still found the book vary engaging, but I felt like the book did get bogged down in the first few chapters.
Jim Lacey's book continues the long lineage of research and historical debate over the Battle of Marathon.
I very rarely give a 5 star rating - but this deserves it... Lacey presents convincing arguments for his point of view... Even though I am typically not a big reader on ancient military history, I thoroughly enjoyed and appreciated this account...
I really enjoyed 3/4 of the book but he rushed through the Battle of Marathon, and parts of one of the last chapters didnt add to the book.
George Collins
George Collins marked it as to-read
Oct 18, 2014
Kirk Stifle
Kirk Stifle marked it as to-read
Oct 02, 2014
Gloria marked it as to-read
Sep 29, 2014
James marked it as to-read
Sep 25, 2014
Austin McGee
Austin McGee is currently reading it
Sep 23, 2014
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Moment of Battle: The Twenty Clashes That Changed the World Pershing Takedown: The 3rd Infantry Division's Twenty-One Day Assault on Baghdad The Canons of Jihad: Terrorists' Strategy for Defeating America Keep from All Thoughtful Men: How U.S. Economists Won World War II

Share This Book

“I remain confident that if faced with such a threat, the West will remember its twenty-five hundred years of tradition, much to the detriment of any possible foe. Having said that, we must all hope our leaders are wise enough to forestall any threat of this magnitude before it manifests itself. Because the Western way of war is brutal. If it is ever again unleashed in all its decisive barbarity, it will be many generations before our enemies recover.” 0 likes
“And it is plain enough, not from this instance only, but from many everywhere, that freedom is an excellent thing since even the Athenians, who, while they continued under the rule of tyrants, were not a whit more valiant than any of their neighbors, no sooner shook off the yoke than they became decidedly the first of all. These things show that, while undergoing oppression, they let themselves be beaten, since then they worked for a master; but so soon as they got their freedom, each man was eager to do the best he could for himself.2 Despite Herodotus’s” 0 likes
More quotes…