Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating

Drudgery Divine: On the Comparison of Early Christianities and the Religions of Late Antiquity

3.79 of 5 stars 3.79  ·  rating details  ·  28 ratings  ·  5 reviews
In this major theoretical and methodological statement on the history of religions, Jonathan Z. Smith shows how convert apologetic agendas can dictate the course of comparative religious studies. As his example, Smith reviews four centuries of scholarship comparing early Christianities with religions of late Antiquity (especially the so-called mystery cults) and shows how...more
Paperback, 160 pages
Published May 28th 1994 by University Of Chicago Press (first published September 18th 1990)
more details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Drudgery Divine, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Drudgery Divine

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 69)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  rating details
It is one of the most boring books I've read, I even thought to trash it a few times! Finally got something after my 3 reading!
For this book you need perseverance and a great deal of interest! Otherwise, stay away!
I bet it will be reading a few times more!
This book it is just so unkind, that you get addicted.
Read a long time ago, but this was my first introduction into theory and method and the study of religion. I need to go back to this, but I remember it being lucid, clear, and compelling. Perhaps one of the most directly relevant theoretical works for Graeco-Roman and Christian "comparison" with a lengthy discussion on the theoretical moves of "comparing" and how that might help us or go wrong depending on our attitudes and employment of comparative tools.
A thought-provoking analysis of the pitfalls of how Christian origins have been studied historically.
Sophia Shafi
Who doesn't love JZ? Okay, non-religious-studies geeks may not like him as much as us nerds do.
Sometimes scholars of Christian origins have agendas. Just saying.
Drfrog marked it as to-read
May 31, 2014
Josh Yuter
Josh Yuter marked it as to-read
Jul 27, 2014
Abigail marked it as to-read
May 13, 2014
Pieter-Jan Beyul
Pieter-Jan Beyul marked it as to-read
Feb 16, 2014
Zainab Hassan
Zainab Hassan marked it as to-read
Feb 13, 2014
Nina Mazhjoo
Nina Mazhjoo marked it as to-read
Feb 07, 2014
Mum marked it as to-read
Jan 19, 2014
Rachel is currently reading it
Jun 19, 2014
Marie Green
Marie Green marked it as to-read
Dec 05, 2013
Grok Testuser
Grok Testuser is currently reading it
Nov 14, 2013
Leni marked it as to-read
Nov 02, 2013
Joe Gurba
Joe Gurba marked it as to-read
Feb 03, 2014
Dave Diaspora
Dave Diaspora marked it as to-read
Jun 13, 2013
« previous 1 3 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
Jonathan Z. Smith is the Robert O. Anderson Distinguished Service Professor of the Humanities at the University of Chicago where he is also a member of the Committee on the History of Culture.
More about Jonathan Z. Smith...
Imagining Religion: From Babylon to Jonestown Relating Religion: Essays in the Study of Religion To Take Place: Toward Theory in Ritual Map is not Territory: Studies in the History of Religions On Teaching Religion: Essays by Jonathan Z. Smith

Share This Book