Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture & the Faiths We Never Knew

My rating:

add to my books

Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture & the Faiths We Never Knew

by Bart D. Ehrman

3.95 · rating details · 710 ratings · 70 reviews

The early Christian Church was a chaos of contending beliefs. Some groups of Christians claimed that there was not one God but two or twelve or thirty. Some believed that the world had not been created by God but by a lesser, ignorant deity. Certain sects maintained that Jesus was human but not divine, while others said he was divine but not human.
In Lost Christianities, ...more

Paperback, 294 pages

Published August 1st 2005 by Oxford University Press (first published January 28th 2002)

more details... edit details

Get a copy:

More…

There is a good chance some of your friends read this book. Sign in to see!

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Lists with This Book

Waiting for the Dalai Lama by Annelie Rozeboom

The Spiritual life of a manic depressive by Pilgrim Simon

The Spiritual Secrets Of Happiness Health And Success by Andrew C. Walton

Spiritual Minded

11th out of 14 books — 4 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 1,463)

filter | sort: default (?) | rating details

Feb 10, 2008

Skylar Burris rated it

Recommends it for: conspiracy theorists

Shelves: christianity

Here is a sentence from "Lost Christianities" that provides a clue to why the book is not really very sensational, as well as a clue to Ehrman's perspective: "It comes as a bit of a shock to most people to realize that the Church has not always had the New Testament." Perhaps it once came as a shock to Ehrman, but it does not come as a shock to any Christian with an inkling of Christian history. I am reminded of Alexander Pope's phrase, "A little learning is a dangerous ...moreHere is a sentence from "Lost Christianities" that provides a clue to why the book is not really very sensational, as well as a clue to Ehrman's perspective: "It comes as a bit of a shock to most people to realize that the Church has not always had the New Testament." Perhaps it once came as a shock to Ehrman, but it does not come as a shock to any Christian with an inkling of Christian history. I am reminded of Alexander Pope's phrase, "A little learning is a dangerous thing." Ehrman seems to have once taken a small drink from the well of Christian history, drawn a startling conclusion from it, and then attempted to shove all future research into the mold of that pre-drawn conclusion.

This book often plays a "what if" game. What if orthodox Christianity didn't win out? What if the Gnostics or the dualists or the Marcionites or the Ebionites won out? Well, it's an amusing hypothetical, I suppose, but it's rather like saying, "What if the Constitution didn't become the standard for the U.S. but instead the Communist Manifesto did?" Ehrman's fun speculations still beg the question as to which form of Christianity most accurately represents Christ, which form of Christianity is most true. This question, perhaps the most essential question, is one Ehrman seems to regard as unimportant.

He explores why the so-called proto-orthodox "won" out, offering reasons that range from geography to forgery and slander, but he does not spend much time asking whether their theology is more accurate, more true, than the theology on offer by the other "varieties" of Christianity. Is it likely that a sect teaching that the God of the Old Testament is evil has grasped a true representation of the 1st century Jew Jesus? Is it likely that a sect teaching there are twelve gods has grasped a true representation of the 1st century monotheist Jesus? Is the theology of a gospel written over 100 years after Christ's death to be trusted more than the theology of a gospel written within less than thirty years of his death? To Ehrman, these are irrelevant questions. What is relevant is that these "varieties" existed and that their adherents claimed to be followers of Christ, and therefore, presumably, the orthodox have no reason to claim they are orthodox. Ehrman leaves the reader with the impression that the "proto-orthodox" are but one group of Christians among many, no more likely to have grasped a true understanding of Christ and his teachings than any other group of self-labeled Christians.

Perhaps the reason Ehrman does not much explore the question of which group most accurately portrays Christ is that the most likely answer is not sensational. While all of these diverse writings are interesting to read about, it seems highly likely that the earliest manuscripts written by near-contemporaries of Christ and chosen for inclusion in the canon after an application of a strict set of standards more accurately represent the views of Christ than do works written 100+ years after his death. It seems likely that the proto-orthodox interpreted Christ's teachings more accurately than did the Manicheans or the Gnostics. The existence of a wide variety of sects, gospels, and epistles is all very interesting, but it is not SENSATIONAL, and Ehrman seems to be trying to make it sensational.

In Ehrman's sensational version of events, the proto-orthodox, through their "machinations," destroyed these other forms of Christianity, which are themselves occasionally portrayed as more virtuous or liberating than orthodox Christianity. But, how, exactly, do the proto-orthodox, who at the time had no state power and were occasionally subject to persecution, carry out their "machinations" except by intellectual persuasion and accepted authority (which itself implies that orthodoxy was established earlier than Ehrman suggests). Ehrman proceeds almost as if these "lost" writings were lost because the "proto-orthodox" collected every existing copy and set them ablaze in a giant bonfire, and not at all because they were the product of unconvincing religions that ultimately died out after failing to adequately portray Christ to the world. Most of these "varieties" are not so much lost Christianities as dead Christianities.

Despite all this criticism, I give the book two stars (an "okay" rating) because it contains so much information, all in one place, on early Christian and Gnostic literature, early sects, and the history of Christianity. I cannot give it more because the information comes obviously processed and arranged to persuade the reader that orthodox Christianity has no more reason to consider itself orthodox than any other form. Religious labels need some definition to be useful at all. If we say the orthodox Christians (those who canonized the Bible, those who established the creeds, those who spread the church throughout the world) have no more right to define Christianity than anyone else, then the Muslims and Unitarians are Christians too; they're just Christians who view Christ differently than orthodox Christians, and so the religious term becomes meaningless. It's almost as if someone started speaking of the "varieties of Judaism" and began behaving as though the Samaritans and the Christians had as much authority to define Judaism as the Jews.

"Lost Christianities" could have benefited from better organization and less backtracking, and, when it comes to textual claims (i.e. about whether or not a verse is original, for instance) it would be helpful if he discussed the dissenting opinions in some detail rather than simply presenting his own perspective as near fact. I suggest that anyone who reads this also read the second half of Timothy Paul Jones's "Misquoting Truth" for two different perspectives. Also of interest are the actual noncanonical texts, many of which can be found collected in "Lost Books of the Bible." Finally, I recommend the slim volume "How We Got the Bible" for a clearer, concise, factual historical overview of why and how the canon was selected.(less)

like 3 likes

· see review

Mar 12, 2009

Tyler rated it

Recommends it for: All; History and Religious Studies Fans

Shelves: non-fiction

Of the four main strands of Christianity prevalent before the fourth century, only one had what it took to emerge as the religion we know today. Theology students are no doubt familiar with this history, but seldom does it make its way past the pulpit. So as a general reader, I found this survey of the earliest years of Christianity informative.

The book, for example, takes up the subject of gnosticism, an early Christian theology that considered matter itself to be evil. Lost Christ...more

· see review

Jan 29, 2009

Steven Stark rated it

If you are interested in early church history, then this a book for you. The followers of Christ were more diverse over the first few centuries of the Christian religion than they are even now. From the Ebionites, who followed the laws of Judaism and used only a version of Matthew as their gospel, to the Marcionites, who only used the letters of Paul and Luke and NO old testament, there were many different interpretations of the religion. This book explores these two groups plus the Gnostics ...moreIf you are interested in early church history, then this a book for you. The followers of Christ were more diverse over the first few centuries of the Christian religion than they are even now. From the Ebionites, who followed the laws of Judaism and used only a version of Matthew as their gospel, to the Marcionites, who only used the letters of Paul and Luke and NO old testament, there were many different interpretations of the religion. This book explores these two groups plus the Gnostics and the Proto-orthodox (they weren't "orthodox" yet) through their writings. This is difficult business because once one group came to dominate the others, most of the writings of the other groups were destroyed. In fact, many gospels and letters are only preserved through letters quoting them in order to condemn them. And many of the writings have only been rediscovered in the 20th century.

Of course, anyone with a New Testament knows how diverse views were in the early church. You just have to read the many references to "false teachers" in the NT to see that. Surely these "false teachers" also felt that the writers of the NT had it wrong. Paul's disagreements with Peter (Galatians) and with the so-called "super apostles" (2 Corinthians) are also good examples.

My favorite part of the book is where Ehrman describes the Jewish origins of Gnosticism. He does so in a very brief and effective way tracing Jewish views of God from the Exodus and the Davidic monarchy through the classical prophetic line of thought, to the emergence of apocalyptical literature, to the arrival at Gnostic thought where the material world is evil and not the product of the "true" God ( represented by Christ) but is rather the creation of the "demiurge" (Yahweh), an imposter God who thinks that He is the one and only God.

Ehrman is thorough and open-minded in his discussion of ancient texts and beliefs. He speculates on why the proto-orthodox view of Christianity "won". The Ebionites required circumcision for conversion - not promising for winning converts. The Marcionites ignored the Old Testament in a culture where ancient authority was revered - nobody wanted another cult with no history. The Gnostics were not into organization and hierarchy - a problem for growing and sustaining a religion. And they were into seriously symbolic stuff - difficult for many to accept.

Ehrman also discusses ancient forgery, both inside and outside of the New Testament, including one example (The Secret Gospel of Mark) where many scholars are very divided on its authenticity.

It's all really interesting, and Ehrman is at time humorous and rarely, if ever, boring. This review, of course, is only scratching the surface of the surface. If you're interested in this subject, this is a great read.

This is a good companion book to the works of Elaine Pagels since she focuses almost exclusively on early Christians Gnosticism. Ehrman rounds things out nicely.(less)

like 1 like

· see review

Jul 31, 2011

Dan added it

Lost Christianities is an excellent introduction for the lay reader/non-specialist into the early and formative years of the faith we now know today as Christianity. Ehrman demonstrates that there were numerous versions of Christianity which preceded what we call today orthodoxy a la Roman Catholicism and mainstream Protestantism which assert the unity of Jesus' divine/human nature as well as other prevailing doctrines including the 27 book New Testament canon and the Trinity. While I thoroughly...more

· see review

Aug 27, 2010

Pamela Tucker rated it

I admit I am an admirer to Bart D. Ehrman and read a lot his books. There are other sources that reveal the hidden books that were among the Christian and their writings that in my opinion most of what is written by Christians to some degree are inspired by the Holy Spirit. Most believers will confess they walk a better life when looking to what the leading of the Holy Spirit will teach.

In his book he shows that different religions since the time of Christianity, but what is missing ...moreI admit I am an admirer to Bart D. Ehrman and read a lot his books. There are other sources that reveal the hidden books that were among the Christian and their writings that in my opinion most of what is written by Christians to some degree are inspired by the Holy Spirit. Most believers will confess they walk a better life when looking to what the leading of the Holy Spirit will teach.

In his book he shows that different religions since the time of Christianity, but what is missing is fundamentalism of the main gospels and the letters were placed in their to prove Paul's case before Rome. Luke his dear friend would right to his political friend in hopes that when PAUL stood before court he would be released. At least he was the first time. Since then religions were popping up everywhere, and most of the letters or information were forever destroyed this was their way of communicating long distance at the time.

With the founding fathers aware of this they began to have their creeds written to give the church strength which it was for at least 50 years. In this book the collections did not happen during this time, but there were many who were being destroyed for pure pleasure of the Romans non faith in anything really.

Many of these letters are held sacred today in Orthodox versions of their bible. Historians kept a point of view on how they saw the new faith in a man professed to be God.

This will include letter fragments from authors such as Mary Magdalene which I think wrote Hebrews or it could have been any one of the women that followed Jesus. Every since women have had a time of it just trying to be educated and knowing the Lord to be able to preach the word. Which when led my the Holy Spirit all things are possible with God. Who knows how many women have had a walk that was rejected by men who thought of them higher in position than what they ought.

I think Jesus was rejected because of his odd behavior as a child, God being so pure and seeing men as they really are gives way to condemnation. So some may have experienced the wrath as God was developing his human side to conform with the spiritual. This is why I think he went away from the age after 12 to 30 to be educated and influenced in the eastern way of life only to develop truth so that each people could understand truth.

The people then were not Christians and were very evil and more so as were the children. Heathens, and they were influenced by their own lusts and desires, and thought of no one but themselves. I believe it is possible for an earthly Jesus to not accept evil of others and did not understand the concepts of blessings until he met his mentor(s) as Zachaeus heard the wisdom and understood he was different than others. Jesus destroyed other demons later written in the gospels...he also matured to understand it was demons to be cast away not people to be punished, and that he was destined to do much more than that.

There are many instances that will give the mind something to expand into the unknown truths of God and how the human side is vulnerable to many things in life.

I have read many books similar to this book, so I just leave it up to the Holy Spirit to guide me through all that the world is and hope to see truth in all things.

Why couldn't there be other writings on Christians we read them everyday walking into bookstores and even writing them ourselves...of course we all have growing stages to go through. Jesus was not so different when it came to his human side. He just grew quicker than most and God sent him to learn. That is why he was so pleased with him as Jesus became the son and man God could really hope for.(less)

· see review

Jun 19, 2009

Rich DiSilvio rated it

Another excellent book by Bart Erhman. Not only are the historical facts that he presents fascinating--and challenging to many diehard Christians-- but they're "crucial" for ALL to read and understand.

Religion is a very tough and sensitive topic. I know from my own book, which dedicates several chapters to religious beliefs and how these deep ideologies shaped the minds and actions of many great- and also evil -leaders.

The broad array of Christian sects that immed...more

· see review

Mar 22, 2011

Ken Robert rated it

Ebionites, Marcionites, and Gnostics. Oh my.

This is a great introduction to the history of the competing theologies and practices of early Christians as can best be determined from ancient texts that have been passed down and rediscovered.

The author Bart D. Ehrman, professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina, argues and, in my opinion, demonstrates that early Christianity was anything but a monolithic religion and that the beliefs that eventually c...more

· see review

Jan 30, 2010

Stacy rated it

· review of another edition

Growing up in a Christian family, the Bible just was. It existed, it was the word of God. But how did that come to be? The first time I learned about the authorship of the Bible was interestingly enough, in my Catholic High School's Freshman Religious Studies class. I learned about the source material for the Gospels (Q) and other interesting tidbits. Still, it wasn't discussed much, or in great detail.

As it turns out, there were many forms of early Christianity. Their teaching...more

· see review

Sep 06, 2011

Neil Hanson rated it

Ehrman is very good at speaking in plain and understandable language about topics that folks often try and make complex and hard to understand. Folks who want no part of asking hard questions about the modern western orthodoxy will not this or others of his books. You can see this plainly in the reviews and comments folks leave regarding his books.

However, if you're someone who asks the hard questions and you're willing to evolve and grow your faith as you learn more, then you'll ver...more

· see review

May 17, 2010

Russell rated it

This is a fascinating book about the diverse early christian cults that existed in the decades immediately following the death of Jesus. Ehrman is a careful and insightful scholar who not only offers well thought our opinions on the subject, but also explains how the majority of scholars have reached such conclusions. My only hesitation in recommending this book is for those who have read some of Ehrman's other works. This is because some of the information contained here is repeated from earlie...more

· see review

Jul 30, 2011

Jc rated it

· review of another edition

As an introduction to the various forms of christianity, e.g. Gnosticism or Marcionism, that existed in the first few hundred years of this odd spin-off of Judaism. Ehrman, a recognized authority of early christianity also is a skilled writer, making this a fine introduction to the early chaos that in time coalesced into the christian orthodoxy. If happen to believe in churchy stuff, or just have an interest in the early history of the most influential religious movement in the history of especi...more

· see review

Sep 26, 2009

Rick rated it

This is a compendium of the minor (and major) heresies of the early Christian era. They had to be dealt with at the 4th-century meeting in Nicea of priests at the behest of the emperor Constantine. As a result we now have the "official" holy book and a Creed that we have to swear to before every (Protestant and I guess Catholic) church service - at least as nearly as I recall, since I have not attended one since ~1962.
The world of true believers would be a lot different if some o...more

· see review

Sep 25, 2010

Felicity Barry rated it

Ehrman's topic fascinates me but his writing to the nonacademic audience just doesn't persuade, at least not in this work. Very interesting analysis of the Marcionite and Ebionite sects of early Christianity that were ultimately suppressed or failed to succeed in the early centuries after Christ. I just wish Ehrman had taken a more rigorous approach even though he was writing to a lay audience. Anyone who read this type of work is not going to be put off by a more scholarly approach and his t...more

· see review

Jun 04, 2010

Sean rated it

Very interesting, but a little dry at times because of the amount of historical background and information Ehrman gives in order to better convey a more complete understanding of the specific topics he covers. This is a must read for the average Christian because most average Christians have absolutely no idea how their orthodox beliefs originated.

Ehrman explains in detail the struggle for dominance among religious groups in the first century for the title of "orthodox" ...more

· see review

Apr 17, 2009

Dave Maddock rated it

Shelves: religion

Bought this book with its companion volume, Lost Scriptures, and read it on a recent China trip. I enjoyed it; Ehrman's an entertaining and thought-provoking read. However, having listened to the Teaching Company lectures of same name and read much of his other material, I didn't get too much out of this one. I'm looking forward to digging into the second volume though.

· see review

Nov 10, 2008

Shippseattle marked it as to-read

The early Christian Church was a chaos of contending beliefs. Some groups of Christians claimed that there was not one God but two or twelve or thirty...more [close] The early Christian Church was a chaos of contending beliefs. Some groups of Christians claimed that there was not one God but two or twelve or thirty. Some believed that the world had not been created by God but by a lesser, ignorant deity. Certain sects maintained that Jesus was human but not divine, while others said he was divin...more

· see review

Jan 13, 2008

Russell rated it

This book provided quite an educational and eye-opening experience in learning of some historical aspects of the creation of the New Testament. The subtitle of the book appropriately describes "the Faiths that We Never Knew" and primarily focuses on their co-existence (and eventual congealment with the early proto-orthodox church). I was fascinated at the variation of beliefs, forgeries, disagreements and incredible amount of scholarly exploration.

I continuously wondered th...moreThis book provided quite an educational and eye-opening experience in learning of some historical aspects of the creation of the New Testament. The subtitle of the book appropriately describes "the Faiths that We Never Knew" and primarily focuses on their co-existence (and eventual congealment with the early proto-orthodox church). I was fascinated at the variation of beliefs, forgeries, disagreements and incredible amount of scholarly exploration.

I continuously wondered throughout the course of the book why his material is relatively "hidden". That is, it seems as though the knowledge of creation of the New Testament is rarely given much attention and neither are the turbulent periods prior to its official canonization. I found it intriguing that canonization "officially" occurred during the Council of Trent, though a letter dated 367AD by Alexandrian bishop Athanasius which states, "in these alone the teaching of godliness is proclaimed. Let no one add to these; let nothing be taken away from them." (p 230). And yet, as Ehrman explains, there continued to be debates and disputes even in his own church. These sort of statements, and additional material covering related events, kept causing me to think about the fact that there was _never_ a clear leader, only many disparate bishops (how many self-appointed, bought or otherwise gained power and monetary support) that appear to have espoused their own agenda prior the creeds. In my opinion and observation, clearly no prophetic leader nor priesthood authority.

There are many, many lost/heretical/non-canonized texts that Ehrman mentions and frequently references his other works in the end notes (in addition to many other sources he cites, I appreciated his thorough and thoughtful notes and references). He specifically covers 44 texts and their role during early Christianity. I felt that he gave ample attention to each in order to cover its relevance, at the same time he avoided providing all of the text in detail (which appeared to not really be necessary).

There was some disturbing material as well in terms of what some of the more off-the-path sects believed. This is no real surprise given Satan's ability to twist and thwart principles of righteousness by contorting them to supply justification of immoral activity.

Lastly, I think this book makes it very clear, in its short 294 pages, that:

* there are NO original manuscripts of the New Testament writings, only "copies made from copies of the copies of the copies of the original"(p. 217)
* there are possibly hundreds of thousands of differences that occurred during the thousands of copies created during the centuries
* many of the accepted books of today's New Testament are suspected forgeries
* the proto-orthodox church engaged in its own modification of the canonized texts
* sects were incredibly diversified in accepted texts and belief systems, there was rare unification until the creeds

I underlined a lot of paragraphs I found particularly interesting in this book. Because this is the first historical analysis on early Christianity I've read, including the texts and creation of New Testament, I'd eagerly recommend it to those already having an interest in scripture study. In the perspective of The Restoration, I found it to be quite a source of corroboration in terms of lost truth, lost scripture and lost faith.

Because of the some the disturbing content (in terms of morality and my sensitivity threshold, which maybe equated to a full page) I rate this at 4/5(less)

like 1 like

· see review

Nov 02, 2007

John rated it

This book is an account of the details of these Christian faiths that were ultimately suppressed, as well as an account of how these faiths became "heretical" while one of these sects of Christianity came to be considered orthodox and ultimately shape the beliefs of Christians down to our own day. I found this to be a fascinating trip through the ancient world. Believers should understand the roots of their religion and of the texts on which it is founded; likewise, non-believers will...moreThis book is an account of the details of these Christian faiths that were ultimately suppressed, as well as an account of how these faiths became "heretical" while one of these sects of Christianity came to be considered orthodox and ultimately shape the beliefs of Christians down to our own day. I found this to be a fascinating trip through the ancient world. Believers should understand the roots of their religion and of the texts on which it is founded; likewise, non-believers will probably also be interested in seeing those roots bared. Christianity has been so influential on our culture for the past 1600 years or so that it seems worth understanding.

Allow me to quote extensively from his introduction. He says "It may be difficult to imagine a religious phenomenon more diverse than modern-day Christianity," and goes on to enumerate the stunning varieties that Christianity takes today in America. He continues, however, to ask

"What could be more diverse than this variegated phenomenon, Christianity in the modern world? In fact, there may be an answer: Christianity in the ancient world. As historians have come to realize, during the first three Christian centuries, the practices and beliefs found among people who called themselves Christian were so varied that the differences between Roman Catholics, Primitive Baptists, and Seventh-Day Adventists pale by comparison."

He gives us some sense of this later in the introduction.

"The wide diversity of early Christianity may be seen above all in the theological beliefs embraced by people who understood themselves to be followers of Jesus. In the third century there were, of course, Christians who believed in one God. But there were others who insisted that there were two. Some said there were thirty. Others claimed there were 365.
"In the second and third centuries there were Christians who believed that God created the world. But others believed that the world had been created by a subordinate, ignorant divinity. (Why else would the world be filled with such misery and hardship?) Yet other Christians thought it was worse than that, that this wrld was a cosmic mistake created by a malevolent divinity as a place of imprisonment, to trap humans and subject them to pain and suffering.
"In the second and third centuries there were Christians who believed that the Jewish Scripture (the Christian "Old Testament") was inspired by the one true God. Others believed it was inspired by the God of the Jews, who was not the one true God. Others believed it was inspired by an evil deity. Others believed it was not inspired.
"In the second and third centuries there were Christians who believed that Jesus was both divine and human, God and man. There were other Christians who argued that he was completely divine and not human at all. (For them, divinity and humanity were incommensurate entities: God can no more be a man than a man can be a rock.) There were others who insisted that Jesus was a full flesh-and-blood human, adopted by God to be his son but not himself divine. There were yet other Christians who claimed that Jesus Christ was two things: a full flesh-and-blood human, Jesus, and a fully divine being, Christ, who had temporarily inhabited Jesus' body during his ministry and left him prior to his death, inspiring his teachingsand miracles but avoiding the suffering and its aftermath.
"In the second and third centuries there were Christians who believed that Jesus' death brought about the salvation of the world. There were other Christians who thought that Jesus' death had nothing to do with the salvation of the world. There were yet other Christians who said that Jesus never died."

Some of these beliefs may seem absurd today, but they were all held passionately by people who believed that they knew what God wanted from them and what Jesus had taught. They had scriptures to back them up and arguments supporting their positions.(less)

· see review

Jan 14, 2011

Joe Henry rated it

Ehrman is a happy discovery for me, and I’m adding him to my short list of favorites on history/interpretation of Christianity—along with Marcus Borg and John Shelby Spong. I’ve heard before many of the historical figures and manuscripts, but Ehrman makes it come alive for me…makes me want to want to read/study more. The book reads almost like a “who-done-it” in places. The promo quote that says it best for me is from Elaine Pagels: “Fascinating….Lively, enjoyable, and accessible.”

· see review

Dec 05, 2009

Tony duncan rated it

· review of another edition

Recommends it for: history religion philosophy

Shelves: audio, history, philosophy, politics, religion-spiritual

Just a phenomenal book. Such a comprehensive and enlightening exploration of what we know about the development of Christian religious sects. Amazing that the "orthodox" sect was able to completely suppress every other strand, of which there were many.

While I loved "gnostic Gospels" there is so much more information in general here and it is presented in such an inclusive (as opposed to objective) manner.

Of course this is a very sensitive issue in the...more

· see review

Apr 21, 2011

Courtney rated it

Shelves: non-fiction

There really is no disputing Ehrman's research, he's very good. My disappointment with this book has more to do with my expectations, I think. I thought this would be more politics between varying religious Christian sects, and how the scriptures we have became canonized. There is work on this but far less than I thought there would be. However, it's mostly about forgeries of the scriptures. This book should have been titled Forgeries of the Ancient Faiths That We Never Knew. I probably wouldn't...more

· see review

Apr 02, 2009

Eric rated it

An important scholarly work for anyone who wants to understand the history of the Bible. Dr. Ehrman provides a remarkably frank and straight-forward look at what went into the creation of the collection of works in our bibles today. Even thought there is a significant amount of expertise and scholarship in this book, Dr. Ehrman has a writing style that makes it easy and enjoyable to follow. Be prepared to learn a lot!

· see review

Oct 13, 2010

Alicia rated it

Shelves: spirituality

If you have ever wondered about the earliest Christian groups, this is a very interesting books. The diversity in beliefs of these groups is amazing. This book also talks about which books the different groups used and considered scripture. Some groups excluded some books that made it in at the end and included some books that didn't. I found it all very interesting to read and think about how Christianity began.

· see review

Nov 07, 2009

Danns rated it

I found the presentation of the material to be very well thought out. The author presented his hypothesis in the beginning and did a fantastic job of backing up his research. I higly recommend this for anyone interesting in the history of western thought, religion and Christianity.

This book has a companion - Lost Scriptures, Books that Did Not Make It into the New Testament. I strongly recommend reading these together.

· see review

Aug 15, 2011

Karen rated it

Shelves: religion

I found this recap of some of the little-known, non-Canonical, "heretical", sometimes forged documents of early Christianities to be fascinating. Ehrman, a professor of Religious Studies at UNC Chapel Hill, writes of these matters straightforwardly but also with great erudition. He has a certain tendency to almost-sensationalize, and the editing wasn't what it could have been - there were lots of repetitions from chapter to chapter - but I thought the content was compelling and it's a ...more

· see review

Jul 27, 2011

James Herrington rated it

An excellent historical perspective on the early history of Christianity. Ehrman provides a mostly objective look at the early manuscripts available with a few forays into the great "what-ifs" - i.e. what if the Gnostics had become the primary Christian sect instead of the proto-orthodox (early Catholics). He also discusses the human motivations involved in the formation of the canon of scripture.

· see review

Nov 10, 2011

Meagan rated it

Shelves: 2011-books, src-fall-2011

I feel like it's only fair for me to preface this review by admitting bias. I am in a class with Professor Ehrman this semester, so I've had his personal interpretation of these topics as well as reading his book. I think Bart makes dense, complicated topics easy to understand and he presents them in a way that is interesting. I thought that I would be totally bored by the material in the book, but instead I found it engaging. He gives a really comprehensive look at how Christianity evolved into...more

· see review

Feb 24, 2011

Shane Cooper rated it

Another great Bart Ehrman book presented in his non-biased way using logic, truth and history rather than emotion, conjecture and a specific faith based slant. It's agnostic in nature and will again, open those interested in knowing more about the truth behind Christian religion, how the bible came to it's current form and many other areas of reason and thought.

· see review

Jan 07, 2010

Elizabeth A is currently reading it

I found this book to be in large part a refresher about how the Scriptures (New Testament) did not emerge whole and perfect upon the death of Jesus, but were compiled over a prolonged period of centuries. On the one hand, it's interesting material. On the other hand, it does seem to be more trouble than the subject is worth. It's not like this is new news.

· see review

Apr 04, 2009

Kcraybould rated it

This was a typically Ehrman book: fascinating subject, well researched and well argued marred only by a slight tendency to the "boring professor lecturing" style of writing during those few parts when he is summarizing a point in order to move along to what really interests him.

Aside from that flaw, this is a fascinating look at how man different Christianities there were in the first couple centuries of the Church and the process by which the orthodox church came to be bef...more

· see review

« previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 … 48 49 next »

new topic
Discuss This Book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Recommend it | Stats | Recent status updates

combine
Other Editions (11)

More editions...

Genres

Religion

85 users

History

42 users

Religion > Christianity

27 users

Non Fiction

25 users

Christian

3 users

Spirituality

3 users

Philosophy

2 users

Religion > Theology

2 users

Church > Church History

2 users

Religion > Church

2 users

See top shelves...

Readers Also Enjoyed

About Bart D. Ehrman

Bart D. Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill. He came to UNC in 1988, after four years of teaching at Rutgers University. At UNC he has served as both the Director of Graduate Studies and the Chair of the Department of Religious Studies.

A graduate of Wheaton College (Illinois), Professor Ehrman received both his Ma...moreBart D. Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill. He came to UNC in 1988, after four years of teaching at Rutgers University. At UNC he has served as both the Director of Graduate Studies and the Chair of the Department of Religious Studies.

A graduate of Wheaton College (Illinois), Professor Ehrman received both his Masters of Divinity and PhD from Princeton Theological Seminary, where his 1985 doctoral dissertation was awarded magna cum laude. Since then he has published extensively in the fields of New Testament and Early Christianity, having written or edited 21 books, numerous scholarly articles, and dozens of book reviews. Among his most recent books are a Greek-English edition of The Apostolic Fathers for the Loeb Classical Library (Harvard University Press), an assessment of the newly discovered Gospel of Judas (Oxford University Press), and two New York Times bestsellers: God’s Problem (an assessment of the biblical views of suffering) and Misquoting Jesus (an overview of the changes found in the surviving copies of the New Testament and of the scribes who produced them).

Among his fields of scholarly expertise are the historical Jesus, the early Christian apocrypha, the apostolic fathers, and the manuscript tradition of the New Testament.

Professor Ehrman has served as President of the Southeast Region of the Society of Biblical literature, chair of the New Testament textual criticism section of the Society, book review editor of the Journal of Biblical Literature, and editor of the monograph series The New Testament in the Greek Fathers (Scholars Press). He currently serves as coeditor of the series New Testament Tools, Studies, and Documents (E.J. Brill), coeditor in chief for the journal Vigiliae Christianae, and on several other editorial boards for journals and monographs in the field.

Winner of numerous university awards and grants, Professor Ehrman is the recipient of the 1993 UNC Undergraduate Student Teaching Award, the 1994 Phillip and Ruth Hettleman Prize for Artistic and Scholarly Achievement, and the Bowman and Gordon Gray Award for excellence in teaching.

Professor Ehrman has two children, a daughter, Kelly, and a son, Derek. He is married to Sarah Beckwith (PhD, King's College London), Marcello Lotti Professor of English at Duke University. He lives in Durham, North Carolina.

(less)

More about Bart D. Ehrman...

Books by Bart D. Ehrman

Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible & Why

Jesus, Interrupted: Revealing the Hidden Contradictions in the Bible & Why We Don't Know About Them

God's Problem: How the Bible Fails to Answer Our Most Important Question-Why We Suffer

Lost Scriptures: Books That Did Not Make It Into the New Testament

The Lost Gospel of Judas Iscariot: A New Look at Betrayer & Betrayed

More…

Share This Book

Facebook Twitter Your website

Pin It

Trivia About Lost Christianiti...

No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Groups That Shelved Lost Christianiti...

The Atheist Book Club

389 members

last activity 3 hours, 50 min ago

shelf: to-read

Debate Religion

168 members

last activity 21 hours, 22 min ago

shelf: to-read

title link	preview: Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture & the Faiths We Never Knew
avg rating	preview: Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture & the Faiths We Never Knew Goodreads rating: 3.95 (710 ratings)
small image	preview: click here [close]
med image	preview: click here [close]
BBCode	[url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/107273.Lost_Christianities?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book][img]http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1171570481m/107273.jpg[/img][/url] [url=http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/107273.Lost_Christianities?utm_medium=api&utm_source=blog_book]Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture & the Faiths We Never Knew by Bart D. Ehrman[/url]

Lost Christianities: The Battles for Scripture & the Faiths We Never Knew

Friend Reviews

Community Reviews

Readers Also Enjoyed

Share This Book

Share This Book on Your Website