Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The South vs. the South: How Southern Anti-Confederates Shaped the Course of the Civil War” as Want to Read:
The South vs. the South: How Southern Anti-Confederates Shaped the Course of the Civil War
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The South vs. the South: How Southern Anti-Confederates Shaped the Course of the Civil War

3.66  ·  Rating Details  ·  119 Ratings  ·  10 Reviews
Why did the Confederacy lose the Civil War? Most historians point to the larger number of Union troops, for example, or the North's greater industrial might. Now, in The South Vs. the South, one of America's leading authorities on the Civil War era offers an entirely new answer to this question.
William Freehling argues that anti-Confederate Southerners--specifically, bord
...more
ebook, 0 pages
Published February 15th 2001 by Oxford University Press, USA (first published 2001)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The South vs. the South, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The South vs. the South

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 264)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Eric
This is a very interesting and well-reasoned book that looks at the role Southerners played in the Union's victory in the Civil War. The author concentrates on "border state whites," his term for white folks who lived in the Union slave states that bordered the South, such as Kentucky and Maryland. Citizens in those states overwhelmingly chose to serve in the Union army rather than the Confederate army. Those who stayed out of the war proved resistant to Confederate efforts to "revolutionize" th ...more
Stephen
The South vs the South is disappointing if well put together; it is largely focused on the role of slaves during the war, covering the politics of emancipation splendidly. There is almost nothing said of the effects of dissent and rebellion by white farmers against the Confederacy, nor any serious treatment given to southern deserters; aside from slavery, in fact, the only southerners who get a lot of attention are those in the border states, whose apathy is the principle subject. That said, for ...more
Sean Chick
Dec 05, 2013 Sean Chick rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This is one of the best books on the war. Freehling's argument is that the South lost because it failed to gain the allegiance of the border states and then lost the loyalty of enough whites and slaves that it gave the Union a vital manpower boost. Freehling is a superb writer who makes his case but rarely overstates it.
David Bates
May 22, 2013 David Bates rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Freehling’s work largely functions by pointing out the divisions within the South as a whole over the issue of secession and tracing how those divisions conditioned the course of the Civil War. Non-Confederate southerners as Freehling terms them, mainly divide into two catagories: border state whites in Missouri, Kentucky, West Virginia and Maryland who did not support secession, and southern blacks. The political inclinations of the white citizens of border states gave the Union a massive advan ...more
Chelsey Ortega
Nov 24, 2015 Chelsey Ortega rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: school, historical
This was a very interesting read. The author tries to explain why the South lost the Civil War (something many historians have tried to do because, let's face it: the South had a great start and it really looked like they were going to win). Anyway, Freehling makes the argument that the South lost because they were divided and against each other because of those divisions. Some of this devisions include: slave owners vs. non slave owners, rich vs. poor, master vs. slave, etc. It is very well wri ...more
Steven Wedgeworth
Jul 21, 2013 Steven Wedgeworth rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A fascinating look into the internal divisions of the Confederacy. Freehling argues that the divisions within the South instigated the Civil War, by hastening secession, and then brought about the end of the Civil War, with less slave-dependent states deciding to give up rather than prolong the fighting.
Daniel
May 05, 2009 Daniel rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
One of the more compelling books on the Civil War and what ultimately caused Southern secession to fail. Thankfully Freehling avoids painting either Northern forces or Southern forces (or their respective nations) as altruistic or heroic.
David R.
The come-on in the dust jacket was hyperbole given that the content was merely pedestrian. And the case was not compelling: the case studies did not convince me that interior resistance was especially potent.
Michelle
Dec 11, 2011 Michelle rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book was good because it was short. It didn't repeat itself over and over making the same point, but it was concise and an easy read for an academic-type book.
Michael
Apr 05, 2007 Michael rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Who knew, man?
Matt
Matt marked it as to-read
Feb 08, 2016
Bill
Bill rated it liked it
Jan 31, 2016
Jeff
Jeff is currently reading it
Jan 24, 2016
Kristen
Kristen marked it as to-read
Jan 20, 2016
Jessica Cooper
Jessica Cooper rated it really liked it
Jan 08, 2016
Francis X DuFour
Francis X DuFour marked it as to-read
Jan 02, 2016
Joanne Emilia
Joanne Emilia rated it it was ok
Dec 16, 2015
Tres Swann
Tres Swann marked it as to-read
Dec 06, 2015
Shyra
Shyra added it
Dec 03, 2015
David Bird
David Bird rated it really liked it
Dec 06, 2015
Gabor
Gabor marked it as to-read
Nov 28, 2015
Fawn Mctagertt
Fawn Mctagertt marked it as to-read
Nov 17, 2015
Andy
Andy marked it as to-read
Nov 06, 2015
John Joseph
John Joseph rated it it was amazing
Nov 05, 2015
Dave Cheeney
Dave Cheeney marked it as to-read
Oct 08, 2015
Nancy
Nancy rated it liked it
Oct 09, 2015
Nosipho
Nosipho marked it as to-read
Aug 22, 2015
Michelle Ruedin
Michelle Ruedin marked it as to-read
Aug 11, 2015
Craig
Craig marked it as to-read
Aug 07, 2015
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Confederate Reckoning: Power and Politics in the Civil War South
  • Apostles of Disunion: Southern Secession Commissioners and the Causes of the Civil War
  • Cold Harbor: Grant and Lee, May 26-June 3, 1864
  • Glory Road
  • No Better Place to Die: The Battle Of Stones River
  • Fighting for the Confederacy: The Personal Recollections of General Edward Porter Alexander
  • The Destructive War: William Tecumseh Sherman, Stonewall Jackson, and the Americans
  • General Lee's Army: From Victory to Collapse
  • The Fate of Liberty: Abraham Lincoln and Civil Liberties
  • The Grand Design: Strategy and the U.S. Civil War
  • Shrouds of Glory: From Atlanta to Nashville: The Last Great Campaign of the Civil War
  • Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the '60s
  • To the Gates of Richmond: The Peninsula Campaign
  • Southern Storm: Sherman's March to the Sea
  • Fateful Lightning: A New History of the Civil War and Reconstruction
  • Three Roads to the Alamo: The Lives and Fortunes of David Crockett, James Bowie, and William Barret Travis
  • Half Slave and Half Free: The Roots of Civil War
  • Sherman: Soldier, Realist, American
William W. Freehling is Singletary Professor of the Humanities Emeritus at the University of Kentucky
More about William W. Freehling...

Share This Book