Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War” as Want to Read:
The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War

4.16  ·  Rating Details  ·  1,139 Ratings  ·  144 Reviews
A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War
Most Americans consider Abraham Lincoln to be the greatest president in history. His legend as the Great Emancipator has grown to mythic proportions as hundreds of books, a national holiday, and a monument in Washington, D.C., extol his heroism and martyrdom. But what if most everything you knew about Lincoln
Paperback, 384 pages
Published December 2nd 2003 by Three Rivers Press (first published 2002)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Real Lincoln, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Real Lincoln

A People's History of the United States by Howard ZinnThe Diary of a Young Girl by Anne Frank1491 by Charles C. Mann1776 by David McCulloughA Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson
Understanding History
12th out of 212 books — 66 voters
1421 by Gavin Menzies1434 by Gavin MenziesThe Devil in the White City by Erik LarsonHoly Bible by Anonymous1491 by Charles C. Mann
Worst historical non-fiction
11th out of 31 books — 30 voters

More lists with this book...

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 2,466)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Oct 23, 2012 Jim rated it did not like it
Eleven chapters of, how shall I put this mildly, bovine waste.

This book was urged upon my by one who found it compelling. Finally, after a century and a half of myth-based pseudo-history propping up the image of "King Lincoln", he told me, comes Thomas J. DiLorenzo, an economist with a book exposing the "truth" about not-so-honest Abe.

I'll admit to skepticism. And I'll even admit that I had no real desire to read The Real Lincoln. Whenever I'm faced with a conflict between mainstream and fringe,
Mar 17, 2008 zikafus rated it it was amazing
Everything you know about Lincoln is wrong... trust me.
This is another one of those books that takes a look at one of America's "heroes", tears off the mask of patriotic romanticism revealing a scoundrel beneath...
Lincoln was likely the worst President in United States history... sound insane? Read the book... you'll be left with zero complaints...
The Civil War initially had NOTHING to do with slavery (which would have been the only justifiable reason to wage it), it began, and was waged until
Jun 21, 2008 Christopher rated it it was amazing
Why was the United States the only country in the world to fight a war to end slavery?

Because the war wasn't about slavery. Like all other wars, it was fought over money and power.

Lincoln, the American Hitler, was the man who single-handedly shredded the Constitution and fathered "Big Government."

The "Church of Lincoln" has distorted facts and history to paint a picture of Lincoln in total contradiction of his real self and motives.

Fortunately, this author demolishes these falsehoods with simple
Christopher Saunders
Aug 18, 2013 Christopher Saunders rated it did not like it
History as ignorant rant. DiLorenzo portrays Lincoln as the peer of Hitler and Stalin, gleefully distorting history whether through misquotation, misrepresentation or outright lying. He claims, for instance, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free a single slave: he ignores that the Union controlled large swaths of the Confederacy by the time it was issued. The 13th Amendment, where slavery was permanently ended through legal, constitutional methods? Not mentioned once. He pretends the war is ...more
Oct 14, 2007 Mark rated it really liked it
Shelves: 2007, history
Disturbing book. The states had a right to secede from the union. This was accepted at the time. Constitutional amendments were proposed to prevent the right of secession. The right of secession is in fact a key to controlling the powers of a central government.

Lincoln entered the war without congressional approval, calling it a "rebellion". He blockaded the south, something that could only be done against a country with which we were at war. He suspended the writ of Habeas Corpus without approv
Oct 23, 2014 Nicholas rated it did not like it
Some weeks back I was in an online discussion about good Lincoln biographies. The book that received the most mentions was The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnecessary War, by Thomas DiLorenzo. Some brief internet searching revealed that the book is quite controversial and has been charged with gross distortion of history. Nevertheless, I was morbidly curious enough to read it myself.

DiLorenzo's stated goal is to get past the "myths" of Lincoln that he believes
Britton Grier
Oct 02, 2014 Britton Grier rated it did not like it
The central argument of the text is that Lincoln was acting unconstitutionally in waging war with the South (i.e. that states had the right to secede). For instance, in regards to the Emancipation Proclamation, DiLornenzo states it was a "war measure [...which] in reality, the president had no power to dictate such a thing to a state government." (p.37) If the southern states seceded (which all in the North and South admitted that they had as evidenced by the requirement that they accept amendme ...more
Gwen Burrow
Nov 22, 2012 Gwen Burrow rated it it was amazing
I've been critical of Lincoln for years, but this book shows (with meticulous research from the 18th and 19th centuries) just how much this man is to be condemned for his lies, his powermongering, and his tyranny. Historians have been stopping their ears to the truth for the past 150 years and more, and it's time to quit. It's time to remember our history, to know our Constitution, and to quit worshipping this beast of big government.
Not so much a history or biography as an apologetic for the mythos of the Lost Cause of the Confederacy. DiLorenzo is correct in arguing that Lincoln and the North in general were not virtuous and sinless moral crusaders. That cartoon history is the stuff of pop culture and grade-school history textbooks. DiLorenzo, though, uses this as a straw man to bat down as if it were actually representative of real historical scholarship, thus creating a classic false dichotomy in which Lincoln is either ...more
Jan 15, 2009 DJ rated it it was ok
Recommends it for: not a soul.
Shelves: autobio-bio
Author Thomas DiLorenzo is a scholar at the League of the South Institute. He is also listed as an ideologue to watch out for on the Southern Poverty Law Center website. It seems to me the book is part of a body of "scholarship" whose ultimate goal is for the South to secede again, and possibly to return to its antebellum social structure. Although no author should be wholly disregarded based on ad hominem attack alone, these facts likely influence my view of the book.

It is not entirely worthles
Sep 04, 2010 Jim rated it it was ok
Shelves: history
The book is worth reading, but it leaves you wishing that it had been written by an author more intent on fleshing out the scholarship than one interested in bashing Lincoln. What are the actual statistics on how much of U.S. revenue was supplied by tariffs? Maybe a graph to show how this was split between the North and the South would have been useful. Could the author have spent a bit more time fleshing out the background of the 'American System' favored by Lincoln and his sponsors? There are ...more
Monica Perez
Jan 21, 2009 Monica Perez rated it liked it
Shelves: recommended
I give it a three instead of a four because I found it somewhat sensationalistic but it really is a must read. From here you can conduct a more academic investigation but it helps you shake off the brainwashing of the history that was written by the winners.
Tim Renshaw
Aug 30, 2015 Tim Renshaw rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: own, ebook
I'm a conservative that loves the U.S. Constitution. Was it a perfect document? Nope. Its largest failing was on the issue of slavery. Hideous that to get all the original states to sign on that this had to be left to a future generation to fix... and it needed it fixed. There, that should hopefully lay aside the kneejerk reaction to what follows as being because I'm some kind of racist. It is a shame that I need to even add in this caveat, but such are the current state of affairs in our politi ...more
Oct 13, 2010 K rated it liked it
2.5 Stars.

I find this to be the case with so many non-fiction books. They have a powerful start and then the book fades into repetition. About 170 pages in and I just couldn't go on. The first part of the book was fascinating, particularly focusing on the political climate and the events leading up to the Civil War. But he did such a good overview that by the time he got to really focusing on Lincoln, I felt like I had read it all before.

I will say that I enjoy seeing Lincoln brought down to a
David Robins
Feb 08, 2011 David Robins rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
DiLorenzo himself sums the book up well in his conclusion: "Despite an unspeakably bloody war, the demolition of constitutional liberties, and the conquest and subjugation of the South for twelve years after the war, Lincoln and his party still failed to completely destroy federalism and states' rights. Because the ideas were so ingrained in the American psyche, something of a revolt against centralized government authority occurred in the postwar years, personified by the presidency of Grover C ...more
Mar 25, 2011 Elena rated it it was amazing
"I have no interest to introduce political and social equality between the white and black in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position. I have never said anything to the contrary."

~Abraham Lincoln, 1858 from The Real Lincoln by Thomas J. DiLorenzo.

Every nation has its myths; we Americans certainly have our share. I think that national myths fulfill the purpose of making people feel better about ugly episodes in history, especially their own history. In
Apr 27, 2015 Leah rated it really liked it
4 1/2 Stars. What an incredible figure Lincoln was. This book does much to shed light on lesser known facts because most of what is taught and propagated about Lincoln as the "Honest Abe" figure. If anyone is interested in Lincoln, his agenda, his politics, his background, and his legacy, this is an excellent read. Dilorenzo is a fantastic writer, this is not a dry history book of facts, but a riveting description of Lincoln, the man, not the myth. He does a good job addressing his critics in th ...more
CJ Ruby
Nov 30, 2015 CJ Ruby rated it did not like it
Nothing new here for "Lost Cause" southern apologists and Lincoln haters. A patchwork of circular logic and twisted contextualization. The war was about slavery. The heart of the states rights argument was for the south to maintain slavery. To deny that is to blind oneself to the truth of the Civil War. Lincoln wasn't a saint, those who revere him as one give ammunition to haters and twisted thinkers like DiLorenzo. Lincoln was a pragmatic politician who succeeded in the most difficult period of ...more
Jun 14, 2012 Monty rated it it was amazing
Shelves: american-history
This book raises some very uncomfortable questions and attempts to provide solid, documented answers to them...
1) What was the real goal of the Whig Party and Henry Clay who were the lifetime "mentors" of Abraham Lincoln?
2) Why is it that of all the many nations which emancipated their slaves between 1790 and 1880, the United States was the only country to fight a Civil War, involving the deaths of over a million people, to do so?
3) Why was it that there were no less than four secession crisis b
Kathy Brown
Oct 24, 2013 Kathy Brown rated it did not like it
Shelves: civil-war, 2013
This book was one that I had to force myself to finish, which isn't usual for me. I have been reading books that give both favorable and critical assessments of historical figures in recent years in an effort to find a balanced view. While I make no claim to being a Civil War authority, I have been reading about this subject for a number of years and have found numberous questionable assertions in "The Real Lincoln", such as Lincoln wanted a war just so he could establish a strong central govern ...more
Apr 22, 2010 John rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: 2010
This is DiLorenzo's first book on Lincoln, and is better than his second, Lincoln Unmasked. The historical context in this book is more complete than his other book. Lincoln and his legacy are highly esteemed, but DiLorenzo demonstrates that Lincoln's presidency were ruinous to the nation and left a legacy of centralized power, leaving the states and the people unable to check federal power.

Lincoln, rather than being the Great Emancipator, was the Great Centralizer. He was also a racist who wor
Jan 26, 2012 Furb rated it really liked it
I wrote a review in the style of a travelogue here:

Just finished this. This was certainly an eye opener. I didn't know much more about Lincoln than what I'd been told about him in skew, um, I mean school. This cites a lot of different sources. Perhaps what I liked most was DiLorenzo's refutation of his detractors in the afterward. That made me laugh. The rest of it is, sadly, tragic history.

This was December 2011's Book of the Month, and the winner of the
Bliss Tew
Feb 23, 2009 Bliss Tew rated it really liked it
In 2008 I read this book. It's important that Americans take a hard look at the man behind the war that most changed America, the War Between the States, that so centralized power in the federal government. Lincoln, a Whig, then a Republican, was a believer in protectionism for his cronies in big business enterprises such as railroads. Understanding the fact that Secession was a "right" derived from the Declaration of Independence, but not an American Right recognized by Abraham Lincoln, sets th ...more
Apr 24, 2016 Kyle rated it really liked it
Recommends it for: Civil war buffs/history buffs
Shelves: history
An excellent read. They should teach stuff like this in high school (that'll be the day, right?). Lincoln here is portrayed as he was - a flawed character and the natural evolution of Hamiltonians/Whigs along with their goals of centralization. This book paints the rolling snowball of government centralization as starting as soon as Lincoln "won" the war. State sovereignty and the constitution never quite meant the same thing after the Civil War. The smokescreen of slavery has been thoroughly de ...more
Edward Welsch
Nov 03, 2015 Edward Welsch rated it really liked it
This is an excellent book of revisionist history that takes down one of the most revered and mythologized American leaders, Abraham Lincoln. The book shows how at its outset the Civil War was chiefly an economic and political struggle between the northern manufacturing states and the southern agrarian exporting states, and that slavery was added as a moral justification only after the conflict was well underway. Lincoln, who was a lawyer and lobbyist for America's largest corporation before he w ...more
Aug 02, 2010 Christopher rated it it was amazing
This book made me want to blast Lincoln's face off of Mount Rushmore and desecrate his temple in Washington.

He was a politician, who held illogical and tyrannical ideas, and he enforced his ideas upon the nation by force of war.

He did more than any man to destroy the union of free and sovereign states that our Founding Fathers established.

He was a racist Hamiltonian, and not the God that our public schools and politicians teach us to worship.
Joshua Horn
Apr 11, 2013 Joshua Horn rated it it was amazing
A re evaluation of the traditional view of Lincoln as one of the greatest presidents in history, who preserved the union and freed the slaves. Instead we see him in his true character, racist and tyrant. Revealing and easy to read. I do think Dilorenzo does make some mistakes, not necessary in what he says, but in what he does not say. Although states rights were important, slavery did play a huge role in bringing the nation to wae
Jay Perkins
Aug 16, 2015 Jay Perkins rated it did not like it
"The Real Lincoln" is an alternative look at the American Civil War that promises to expose Abraham Lincoln's true intent in waging that cruel and bloody conflict. He argues that Lincoln purposefully lead the nation into war to create a strong federal power and destroy the advocates of limited government in the south. Instead of being the "great emancipator", DiLorenzo argues, Lincoln should be remembered as the "great centralizer". Some of what DiLorenzo discusses is very important and is unkno ...more
Dec 20, 2014 Eric rated it really liked it
We all know the official story. That evil south broke away from the union because slavery. That would have destroyed 'murca, so God sent this humble saint to pull things back together.

Too bad it isn't true. Lincoln in real life was a tyrant, who destroyed the idea of the union. He was a predecessor to the Bush II administration with its Patriot Act. He destroyed the Constitution and replaced a voluntary union of sovereign states with a compulsory federal union of subject states.

Lincoln didn't "e
Jan 13, 2014 Nathan rated it it was amazing
The USA ceased to be a republic when Lincoln became president and became an empire.

Every nation in the world that had slaves freed them peacefully. The USA was the only one that had a war to do so. If what was spent on the war had been spent to free the slaves, each slave would have had enough to own 40 acres of land.

Lincoln was a white supremacist! 3 months after the treaty was signed with the south, he sent the army to wipe out the Sioux indians to make room for a railroad.

Kalr Marx sent Linc
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 82 83 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • Nullification: How to Resist Federal Tyranny in the 21st Century
  • FDR's Folly: How Roosevelt and His New Deal Prolonged the Great Depression
  • The South Was Right!
  • America's Great Depression
  • A Nation of Sheep
  • The Myth of the Robber Barons: A New Look at the Rise of Big Business in America
  • A Foreign Policy of Freedom: Peace, Commerce, and Honest Friendship
  • The Politically Incorrect Guide to the Great Depression and the New Deal
  • The New Dealers' War: F.D.R. and the War Within World War II
  • The Roosevelt Myth: 50th Anniversary Edition
  • Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government
  • Churchill, Hitler and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World
  • The Creature from Jekyll Island: A Second Look at the Federal Reserve
Thomas James DiLorenzo is an American economics professor at Loyola University Maryland. He identifies himself as an adherent of the Austrian School of economics. He is a senior fellow of the Ludwig von Mises Institute and an associated scholar of the Abbeville Institute. He holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Virginia Tech.
More about Thomas J. DiLorenzo...

Share This Book

“Tocqueville was correct in his rendition of how the Constitution was formed, but he likely never dreamed that an American president would ever send an invading army to kill some 300,000 of his own citizens in order to destroy the right of secession, a right that all of America's founding fathers held as sacrosanct and that was at the very heart of the American system of government.” 2 likes
“Woodrow Wilson would write approvingly in his 1908 book, Constitutional Government in the United States, that “the War between the States established… this principle, that the federal government is, through its courts, the final judge of its own powers.” 26 This was the Jeffersonians’ greatest fear. Thanks to Lincoln's war, states’ rights would no longer perform its most important function: protecting the citizens of the states from federal judicial tyranny.” 0 likes
More quotes…