Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “The Works of Aristotle the Famous Philosopher” as Want to Read:
The Works of Aristotle the Famous Philosopher
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

The Works of Aristotle the Famous Philosopher

3.60  ·  Rating Details  ·  68 Ratings  ·  6 Reviews
Paperback, Large Print, 376 pages
Published October 11th 2007 by BiblioLife (first published 1684)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about The Works of Aristotle the Famous Philosopher, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about The Works of Aristotle the Famous Philosopher

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 266)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Jan 31, 2015 Will rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
"A word of Advice to both Sexes, consisting of several Directions with regard to Copulation.

As Nature has a mutual desire for copulation in every creature, for the increase and propagation of its kind, and more especially in man, the lord of creation and the masterpiece of Nature, in order that such a noble piece of divine workmanship should not perish, something ought to be said concerning it, it being the foundation of everything that we have hitherto been treating of, since without copulation
A Marie
Jul 23, 2016 A Marie marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Any interest in this book will primarily lie in its historical function, obviously (Leopold Bloom spies a copy in Joyce's _Ulysses_, as noted in this wonderful review: The book was a kind of blockbuster, reflecting a period in which interest in the self, the body, and gender norms had intensified. For that reason, it has appeal across a range of inquiries, from the history of science and the history of sexuality and of gender to literary production thro ...more
May 10, 2010 Melissa rated it liked it
This book was so crazy. A midwifery manual from the 17 century, it was falsely attributed to Aristotle somehow. It's full of interesting "scientific information" about anatomy, physiology, genetics, conception, gestation, and many other topics. At the time this information was modern and accepted, but the vast majority of it has since been disproven. In addition, there are many recipes for remedies, medicines, poultices, and much more, that would certainly interest the modern-day herbalist. Howe ...more
Adam Stevenson
Sep 10, 2013 Adam Stevenson rated it really liked it
There is something fascinating in old medical works, and this piece of seventeenth century popular science about how to make and deliver babies is no exception. Some of the information and advice seems sensible, some seems enlightened, some seems crazy and some seems criminal but it's all based on a view of the body we no longer hold, unless we are one of them holistic/qi/good and bad energy nutjob type people.
Jan 07, 2014 Andrew rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Interesting as a primary source for historical study, but boring and useless in all other contexts.
Jun 18, 2007 Jeremy rated it it was amazing
Where children thus are born with hairy coats
Heaven's wrath unto the kingodom it denotes.
Feb 23, 2014 Lawrence marked it as to-read  ·  review of another edition
Brian Barth
Brian Barth rated it it was amazing
Jul 25, 2016
Aditya Laddha laddha
Aditya Laddha laddha is currently reading it
Jul 19, 2016
Brandon Longstreth
Brandon Longstreth marked it as to-read
Jul 12, 2016
Holly added it
Jul 11, 2016
Steven marked it as to-read
Jun 29, 2016
Alicia Gioia
Alicia Gioia marked it as to-read
Jun 11, 2016
Stieltjes rated it liked it
Jun 11, 2016
Monster marked it as to-read
Jun 07, 2016
Jonathan marked it as to-read
Jun 05, 2016
Alex Toby
Alex Toby marked it as to-read
Jun 02, 2016
Alva marked it as to-read
May 30, 2016
chelsie hellwig
chelsie hellwig marked it as to-read
May 26, 2016
Carl marked it as to-read
May 24, 2016
wolffie777 marked it as to-read
May 22, 2016
Chris Gail
Chris Gail marked it as to-read
May 20, 2016
Gevorg Hakobyan
Gevorg Hakobyan rated it it was amazing
May 17, 2016
K.S. Trenten
K.S. Trenten is currently reading it
May 14, 2016
Sheri Van Wert
Sheri Van Wert marked it as to-read
Apr 27, 2016
Sunil Jaswal
Sunil Jaswal is currently reading it
Apr 27, 2016
Trulyaragorn marked it as to-read
Apr 26, 2016
Julia Sullivan
Julia Sullivan marked it as to-read
Apr 23, 2016
Showie rated it it was amazing
Apr 22, 2016
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • A Pluralistic Universe
  • An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, Volume 1MDCXC, Based on the 2nd Edition, Books 1 and 2
  • Homer and Classical Philology
  • Apocolocyntosis
  • The Bible Period by Period A Manual for the Study of the Bible by Periods
  • History of Astronomy
  • A Short History of Greek Philosophy
  • Logic Deductive and Inductive
  • A Treatise on Good Works
  • A Discourse on the Method of Correctly Conducting One's Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences
  • Ancient Rhetorics for Contemporary Students
  • Ancient Rome: From the Earliest Times Down to 476 A.D.
  • Lewis Carroll's Symbolic Logic
  • The Histories I-II
  • Introduction To The Old Testament
  • Handy Dictionary of Poetical Quotations
  • The Life of David As Reflected in His Psalms
  • Worlds Away (The Interstellar Age, #3)
"Pseudo-Aristotle is a general cognomen for authors of philosophical or medical treatises who attributed their work to the Greek philosopher Aristotle, or whose work was later attributed to him by others. Such falsely attributed works are known as pseudepigrapha.

The first Pseudo-Aristotelian works were produced by the members of the Peripatetic school which was founded by Aristotle. However, many
More about Pseudo-Aristotle...

Share This Book

“withal vain-glorious, proud and inconstant. He whose arms are very short in respect to the stature of his body, is thereby signified to be a man of high and gallant spirit, of a graceful temper, bold and warlike. He whose arms are full of bones, sinews and flesh, is a great desirer of novelties and beauties, and one that is very credulous and apt to believe anything. He whose arms are very hairy, whether they be lean or fat, is for the most part a luxurious person, weak in body and mind, very suspicious and malicious withal. He whose arms have no hair on them at all, is of a weak judgment, very angry, vain, wanton, credulous, easily deceived himself, yet a great deceiver of others, no fighter, and very apt to betray his dearest friends. CHAPTER IV Of Palmistry, showing the various Judgments drawn from the Hand. Being engaged in this fourth part to show what judgment may be drawn, according to physiognomy, from the several parts of the body, and coming in order to speak of the hands, it has put me under the necessity of saying something about palmistry, which is a judgment made of the conditions, inclinations, and fortunes of men and women, from the various lines and characters nature has imprinted in their hands, which are almost as serious as the hands that have them. The reader should remember that one of the lines of the hand, and which indeed is reckoned the principal, is called the line of life; this line encloses the thumb, separating it from the hollow of the hand. The next to it, which is called the natural line, takes its” 0 likes
More quotes…