Goodreads | The Once and Future King

topics	replies	views	last activity
Arthuriana -- all...: Who does it best?	2	9	5 days ago, 06:06PM

Andrew rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

06/30/08

Read in June, 2008

It is easy to forget that the fantasy genre does have other giants besides Tolkien. T.H. White is such a person. If you want a literary step up from the popcorn fantasy out there give this book a try.

This book is divided into four books. They all go together but they are also all different in focus and have a growing change in mood. White is using Thomas Malory's Le Morte D'Arthur as the outline for his story. He writes in a very anachronistic and witty manner. He also vaguely dates th...more

Like this review? yes

add a comment

Jeremy rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

01/17/08

Read in January, 2008

recommends it for: anyone who enjoys adventure, romance, history, or fantasy

I read this book about every two years. It is one of my absolute favorites. The stories and the characters are so well-crafted that I can read it over-and-over time and again with just as much pleasure as the first time.
This novel is actually divided into four 'books' within itself, and while you can read the four books out of order, it really is meant to be read from front to back.
The first book, "The Sword In The Stone", is much like the Disney animated movie that was adapted f...more I read this book about every two years. It is one of my absolute favorites. The stories and the characters are so well-crafted that I can read it over-and-over time and again with just as much pleasure as the first time.
This novel is actually divided into four 'books' within itself, and while you can read the four books out of order, it really is meant to be read from front to back.
The first book, "The Sword In The Stone", is much like the Disney animated movie that was adapted from it. There are a few scenes in the movie which are not in the book, and quite a bit in the book which is not in the movie, but the overall flavor is the same, and the essence of the story is there. The main thing lacking from the movie, which is quite important in the novel, is that Merlin is teaching Arthur (Wart) about the ways of humanity, civilization, and society, so that when he becomes the King he will not just continue with things as they have been, but learn to reason and think for himself, to try his best to make the world a better place. These lessons are referred to again and again later in the novel. This first book has far more magic and fairy-tale qualities than any of the rest of the book.
The second book is called "The Queen of Air and Darkness", and primarily has to do with Arthur's nephews from his half-sister, Morgause, and ends with Morgause, not knowing that Arthur is her half-brother, bewitching him and seducing him to give her a child. This child, Mordred, is the essence of fate of Arthur and what makes this novel such a tragedy. White reveals this information as well, and knowing it here does not spoil the remainder of the book in anyway. This second book is one of the shortest of the four.
The third book is easily my favorite and is called "The Ill-Made Knight". It is the story of Sir Lancelot. This portion of the novel (and many smaller pieces of it) are where a great many Hollywood movies pull their King Arthur and Lancelot material from, only they usually get it all wrong. Lancelot, in this book, is the greatest knight in the world, though he is quite ugly - not the sexy and charming knight as is always portrayed in the movies. His face is often compared to a gargoyle. I believe this is quite important. It helps the reader to better understand his relationship with Queen Guenevere ("Jenny") and to understand that the Queen does not have this lifelong affair with her husband's best friend simply because he is charming and handsome and the best knight in the world. The character of Lancelot (as are Arthur and Guenevere) is so richly charactered. His struggles with his faith and humanity, and how those play against his love for his best friend's wife, are his lifelong struggles. Lancelot is shown to be an honest person, of the truest sense, even though he lives this lifelong struggle of adultery with his best friend's wife. The love triangle between Lancelot, Guenevere, and Arthur (and Qudrangle with God, as White often represents it) is the heart of this book, though the book really focuses on Lancelot's internal struggles. This book also serves to explore Arthur's attempts at removing the "Might Is Right" mentality of the Middle Ages, and gives us the Quest for the Holy Grail stories. This book, along with the first book, represents the bulk of this novel's content.
The last book, "A Candle In The Wind", brings together all the elements of Arthur's tragedy. The irony in this book is how Arthur's own new system of "justice" is used against him bring to light (publicly) the affair between Lancelot and Guenever.
This novel is a wonderful exploration of humanity, society, and civilization, and a beautiful fairy tale tragedy....less

Like this review? yes (4 people liked it)

2 comments

Corinne rated it:

(review of isbn 0441003834)

06/03/08

bookshelves: ward-book-club

Read in June, 2008

This book terrified me, on many levels. It's 667 pages long, to begin with. It's been a while since I read a serious chunkster like that (besides Harry Potter, which someone in my mind doesn't really count...).

Besides that, I am just not a fan of "Authur" stories, despite my deep love of the Disney movie The Sword and the Stone, of course. Even since I saw the musical "Camelot" in the theater when I was in high school, the story just didn't appeal to me. Then my book club...more This book terrified me, on many levels. It's 667 pages long, to begin with. It's been a while since I read a serious chunkster like that (besides Harry Potter, which someone in my mind doesn't really count...).

Besides that, I am just not a fan of "Authur" stories, despite my deep love of the Disney movie The Sword and the Stone, of course. Even since I saw the musical "Camelot" in the theater when I was in high school, the story just didn't appeal to me. Then my book club chose this as our monthly selection and I finally decided it was time to tackle this monster.

Was it worth reading? Absolutely. This book is so much more than just Arthur and Camelot. The first section of the book is essentially the Disney movie, and that part does grab you and you love Wart so much that you keep reading just to find out how it ends for him (although, it got harder and harder to keep reading for a while there, in the middle - it got a bit slow).

White, our beloved author, is a genius, really. He's like your friend or fellow book club member, who just happened to be there, in the middle ages, and he's telling you the story with his own language and always using references to modern day concerns and people. He sometimes appears to mock them and their ways (oh, especially those blundering old knights...), other times he pities them, but mostly, I felt as though he was trying to understand them and why they made the choices they did.

The book is, to me, chiefly three different things.

First, it is a the "historical" study of England at the time, which is interesting and confusing at the same time, with many Lords and Kings and battles etc. Obviously this is a fantasy book and it's based on legend, but either way, we read a lot of political and historical stuff.

Second, much of the book is devoted to a character study of Arthur and Guinevere and Lancelot. Arthur, the imperfect, naive, thoughtful and above all, forgiving king. Guinevere, the stubborn and difficult to understand queen/mistress - White often just tells us straight out that he doesn't know why she made the choices she did. And Lancelot - the ill-made knight, the self-loathing hero of the round table who made a lot of mistakes and yet always tried his best to be moral (except where Guinevere was concerned, of course).

Thirdly, I felt like this was a very moral and philosophical book. White asks difficult questions, usually through Arthur, trying to figure out questions like: Is man inherently good? Why do we have wars and what causes them? Which do we owe more loyalty to, our family (clan) or our country? Is it better to get revenge or to forgive? How do we best create peace: through worship, through wars or through civil justice?

This book is truly a work of art. I must admit however, that as soon as the "Sword in the Stone" section of the book is over, the story was completely depressing, in every way imaginable. Nearly everyone is either deceived, deceitful, or unhappy. Bad things are constantly happening to good people and even the good people seem to be constantly making bad choices. I must also admit, however, that it was still insanely interesting and worthwhile - and, even amid the depressing things, I found myself laughing out loud. Often I found myself pondering the idea of actions and consequences and how often our actions can lead to things in our future that we never could've imagined. My heart ached for Arthur, for what he had and for what he lost.

But, you should read it. Read it for Arthur and Sir Pellinore and for White's use of the word "chuckle-head." I'd be surprised if you regret it....less

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

1 comments

Megan rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

02/11/08

bookshelves: fantasy, political-theory, romance

Read in January, 2008

recommends it for: Angelo, Mara, Jeremy

This is an entertaining and accessible novelization about political theory, told through a rather extraordinary re-imagining of the beloved mythological characters of Arthurian legend. I found White's characterizations of Arthur, Lancelot, and Guenevere to be psychologically probing, nuanced, and fascinating, if a little overly tragic. His Merlyn however, was so doddering and wonderful it made me want to cry. If only Merlyn were in more of the book; he was by far my favorite. The Once and Future...more This is an entertaining and accessible novelization about political theory, told through a rather extraordinary re-imagining of the beloved mythological characters of Arthurian legend. I found White's characterizations of Arthur, Lancelot, and Guenevere to be psychologically probing, nuanced, and fascinating, if a little overly tragic. His Merlyn however, was so doddering and wonderful it made me want to cry. If only Merlyn were in more of the book; he was by far my favorite. The Once and Future King focuses mostly on the triangle between Arthur, Lancelot, and Guenevere, and has long portions on both Arthur's and Lancelot's childhoods, but not much about Merlyn's or Guenevere's background. Many famous tales of the knights of the Round Table are skimmed over or omitted in order to focus more on the story of Arthur's experimentations with political justice, but that's what makes this a novel, rather than a collection of myths and legends, and for this it has a coherence that other books about Arthurian Legend lack.

I had read this as a kid, and enjoyed it because I loved King Arthur, but I remember at the time being frustrated about the reality of the affair between Lancelot and Guenevere. I identified with Arthur so much it hurt to see him so... put aside, and by people who did actually care for him. Now as an adult I understand there's so much more to it than I had originally understood as a child, and I identify more with Lancelot than I did before, though I still feel horribly sad when I think of poor Arthur, and the two people he loves most not loving him enough to remain faithful to him, or at least to not recklessly cast all he had worked for into ruin for selfish pleasure. His character, though, as the book goes on becomes painfully thin - he turns the other cheek far too often with no seeming cause or without much thought; it's rather frustrating. I like to think of Arthur, despite his failings, as a powerful and wise king, not a sad sap to afraid to move for fear of upsetting something. It's hard to read about his downfall and watch accept his fate without much of a fight at all - though I guess why he does so is sort of modestly explained.

I wish I could read this a third time, when I am older, and identify with Guenevere, but the female characterizations in White's novel (partially perhaps not his fault as he didn't have much to work with from Malory, his greatest source) are woefully absent. The text just doesn't have much to explain Guenever or Elaine, at least not with the same depth and comlexity with which it explores Arthur and Lancelot.

I want to read The Book of Merlyn, because it was supposed to be the end of the cycle, and I was hoping it would have more to say about my favorite character. So there's hope yet that Merlyn's curious motivations might be explored someday, but the women of Arthurian legend will have to wait for another writer to take them up some other time.
...less

Like this review? yes

add a comment

Michael rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

08/16/08

Read in August, 2008

For the most part, this novel--well, collection of novels, in truth--is simply a work of genius. Many great lines (too many to quote from memory just now, but suffice to say they were all ravenously devoured by the jaded peacenik that is me), many wondrous adventures, many touching moments, and many, many pages.

I was disappointed to learn that the Wizard's Duel between Merlyn and "Mad, Mad" Madame Mim was cut out of this version of TOaFK (I heart acronyms, just about ...more For the most part, this novel--well, collection of novels, in truth--is simply a work of genius. Many great lines (too many to quote from memory just now, but suffice to say they were all ravenously devoured by the jaded peacenik that is me), many wondrous adventures, many touching moments, and many, many pages.

I was disappointed to learn that the Wizard's Duel between Merlyn and "Mad, Mad" Madame Mim was cut out of this version of TOaFK (I heart acronyms, just about as much as I heart anachronisms, which are delightfully peppered throughout the novel, particularly the earlier segments, mostly appearing because of the clever characterization that has Merlyn living "backwards in time," meaning he is growing younger as Arthur grows older). For some reason, someone (T.H. White? Editors? I know not...I'm too tired to Google it right now) decided Mim doesn't fit in the story, so they cut her out. Oh well, at least she lives on in the Disney movie, which is good but in retrospect doesn't really do the novel The Sword in the Stone justice at all, since the book is very much an anti-war treatise and the movie is, well, a Disney movie.

Also, I was disappointed to find that the later segments of TOaFK tend to drag and do not usually retain the pace of the earlier segments and therefore require a much longer attention span, something I don't usually like to pull out for summer reading. But still, as long-winded as the latter sections can be, they are still chock-full of typical T.H. White insights and anti-war sentiment, both of which I heartily cherish. Most moving in particular is Arthur's obligatory death scene (or dying scene actually, as he doesn't actually die "on camera"), which I wasn't expecting to be so emotional. But it makes sense, I guess, that after you've stuck with a character for so many pages, from childhood through late adulthood, through trials and tribulations, through adultery and deceit, that you develop an emotional attachment to him or her.

Perhaps that is what I liked best about the novel, actually: getting to see a colorful illustration of the life and death (or dying) of a character so deeply embedded in Western culture and traditions that practically everyone in Europe and the U.S. knows who he is, a character who I, at least, have known and loved my entire life.

I heard it through the grapevine that they're trying to make a film adaptation--a new and supposedly complete film adaptation, that is--of TOaFK. I only hope that they keep in the anti-war sentiment and hilarious anachronisms and avoid the "bibbiddy-bobbeddy-boo"-ness that can so easily be put into--and consequently water down and belabor--an adaptation like this. The best film adaptations stick to the heart of the original story, and if Hollywood can do that with TOaFK, then oh, what a heart this adaptation will have....less

Like this review? yes

add a comment

Jamie rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

08/05/08

Read in May, 2007

I really didn't get what I expected out of this book, which I always thought was a serious retelling of the King Arthur legend. I mean, it is that. Eventually. But it's strangely paced and the work's tone follows this odd arc across its four books that put me off.

The first book, "The Sword in the Stone," follows Arthur's childhood, and it's dippy, whimsical, and laden with fantasy. It is, in fact, not too far from the Disney cartoon adaptation of the same name. Arthur has all kinds...more I really didn't get what I expected out of this book, which I always thought was a serious retelling of the King Arthur legend. I mean, it is that. Eventually. But it's strangely paced and the work's tone follows this odd arc across its four books that put me off.

The first book, "The Sword in the Stone," follows Arthur's childhood, and it's dippy, whimsical, and laden with fantasy. It is, in fact, not too far from the Disney cartoon adaptation of the same name. Arthur has all kinds of adventures when his tutor Merlin turns him into different kinds of animals so that he can commune (literally) with nature. There's also legendary figures like Robin Hood and mythical creatures like griffins. The whole thing was chock full of anachronisms and modern humor, which was pretty distracting. It's probably good stuff for young adults, but I found it pretty silly and almost quit reading.

The weird thing is that beginning in the next book and continuing on through the last two, things start to get more serious. The second book still has some humor and silliness in it, such as when two knights create an elaborate costume to impersonate the mythical Questing Beast, only to have a real Questing Beast fall in love with them and pursue them across the countryside. But it's more melancholy, too. The third book turns its focus to Sir Lancelot's rise to prominence, and by the fourth book there is no humor at all and the tone is utterly tragic as it recounts the star-crossed love triangle between King Arthur, Sir Lancelot, and Queen Guenever. It ends quite sadly and is a far cry from a young boy who turns into a talking fish and has grand adventures in the Sherwood Forest.

I actually enjoyed the parts dealing with Arthur, Lancelot, and Guenever. It's a powerful story about love, loyalty, honor, justice, and pride. Those are the kind of powerful concepts that I think of when somebody mentions the Arthurian legends, and it works here. What didn't work quite as well is how the whole novel jumps around from focus to focus and lurches along the time line without any concern for pacing. This is a story that should have felt more epic in places, and it didn't. I also didn't like how the first book about Arthur's childhood had a tone that was so discordant with the rest of things. It's not even like they're part of the same story or world.

Still, it was more entertaining and enjoyable than not, especially the tragedy revolving around a king, his queen, and his most loyal (sorta) and upstanding (kinda) knight. And it's all pretty clean with just a little violence, so I think a lot of young adults would like it, especially if they're into the setting....less

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

add a comment

Travis rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

07/16/08

Read in May, 2007

recommended to Travis by: Xavier & Magneto
recommends it for: All

Just last week I finished one of the greatest books I have ever read. The Once & Future King by T.H. White.

I had never heard of the book until it was mentioned in Bryan Singer's X-Men movies. Xavier talks about it with his students and Magneto can be seen reading it while in his plastic prison. Because all great works of art are connected I had to read the book. I didn't even know it was about King Arthur and his knights until I found it on Amazon.com.

Like most people I was famil...more Just last week I finished one of the greatest books I have ever read. The Once & Future King by T.H. White.

I had never heard of the book until it was mentioned in Bryan Singer's X-Men movies. Xavier talks about it with his students and Magneto can be seen reading it while in his plastic prison. Because all great works of art are connected I had to read the book. I didn't even know it was about King Arthur and his knights until I found it on Amazon.com.

Like most people I was familiar with the characters and parts of the plot. What surprised me is how much of the story is a tragedy. The story couldn't really unfold any other way.

It all starts quite simply. Arthur is a young boy called Wart. Wart lives a sequestered life in feudal England training to be a knight. One morning Wart is searching the forest for a lost falcon and stumbles upon Merlyn's cottage. It is here that the story really starts. Merlyn becomes Wart's tutor and teaches by turning the boy into all manner of animals.

Disney adapted this section, titled The Sword in the Stone, into one of its early animated features with a fair amount of accuracy. Disney's only noticeable changes are addition of musical numbers and the absence of Robin Hood.

The next two sections, titled The Queen of Air & Darkness and The Ill Made Knight, serve to introduce more of the principle characters. It is in these two sections that we meet Queen Morguase, mother of the Orkney clan, as well as Lancelot and Guenever. It is all of these characters, including Arthur himself, who ultimately bring about the downfall of Camelot.

The final section, titled The Candle in the Wind, brings everything to its inevitable conclusion. Lancelot, by rescuing Guenever from the stake, forces Arthur to leave Camelot in the care of a wretched little prick named Mordred.

In the face of all this tragedy some hope survives. Arthur remembers his idea of a just and peaceful civilization, his candle in the wind, and passes it along to a young page named Thomas Mallory. Mallory goes on to write Le Morte de Arthur, perhaps the earliest version of the Arthurian legend.

What makes the book so great is the level of realism White brings to what would otherwise be a fairy tale. A professional journalist turned novelist White cares about the world he creates. He knows what details would add to the plot and what might take away from it. The characters are well rounded human beings; motivated by both their strengths and weaknesses. They live in a real place and coexist with all manner of fantastic beasts. Magic is a natural part of life; no more extraordinary than a jousting match.

Like any great work of art I was sorry I had to finish.

...less

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

Melanie rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

06/18/07

bookshelves: classics, kids_books

Read in September, 2006

recommends it for: Absolutely!!!

for some reason writing my little summary of this book has been the hardest of all that I have done. I finished this one about a week ago, and haven't been able to write something good enough to do justice to this classic book. I think it might be one of my all time favorites. Surprisingly, it is not because of Merlin and his magic... instead I love it for what it tells the reader about human nature and the evolution of civil societies. I was a poly-sci major and should have read this book then ...more for some reason writing my little summary of this book has been the hardest of all that I have done. I finished this one about a week ago, and haven't been able to write something good enough to do justice to this classic book. I think it might be one of my all time favorites. Surprisingly, it is not because of Merlin and his magic... instead I love it for what it tells the reader about human nature and the evolution of civil societies. I was a poly-sci major and should have read this book then as required reading.
Arthur assumed the throne and matched strength with strength. As a teen he had to prove that he was strong enough for others to respect him. Then he created the idea of round table, where "might for right" would be the theme, the strongest would fight for the weakest. The only problem... The strongest won, and still had the desire and energy to fight. The members of the round table were too good at eliminating their opposition and soon there were no more foes to chase and they became restless. Arthur then sends the knights on a search for spiritual artifacts like the hold grail. Well those who succeeded never came back, and those who came back were just as angry as before. Arthur finally decides that the "only way [he:] can keep clear of force is by justice. Far from being willing to execute his enemies, a real king must be willing to execute his friends... and his wife." He found that the only way to check force was by having a code for justice (law.)
the only problem... his best friend and his wife are having an affair and his enemies trapped him into carrying out justice against the two most important people to him. In his quest for justice, he left no room for mercy. Which makes one wonder if and how you find a balance between justice and mercy without being a hypocrite. (I think maybe only God can, that we all are hypocrites in our administration of mercy.)

poor Arthur just wants to do what is good and what is right. These desires end up making his wife a prisoner, Banishing his oldest and dearest friend, all while his illegitimate son is trying to kill him and steal his throne. Though Arthur sees everything he tried to build for the better crumble... He doesn't give up hope on a future king picking up where he left off.

all I can say is wow. I love this book....less

Like this review? yes

2 comments

JG rated it:

(review of isbn 0441003834)

04/30/08

bookshelves: classics, fantasy, fiction

Read in April, 2008

This is the story of King Arthur, Guenever and Lancelot. I think we all know how that goes.

I've been reading this off and on for the past six months. I would start to read it, lose interest, and pick up something more interesting. I finally decided that it was time to either give up on it or finish it because I was tired of it taking up space in my nightstand. That was a good place for it because I couldn't read more than a chapter or two without falling asleep. That's not like me at ...more This is the story of King Arthur, Guenever and Lancelot. I think we all know how that goes.

I've been reading this off and on for the past six months. I would start to read it, lose interest, and pick up something more interesting. I finally decided that it was time to either give up on it or finish it because I was tired of it taking up space in my nightstand. That was a good place for it because I couldn't read more than a chapter or two without falling asleep. That's not like me at all.

The first part of the book is like the Disney movie, "The Sword in the Stone." Should be pretty cool, right? I liked that movie. But this is terrible. The basic plot is the same, but the writing is pretty dense and dry. The author keeps referring to Sir Thomas Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur. I don't know if The Once and Future King is supposed to be a "good parts" translation of the first book, but I sort of got the feeling that's how it worked. Either way, it did feel like a long (677 pages in my edition, to be exact) book report. Can't you remember those book reports you wrote when you were a kid? "This happened, then this happened, then something else happened, The End." That's how this felt. The characters never felt real, the place never felt real, and I never really cared about any of it.

Probably the best parts of the book didn't even involve the "real" story at all. T. H. White would occasionally go off on tangents about how people and politics really haven't changed so we shouldn't think that we're any better than what we may be tempted to look on as the savages of the Dark Ages. And while I never really felt like any of the characters were real, he did manage to make Sir Lancelot into more than just the hero we all think of him as today. White's Lancelot is ugly, conflicted, religious, faithful and yet faithless and, of course, the best knight in the world. He should have felt real to me, but he didn't. Now that I'm really thinking about it, I think the problem for me is that there isn't much dialogue. It was mostly descriptions of who did what, and I guess that I like conversations in my books. Had there been more dialogue, Lancelot would probably have been an amazing character and the entire book would have been better.

...less

Like this review? yes

add a comment

Octavia rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

07/28/08

Pretty good, but somehow it almost completely robbed all the romance from the story. Also, I noticed a lot of things happened differently in this story than I remember happening.

Here are some passages that stood out to me:

"For her, hoever, as for all women, the dreads were in advance of the male horizon. Men often accuse women of driving them to unfaithfulness by senseless jealousy, before there ahs been any thought of unfaithfulness on their part. Yet the thought was probably ther...more

Like this review? yes

add a comment

erik rated it:

(review of isbn 0399105972)

08/02/08

bookshelves: literature

Read in January, 1965

recommended to erik by: Einar Graff
recommends it for: everyone

Bored with school books, I asked Dad which of his books he'd recommend. Looking up at his shelves above the desk in a living room nook, he listed Robert Graves' novels, Charles Beard's histories and T. H. White's The Once and Future King. Beard was college reading for him, the kind of book his own father might have recommended. Graves and White were books he had enjoyed during long, boring cruises through the Atlantic and Pacific during WWII.

Although I much enjoyed Graves' novels and made...more

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

Muneeb rated it:

(review of isbn 0441003834)

12/19/07

Read in December, 2007

WOW! Those were murmured out of my mouth as I finished reading T.H White’s The Once and Future King. When I first started to read the story of Arthur I was excepting something like the Disney movie "The Sword in the Stone." As I began to engross myself into the book I was soon corrected.

The Once and Future King consists of four different books making up the story of King Arthur. The first book is probably the best known book because of Disney’s adaptation of it, The Sword in...more

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

Jared rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

03/11/08

Read in April, 2004

T.H. White's now-classic rendering of the myth of King Arthur. The book encompasses his coming-of-age, his rise to power, his reign as a unifying king, and his fall, not overlooking the traditions that hold that Arthur will one day return.

White's writing is refreshing because it deals with serious themes without feeling too heavy. He has a sort of whimsical prose that works well dealing with a character surrounded by magical legend and mythos. He also pokes fun at himself--most obviously ...more

Like this review? yes

add a comment

Taka rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

12/13/07

bookshelves: japan_jul07-present, other_lit

Read in December, 2007

A brilliant re-telling--

Funny, engaging, and ultimately sad, this modern re-telling of Malory's Le Morte D'Arthur is simply brilliant, especially after reading the original in Middle English.

It pokes fun at Malory's formulaic story-telling to great effect (esp. when Sir Grummor and Pallinore fight in the first book, which is one of my favorite scenes) and recasts the legendary, machinelike figures into human beings with emotions and thoughts (and man he does well with Lancelot in ...more

Like this review? yes

add a comment

Werner rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

07/02/08

bookshelves: fantasy

Read in January, 1984

recommends it for: Fantasy fans (especially of Arthurian fantasy)

As the above description notes, this collection (it includes The Sword in the Stone, The Witch in the Wood, and The Ill-Made Knight, plus, I believe, some additional material) is "different" in it's approach to the Arthurian legend; but whether it represents "the modern" view of Arthur is dubious --White's view is pretty much unique. (If there is such a thing as a "modern" view of Arthur, it would probably be the historical view that tries to p...more

Like this review? yes (1 person liked it)

add a comment

Allison rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

05/08/08

Read in January, 1987

i read this when i was a little kid, and have kept rereading it for years. i just love this book. each section is written in prose that suits the time of life of arthur. the sword and the stone is filled with fun and magic and little adventures, perfectly suited to the life of the child. the middle section is a love story with big grand plot twists and that sort of thing, when arthur is a relatively young man. the end, as well as the book of merlyn, is the part of the story that is probabl...more

Like this review? yes (2 people liked it)

1 comments

David added it (review of isbn 0441627404)

08/27/07

bookshelves: summer2007, thirdtimesacharm

Read in June, 2007

This was my third (fourth?) time trying to get through this book. It's not that it's bad or difficult; it's that I'm cursed whenever I try. My life always goes totally nuts whenever I open these pages.

But I did it. T. H. White does a great job reinterpreting the Arthur legend, especially for his post-WWII world. He tackles some of the biggest themes allowed in literature, and his quirky style of writing allows him to question many of them directly, both through the characters and in his own ...more

Like this review? yes

add a comment

Mark rated it:

(review of isbn 0441627404)

05/29/08

Read in May, 2008

I’ve never given King Arthur much thought. He and his Round Table never struck much interest in me. Always seemed like kids’ stories and folklore in the vein of John Henry, Pecos Bill and Paul Bunyan.

But this is genuinely a fantastic piece of work. It’s well written, sure, but T.H. White had something to say. Published in 1952, just seven years after World War II, in the midst of American congressmen performing a vehement witch hunt for communists and a Cold War, many people had a lot...more

The Once and Future King

discuss this book

groups with this book

friend reviews (0)

lists with this book

other reviews (showing 1-20 of 5771)