Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Forged: Writing in the Name of God--Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are” as Want to Read:
Forged: Writing in the Name of God--Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Forged: Writing in the Name of God--Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are

3.96  ·  Rating Details  ·  2,026 Ratings  ·  204 Reviews
s/t: Why the Bible's Authors Are Not Who We Think They Are
Bart D. Ehrman, the New York Times bestselling author of Jesus, Interrupted and God's Problem reveals which books in the Bible's New Testament were not passed down by Jesus' disciples, but were instead forged by other hands--and why this centuries-hidden scandal is far more significant than many scholars are willin
ebook, 251 pages
Published March 22nd 2011 by HarperOne (first published March 2nd 2011)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Forged, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Forged

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-30 of 3,000)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Bill  Kerwin
Bart Ehrman is a legitimate scripture scholar who began as a fundamentalist at the Moody Bible Institute and who is now an agnostic teaching at Chapel Hill. He is scrupulously accurate and typically fair-minded, but he does have an ax to grind: he is a man who feels he has been deceived by lies and misled by euphemisms, and consequently commits himself--at least in his non-scholarly books like this one--to calling a spade a bloody shovel.

The term pseudo-epigraphy--the scholarly term for works f
Clif Hostetler
Apr 28, 2011 Clif Hostetler rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: religion
The material covered isn't new to anyone familiar with critical biblical scholarship.
However, Ehrman is different because of the following:

1. He's willing to call it forgery, lying and deceit (where appropriate).
2. He says those who use milder adjectives are not supported by the evidence.
3. He used to believe the Bible was true without error.
4. He is now writing about the untruths and errors contained in the Bible.
5. His writing style is interesting and clear.
6. He has the academic credentials
I am a nominal Roman Catholic. I attend mass once a week; I send my children to Catholic school; my wife teaches at Catholic school; I am a semi-active volunteer in my parish community; I even play in the Sunday evening worship band. (Yes, Catholics can have worship bands, too.) For most of my life, up until a few years ago, I would have described myself as an evangelical Christian. I spent my formative years in the Presbyterian Church (USA) then, for over a decade, I was a member and very activ ...more
May 27, 2011 Trevor rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history, religion
Part of me wasn’t going to bother with this one. I had already read Misquoting Jesus, and suspected this book would be much the same and on exactly the same topic. But, although he does cover some of the same material (mostly right at the end) he does this in a very summary way – just enough to remind you of some of the stories there. This book covers lots of new ground for me and, like his other books, is remarkably interesting.

I’m not going to do a full review of this one, really. This will be
Jun 26, 2011 Laura rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Recommended to Laura by: NPR
When I was young and still trying to be a Christian, something I read mentioned off handedly that at first, the book of Job ended with him abasing himself before God. No restoration, no great grandchildren, no death at 140 full of days. It was the first time it had hit me that this book I’d read and been taught was central to faith, while perhaps inspired in the writing, was edited by human hands. It preyed on me. On the one hand, it made it seem like a wiser text. Bad things do happen to good p ...more
Grace Tjan
Oct 31, 2011 Grace Tjan rated it liked it
What I learned from this book (in no particular order):

1. There were lots of forged writings in the ancient world, including biblical ones.

2. Out of the 27 books of the New Testament, 10 might have been forged works --- depending on which biblical scholar you talked to.

3. Some modern-day scholars of biblical textual criticism prefer to call them “pseudepigrapha” (“falsely attributed”), but this term is misleading, as the authors of these works intended to pass themselves off as someone else, ty
Oct 07, 2012 Louise rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: bible-studies
While looking for something aimed at the general reader on how the books of the Bible were selected, I came upon this book. It has a different focus, but through the story of how the books were written, it answers some questions on how the actual canon was created.

The author, Bart Ehrman, provides a lot of background on the times with emphasis on literacy, the culture's view of forgery, pseudonyms and other aspects of authorship. His best descriptions are those of why some books are suspect: som
This book is another winner by Bart Ehrman, whose works I have reviewed before. Ehrman has the knack of dealing with complex issues in in assessable terms. He clears up murky issues, defines sneaky slippery terms and frequently footnotes to lead the reader to other authors' works. Needless to say, dealing with the issue of forgery or falsity in the Bible is a little like juggling live lobsters and lit dynamite, hot, emotional and controversial. Ehrman is an agile and dextrous juggler who leads h ...more
Dave Maddock
Mar 29, 2011 Dave Maddock rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: religion
Not much new in this book if you're familiar with Ehrman's other work. As he has done before, Ehrman marshalls his typical collection of anecdotes, facts, assertions, etc. and applies them to a specific focus. In Misquoting Jesus the focus was textual variation in New Testament manuscripts. In Jesus Interrupted it was variation in content, theme, etc. in NT books. In Forged, he focuses specifically on authorship.

The details about the books themselves are nothing new to people who know what they
Aug 09, 2011 Scott rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
A lot of Ehrman's work I've considered simply popularization of stuff that those of us with academic training in religion learned in school. I think he would generally acknowledge that. Gosh, I even learned most of it in my Southern Baptist school, because the academic standards of historical-critical method were still used.

I really wanted to read this book, however, because it made what to me was a new argument. It had been standard in my education and in other commentaries I've read to claim t
Dec 13, 2012 Darrel rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
This book felt like an easy walk and discussion with the author. I was pretty familiar with the territory he covers, but the greater detail was welcome as well as well reasoned arguments. I particularly liked how he used non-canonical and other ancient texts to illustrate the process of forgery, plagiarism, etc. I found his precision of language important in understanding the claims of moderns about ancient writers. I was told throughout my seminary and early religious training that forgery and ...more
Russell Ince
Jun 15, 2011 Russell Ince rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition

I am a big fan of Bart Ehrman because, as an erstwhile Christian and venerable New Testament scholar, he is adequately equipped to discuss these subjects but unlike many Christian academics his agnosticism lends him an air of intellectual honesty which I, as an agnostic atheist interested in Christianity, sometimes find lacking in other New Testament scholars. Ehrman has a respect for his Christian material that axe-grinding atheists may lack but is not clouded by personal subjectivities and rel
David Schwan
Nov 08, 2014 David Schwan rated it really liked it
Interesting book. A somewhat large percentage of the new testament was written by people other than who the works are attributed to. Sometimes it has been clear that these occurred and these works were officially blessed by the church, other times it has only been modern scholarship that has identified certain works as deceiving at the minimum. This book can in places present more detail than is necessary to make it's point but in spite of this is still a very insightful book well worth reading.
Feb 24, 2015 Jon rated it liked it  ·  review of another edition
I was vaguely familiar with the controversy about how to take Biblical books which were clearly not really written by the authors who are claimed (in the books themselves) to have written them. Ehrman is quick to point out that he is NOT talking about the gospels, none of which itself claims to have been written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, or John. He is talking mainly about 1 and 2 Peter, 1 and 2 Timothy, Titus, 2 Thessalonians, Colossians, and Ephesians. Most authorities explain away false claims ...more
Kristi Richardson
“One of the ironies of modern religion is that the absolute commitment to truth in some forms of evangelical and fundamentalist Christianity and the concomitant view that truth is objective and can be verified by any impartial observer have led many faithful souls to follow the truth wherever it leads—and where it leads is often away from evangelical or fundamentalist Christianity. So if, in theory, you can verify the “objective” truth of religion, and then it turns out that the religion being e ...more
Thomas Wells
Feb 07, 2013 Thomas Wells rated it did not like it  ·  review of another edition
The author begins the book by assuming that the New testament is forged. He offers terrible arguments, the only basis for which is on ancient forging practices. I attempted to write a history paper to argue against this book, but there wasn't enough historical evidence being proposed to argue against.
Jun 19, 2014 Sarah rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This book contains a lot of good information, even though it was somewhat dry and academic. I found it to be very much worth reading. It talks about how many of the books of the New Testament are forgeries written by authors pretending to be people they weren't. I found it ironic that some of the most memorable Bible passages that speak out against lying, such as the one that says "the truth will set you free" were written by forgers who were lying about who they were in order to geai a wider re ...more
If you've read the rest of Ehrman's oeuvre, there won't be a great deal more in this book to sink your teeth into. Right now I suspect Ehrman's a popular New Testament exegesis factory but even a factory turns out good material, even if it all starts to look the same. He does, however, footnote everything. He gives you the location of his source material in English so you can check up behind him. He does not make things up (as colorful as Borg and Crossan's book might have been, they made stuff ...more
Lumumba Shakur
Professor Ehrman writes in a highly accessible and entertaining style. The message is profound: forgery was a widespread practice in Early Christianity - so widespread that in one way or another, it found its way into almost half of the books of the New Testament. But as it is not a new claim, I got the book to serve as a comparison between the canonization of Christian scripture and hadith authentication. With that aim in mind, I appreciate Ehrman's focus on the discipline of textual criticism ...more
Aug 05, 2011 Joe rated it it was ok  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: bible, 2011
For the Presbyterian Outlook

Bart Ehrman has once again written a sprightly, challenging and informative volume. Some of his previous books too often offer a rehash of well known scholarly conclusions, served up in an exaggerated fashion that is often misleading. You will find similar tendencies in Forged, but Ehrman also offers some original research which will be presented in a more scholarly volume at a later date.

The basic premise of Forged is that much of the New Testament is in fact compris
May 14, 2012 Kris rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: own
I really enjoyed reading this book and I think that it would be a good book for all people to read.

Here are a few things I read about in the book. If any of this interests you then you should pick up the book and read it. Or if you are a christian, then you really should read this book.

Many early christian writings are pseudonymous, going under a false name. A more common word for this is forgery.

Second Thessalonians which claims to be written by Paul warns against falling for forgeries but it i
May 09, 2011 Sean rated it it was amazing  ·  review of another edition
I would suggest that every Christian read this book, but you could give all the evidence in the world - you could give concrete proof - that the Bible is an imperfect, fallible, and very human book, and most Christians would still believe it's the inerrant and perfect "Word of God." People believe what they want to believe. It's just really sad that so many people base their lives on the Bible, but are at the same time so ignorant of its history. Most Christians can't even answer simple question ...more
Aug 31, 2011 Richard rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
This is at least the 9th book I've read by noted Biblical scholar Bart Ehrman. I've enjoyed every one, including now Forged. As usual, the writing is clear and witty. Ehrman compellingly lays out the evidence that at least 10 of the 27 books of the New Testament are forgeries. That is, each of these books was written by someone other than the person who claims to be the author, in order to deceive the world at large in the early centuries A.D. There are other forgeries. Other New Testament books ...more
Apr 20, 2011 Vegantrav rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
In his latest book, Bart Ehrman points out that many of the books of the New Testament were written by men claiming to be apostles when they really were not. For example, Jesus’s disciple Peter did not write the books of 1 and 2 Peter, nor did the apostle Paul write Ephesians, Colossians, 2 Thessalonians, or the pastoral epistles (1 and 2 Timothy and Titus). This is the accepted view in academia; it is the consensus among almost all New Testament scholars. Even at the conservative evangelical se ...more
Apr 26, 2011 Martha rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: read-in-2011
First, I received an uncorrected proof of Forged from the publisher, HarperOne. There was no other compensation and I made no promises as to what I would say about it.

Forged is a book aimed at a popular readership using material Bart Ehrman plans to use also for a more scholarly book about the practice of forgery in the ancient world and the forgery of documents in early Christianity. The practice was not, according to Ehrman, generally accepted in the Ancient World, despite what I may have lear
Ashish Jaituni
May 09, 2015 Ashish Jaituni rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Shelves: history
Forged is an interesting read. Despite its shortcomings, it does a masterful job of raising the issue of traditional authorship in an accessible and entertaining manner to the general public. I have read books by both sides. This book is good but I can't say I am convinced as it is simply too difficult to conclude. The other side has pretty convincing arguments too! I recommend it.
Barth Siemens
Having read the first 77 of 265 pages (not including notes), I expected to find one iota of fact that supports the assertion on the book cover, "Why the Bible's Authors are not who we think they are". There is enough insinuation to stuff into every toy that I will ever knit. I give up.
Jun 03, 2015 Julie rated it really liked it  ·  review of another edition
Bart Ehrman writes in a clear and compelling way to explain pretty obscure academic and historical facts so that they make a lot of sense. I am convinced that large parts of the bible are forgeries, not to mention all of the other noncanonical writings he explains. Very illuminating.
It’s amazing to me how many religious people know nothing about the “Holy” Bible at all. For those who think the bible was delivered whole cloth to King James, this book would provide some serious educational value. Ehrman is a seriously qualified biblical and historical scholar and brings clear and accessible writing to the general reader. I have read most of Ehrman’s non-technical work and wondered if I would learn anything new from ‘Forged.’ I did learn new things. How delightful it was to fi ...more
Sahar Kharrufa
Jun 07, 2011 Sahar Kharrufa rated it it was amazing
Very interesting. Especially coming from a born again christian and an evangelical Bible scholar. Its very difficult to separate the truth from the trash when you have preconceived ideas. Which all religious people have.
In short, the author discusses the plausibility of getting a true account of the bible using references which are almost impossible to verify. He refers to much material which appears to be especially suspect and is a part of todays new testament. He also says, very briefly, tha
« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 99 100 next »
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »
  • The Bible Unearthed: Archaeology's New Vision of Ancient Israel and the Origin of Its Sacred Texts
  • Jesus Wars: How Four Patriarchs, Three Queens, and Two Emperors Decided What Christians Would Believe for the Next 1,500 years
  • The Christian Delusion: Why Faith Fails
  • Not the Impossible Faith
  • The Incredible Shrinking Son of Man: How Reliable is the Gospel Tradition?
  • The Dark Side of Christian History
  • When Jesus Became God: The Struggle to Define Christianity during the Last Days of Rome
  • Who Wrote the New Testament? The Making of the Christian Myth
  • A History of the End of the World: How the Most Controversial Book in the Bible Changed the Course of Western Civilization
  • 50 Reasons People Give for Believing in a God
  • Revelations: Visions, Prophecy, and Politics in the Book of Revelation
  • Attack of the Theocrats!: How the Religious Right Harms Us All — and What We Can Do About It
  • The Born Again Skeptic's Guide To The Bible
  • The Jesus Puzzle: Did Christianity Begin with a Mythical Christ? Challenging the Existence of an Historical Jesus
  • The Secret Origins Of The Bible
  • Why We Believe in God(s): A Concise Guide to the Science of Faith
  • Some Mistakes of Moses
  • The Rise and Fall of the Bible: The Unexpected History of an Accidental Book
Bart D. Ehrman is the James A. Gray Distinguished Professor at the University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill. He came to UNC in 1988, after four years of teaching at Rutgers University. At UNC he has served as both the Director of Graduate Studies and the Chair of the Department of Religious Studies.

A graduate of Wheaton College (Illinois), Professor Ehrman received both his Masters of Div
More about Bart D. Ehrman...

Share This Book

“The search for truth takes you where the evidence leads you, even if, at first, you don't want to go there.” 42 likes
“This motivation was at work in both Christian and non-Christian circles. We know this because ancient authors actually tell us so. For example, a commentator on the writings of Aristotle, a pagan scholar named David, indicated: “If someone is uninfluential and unknown, yet wants his writing to be read, he writes in the name of someone who came before him and was influential, so that through his influence he can get his work accepted.” 0 likes
More quotes…