Constitution Cafe: Jefferson's Brew for a True Revolution: Jefferson's Brew for a True Revolution
by
Christopher Phillips (Goodreads Author)
Energized by the initial optimism surrounding Obama's presidency and, conversely, the fierce partisanship in Congress, Christopher Phillips has set out to engage Americans in discussions surrounding our must fundamental rights and freedoms, with some help from Thomas Jefferson. A radical in his own day, Jefferson believed that the Constitution should be revised periodicall...more
Hardcover, 321 pages
Published
August 22nd 2011
by W. W. Norton & Company
Friend Reviews
To see what your friends thought of this book,
please sign up.
This book is not yet featured on Listopia.
Add this book to your favorite list »
Community Reviews
(showing
1-30
of
164)
I'd actually like to give this 2.5 stars, but don't take the rating as a reason not to read the book, do read it and talk about it with everyone you know. I support the idea for a new Constitutional convention, and I appreciated the diverse voices in the amendment discussions, especially the female prisoners and the San Fransisco Scouts. The draft discussions are very good, and I agree that if Americas Armies were not all volunteer, we would not be involved in the Imperial ventures in Iraq and A...more
I started this book only to prepare for a city-wide book event; previously I had little interest in the constitution, under the notion that it's the foundation of American politics that should not be disobeyed nor (God forbid) changed. Phillips' discussions about doing the latter make the idea actually seem reasonable, if not feasible.
The book doesn't begin all that exciting - after all, since when is there a nonfiction thriller about the constitution? - but it's worth reading to get a glimpse o...more
The book doesn't begin all that exciting - after all, since when is there a nonfiction thriller about the constitution? - but it's worth reading to get a glimpse o...more
Christopher Phillips has thrown a big, fat, juicy bone into the political arena that is sure to please both Constitutional Statics (restraint) and Constitutional Activists (responsive) alike. No matter where the reader falls on this continuum, each knows that there is nothing more satisfying than reading a well-written and researched argument about the merits of judicial restraint. Within the contour of numerous vignettes based upon anecdotal reasoning, personal interviews and historical review,...more
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it,
click here.
This book started off interesting, but by about 1/4 through, I got bored. Learning about how Thomas Jefferson (and the men of his time) envisioned the Constitution and relatedly, the Declaration of Independence, is interesting. You don't spend much time in 8th grade US History or 10th grade AP US History on this stuff (or maybe you do, and I just didn't pay attention). However, reading the interpretations/opinions of regular joes across America? Decidedly less interesting. For me, at least.
I found this book refreshing in the midst of the election of 2012. A new perspective on what our constitution could be and what it was meant to be. What a great concept".. Changing our constitution with the times. Taking out what does not fit anymore and adding in what does.
I did not necessarily like the recommendations, but love theconcept. And I loved reading about the history of our constitution and Jefferson's thoughts on it.
I did not necessarily like the recommendations, but love theconcept. And I loved reading about the history of our constitution and Jefferson's thoughts on it.
Dec 10, 2011
Juliana
marked it as to-read
NPR - December 10, 2011
Reconstituting The Constitution: How To Rewrite It?
Reconstituting The Constitution: How To Rewrite It?
This book wants to be a Socratic attempt to better understand and reform the constitution, but it is terrible. The conversations have all been extensively rewritten by Phillips, so any group consensus is destroyed with his really hackneyed dialog (it's painful) that is always too abrupt in coming to a conclusion. The amendments agreed upon by the groups are always short sighted and pathetic (are we supposed to lean through haphazard attempts?) and the author's political bias doesn't guide this,...more
May 23, 2013
Angela
is currently reading it
May 20, 2013
Chris
is currently reading it
May 15, 2013
Perri
marked it as to-read
Apr 24, 2013
Kevin Odusoga
marked it as to-read
Apr 05, 2013
Chris Nguyen
is currently reading it
Mar 29, 2013
Ariel
is currently reading it
Mar 18, 2013
Travis Williams
marked it as to-read
Feb 24, 2013
Archie Diệp
marked it as to-read
Feb 15, 2013
Toby
marked it as to-read
Feb 13, 2013
Erica
marked it as to-read
Jan 24, 2013
Gabriel Salis
marked it as to-read
Jan 20, 2013
G
marked it as to-read
Jan 15, 2013
Brenton
marked it as to-read
There are no discussion topics on this book yet.
Be the first to start one »
I'm an author, scholar and pro-democracy activist. My principal projects are Socrates Cafe (see www.philosopher.org) and Constitution Cafe (see www.ConstitutionCafe.org), and my personal website is at www.ChristopherPhillips.com
More about Christopher Phillips...
Share This Book
No trivia or quizzes yet. Add some now »

Loading...
view 1 comment
















