Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Electromagnetic Theory (Volume 1)” as Want to Read:
Electromagnetic Theory (Volume 1)
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Electromagnetic Theory (Volume 1)

0.0  ·  Rating Details ·  0 Ratings  ·  1 Review
Purchase of this book includes free trial access to www.million-books.com where you can read more than a million books for free. This is an OCR edition with typos. Excerpt from book: CHAPTER 1L OUTLINE OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC CONNECTIONS. Electric and Magnetic Force; Displacement and Induction; Elastivity and Permittivity, Inductivity and Reluctivity. 20. Our primary knowle ...more
Paperback, 158 pages
Published January 1st 2012 by General Books (first published January 1st 1950)
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Electromagnetic Theory, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Electromagnetic Theory

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-12)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Redradist
dgdg
Rajganesh
Rajganesh marked it as to-read
Jan 20, 2013
Joseph Hyde
Joseph Hyde marked it as to-read
Apr 15, 2013
John Thurston
John Thurston marked it as to-read
Jun 19, 2013
Scott
Scott marked it as to-read
Dec 01, 2013
Daniel G. Taylor
Daniel G. Taylor marked it as to-read
Jan 04, 2015
Srinu
Srinu marked it as to-read
Jan 08, 2015
Peter Hofbauer
Peter Hofbauer marked it as to-read
Jun 05, 2015
Shaff
Shaff marked it as to-read
Aug 20, 2015
Alex
Alex is currently reading it
Apr 06, 2016
Simone Rametti
Simone Rametti marked it as to-read
Jul 19, 2016
Katelijne Hebberecht
Katelijne Hebberecht marked it as to-read
Sep 16, 2016
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book



“As to the need of improvement there can be no question whilst the reign of Euclid continues. My own idea of a useful course is to begin with arithmetic, and then not Euclid but algebra. Next, not Euclid, but practical geometry, solid as well as plane; not demonstration, but to make acquaintance. Then not Euclid, but elementary vectors, conjoined with algebra, and applied to geometry. Addition first; then the scalar product. Elementary calculus should go on simultaneously, and come into vector algebraic geometry after a bit. Euclid might be an extra course for learned men, like Homer...” 2 likes
Ohm found that the results could be summed up in such a simple law that he who runs may read it, and a schoolboy now can predict what a Faraday then could only guess at roughly. By Ohm's discovery a large part of the domain of electricity became annexed by Coulomb's discovery of the law of inverse squares, and completely annexed by Green's investigations. Poisson attacked the difficult problem of induced magnetisation, and his results, though differently expressed, are still the theory, as a most important first approximation. Ampere brought a multitude of phenomena into theory by his investigations of the mechanical forces between conductors supporting currents and magnets. Then there were the remarkable researches of Faraday, the prince of experimentalists, on electrostatics and electrodynamics and the induction of currents. These were rather long in being brought from the crude experimental state to a compact system, expressing the real essence. Unfortunately, in my opinion, Faraday was not a mathematician. It can scarcely be doubted that had he been one, he would have anticipated much later work. He would, for instance, knowing Ampere's theory, by his own results have readily been led to Neumann's theory, and the connected work of Helmholtz and Thomson. But it is perhaps too much to expect a man to be both the prince of experimentalists and a competent mathematician.” 2 likes
More quotes…