Being and Time: A Translation of Sein and Zeit (SUNY series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy)

by Martin Heidegger
Being and Time: A Translation of Sein and Zeit (SUNY series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy)  
published 1996 by State University of New York Press
binding Paperback
isbn 0791426785   (isbn13: 9780791426784)
pages 487
description Martin Heidegger paved the road trod on by the existentialists with the 1927 publication of Being and Time. His encyclopedic knowledge of philo...more
date added
02-14-07



Sign in to Goodreads to see your friends' reviews of Being and Time: A Translation of Sein and Zeit.







discuss this book

There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »




friend reviews (0)

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.



lists with this book

This book is not in any lists. Go add it to a list.




other reviews (showing 1-20 of 785)



Neurosys
bookshelves: philosophical-investigations
Read in July, 2007
recommends it for: philosophy majors
A necessary read to see to turn from Cartesian philosophy. Heidegger "explodes all of the history of ontology" in this work, where he finally uncovers the question of being, which has been neglected since Plato and Aristotle first considered way back. Since philosophers, namely Descartes and Husserl, have assumed being to be an impenetrable subjectivity, a soul or an ego.

Heidegger main goal is undercut the ontology that generates either/ors, the kind of ontology found in Plato’s ...more
Like this review?   yes   (2 people liked it)
  add a comment

Mike
02/14/08

Read in January, 2004
This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  add a comment

Jo
Jo rated it: 1 of 5 stars1 of 5 stars1 of 5 stars1 of 5 stars1 of 5 stars
01/29/08

This review has been hidden because it contains spoilers. To view it, click here.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Ann
06/15/07

bookshelves: favoritephilosophy
Ah, Heidegger. My friends from sophomore year in college probably remember me dragging this monstrosity with me everywhere. I signed up for the class only because I had heard the professor who taught it was great. And he was. What was unexpected was that I actually really liked Heidegger's writing. I did not even know who he was when I signed up for the class, but he turned out to be one of my favorites. Heavily indebted to Nietzsche and in turn an influence on Sartre and the existentialis...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Justin
Justin rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
08/22/07

Read in October, 2007
recommends it for: Geniuses/No One Else
There comes a time in some men's lives when they say to themselves, "I think I'm ready to read Being and Time." But saying you're going to sit down and read Being and Time is like saying you're going to sit down and read Finnegan's Wake or some such other notoriously opaque tome. You might get through the book but there's going to be a fair amount of forehead-slapping and head-pounding, and when you're done you feel like you understood maybe 60% of it, if not like ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Jack
05/20/08

Read in December, 1998
recommends it for: Philosophers
This book is dense. Be prepared to read pages 3-10 times to make sure you understand the nuances of how the words are used by the author. This book sums up everything it is about in the title, Being and Time. Being is dissected and torn apart and put back together again as it relates to Time. This is due to the fact that all Beings are Temporal. That is to say that all Beings exist in Time so as such they can not be separated from Time for then they would cease to Be.

Once you read thi...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Patrick
Patrick rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
01/19/08

bookshelves: currently-reading
Read in December, 2007
recommends it for: Continental philosophy junkies
As most people would probably suspect, reading this book is an ongoing project; one can't read it the way one reads a novel. I'm about eighty-odd pages into it at this point, smack in the middle of part III, "The Worldliness of the World". In this section is contained Heidegger's analysis of the ontology, or definition of being, implicit in Descartes' work. Specifically, Descartes' Principia.

Heidegger's choice of the Principia in particular is a very wise and subtle move because i...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Jodi Lu
recommends it for: suckers.
GET OVER YOURSELF and distill some of these ideas into real words and real arguments and maybe, just maybe we'd have something really interesting and important here. but who the hell knows in all that gunk? it's like trying to follow a recipe for baked alaska written by gertrude stein!! you sit with your highlighter drying out like....uhhhh...okay i didn't mark anything in 20 pages so maybe this sentence is a keeper? 200 pages into this beast is the precise point at which, as a philo major, ...more
Like this review?   yes   (2 people liked it)
  add a comment

Jake
07/03/08

bookshelves: brain-busters, never-finished, philosophy
recommends it for: Serious students only
Heidegger was the student of Edmund Husserl and came to be renowned mainly for this book. If you are really serious about understanding this work, I think it would be best to have a teacher, at least to get you properly introduced to the terminology. Ontic, existenz, Dasien, it can all be quite a mouthful.

Does he cover any new ground? Some say yes, some say he just created a new language game. If you've read any pre-socratic or neo-platonic philosophy you might get more out of his writings ...more
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Christy
bookshelves: philosophy
Read in January, 2003
To be fair, I didn't finish the book. I was sitting in on a graduate course on Heidegger. I made it about halfway through Being and Time before I had to stop attending in order to focus on completing work on my M.A. I was enjoying the reading of it--of course, here by "enjoying" I mean something different than "having fun." It was challenging, extremely challenging, and I felt I was slowly getting somewhere with it.

It would probably earn a higher rating if I ...more
Like this review?   yes   (1 person liked it)
  1 comments

Thomas
Thomas rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
09/06/07

bookshelves: philosophy
Read in January, 2001
recommends it for: those interested in meditation and phenomenology
By far the most influential book in philosophy that I have ever read. Actually, I must make a disclaimer, I haven't yet read the entire thing. It is an unbelievably dense read, the kind where an entire day can be spent on one sentence. I must make a note about this translation. There are an uncomfortably large amount of errors in this one and I would recommend researching others. I read it with the German text beside me, so the errors did not go unnoticed.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

William
William rated it: 4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars4 of 5 stars
07/05/08

I'm still working my way through this, I had planned to finish it and then read commentary and criticism of it, but I got impatient and started reading secondary literature long before finishing. I'm finding this to be a little bit more useful, as I'm an autodidact when it comes to philosophy, so my familiarity with parts of the tradition Heidegger criticizes varies wildly.
Anyhow, it's fascinating.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Andrew
07/11/07

Good luck with this one. One of the "greatest philosophical works" of the 19th. How much of that rep is due to the fact that most people struggle to read it? (I know I did.) It's hopelessly convoluted and esoteric, even frustrating, and when you do cut down to his points they're hardly more than wordplay. Sartre would go on to continue some of that legacy, but with easier sentences and/or an involving fiction.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Yifot
Yifot rated it: 5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars5 of 5 stars
04/08/07

bookshelves: philosophy
recommends it for: eh...
The bigger the better. After this read you will be in full possession of your thinghood.

I admit, I only read 2/3 of it, but I skimmed the parts I didn't read, and I've read so much about it and I read all of History of the Concept of Time (cause the teacher didn't say how much to read) and though it seems like a rough draft for Being and Time, it's not, but its a good ground flora.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Sophia
11/08/07

Although the ideas are interesting, it was tedious to get through. I need writing (even philosophical writing) to be more fluid. I'm attention deficient as it is, I need a good conversational tone.

I like the idea of history and tradition being inescapable aspects of reality and the question of authenticity for Dasein. What I don't understand is how Dasein's being is time.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

~m.
10/08/07

bookshelves: currently-reading
I would give this 5 stars except that I haven't finished it yet. This is one of the most astounding pieces of philosophy I have read. While it is a very difficult read and I'm sure the translation gets in the way of much, from what I have been able to join together so far, it completely turns much of what I know about the world and our being, my being, and being ...upside down.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Seth
09/03/07

This was certainly difficult but fascinating. Be prepared for passages of untranslated Greek. I read it in an Existentialism class that presented Heidegger's work and Emmanuel Levinas's in a dialogue, which helped us get a more full understanding of each philosopher and the context from which they worked. I recommend following it with Time and the Other by Levinas.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Pamela
10/05/07

recommends it for: the intellectually brave.
This is a VERY difficult read. I would recommend accompanying it with Hubert Dreyfus' book on Heidegger's "Being and Time." But...wow. I worked my way through this book (with the help of Fred Rush) after being steeped in a lot of modern and then analytical philosophy. This book informs a lot of my positions on the self, and on...well, being and time.

:p
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Tonydowler
Among the great philosophical works of the modern age, and an impenetrable puzzle. After spending three years trying to dechipher it for my master's thesis, I am still surprised every time I open it up. This is the translation I cut my teeth on. There's a newer translation that's probably more readable, but I have a nostalgic attachment to this one.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment

Ian
12/14/07

recommends it for: Everyone
This book changed my life. It helps that I'm a philosophy major, and took a class on the book (which I honestly recommend NOT reading it unless you have someone who actually understands it helping you). This is the book that make me decide to actually go into Philosophy, specifically 20th Century Continental. It's just... amazing.
Like this review?   yes  
  add a comment


« previous 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 39 40



book data (includes all editions)

avg rating (all editions): 4.08 (516 ratings)
avg rating (this edition): 4.12 (89 ratings)
number of reviews: 86






other editions

Being and Time (Hardcover)
Being and Time (Paperback)
Sein und Zeit (Gebundene Ausgabe)