Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read.
Start by marking “Literacy as Involvement: The Acts of Writers, Readers, and Texts” as Want to Read:
Literacy as Involvement: The Acts of Writers, Readers, and Texts
Enlarge cover
Rate this book
Clear rating
Open Preview

Literacy as Involvement: The Acts of Writers, Readers, and Texts

4.4  ·  Rating Details ·  5 Ratings  ·  2 Reviews
In Literacy as Involvement, Deborah Brandt examines the cultural and social roots of the acts of reading and writing. The book asks, for example, whether literacy is a natural growth of or a radical shift from orality. It questions the contrary views that literacy is either the learning of the conventions of language or is better understood as heightened social ability. Fi ...more
Hardcover, 172 pages
Published July 1st 1990 by Southern Illinois University Press
More Details... edit details

Friend Reviews

To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.

Reader Q&A

To ask other readers questions about Literacy as Involvement, please sign up.

Be the first to ask a question about Literacy as Involvement

This book is not yet featured on Listopia. Add this book to your favorite list »

Community Reviews

(showing 1-14)
filter  |  sort: default (?)  |  Rating Details
Eric
Jan 02, 2014 Eric rated it really liked it
Shelves: rhet-comp, field-exam
The first chapter of Brandt’s book explores the basic principles of “strong-text theories” of literacy such as those forwarded by Walter Ong and Deborah Tannen (13), which she goes on to critique extensively. As Brandt puts it, “My aim is to look hard at the foundations of this antisocial view of literacy in order to offer a reformulation of the nature of literate language and the social processes that spawn it” (2). Whereas strong-text theories assume literate language is premised on ...more
Mary
Aug 11, 2011 Mary rated it really liked it
Could we collapse speech and communication and composition again? The interrelationality of orality and literacy suggests a cross-disciplinary project, but how would it look now that the split has been made, with departments being very pedagogically, disciplinarily and often geographically separated? A class would perhaps have to be team-taught. And yet most of my FCY colleagues (and I myself) include a presentation component to our classes. What we don’t do is to make the talking and the ...more
Sarah
Sarah rated it really liked it
Dec 23, 2015
Kara Poe Alexander
Kara Poe Alexander rated it it was amazing
Jan 17, 2013
Kathy
Kathy rated it it was amazing
May 23, 2012
Angela Alcorn
Angela Alcorn marked it as to-read
Jun 30, 2010
Lauren
Lauren is currently reading it
May 20, 2012
Daryl Lucas
Daryl Lucas marked it as to-read
Jul 07, 2012
Nate
Nate marked it as to-read
Feb 09, 2013
Alycia
Alycia marked it as to-read
Sep 18, 2013
Buffy Hamilton
Buffy Hamilton marked it as to-read
Feb 16, 2014
Rachel
Rachel added it
Jun 06, 2015
Monika Nielsen
Monika Nielsen marked it as to-read
Nov 16, 2014
There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Be the first to start one »

Share This Book