date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Lucy
(new)
Aug 31, 2012 09:13pm
Excellent news! Jonathan is an effective character and I can certainly see how one could learn much more about his own narrative thread, often out of view of young Sherlock. Moreover, I want to learn more about him, since he already emerges as a rounded character.
reply
|
flag
*
When Jonathan first jumped down with his crude wooden sword in The Crack in the Lens, I thought that would be the beginning and the end of his appearance but he turned and asked Sherlock to teach him how to fence. He never let me forget that and often came back to me and said "You forgot about my part in that" or "I know more about that than you are telling." He was irresistible and often willing to tell more of Sherlock's tale than Holmes would ever consider. I could not deny the size of his role in Part I of the Consulting Detective Trilogy. But we both knew he would have to leave at the end and his life would take a different path. It was necessary for them both and, in time, it will leave the door open for Dr. Watson.
You let the different pieces fall into place very naturally. It doesn't feel forced--the dramatic irony of knowing where this leads never overwhelms because Young Sherlock is already his own man, on his way to becoming the mature, complicated genius we know from Conan Doyle.
That is wonderful news to here. I really liked Jonathan in the two books and was sad when Sherlock sent him home at the end of the latest book. I can't wait to read these and to see, what well become of Jonathan.
Oh, lovely! We'll get Johnathan back! I was very disappointed when Sherlock sent him home and also sad for him, because what would he do now alone in the country after he has lived a more exciting/fulfilling live at Sherlock's side? It seemed a bit unfair to just abandon him!

