date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Thomas
(new)
Apr 04, 2012 09:24am
I think the book has a great message Victoria... :)
reply
|
flag
*
I love the themes of self-acceptance and beauty, as well as the take on interracial relationships. I am so passionate about this book!
If you would like some of that constructive criticism, commentary, and beloved backlash, perhaps you might peruse the tumblr tag of your book: http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/save-the...
"But then, she's the kind of free spirit who would eschew limiting herself to a single category." The dripping condescension of this statement encapsulate the ignorance of this story. This isn't some cutesy "Freaky Friday" tale. It's a story that declares itself anti-/counter-prejudice, yet entrenches the archetypes that embody prejudice. As if a ruling class would call themselves 'coals'- that dirty, dark substance that pollutes and kills those who mine it, while the poor fair-skinned oppressed would be called 'pearls' (beautiful, precious, rare and used in jewellery and ornamentation). Right. The protagonist is blonde-haired and blue-eyed...not a brunette, or a red-head, but the epitome of the 'beauty ideal' that has bred self-hatred and feelings of inadequacy in generations of girls from a diaspora of ethnic backgrounds.
And the use of black face - a 'tradition' that is stewed in bigotry, exclusion and Jim Crow racism - as the means of allowing the protagonist to 'pass'. This isn't irony, because it's too insulting and lazy to be ironic. It's racist. But then, perhaps that should not be surprising considering the jaw-dropping comments you put your name to in this blog:
"Her first reaction is shame. He has slandered her with an ugly epithet -- a disgusting remark about her lips. Later, she wonders how he could possibly have mistaken her race. She is white, the remark usually targeted at blacks. (The term "African American" did not exist in that day.)" So it was not the the statement was ugly - it was that it should not have been directed at the author because she was white.
"Soap-mouth-washing words that were forbidden in my youth now populate rap songs so often I wonder if, happily, they have lost their vile connotations." No. Just no to this, And please do not ever think it is okay for you use this term.
"The majority feeling that bloggers have expressed about Bramford: he's sexy, not because of his color, but because he's a strong hero." Not because of his colour...
"Which is the real message of the book, and why I love writing for open-minded young adults!" I wonder how many of those 'open-minded young adults' were the 'Coals' in your 'book'
And I read the webpage 'profile' for Jamal (http://www.savethepearls.com/members/...). It's disgusting. I have no other word for it.
Lack of objection my ass. No one had heard of you because you aren't exactly a great writer or a decent person.
"African-American community of readers, if such a category still exists,"Seriously?! Did you read this aloud after your wrote it?
Nyasha wrote: ""African-American community of readers, if such a category still exists,"Seriously?! Did you read this aloud after your wrote it?"
The self-reflective, self-respecting, author of puerile racist crap is a demographic that does not exist in the vicinity of Ms. Foyt. She makes sure of that each time she looks in the mirror.
The coy, self-serving remark, 'I am not naive enough to think we live in a world without racial issues' does not prove a damn thing or make you any less of a contributor to those 'issues'. You have absolutely no idea of the realities of living with racism, and the notion that because you were once mistaken for a mixed-race girl, you have it all down pat, not only proves that but is unbelievably offensive. Can you not see that? 'Beastman'???? And yet you pride yourself on challenging stereotypes? Face it, you have made a horrible, horrible mistake with this book.


