|
|
This book had some issues. My biggest complaint was that the author's biggest weakness seemed to be dialog. Sometimes the characters were kind of stiff and other times they were clearly saying something only to explain a point to the reader. And the ...moreThis book had some issues. My biggest complaint was that the author's biggest weakness seemed to be dialog. Sometimes the characters were kind of stiff and other times they were clearly saying something only to explain a point to the reader. And the few times kids appeared, they were written with really poor grammar, which made no sense because none of the adults around them talked like that. I am fairly ignorant of Amish culture and took it on faith that the author did enough research. However, this assumption went out the window when an 18-year-old with only an eighth-grade education was given a job as a teacher at a preschool for children with special needs because of a "moving letter." At this point, I decided that the author wasn't actualy TRYING to make the book realistic.
But despite what I considered shortcomings, I finished the book pretty quickly. I have a fair amount of demands on my time and when I read a book quickly, it means that I have been making time for it. The overall story pulled me in and made me want to read it. That's the best quality in a book.(less)
|
|
|
|
I read this book, like at least a few others, becuase I enjoyed the Hallmark channel movie based on it. Usually when I watch a movie version first, I am excited to read all the parts that were cut out for the movie. But I just didn't feel like I wa...moreI read this book, like at least a few others, becuase I enjoyed the Hallmark channel movie based on it. Usually when I watch a movie version first, I am excited to read all the parts that were cut out for the movie. But I just didn't feel like I was getting anything extra from this book. While I still enjoyed the book, it felt slow.(less)
|
|
|
|
While it is possible for a plot to be too simple, this author seemed to believe that his story would get better and better the more complicated he could make the plot. What we end up with is three protagonists who are rarely together so we have to fo...moreWhile it is possible for a plot to be too simple, this author seemed to believe that his story would get better and better the more complicated he could make the plot. What we end up with is three protagonists who are rarely together so we have to follow at least two and sometimes three different story lines at the same time with constant shifting between them, not to mention all the not-very-well-defined time traveling and it's kind of a mess. There are two or three chapters near the end which seem to be added just to try to explain everything else that happened. But by the time I got to those chapters, I had stopped caring. The author was too busy spinning a web to make us care about any of the main characters. Even the names were not consistant. We have one character who is alternately refered to as the witch or the countess and I think she may have been given a name, too. There is "the secretary" who is also "Cavandish." I kept forgetting this was the same person. The bad guys also have two names and it doesn't seem to matter who is talking about them as to which name is used. Even Kate, one of the main siblings, meets one person who constantly calls her Katherine and another who always calls her Katrina and she never once says, "Hello! My name is Kate!"(less)
|
|
|
There is a pretty wide range of stories here so it was hard to give it a rating as a whole. I came up with three stars as an average. Getting more young boys into reading is a very noble goal so I had higher hopes. A few of these had messages that I'...moreThere is a pretty wide range of stories here so it was hard to give it a rating as a whole. I came up with three stars as an average. Getting more young boys into reading is a very noble goal so I had higher hopes. A few of these had messages that I'd rather my own boys were not exposed to, particularly humor at the expense of others. I hope some of the other guys read collections are better.
Best of Friends (2 stars) - This is a story about a kid pretending to be friends with someone he doesn't like so that he can get something he wants from him. Besides the fact that this is a terrible message for kids, the story was just kind of dull.
Will (4 stars) - Will is about a class of kids who all sprout oddities (wings, super powers, etc) and then one of the few kids who doesn't gets to be the real hero. I liked this story, but didn't think it was particularly funny. Seemed like it would fit better in a sci-fi collection.
Artemis Begins (5 stars) - The only 5 star effort was this gem about growing up in a house with five boys and their various personalities. I knew how it was going to end right away, but still enjoyed the lead up. This was the only one that made me laugh out loud.
???? - The story by Jeff Kinney was not available for the proof.
Dear Lady Author (3 stars) - This is a series of letters between a kid and an author for a school assignment. The first letter and response were great, but then it really doesn't go anywhere after that.
A Fistful of Feathers (3 stars) - This is a story about a boy whose father decides to "make a man out of him" by getting a live turkey shortly before Thanksgiving. The boy then believes the turkey is out to get him. The story probably would have been 5 stars if it had been edited down to about half. It dragged on and on.
Kid Appeal (2 stars) - Two boys need an idea to enter a contest. Pretty dull and unbelievable and most of the "gags" were about how one boy or the other was stupid. Fifth-graders not knowing the answer to 20 plus 20 is not funny.
What? You Think You Got It Rough? (1 star) - Terrible story about a kid with an abusive grandfather. Most of it is dialog and all the characters have grammar that makes your brain hurt. It was torture to finish it.
My Parents Gave My Bedroom to a Biker (4 stars) - A mildly amusing, but mostly just weird, story about exactly what the title says. Not a bad read.
The Bloody Souvenir (4 stars) - I had a hard time rating this one because I had a hard time reading it. It's not for the squeamish and I am very squeamish. But I still saw the merit and got a couple of grins out of it. I think many boys would enjoy it.(less)
|
|
|
I enjoyed this book. It was informative and occasionally entertaining. Clearly, a lot of research went into it (there are about 30 pages of notes and sources), but parts of it felt overly drawn-out, as though the author wanted to mention every source...moreI enjoyed this book. It was informative and occasionally entertaining. Clearly, a lot of research went into it (there are about 30 pages of notes and sources), but parts of it felt overly drawn-out, as though the author wanted to mention every source she used, even when they said essentially the same thing. All this made it a bit repetitive at times as well. The first part is a biography that seems to say over and over how little is actually know about Jane Austen. But it is well-written so most of this is forgivable. The first and last chapters were my favorites (there are only seven in the whole book). The first chronicled the dates that Austen's books were written and published, not at all the same order. And the last focused on recent attempts to capitalize on her popularity with movie adaptations and fan fiction. Unfortunately, despite the lengthy bibliography Claire Harman loses some of her credibility near the end when she cites "Pemberley: Or Pride and Prejudice Continued" as one of the "most intelligent" sequels.
One word of caution, the author assumes that anyone reading this book is fully acquinted with the plots of Austen's novels. If you haven't read all of the them and are concerned about spoilers, you may want to finish Austen's works before you read this.(less)
|