<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<author>
  
  <id>57674</id>
  <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
  <fans_count type="integer">2</fans_count>
  <followers_count type="integer">0</followers_count>
  <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
  <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  <about><![CDATA[]]></about>
  <influences><![CDATA[]]></influences>
  <gender></gender>
  <hometown></hometown>
  <born_at></born_at>
  <died_at></died_at>
  
  <books>
        <book>
  <id type="integer">3523354</id>
  <isbn>1847080103</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781847080103</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">18</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[The Book of Dead Philosophers]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3523354.The_Book_of_Dead_Philosophers</link>
  <average_rating>3.54</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>79</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Starting from the premise that philosophers' deaths have been as interesting as their lives, Simon Critchley pulls readers in with quirky stories of how philosophers died and then confronts the big themes - in this case, what 'a good death' means and how to live with the knowledge of death and free from what he calls 'delusions and sophistries'. The book consists of short, sometimes very short, entries on various philosophers, cataloguing the manner of their demises and linking this to their central ideas. These entries would run from a couple of sentences in the case of the Pre-Socratics or minor Medievals and Moderns, up to a paragraph or indeed short essays of about 800 words in the case, say, of Socrates, Seneca, Rousseau, Kant and Nietzsche. Some of the entries would be rather pithy and, hopefully, witty.The book would be framed with an Introduction, and a long concluding chapter on philosophy and death where I would seek to defend what I have already said about the ideal of the philosophical death as a way of denouncing contemporary delusions and sophistries, what Francis Bacon saw as the Idols of the Tribe, the Den, the Market-Place and the Theatre (incidentally, Bacon died in a particularly cold winter in London in 1626 from a cold contracted after trying to stuff a chicken with snow as an experiment in refrigeration).  ']]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>57674</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>299</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>59</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>2008</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">100017</id>
  <isbn>0192853597</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780192853592</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">6</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1171459076m/100017.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1171459076s/100017.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/100017.Continental_Philosophy_A_Very_Short_Introduction</link>
  <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>40</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Simon Critchley's Very Short Introduction shows that Continental philosophy encompasses a distinct set of philosophical traditions and practices, with a compelling range of problems all too often ignored by the analytic tradition.  He discusses the ideas and approaches of philosophers such as Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre, Habermas, Foucault, and Derrida, and introduces key concepts such as existentialism, nihilism, and phenomenology by explaining their place in the Continental tradition.]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>57674</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>299</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>59</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>2001</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">743325</id>
  <isbn>1844671216</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781844671212</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">6</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Infinitely Demanding: Ethics of Commitment, Politics of Resistance]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1177936939m/743325.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1177936939s/743325.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/743325.Infinitely_Demanding_Ethics_of_Commitment_Politics_of_Resistance</link>
  <average_rating>3.74</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>31</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>A new political ethics that confronts the injustices of liberal democracy.</strong><br/><br/><em>Infinitely Demanding</em> is the clearest, boldest and most systematic statement of Simon Critchley's influential views on philosophy, ethics, and politics. Part diagnosis of the times, part theoretical analysis of the impasses and possibilities of ethics and politics, part manifesto, <em>Infinitely Demanding</em> identifies a massive political disappointment at the heart of liberal democracy and argues that what is called for is an ethics of commitment that can inform a radical politics. Exploring the problem of ethics in Kant, Levinas, Badiou, and Lacan that leads to a conception of subjectivity based on the infinite responsibility of an ethical demand, Critchley considers the possibility of political subjectivity and action after Marx and Marxism. <em>Infinitely Demanding</em> culminates in an argument for anarchism as an ethical practice and a remotivating means of political organization.]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>57674</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>299</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>59</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>2007</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">761919</id>
  <isbn>1859842461</isbn>
  <isbn13>9781859842461</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Ethics-Politics-Subjectivity: Essays on Derrida, Levinas and Contemporary French Thought]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178132818m/761919.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1178132818s/761919.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/761919.Ethics_Politics_Subjectivity_Essays_on_Derrida_Levinas_and_Contemporary_French_Thought</link>
  <average_rating>4.50</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>8</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[In Ethics-Politics-Subjectivity Simon Critchley takes up three questions at the centre of contemporary theoretical debate: What is ethical experience? What can be said of the subject who has this experience? What, if any, is the relation of ethical experience to politics? These questions are approached by way of a critical confrontation with a number of major thinkers, including Lacan, Genet, Blanchot, Nancy, Rorty and, in particular, Levinas and Derrida. Critchley offers a critical reconstruction of Levinas's notion of ethical experience and, questioning the religious pietism and political conservatism of the dominant interpretation of Levinas's work, develops an ethics of finitude which, far from being tragic, opens on to an experience of humour and the comic. Using this reading of Levinas as a way of unlocking the rich ethical potential of Derrida's work, Critchley outlines and defends the political possibilities of deconstruction. On the basis of Derrida's recent work, Critchley attempts to rethink notions of friendship, democracy, economics and technology.]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>57674</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>299</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>59</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1998</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">1170797</id>
  <isbn>0415251214</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780415251211</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[On Humour]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1181611534m/1170797.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1181611534s/1170797.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1170797.On_Humour</link>
  <average_rating>3.44</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>9</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>On Humour</em> is a fascinating and beautifully written book on what philosophy can tell us about humor and about what it is to be human. Simon Critchley probes some of the most perennial features of humor, such as our tendency to laugh at animals and our bodies, why we mock death with comedy and why we think it's funny when people start to act like machines. He also looks as the darker side of humor, as when rife with sexism and racism, and shows how humor might remind us of people we would rather not be. Above all, Simon Critchley argues that humor can tell us much about the human condition, the meaning of life and why comedy itself begins in philosophy.</p>]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>57674</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>299</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>59</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>2002</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">746784</id>
  <isbn>0415356318</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780415356312</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">1</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Things Merely Are: Philosophy in the Poetry of Wallace Stevens]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1177973762m/746784.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1177973762s/746784.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/746784.Things_Merely_Are_Philosophy_in_the_Poetry_of_Wallace_Stevens</link>
  <average_rating>4.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[<p>This book is an invitation to read poetry. Simon Critchley argues that poetry enlarges life with a range of observation, power of expression and attention to language that eclipses any other medium. In a rich engagement with the poetry of Wallace Stevens, Critchley reveals that poetry also contains deep and important philosophical insight. Above all, he argues for a &quot;poetic epistemology&quot; that enables us to think afresh the philosophical problem of the relation between mind and world, and ultimately to cast the problem away.<br/> <br/> Drawing astutely on Kant, the German and English Romantics and Heidegger, Critchley argues that through its descriptions of particular things and their stubborn plainness - whether water, guitars, trees, or cats - poetry evokes the &quot;mereness&quot; of things. It is this experience that provokes the mood of calm and releases the imaginative insight we need to press back against the pressure of reality. Critchley also argues that this calm defines the cinematic eye of Terrence Malick, whose work is discussed at the end of the book.</p>]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>57674</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>299</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>59</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>2005</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">870733</id>
  <isbn>0415128218</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780415128216</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">2</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Very Little...Almost Nothing: Death, Philosophy, Literature]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1179070426m/870733.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1179070426s/870733.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/870733.Very_Little_Almost_Nothing_Death_Philosophy_Literature</link>
  <average_rating>3.60</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[If one is to look to where philosophy begins, one must understand the significance of death or finitude for philosophy as well.  Beginning with first use of the concept of &quot;nihilism&quot; or finitude for philosophy, Very Little... Almost Nothing surveys the works of Nietzsche and Heidegger, Blanchot, Levinas, Cavell and Beckett, considering the contribution of these writers to the question of finitude and allowing us to analyze the relationship between philosophy and literature anew.  <p>Philosophical modernity may be thinking through of the death of God, but as Simon Critchley argues, this offers little comfort in the face of an uncertain world. Critchley calls upon literature not to restore meaning to life but to show the meaninglessness of life as an achievement, the achievement of the ordinary or the everyday.</p>]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>57674</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>299</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>59</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1997</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">743327</id>
  <isbn>0748612173</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780748612178</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">2</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[The Ethics of Deconstruction]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1177936941m/743327.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1177936941s/743327.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/743327.The_Ethics_of_Deconstruction</link>
  <average_rating>4.50</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>4</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[It is now widely accepted that <em>The Ethics of Deconstruction</em> was the first book to argue for the ethical turn in Derrida's work and to show as powerfully as possible how deconstruction has persuasive ethical consequences that were vital to our thinking through of questions of politics and democracy. Now reissued with three new appendices which restate as well as reflect upon and deepen the book's argument, this is undoubtedly the standard work in the field.]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>57674</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>299</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>59</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1992</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">314294</id>
  <isbn>9501265048</isbn>
  <isbn13>9789501265040</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Desconstruccion y Pragmatismo]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1173683298m/314294.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1173683298s/314294.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/314294.Desconstruccion_y_Pragmatismo</link>
  <average_rating>4.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>1</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>57674</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>299</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>59</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
    <author>
    <id>4132</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Jacques Derrida]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/authors/1217243314p5/4132.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/authors/1217243314p2/4132.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/4132.Jacques_Derrida]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.99</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>3262</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>237</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
    <author>
    <id>24325</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Ernesto Laclau]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/authors/1257468620p5/24325.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://photo.goodreads.com/authors/1257468620p2/24325.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/24325.Ernesto_Laclau]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.91</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>222</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>20</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1996</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">5037573</id>
  <isbn>0791427234</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780791427231</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Deconstructive Subjectivities (S U N Y Series in Contemporary Continental Philosophy)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5037573.Deconstructive_Subjectivities</link>
  <average_rating>0.0</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>0</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>57674</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Simon Critchley]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/57674.Simon_Critchley]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.75</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>299</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>59</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
    <author>
    <id>148408</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Peter Dews]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/148408.Peter_Dews]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.92</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>13</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>3</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1996</published>
</book>

      <books>
</author>
</GoodreadsResponse>