<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<GoodreadsResponse>
	<Request>
		<authentication>false</authentication>
		    <method><![CDATA[]]></method>
	</Request>
	<author>
  
  <id>42964</id>
  <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
  <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
  <fans_count type="integer">0</fans_count>
  <followers_count type="integer">0</followers_count>
  <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
  <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
  <about><![CDATA[]]></about>
  <influences><![CDATA[]]></influences>
  <gender></gender>
  <hometown></hometown>
  <born_at></born_at>
  <died_at></died_at>
  
  <books>
        <book>
  <id type="integer">1060058</id>
  <isbn>0252073975</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780252073977</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Brief, Liberal, Catholic Defense of Abortion]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1180637356m/1060058.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1180637356s/1060058.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1060058.A_Brief_Liberal_Catholic_Defense_of_Abortion</link>
  <average_rating>4.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>2</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[The Catholic church has always opposed abortion, but - contrary to popular belief - not always for the same reasons. This tightly argued, historically grounded study sets out to demonstrate that a &quot;pro-choice&quot; stance, now held by a significant minority of Catholics, is as fully justified by Catholic thought as an anti-abortion view, and may even be more compatible with Catholic tradition than the current opposition to abortion espoused by many Catholics and most Catholic leaders. &quot;A Brief, Liberal, Catholic Defense of Abortion&quot; argues that the current Catholic anti-abortion stance is justified neither by modern embryology nor by ancient church teachings. Combining up-to-date information on fetal development with a thorough grasp of the works of the church's early thinkers (such as Sts. Augustine and Thomas Aquinas), Daniel A. Dombrowski and Robert Deltete expose crucial contradictions between the early and the modern church's views of abortion.]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>42964</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.40</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>0</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>2006</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">1659387</id>
  <isbn>0252066383</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780252066382</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Babies and Beasts: THE ARGUMENT FROM MARGINAL CASES]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1186498956m/1659387.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1186498956s/1659387.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1659387.Babies_and_Beasts_THE_ARGUMENT_FROM_MARGINAL_CASES</link>
  <average_rating>5.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>1</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>42964</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.40</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>0</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1997</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">889912</id>
  <isbn>0791450120</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780791450123</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Rawls and Religion: The Case for Political Liberalism]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1179206134m/889912.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1179206134s/889912.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/889912.Rawls_and_Religion_The_Case_for_Political_Liberalism</link>
  <average_rating>2.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>1</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Employs the political philosophy of John Rawls to address controversies involving politics and religion.]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>42964</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.40</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>0</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>2001</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">75591</id>
  <isbn>0791434923</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780791434925</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Kazantzakis and God (Suny Series in Constructive Postmodern Thought)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170877509m/75591.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1170877509s/75591.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/75591.Kazantzakis_and_God</link>
  <average_rating>2.00</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>1</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>42964</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.40</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>0</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1997</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">6979446</id>
  <isbn>0226155463</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780226155463</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Contemporary Athletics and Ancient Greek Ideals]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6979446-contemporary-athletics-and-ancient-greek-ideals</link>
  <average_rating>0.0</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>0</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;DIV&gt;&lt;P style=&quot;MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt&quot;&gt;Despite their influence in our culture, sports inspire dramatically less philosophical consideration than such ostensibly weightier topics as religion, politics, or science. Arguing that athletic playfulness coexists with serious underpinnings, and that both demand more substantive attention, Daniel Dombrowski harnesses the insights of ancient Greek thinkers to illuminate contemporary athletics.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style=&quot;MARGIN: 0in 0in 0pt&quot;&gt;            Dombrowski contends that the ideas of Plato, Aristotle, and Plotinus shed important light on issues—such as the pursuit of excellence, the concept of play, and the power of accepting physical limitations while also improving one’s body—that remain just as relevant in our sports-obsessed age as they were in ancient Greece. Bringing these concepts to bear on contemporary concerns, Dombrowski considers such questions as whether athletic competition can be a moral substitute for war, whether it necessarily constitutes war by other means, and whether it encourages fascist tendencies or ethical virtue. The first volume to philosophically explore twenty-first-century sport in the context of its ancient predecessor, <em>Contemporary Athletics and Ancient Greek Ideals</em> reveals that their relationship has great and previously untapped potential to inform our understanding of human nature.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>42964</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.40</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>0</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>2009</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">3770371</id>
  <isbn>0791430995</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780791430996</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Analytic Theism, Hartshorne, and the Concept of God (S U N Y Series in Philosophy)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3770371.Analytic_Theism_Hartshorne_and_the_Concept_of_God</link>
  <average_rating>0.0</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>0</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>42964</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.40</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>0</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1996</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">3641881</id>
  <isbn>0877228027</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780877228028</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Christian Pacifism (Ethics and Action Series)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3641881.Christian_Pacifism</link>
  <average_rating>0.0</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>0</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[Arguing that war is philosophically irreconcilable with Christianity, Daniel Dombrowski contradicts just war theorists, whose position can be traced to Church figures&#151;notably Tomas Acquinas. While the roots of pacifism lie in the teachings of Jesus, Dombrowski relies as much on philosophical argument as on theological exegesis or speculation. Classical sources (the Bible, Saint Augustine, Saint Thomas Aquinas) are treated along with several contemporary scholars and pacifists, among them: Elizabeth Anscombe, Paul Ramsey, James Turner Johnson, Michael Walzer, Richard Wasserstrom, Douglas Lackey, Martin Luther King, Jr., Gandhi, Jenny Teichman, Charles Hartshorne, George Weigel, and Finnis-Boyle Grisez. His intent is to provide a concentrated defense of pacifism that will be useful for scholars who are interested in strengthening the intellectual rigor of their views or to just war theorists who are bewildered by pacifism as an intellectual stance.  <p>Never a popular position, the concept of pacifism has been diluted, if not circumvented, by both philosophers and artists. Dombrowski responds to its unfavorable position during most of the history of Christianity through a Platonic analysis of the negative effect art has had on Christian pacifism. He shows how both visual art and dance have created significant obstacles to the portrayal of Jesus the peacemaker. The author also considers the connection between philosophy of religion and pacifism.  <p>Christian Pacifism offers a clear overview of most of the major differences among pacifists, just war theorists, and &quot;war is hell&quot; theorists. The book avoids parochialism throughout, so it is of interest not only for Christians.</p></p>]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>42964</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.40</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>0</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1991</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">3631100</id>
  <isbn>0887067042</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780887067044</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Hartshorne and the Metaphysics of Animal Rights (S U N Y Series in Philosophy)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1252142513m/3631100.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1252142513s/3631100.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3631100.Hartshorne_and_the_Metaphysics_of_Animal_Rights</link>
  <average_rating>0.0</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>0</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>42964</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.40</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>0</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1988</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">3185594</id>
  <isbn>0820403644</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780820403649</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[Thoreau the Platonist (American University Studies. Series V, Philosophy, Vol 10)]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3185594.Thoreau_the_Platonist</link>
  <average_rating>0.0</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>0</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>42964</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.40</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>0</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>1986</published>
</book>

        <book>
  <id type="integer">2702105</id>
  <isbn>0791462846</isbn>
  <isbn13>9780791462843</isbn13>
  <text_reviews_count type="integer">0</text_reviews_count>
  <title>
    <![CDATA[A Platonic Philosophy of Religion: A Process Perspective]]>
  </title>
  <image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg</image_url>
  <small_image_url>http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg</small_image_url>
  <link>http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2702105.A_Platonic_Philosophy_of_Religion_A_Process_Perspective</link>
  <average_rating>0.0</average_rating>
  <ratings_count>0</ratings_count>
  <description>
    <![CDATA[A Platonic Philosophy of Religion challenges traditional views of Plato's religious thought, arguing that these overstate the case for the veneration of Being as opposed to Becoming. Daniel A. Dombrowski explores how process or neoclassical perspectives on Plato's view of God have been mostly neglected, impoverishing both our view of Plato and our view of what can be said in contemporary philosophy of religion on a Platonic basis. Looking at the largely ignored later dialogues, Dombrowski finds a dynamic theism in Plato and presents a new and very different Platonic philosophy of religion. The work's interpretive framework derives from the application of process philosophy and discusses the continuation of Plato's thought in the works of Hartshorne and Whitehead.]]>
  </description>
<authors>
    <author>
    <id>42964</id>
        <name><![CDATA[Daniel A. Dombrowski]]></name>
    <image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-200x266.jpg]]></image_url>
    <small_image_url><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/images/nophoto/nophoto-U-50x66.jpg]]></small_image_url>
    <link><![CDATA[http://www.goodreads.com/author/show/42964.Daniel_A_Dombrowski]]></link>
    <average_rating>3.40</average_rating>
    <ratings_count>5</ratings_count>
    <text_reviews_count>0</text_reviews_count>
  </author>
  </authors>  <published>2006</published>
</book>

      <books>
</author>
</GoodreadsResponse>