false 255092 0 0 http://www.dougwalton.ca/autobio/webBioW...]]> 454603 0521379253 9780521379250 3 http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174920338m/454603.jpg http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1174920338s/454603.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/454603.Informal_Logic_A_Handbook_for_Critical_Argument 3.91 11 255092 3.76 21 3 1989 3944651 0521713803 9780521713801 0 http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/3944651.Informal_Logic_A_Pragmatic_Approach 3.60 5 255092 3.76 21 3 2008 2944704 0521530202 9780521530200 0 http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2944704.Fundamentals_of_Critical_Argumentation 4.00 2 255092 3.76 21 3 2005 1218556 0271014741 9780271014746 0 http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1218556.Arguments_from_Ignorance 4.00 1 ]]> 255092 3.76 21 3 1996 1639219 0271008539 9780271008530 0 http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1186200009m/1639219.jpg http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1186200009s/1639219.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1639219.The_Place_of_Emotion_in_Argument 3.00 1
First, is it reasonable, even if not conclusive, as an argument?

Second, is it weak and therefore open to critical questioning for argument?

And third, is it fallacious? The third category is a strong charge that incurs a critical buren to back it up by citing evidence from the given text and context of dialogue.

Walton used fifty-six case studies to demonstrate that the problem of emotional fallcies is much subtler than has been previously believed. Ranging over commercial advertisements, political debates, union-management negotiations, and ethical disputes, the case studies reveal that these four types of appeals, while based on presumptive reasoning that it tentative and subject to default, are not always or necessarily fallacious types of argumentation.

]]> 255092 3.76 21 3 1992 1059148 0791434621 9780791434628 0 http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1180631225m/1059148.jpg http://photo.goodreads.com/books/1180631225s/1059148.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/1059148.Appeal_to_Pity_Argumentum_Ad_Misericordiam 3.00 1 255092 3.76 21 3 1997 6833017 0271018186 9780271018188 0 http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6833017-appeal-to-popular-opinion 0.0 0 255092 3.76 21 3 1998 6509492 0802071376 9780802071378 0 http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/6509492-argument-structure 0.0 0 255092 3.76 21 3 1996 5935758 0791442675 9780791442678 0 http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5935758.One_Sided_Arguments_A_Dialectical_Analysis_of_Bias 0.0 0 The book concedes the postmodernist premise that bias is quite normal in everyday conversational arguments, and that a finding of bias should not, by itself, constitute grounds for criticizing an argument as critically deficient or fallacious. But the book strongly disagrees with the postmodernist conclusion that no standard of rationality can be brought to bear to condemn narrowly interest-based or one-sided arguments as biased. It is argued that in some cases narrow, one-sided partisanship in an argument is justifiably a basis for negative criticism of the worth of the argument.

]]> 255092 3.76 21 3 1999 5647470 0271016949 9780271016948 0 http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-111x148.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/images/nocover-60x80.jpg http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/5647470.Appeal_to_Expert_Opinion_Arguments_from_Authority 0.0 0 255092 3.76 21 3 1997