Paul Davies





Paul Davies

Author profile


born
April 22, 1946 in The United Kingdom

genre


About this author

Paul Charles William Davies AM (born 22 April 1946) is a British-born physicist, writer and broadcaster, currently a professor at Arizona State University as well as the Director of BEYOND: Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science. He has held previous academic appointments at the University of Cambridge, University of London, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, University of Adelaide and Macquarie University. His research interests are in the fields of cosmology, quantum field theory, and astrobiology. He has proposed that a one-way trip to Mars could be a viable option.

In 2005, he took up the chair of the SETI: Post-Detection Science and Technology Taskgroup of the International Academy of Astronautics.


Average rating: 3.83 · 2,388 ratings · 298 reviews · 128 distinct works
Mind of God: The Scientific...
3.76 of 5 stars 3.76 avg rating — 399 ratings — published 2001 — 13 editions
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books
About Time: Einstein's Unfi...
3.96 of 5 stars 3.96 avg rating — 326 ratings — published 1995 — 6 editions
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books
How to Build a Time Machine
3.74 of 5 stars 3.74 avg rating — 290 ratings — published 2001 — 11 editions
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books
God and the New Physics
3.86 of 5 stars 3.86 avg rating — 225 ratings — published 1983 — 9 editions
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books
The Eerie Silence: Renewing...
3.81 of 5 stars 3.81 avg rating — 157 ratings8 editions
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books
The Goldilocks Enigma: Why ...
3.89 of 5 stars 3.89 avg rating — 142 ratings — published 2006 — 5 editions
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books
The Last Three Minutes: Con...
3.71 of 5 stars 3.71 avg rating — 168 ratings — published 1994 — 13 editions
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books
The Fifth Miracle: The Sear...
3.94 of 5 stars 3.94 avg rating — 96 ratings5 editions
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books
Cosmic Jackpot: Why Our Uni...
3.86 of 5 stars 3.86 avg rating — 78 ratings — published 1988 — 5 editions
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books
Are We Alone?: Philosophica...
3.73 of 5 stars 3.73 avg rating — 63 ratings — published 1995 — 4 editions
My rating:
didn't like it it was ok liked it really liked it it was amazing
add to my books
More books by Paul Davies…
The Last Three Minutes: Con...
Science Masters (1 book)
by
3.7142857142857144 of 5 stars 3.71 avg rating — 168 ratings

Upcoming Events

No scheduled events. Add an event.

“Scientists are slowly waking up to an inconvenient truth - the universe looks suspiciously like a fix. The issue concerns the very laws of nature themselves. For 40 years, physicists and cosmologists have been quietly collecting examples of all too convenient "coincidences" and special features in the underlying laws of the universe that seem to be necessary in order for life, and hence conscious beings, to exist. Change any one of them and the consequences would be lethal. Fred Hoyle, the distinguished cosmologist, once said it was as if "a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics".

To see the problem, imagine playing God with the cosmos. Before you is a designer machine that lets you tinker with the basics of physics. Twiddle this knob and you make all electrons a bit lighter, twiddle that one and you make gravity a bit stronger, and so on. It happens that you need to set thirtysomething knobs to fully describe the world about us. The crucial point is that some of those metaphorical knobs must be tuned very precisely, or the universe would be sterile.

Example: neutrons are just a tad heavier than protons. If it were the other way around, atoms couldn't exist, because all the protons in the universe would have decayed into neutrons shortly after the big bang. No protons, then no atomic nucleuses and no atoms. No atoms, no chemistry, no life. Like Baby Bear's porridge in the story of Goldilocks, the universe seems to be just right for life.”
Paul Davies

“When I was a child, I often used to lie awake at night, in fearful anticipation of some unpleasant event the following day, such as a visit to the dentist, and wish I could press some sort of button that would have the effect of instantly transporting me twenty-four hours into the future. The following night, I would wonder whether that magic button was in fact real, and that the trick had indeed worked. After all, it was twenty-four hours later, and though I could remember the visit to the dentist, it was, at that time, only a memory of an experience, not an experience.”
Paul Davies, About Time

“Tidak ada kesalah-pahaman mengenai ilmuwan yang lebih besar daripada kepercayaan yang berkembang bahwa mereka adalah individu-individu yang dingin, keras, dan tak berjiwa.”
Paul Davies, Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World



Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Paul to Goodreads.