|
Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World
— published 2001 — 13 editions |
|
|
About Time: Einstein's Unfinished Revolution
— published 1995 — 6 editions |
|
|
How to Build a Time Machine
— published 2001 — 11 editions |
|
|
God and the New Physics
— published 1983 — 9 editions |
|
|
The Eerie Silence: Renewing Our Search for Alien Intelligence
— 8 editions |
|
|
The Goldilocks Enigma: Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life?
— published 2006 — 5 editions |
|
|
The Last Three Minutes: Conjectures About The Ultimate Fate Of The Universe
— published 1994 — 13 editions |
|
|
The Fifth Miracle: The Search for the Origin and Meaning of Life
— 5 editions |
|
|
Cosmic Jackpot: Why Our Universe Is Just Right for Life
— published 1988 — 5 editions |
|
|
Are We Alone?: Philosophical Implications Of The Discovery Of Extraterrestrial Life
— published 1995 — 4 editions |
Upcoming Events
No scheduled events.
Add an event.
“Scientists are slowly waking up to an inconvenient truth - the universe looks suspiciously like a fix. The issue concerns the very laws of nature themselves. For 40 years, physicists and cosmologists have been quietly collecting examples of all too convenient "coincidences" and special features in the underlying laws of the universe that seem to be necessary in order for life, and hence conscious beings, to exist. Change any one of them and the consequences would be lethal. Fred Hoyle, the distinguished cosmologist, once said it was as if "a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics".
To see the problem, imagine playing God with the cosmos. Before you is a designer machine that lets you tinker with the basics of physics. Twiddle this knob and you make all electrons a bit lighter, twiddle that one and you make gravity a bit stronger, and so on. It happens that you need to set thirtysomething knobs to fully describe the world about us. The crucial point is that some of those metaphorical knobs must be tuned very precisely, or the universe would be sterile.
Example: neutrons are just a tad heavier than protons. If it were the other way around, atoms couldn't exist, because all the protons in the universe would have decayed into neutrons shortly after the big bang. No protons, then no atomic nucleuses and no atoms. No atoms, no chemistry, no life. Like Baby Bear's porridge in the story of Goldilocks, the universe seems to be just right for life.”
― Paul Davies
To see the problem, imagine playing God with the cosmos. Before you is a designer machine that lets you tinker with the basics of physics. Twiddle this knob and you make all electrons a bit lighter, twiddle that one and you make gravity a bit stronger, and so on. It happens that you need to set thirtysomething knobs to fully describe the world about us. The crucial point is that some of those metaphorical knobs must be tuned very precisely, or the universe would be sterile.
Example: neutrons are just a tad heavier than protons. If it were the other way around, atoms couldn't exist, because all the protons in the universe would have decayed into neutrons shortly after the big bang. No protons, then no atomic nucleuses and no atoms. No atoms, no chemistry, no life. Like Baby Bear's porridge in the story of Goldilocks, the universe seems to be just right for life.”
― Paul Davies
“When I was a child, I often used to lie awake at night, in fearful anticipation of some unpleasant event the following day, such as a visit to the dentist, and wish I could press some sort of button that would have the effect of instantly transporting me twenty-four hours into the future. The following night, I would wonder whether that magic button was in fact real, and that the trick had indeed worked. After all, it was twenty-four hours later, and though I could remember the visit to the dentist, it was, at that time, only a memory of an experience, not an experience.”
― Paul Davies, About Time
― Paul Davies, About Time
“Tidak ada kesalah-pahaman mengenai ilmuwan yang lebih besar daripada kepercayaan yang berkembang bahwa mereka adalah individu-individu yang dingin, keras, dan tak berjiwa.”
― Paul Davies, Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World
― Paul Davies, Mind of God: The Scientific Basis for a Rational World
Is this you? Let us know. If not, help out and invite Paul to Goodreads.




































